CVI
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Attridge, S. R.
Right arrow Articles by Manning, P. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Attridge, S. R.
Right arrow Articles by Manning, P. A.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology, May 2000, p. 444-450, Vol. 7, No. 3
1071-412X/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Susceptibility of Vibrio cholerae O139 to Antibody-Dependent, Complement-Mediated Bacteriolysis

Stephen R. Attridge,1,* Firdausi Qadri,2 M. John Albert,2 and Paul A. Manning3

Microbial Pathogenesis Unit, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia 5005, Australia1; International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh, Dhaka 1000, Bangladesh2; and Astra Research Centre Boston, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139-42393

Received 15 October 1999/Returned for modification 21 December 1999/Accepted 17 February 2000

Volunteer studies with Vibrio cholerae O1 have shown that the best correlate of a vaccine's protective efficacy is its propensity to elicit serum bactericidal responses in its recipients. Attempts to detect such responses following infection with V. cholerae O139, however, have met with varying success. Using a tube-based assay which involves viable counting, we now report that strains of serogroup O139 can appear to be sensitive or resistant to a fixed concentration of complement in the presence of antibody, depending on assay conditions. Susceptibility to lysis is critically dependent on the availability of complement, but with O139 indicator strains this is not simply determined by the concentration of serum added to the reaction mix. The nature of the assay diluent and the concentration of indicator bacteria can also dramatically affect bactericidal end points, whereas such variables have minimal significance with O1 indicator bacteria. Although some laboratories use unencapsulated mutant strains to seek evidence of seroconversion following exposure to V. cholerae O139, this is not necessary, and our findings question the significance of capsule expression as a determinant of complement sensitivity when antibody is present. The medium used for growth of the indicator strain and the particular strain used appeared to be unimportant. Each of seven O139 isolates tested was found to be lysed by antibody and complement in our standard assay system, which allowed the detection of significant serum bactericidal responses in 9 of 11 cases of O139 disease.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Microbial Pathogenesis Unit, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia 5005, Australia. Phone: 61 8 8303 4151. Fax: 61 8 8303 4362. E-mail: stephen.attridge{at}adelaide.edu.au.


Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology, May 2000, p. 444-450, Vol. 7, No. 3
1071-412X/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.



This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. Infect. Immun.
J. Clin. Microbiol. J. Virol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 2000 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.