| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology, September 2002, p. 1137-1141, Vol. 9, No. 5
1071-412X/02/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/CDLI.9.5.1137-1141.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Laboratori de Parasitologia, Facultat de Farmàcia, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona,1 Departamento Patología Animal I, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain,2 Laboratoire Parasitologie-Mycologie, Faculté de Médecine et de Pharmacie, Université de Franche-Comté, Besançon, France3
Received 26 November 2001/ Returned for modification 7 March 2002/ Accepted 17 May 2002
This study of several techniques for detecting cryptic leishmaniasis in dogs from areas in Spain where Leishmania infantum is highly endemic concludes that immunological techniques (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, immunofluorescence antibody test, Western blotting, delayed-type hypersensitivity reaction, and in vitro lymphocyte proliferation assay) do not clearly differentiate between noninfected and infected asymptomatic dogs and that culture and PCR are more reliable diagnostic tools.
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»