CVI Accepts, published online ahead of print on 7 October 2009
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Reisinger, K. S.
Right arrow Articles by Dull, P. M.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Reisinger, K. S.
Right arrow Articles by Dull, P. M.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Clin. Vaccine Immunol. doi:10.1128/CVI.00207-09
Copyright (c) 2009, American Society for Microbiology and/or the Listed Authors/Institutions. All Rights Reserved.

Quadrivalent meningococcal vaccination in adults: A Phase III comparison of an investigational conjugate vaccine, MenACWY-CRM, with the licensed vaccine, Menactra

Keith S. Reisinger*, Roger Baxter, Stanley L. Block, Jina Shah, Lisa Bedell, and Peter M. Dull

Primary Physicians Research, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; Kaiser Permanente Vaccine Study Center, Oakland, California; Kentucky Pediatric and Adult Research, Inc., Bardstown, Kentucky; Novartis Vaccines and Diagnostics, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Email: KSRPPR{at}aol.com.


arrow
Abstract

Neisseria meningitidis is a leading cause of bacterial meningitis in the US with highest case-fatality rates reported in individuals ≥15 years of age. This study compares the safety and immunogenicity of the Novartis Vaccines investigational quadrivalent meningococcal CRM197 conjugate vaccine, MenACWY-CRM, with those of the licensed meningococcal conjugate vaccine, Menactra®, when administered to healthy adults. In this Phase III multicenter study, 1359 adults 19-55 years of age were randomized to one of four groups (1:1:1:1 ratio) to receive a single dose of one of three lots of MenACWY-CRM or a single dose of Menactra. Sera obtained at baseline and 1 month post-vaccination were tested for serogroup-specific serum bactericidal activity using human complement (hSBA). The hSBA titers following vaccination with MenACWY-CRM and Menactra were compared in non-inferiority and pre-specified superiority analyses. Reactogenicity was similar between the MenACWY-CRM and Menactra groups and neither vaccine was associated with a serious adverse event. Compared with Menactra, MenACWY-CRM met the superiority criteria for the proportions of recipients achieving a seroresponse against serogroups C, W-135, and Y and the proportion of subjects achieving post-vaccination titers ≥1:8 for serogroups C and Y. MenACWY-CRM immunogenicity was statistically non-inferior (lower limit of the two-sided 95% confidence interval was > -10%) to Menactra for all four serogroups, with post-vaccination hSBA geometric mean titers being consistently higher for MenACWY-CRM than for Menactra. MenACWY-CRM is well tolerated in adults 19-55 years of age, with immune responses to each of the serogroups non-inferior, and in some cases statistically superior, to those to Menactra.