Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology, May 2003, p. 399-404, Vol. 10, No. 3
1071-412X/03/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/CDLI.10.3.399-404.2003
Copyright © 2003, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Division of Allergy-Immunology, Joseph Stokes, Jr. Research Institute, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, and Department of Pediatrics, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania,1 Westat, Inc., Bethesda, Maryland,2 Department of Pediatrics, University of California at San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, California,3 Departments of Epidemiology and International Health, Medicine, and Pediatrics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama4
Received 13 September 2002/ Returned for modification 18 November 2002/ Accepted 28 January 2003
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
), while TH2 cells produce IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, and IL-10. Prior to differentiation, the majority of T cells produce both TH1- and TH2-type cytokines and are designated TH0 cells (12). Generally, TH2 cytokines inhibit TH1 cytokines. IL-12 is a distinct cytokine that is important in the regulation of TH1 and TH2 cytokines.
In children and adults, higher IL-4 and lower IL-2 levels have been associated with HIV infection (4, 5, 11, 20). In addition, deficient IL-2 production in children has been associated with decreased T-cell responses to viral antigens and decreased cytotoxic T-cell lymphocyte activity (9). Low circulating levels of the proinflammatory cytokine tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-
) correlated with lower viral load and slower progression of HIV-associated disease (19). The circulating levels of TNF-
protein and mRNA were higher in HIV-infected children than in healthy control children, an observation that has also been reported for adults (13). In contrast, other studies have found elevated levels of TH1 and TH2 cytokines in HIV-infected persons compared to those in uninfected controls. These cytokine levels did not change with disease progression (8). Graziosi et al. (8) found that both IFN-
and IL-10 were produced in large amounts by the CD8+ T cells of HIV-infected individuals and that these levels remained relatively high throughout the course of HIV infection. One possible reason why the reported data have remained difficult to interpret is the variation in laboratory techniques across studies. In general, the in vitro use of mitogens and antigens for stimulation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) has been required in order to detect the low levels of cytokines (3). The use of different antigens and mitogens to stimulate the PBMCs contributes to the difficulty of comparing results across studies (3). Altfeld et al. found that competitive reverse transcriptase PCR was a more sensitive measure of cytokine production than protein enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and allowed detection of cytokines in unstimulated PBMCs (1). Elevated IL-4/IFN-
ratios were associated with higher viral loads and reduced CD4+-T-cell counts in this study (1).
Although there have been studies of cytokines in children and adults, there are no data available on cytokine production, stimulated or unstimulated, for healthy or HIV-infected adolescents. Our objectives were to analyze and characterize mRNA and cytokine protein levels of IFN-
, IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-
) in both unstimulated and stimulated PBMCs obtained from a large cohort of HIV-seropositive and -seronegative adolescents and to correlate the cytokine results with HIV type 1 (HIV-1) RNA levels and CD4+-T-cell counts, critical markers of disease progression in HIV-seropositive adolescents. We examined the following hypotheses: (i) there would be a shift from a TH1 response to a TH2 response in the presence of HIV infection: (ii) this pattern would be seen most clearly in subjects with severe HIV-associated disease, as measured by either CD4+-T-cell count or HIV load: and (iii) subjects with HIV infection who were in relatively good health would not differ significantly from high-risk HIV-seronegative subjects.
|
|
|---|
Schedule of assessments of HIV-seropositive and -seronegative subjects. HIV-seropositive subjects were examined every 3 months. Blood was drawn for CD4+- and CD8+-T-cell counts at every visit. Blood for cytokine measurements and an expanded immunophenotyping panel was drawn every 6 months. HIV-seronegative subjects had blood drawn every 6 months for CD4+- and CD8+-T-cell counts, cytokine measurements, and a detailed immunophenotyping panel (6, 7).
Laboratory methods. (i) Stimulation. PBMCs were prepared using Ficoll-Paque (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Arlington Heights, Ill.) and resuspended in RPMI 1640 medium (Gibco BRL, Grand Island, N.Y.) with 10% fetal bovine serum. A total of 2 x 106 cells in l ml of medium was incubated for 24 h for ELISA, and 106 cells were incubated for 24 h for RNA analysis. Each intracellular cytokine assay used a total of l06 cells in 1 ml of medium. Phorbol myristate acetate (PMA) (Sigma, St. Louis, Mo.) was used at a final concentration of 100 ng/ml for ELISA and RNA analysis, previously demonstrated to provide optimal conditions for the assay (18).
(ii) Cytokine detection.
Cell culture supernatants were harvested, frozen, and stored at -70°C. ELISAs for IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, TNF-
, and IFN-
were performed in triplicate wells according to the manufacturer's instructions (Endogen, Woburn, Mass.). Published studies have shown that ELISAs are generally reproducible, with a typical interassay variation of approximately 50% (2). The lower limit of detection for ELISA is 3 to 8 pg/ml (18).
RNA was prepared using TriReagent (Molecular Research Center, Cincinnati, Ohio), and cDNA was prepared by reverse transcription of RNA by avian myeloblastosis virus reverse transcriptase using oligo(dT) primers (Boehringer Mannheim, Indianapolis, Ind.). Each amplification used cDNA equivalent to 5 x 104 cells. Mimics and primers for IL-2, IL-4, TNF-
, and IFN-
were obtained from Clontech (Palo Alto, Calif.) and used in a standard dilution series with 40 cycles of amplification according to the manufacturer's suggested protocol. Quantitation was performed by comparison of cDNA target and mimic amplimers as recommended by the manufacturer. The lower limit of detection was 0.00005 amol/104 cells.
(iii) HIV load. Quantitative plasma HIV-1 RNA was assessed in a central laboratory with frozen specimens using either NASBA or NucliSens assay (Organon Teknika, Durham, N.C.).
Statistical methods. Eligibility criteria for the data set analyzed. All subjects in the REACH cohort who had cytokine analysis performed at least once during the study were potentially eligible for inclusion in this analysis. One set of cytokine protein measurements and one set of cytokine mRNA measurements were selected per subject. Subjects who had only protein data or only mRNA data were included in the analysis for those measures that were available. We also required that a detailed lymphocyte immunophenotyping panel (6, 7) and HIV load (for HIV-seropositive subjects) be available for each visit that was selected for analysis.
All cytokines were not available and analyzed for every subject; therefore, the number of subjects included in the analysis for each cytokine varied.
Comparison of cytokine protein markers in groups of subjects.
Ten cytokine protein markers were examined in the analysis: unstimulated and stimulated IL-2, IFN-
, IL-4, IL-6, and TNF-
. Eight cytokine mRNA markers were examined: unstimulated and stimulated IL-2, IFN-
, IL-4, and TNF-
. Because there were a large number of values that were below the limit of detection for most of these markers, the data were analyzed in two ways. First, groups were compared for differences in the proportion of subjects who had detectable values for each marker. Second, among those subjects who had detectable values, groups were compared for differences in the distributions of the values.
HIV-seropositive subjects were divided into three subgroups based on HIV load at the time of the selected visit: undetectable (<400 copies/ml), detectable but
10,000 copies per ml, and >10,000 copies per ml. For each cytokine marker, five group comparisons were made as follows: (i) all HIV-seronegative subjects were compared to all HIV-seropositive subjects, (ii) HIV-seronegative subjects were compared to HIV-seropositive subjects with viral loads of >10,000 copies/ml, (iii) HIV-seropositive subjects with undetectable viral loads were compared to HIV-seropositive subjects with viral loads of >10,000, (iv) a trend analysis was performed to examine differences across the three HIV-seropositive subgroups, and (v) a trend analysis was performed to examine differences across the HIV-seronegative group and the three HIV-seropositive subgroups.
A secondary analysis was performed in the same manner, but subjects were divided into three subgroups based on CD4+-T-cell counts at the time of the selected visit: <200, 200 to 499, and
500 cells/mm3.
For two-group comparisons of the proportions of subjects with detectable responses, chi-square or Fisher's exact tests were used, depending on cell size. For three- and four-group comparisons of the proportions with detectable responses, the Cochran-Armitage trend test was used. For differences in distributions of detectable values, the nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis rank sum test was used.
|
|
|---|
Clinical and demographic characteristics of the 520 eligible subjects are shown in Table 1. Sixty-five percent of the subjects (n = 337) were HIV seropositive. Approximately 71% (n = 367) were African American, and 75% (n = 391) were female. The mean age of the study cohort was 17.4 years. The mean and median CD4+-T-cell counts were 534 and 499 cells/mm3, respectively, for HIV-seropositive subjects. Most of the HIV-seropositive subjects were relatively healthy; only 8.1% had CD4+-T-cell counts below 200 cells/mm3. Approximately 25% of the HIV-seropositive subjects had viral loads below the level of detection (defined as <400 copies/ml). Mean and median viral load values for subjects with viral loads equal to or above 400 copies/ml (n = 253) were 39,382 and 10,000 copies/ml, respectively. Approximately half of the HIV-seropositive subjects were taking antiretroviral medication at the sampling time point selected for inclusion in the data set analyzed: 49% were on combination antiretroviral therapy, and 3% were on monotherapy. The remaining HIV-seropositive subjects were not taking any antiretroviral medication at the sampling time point selected for inclusion in the data set analyzed.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Descriptive profile of the study population (n = 520)
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Percentages of subjects with detectable cytokine markers
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 3. Medians and interquartile ranges for cytokine measures in subjects with detectable cytokine responses
|
0.05, unadjusted for multiple comparisons. Another 90 comparisons were made of the distribution of detectable responses, and only three of these achieved a P value of
0.05, unadjusted for multiple comparisons. Of the seven comparisons with a P value of
0.05, five were in the direction opposite that of the hypothesized shift from a TH1-to-TH2 cytokine response to HIV-associated disease. Results were similar when analyses were repeated using CD4+-T-cell counts (data not shown). No patterns consistent with a TH1-to-TH2 cytokine shift were detected. |
|
|---|
, IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, and TNF-
in samples derived from a large cohort of HIV-seropositive and -seronegative adolescents. Detailed analyses of these data indicate that there were no differences detected between HIV-seropositive and HIV-seronegative adolescents and that there was no apparent relationship between these measurements and viral loads or CD4+-T-cell counts, parameters selected as markers of HIV-associated disease status. In the data set examined, the hypothesis of a shift from TH1 to TH2 cytokines is not supported. The observed associations were not consistent with any of the following hypothesized relationships: (i) that there would be a shift from a TH1 response to a TH2 response in the presence of HIV infection; (ii) that this pattern would be seen most clearly in subjects with severe HIV-associated disease, as measured by either CD4+-T-cell count or HIV load; and (iii) that subjects with HIV infection who were in relatively good health would not differ significantly from high-risk HIV-seronegative subjects. The cohort contributing the samples used in this study was comprised primarily of relatively healthy adolescents, including those with HIV infection, compared to the HIV-infected subjects used in studies that reported a cytokine shift. For example, the recent reports of Altfeld et al. (1) and Rizzardi et al. (13) included patients with AIDS-defining illnesses and advanced HIV-associated disease. We did not observe any evidence of a cytokine shift in our study, even in comparisons of HIV-seronegative subjects and HIV-seropositive subjects with viral loads of >10,000 copies/ml.
On the basis of our data, we conclude that, early in the course of HIV-associated disease in adolescents, there are no detectable shifts in cytokine production. Previously published immunologic studies conducted on the REACH cohort have indicated that these adolescents were relatively early in their course of HIV infection (6, 16). Among the HIV-seropositive youths, 50% had CD4+-T-cell counts of greater than 500 cells/mm3, 63% had plasma viral loads of less than 10,000 copies per ml, and 89% had intact delayed-type hypersensitivity responses (anergy responses) (15). In addition, the immune systems of HIV-infected adolescents in this cohort are functioning at a higher level than those of HIV-infected children or adults (7). A unique observation of the REACH cohort is the finding of increased naive CD8+-T-cell numbers at all CD4+-T-cell strata in comparison to adults (7). These findings are consistent with the concept that HIV-infected adolescents may have the potential to repopulate naive T lymphocytes (7). High numbers of Ki-67 proliferating cell populations in both the CD4+- and CD8+-T-cell subsets have also been observed (17).
One of the technical limitations of our data, a limitation shared by others working in this area, is the use of bulk PMA or phytohemagglutinin (PHA) stimulation assays. During the course of these investigations, we measured cytokine secretion and intracellular protein expression in mRNA in resting and stimulated PBMCs in a group of subjects in order to examine the effects of various stimuli (18). The limitations of bulk (PMA or PHA) stimulation of PBMCs relates to the existing cellular makeup of the PBMC population (18). Ledru et al. observed a significant alteration in the proportions of T cells producing type 1 cytokines (specifically CD45RA and CD45RO subsets), rather than a cytokine shift (10). In this analysis, we did not control for intersample variation in the cellular makeup.
The cross-sectional sampling approach used to develop the data set analyzed also may have influenced our results. This approach was selected in order to make optimal use of the available cohort. Since only a small subset of the REACH cohort developed progression to an AIDS-defining condition, future longitudinal analyses of cytokine profiles in sequential samples from this subset may be more informative.
In summary, our data do not support the hypothesized TH1-to-TH2 shift with advancing HIV-associated disease. This finding is most likely related to both the HIV-1-associated disease stage and to the relatively well-preserved state of the immune system in the cohort of adolescents in this study. Technical limitations may also have contributed to our inability to detect a shift in cytokine expression. Nevertheless, failure to identify a TH1-to-TH2 cytokine shift in those adolescents with the most advanced HIV-associated disease suggests strongly that this model may not be appropriate for understanding progression of HIV-associated disease in adolescents.
S. D. Douglas, S. Durako, M. Camarca, A.-B. Moscicki, and C. M. Wilson are members of the Adolescent Medicine HIV/AIDS Research Network. The following investigators, listed in order of the numbers of subjects enrolled, participated in this study: L. Friedman, L. Pall, D. Maturo, and A. Pasquale at the University of Miami; D. Futterman, D. Monte, M. Alovera-DeBellis, N. Hoffman, and S. Jackson at Montefiore Medical Center; D. Schwarz and B. Rudy at the University of Pennsylvania and the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia; M. Tanney and A. Feldman at the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia; M. Belzer, D. Tucker, C. Hosmer, and K. Chung at the Children's Hospital of Los Angeles; S. E. Abdalian, L. Green, C. McKendall, and L. Wenthold at Tulane Medical Center; L. J. D'Angelo, C. Trexler, C. Townsend-Akpan, R. Hagler, and J. A. Morrissy at the Children's National Medical Center; L. Peralta, C. Ryder, S. Miller, and S. Calianno at the University of Maryland; L. Henry-Reid and R. Camacho at Cook County Hospital and University of Chicago; M. Sturdevant, A. Howell, and J. E. Johnson at Children's Hospital, Birmingham, Ala.; A. Puga, D. Cruz, and P. McLendon at the Children's Diagnostic and Treatment Center; M. Sawyer, J. Tigner, and A. Simmonds at Emory University; P. Flynn, K. Lett, J. Dewey, and S. Discenza at St. Jude Children's Research Hospital; L. Levin and M. Geiger at Mt. Sinai Medical Center; P. Stanford and F. Briggs at the University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey; and J. Birnbaum, M. Ramnarine, and V. Guarino at the SUNY Health Science Center, Brooklyn, N.Y. The following investigators were responsible for the basic science agenda: C. Holland, Center for Virology, Immunology, and Infectious Disease, Children's Research Institute, and Children's National Medical Center; D. A. Murphy, University of California at Los Angeles; S. H. Vermund, University of Alabama at Birmingham; and P. Crowley-Nowick, The Fearing Laboratory, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass. Network operations and analytic support are provided by C. Partlow at the University of Alabama at Birmingham; J. H. Ellenberg, B. Hobbs, A. Bennett, K. Clingan, J. Houser, V. Junankar, O. Leytush, L. Muenz, Y. Ma, R. Mitchell, T. Myint, P. Ohan, L. Paolinelli, M. Rakheja, M. Sarr, and A. Soloviov at Westat, Inc. Staff from sponsoring agencies include A. Rogers and A. Willoughby (NICHD), K. Davenny and V. Smeriglio (NIDA), E. Matzen (NIAID), and B. Vitiello (NIMH).
The Adolescent Medicine HIV/AIDS Research Network is supported by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, with supplemental funding from the National Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institute of Mental Health, and the Health Resources and Services Administration, and funding for laboratory studies was provided by NIH grants HD-3-31362 and HD-DA-32842.
|
|
|---|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»