Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology, July 2003, p. 525-528, Vol. 10, No. 4
1071-412X/03/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/CDLI.10.4.525-528.2003
Copyright © 2003, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Departments of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, St. Elisabeth Hospital, Tilburg,1 Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht,2 Department of Anesthesiology, University Medical Centre St. Radboud, Nijmegen,3 Amphia Hospital, Breda, The Netherlands4
Received 30 May 2002/ Returned for modification 8 February 2003/ Accepted 26 March 2003
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
All these risk factors can cause endothelial injury and dysfunction, which in many studies is considered the first step in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis. It forms the basis of the so-called response-to-injury hypothesis (19). This response to endothelial injury is mediated at every stage of atherosclerosis by monocyte-derived macrophages and specific subtypes of T lymphocytes (10, 19).
Elevated levels of C-reactive protein (CRP), tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-
), or interleukin-6 (IL-6) are associated with an increased risk of future myocardial infarction (12, 16, 17, 18). Patients with elevated CRP levels (>2.0 mg/liter) are at risk of recurrent angina pectoris and acute myocardial infarction. Conversely, in patients with unstable angina pectoris, CRP levels are elevated (13). Researchers have now suggested that inflammatory markers such as CRP may provide information about cardiovascular risk (16).
Inflammatory markers such as IL-2R, IL-6, IL-8, TNF-
, and CRP can provide information about the mechanism of the inflammatory reaction associated with atherosclerosis. IL-2R, IL-6, IL-8, and TNF-
derive from activated monocytes, macrophages, T cells, or endothelial cells. These inflammatory markers stimulate fibroblasts and smooth muscle cells to proliferate. They may also induce free radical generation by neutrophils, and this may facilitate oxidation of low-density protein cholesterol and attract monocytes and other inflammatory cells to the area of endothelial damage (6, 10). Cytokines promote the production of endogenous tissue plasminogen activator and plasminogen activator inhibitor 1, which stimulate thrombus formation (14).
There is much speculation about the anti-inflammatory potential of macrolides independent of their well-established role in the chemotherapy of infectious diseases. Macrolides have potentially relevant in vitro, ex vivo, and in vivo immunomodulatory effects (11). To investigate the effect of clarithromycin on inflammatory markers in patients prior to coronary artery surgery, we performed a prospective, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study.
|
|
|---|
From each patient, 10 ml of blood (extracted with EDTA) was obtained at the following stages: (i) during the initial preoperative outpatient visit, (ii) on the day of surgery just before the operation, and (iii) 8 weeks after surgery. Blood samples were stored at 4°C immediately after collection and centrifuged within 2 h. Plasma was then stored at -70°C pending further testing. This plasma was analyzed with an IMMULITE analyzer according to the manufacturer's instructions (EURO/DPC Ltd., Glyn Rhonwy, United Kingdom) for quantitative estimation of soluble IL-2R (units per liter), IL-6 (picograms per liter), IL-8 (picograms per liter), TNF-
(picograms per liter), and CRP (milligrams per liter).
The study was approved by the local medical ethics committee.
Statistical analysis. A sample size calculation was made to measure the effect on the CRP value based on the results from a previous study (2). In this study the placebo group had a mean CRP value of 8.7 mg/liter and a standard deviation (SD) of 6.0. For a hypothesized reduction of 30% (2.6 mg/liter) of the CRP with a power of 90% and a significance level of 0.05, 113 subjects were needed per study group.
All baseline characteristics were analyzed by using a
2 test for the distribution of categorical variables and Student's t test to compare continuous variables. To assess the differences in inflammatory marker values between the two treatment groups, a comparison was made using Student's t test or the Mann-Whitney U test, when appropriate. Statistical significance was accepted when P was <0.05.
|
|
|---|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Patient characteristics
|
The baseline levels of inflammatory markers for both treatment groups on the day of the preoperative visit (visit 1), as well as the values after treatment on the day of surgery (visit 2) and 8 weeks after surgery (visit 3), are shown in Table 2. As the data in the table indicate, there were no significant differences in the levels of inflammatory markers between the two groups at visit 1, 2, or 3 (Table 2). Changes in the levels of inflammatory markers between visits were also calculated. There were no significant differences in these changes between the treatment groups.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Inflammatory markers at visits 1, 2, and 3
|
|
|
|---|
The hypothesis that atherosclerosis has an infectious etiology has promoted studies of the effect of antibiotics, especially macrolides. The activity against C. pneumoniae and the general anti-inflammatory effect on the outcome in patients with cardiovascular disease were studied retrospectively as well as prospectively.
For example, Østergaard et al. in a retrospective cohort study (15) assessed the time-dependent effect of macrolide therapy versus that of penicillin therapy on the risk of hospitalization due to cardiovascular disease. The authors concluded that the decreased relative risk of hospitalization (0.48) due to cardiovascular disease in users of macrolides within 3 months indicated a possible direct anti-inflammatory effect on diseased vessels, but this was not further studied.
In several prospective intervention studies using either azithromycin (AZ) or roxithromycin, the anti-inflammatory effect was examined. Gupta et al. (7, 8) performed the first intervention trial in which 60 survivors of acute myocardial infarction with persistently elevated antichlamydial antibody titers were treated with a 3-day course of AZ, followed by a single dose per week for 3 months, or with a placebo. In a subgroup of patients treated with a double dose of AZ, significant decreases in total monocyte tissue factor and CD11b were found after 6 months (but not 3 months). This indicates a stronger anti-inflammatory effect after 6 months when a double dose of AZ was used. However, no significant differences were noted in the levels of any of the inflammatory markers in either of the normal groups receiving AZ or placebo. In a similar study by Gurfinkel et al. (9), 202 patients with coronary heart disease were treated with roxithromycin for 30 days. CRP levels decreased in both the placebo and the roxithromycin treatment groups at 30 days, but the declines did not reach statistical significance. Moreover, CRP was not associated with the significant reduction in ischemic events. This result indicates that the reduction in cardiovascular events in these studies is based on a stabilizing effect on atherosclerotic plaques, caused by an antichlamydial effect, rather than on an anti-inflammatory effect.
More recently, Anderson et al. (2) treated 302 patients who had coronary artery disease and a seropositive reaction to C. pneumoniae with AZ or placebo (in a similar treatment protocol as that described by Gupta et al. [7, 8]). The levels of four inflammatory markers were unchanged at 3 months but showed minor changes after 6 months. The changes in the levels of inflammatory markers before and after treatment were significantly lower for CRP (P = 0.011) and IL-6 (P = 0.043) after 6 months (not after 3 months). It must be stressed that no difference was found in clinical events and that these results are based on minor changes; a major anti-inflammatory effect was not shown. The overall minor changes in inflammatory markers are consistent with our study results.
The duration of treatment could be of critical importance in explaining the different results in various studies. Our study patients were treated, on average, with 16 tablets (a number equivalent to the number of treatment days). We therefore repeated our analysis on a subgroup of 114 patients who were treated with 14 or more tablets, but we found no differences in levels of inflammatory markers between the two groups at visit 1, 2 or 3. A repeated analysis of a small subgroup of 56 patients treated with 21 or more tablets also did not show any differences. For that reason we can conclude that the possible anti-inflammatory effect of clarithromycin, if any at all, does not increase with the duration of treatment. In addition, in the intervention studies mentioned above, even though patients received long-term treatment for 1 to 3 months (2, 7, 8), such treatment had little or no effect on inflammatory markers. Other data about a difference between the effects of short-term and long-term administration of macrolides on the immune response have been reported in a review by Labro (11). These studies are, however, mainly ex vivo studies, so comparison to the results with our study population is not appropriate.
In conclusion, several studies have demonstrated an anti-inflammatory effect of macrolides in vitro and in treatment of diseases involved with the bronchial epithelium (1, 3, 20). The present study is, however, in our opinion the first reported in vivo study about the effect of clarithromycin in patients with atherosclerosis and indicates that clarithromycin has no measurable anti-inflammatory effect in such patients.
|
|
|---|
and increased risk of recurrent coronary events after myocardial infarction. Circulation 101:2149-2153.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»