Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology, November 2003, p. 1059-1064, Vol. 10, No. 6
1071-412X/03/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/CDLI.10.6.1059-1064.2003
Copyright © 2003, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Bio-Safety Research Institute, Department of Veterinary Clinical Pathology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Chonbuk National University, Jeonju, Jeonbuk 561-756, South Korea,2 Division of Medical Microbiology, Department of Pathology, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institution, Baltimore, Maryland 212871
Received 6 May 2003/ Returned for modification 16 June 2003/ Accepted 21 July 2003
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
Human anaplasmosis (formerly human granulocytic ehrlichiosis [HGE]) and human monocytic ehrlichiosis (HME) are emerging infectious diseases transmitted by ticks. The etiological agents of HGE and HME are Anaplasma phagocytophilum and Ehrlichia chaffeensis, respectively, and these have been classified as members of the family Anaplasmataceae (11, 13).
HME and HGE were first reported and described in the United States (2, 9). However, serologic evidence of A. phagocytophilum infection has been found broadly (3). Seroepidemiologic and molecular studies have shown that these causative agents are also present in Asia (6, 17). Nevertheless, the tick-borne diseases HGE and HME have not yet been reported in South Korea.
The diagnosis of these diseases depends on evaluation of clinical, laboratory, and epidemiological data. A. phagocytophilum and E. chaffeensis infections are characterized by the presence of intracytoplasmic inclusions called morulae within leukocytes of human or animal peripheral blood smears. However, since it is difficult to detect A. phagocytophilum and E. chaffeensis, examination of blood smears for morulae is not a sensitive approach for laboratory diagnosis. Thus, testing of serum for antibodies against A. phagocytophilum and E. chaffeensis is important.
In this study, we tested human patients in South Korea for antibodies against A. phagocytophilum and E. chaffeensis using the indirect fluorescent-antibody assay (IFA) and the Western blot assay.
|
|
|---|
![]() View larger version (33K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Flow diagram for diagnosis of ehrlichiosis or anaplasmosis from febrile patients by PHERI and NIH in South Korea.
|
The E. chaffeensis Arkansas strain was propagated in DH82 cells (a dog macrophage cell line) in Dulbecco's minimal essential medium (GIBCO-BRL) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (GIBCO-BRL) and 2 mM L-glutamine (GIBCO-BRL) in an incubator at 37°C with 5% CO2 (14).
Cell number and viability were checked manually by trypan blue staining. The infection rate was monitored by examination of cytocentrifuged (Cytospin 3 cytocentrifuge; Shandon, Pittsburgh, Pa.) preparations by Leuko-Stat staining (HEMA 3; Biochemical Science Inc., Swedesboro, N.J.).
IFA. IFA was performed by a previously described procedure (26). Briefly, A. phagocytophilum-infected HL-60 cells and E. chaffeensis-infected DH82 cells were preloaded onto slides, fixed with acetone, and used as antigens. For antibody titrations, twofold serial dilutions of human serum were prepared, starting at a dilution of 1:80, in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; pH 7.4) with 0.5% nonfat dry milk (PBSM). A fluorescein isothiocyanate-labeled goat anti-human IgG-IgA-IgM (IgGAM; Kirkegaard & Perry Laboratories, Inc., Gaithersburg, Md.) conjugate at a 1:50 dilution in PBSM was used as the secondary antibody. Before fluorescence microscopic examination, the antigen slides were counterstained with 0.005% Evans blue and mounted for examination.
Western blot assay. The Western blot assay was performed by previously described procedures (1, 4, 12, 28). Antigens were prepared from A. phagocytophilum and E. chaffeensis purified by a gradient centrifugation method. Normal HL-60 cell and DH82 cells were used as negative antigen controls. Human serum was diluted 1:100 in PBSTM (1% normal goat serum diluted with 0.1 M PBS with 0.05% Tween 20 and 0.5% nonfat dry milk). Alkaline phosphatase-labeled goat anti-human IgGAM (Kirkegaard & Perry Laboratories, Inc.) was used as a secondary antibody at a 1:5,000 dilution in PBSTM. 5-Bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl phosphate-nitro blue tetrazolium chloride was used as the substrate for alkaline phosphatase and color development.
Statistical analysis for independence of tests.
The independence of the test results for O. tsutsugamushi with regard to positive or negative IFA or Western blotting results for A. phagocytophilum and E. chaffeensis was assessed by the
2 test.
|
|
|---|
2 tests for A. phagocytophilum (P < 0.01) or E. chaffeensis (P < 0.002), or both (P < 0.001). |
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Patient sexes and sex ages IFA titers, and Western blot assay results for sera reacted against A. phagocytophilum and O. tsutsugamushia
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Patient sexes and sex ages, IFA titers, and Western blot assay results for sera reacted against E. chaffeensis and O. tsutsugamushia
|
![]() View larger version (33K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. E. chaffeensis, A. phagocytophilum, and O. tsutsugamushi antibodies in human sera collected from patients in Jeonnam and Jeonbuk, South Korea, in 2001 and 2002. n, number of patients examined.
|
2 tests for A. phagocytophilum (P < 0.05) or E. chaffeensis (P < 0.002), or both (P < 0.001).
![]() View larger version (112K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Western blot assay of electrophoretically separated gradient-purified A. phagocytophilum (A) and E. chaffeensis (B) antigens reacted with IFA-positive sera. Lanes: M, protein size marker; -, negative control; +, positive control; the lane numbers represent sample numbers. (A) Twenty-five serum specimens (83.3%) reacted with an A. phagocytophilum antigen of approximately 44 kDa presumed to be Msp2. The reaction patterns were divided into three groups: 11 serum specimens reacted only with the 44-kDa antigen, 8 reacted with the 44-kDa antigen and another antigen between 60 and 85 kDa, and 5 reacted with the 44-kDa antigen and two other antigens between 60 and 160 kDa. (B) Twenty-nine (74.4%) serum specimens reacted with purified E. chaffeensis antigens. The reaction patterns of 32 serum specimens were also divided into three groups: 15 reacted only with antigens of 28 kDa, 10 reacted with two antigens between 28 and 35 kDa, and 4 reacted with three or four antigens between 26 and 100 kDa.
|
|
|
|---|
Among all of the serum specimens submitted for this study, 138 showed positive reactions for O. tsutsugamushi by IFA. The relatively higher rate of IFA positivity for O. tsutsugamushi seems to reflect the fact that all serum specimens were collected from patients with febrile responses typical for scrub typhus. However, this may also indicate cross-reactivity between A. phagocytophilum, E. chaffeensis, and O. tsutsugamushi. It is well recognized that serum samples from patients with HGE cross-react with E. chaffeensis (24). Bunnell et al. (5) suggested that suspected cross-reactions between A. phagocytophilum and Borrelia burgdorferi antigens in a murine model were not significant enough to confuse the results of specific serological tests. In the present study, 102 serum specimens were IFA positive only for O. tsutsugamushi, suggesting that cross-reactions between E. chaffeensis or A. phagocytophilum and O. tsutsugamushi are also not significant and that HGE or HME may exist as mixed infections or subsequent to infection with O. tsutsugamushi in patients with acute fever. Moreover, the independence of the results obtained by both IFA and the Western blot tests indicates that the concurrent positive reactions are unlikely to be due to cross-reactions. It would be useful to assess seroconversion or fourfold increases in titers between paired serum specimens, which was not possible for the single serum samples tested in the present study.
Although IFA is the most sensitive method, it can give inconsistent results because of antigenic diversity and various technical factors among different laboratories. For example, use of the MRK strain of A. phagocytophilum (Ehrlichia equi) as the antigen for IFA revealed a high degree of variability even if tests were performed in the same laboratory (1). Western blot assays are generally thought to provide more detailed information than IFA about the specific reactive antigens. Therefore, we confirmed the IFA results by Western blot assays using purified A. phagocytophilum and E. chaffeensis antigens. All sera that reacted against A. phagocytophilum in Western blot assays recognized an antigen of approximately 44 kDa that is presumed to represent MspII. The reaction patterns of those sera could be further divided into three groups, depending on the overall number of antigens detected, further enforcing the likelihood of the addition of specificity with Western blot assays. Likewise, when purified E. chaffeensis antigens were used in a Western blot assay, all sera reacted against an antigen of approximately 28 kDa that is presumed to represent the p28 major membrane protein family. These reaction patterns could also be divided into three groups: the first group reacted only with an antigen of approximately 28 kDa; the second group reacted with two antigens that showed bands between 28 and 35 kDa, which may reflect detection of the E. chaffeensis p28 family of membrane proteins; and the third group reacted with three or four antigens which showed bands between 26 and 120 kDa, also reflecting the detection of higher-molecular-size antigens, such as the immunodominant protein gp120 (29) and conserved heat shock proteins of questionable specificity for E. chaffeensis.
Such variable reactions in Western blot assays have been demonstrated before with both A. phagocytophilum and E. chaffeensis. Unver et al. (25) reported that IFA-positive sera of HME patients reacted not only with the p28 family of major surface proteins but also with several other native antigens of E. chaffeensis, while Chen et al. (9a) showed variable degrees of genus, species, and strain specificity. However, further studies are needed to verify these Western blot assay results, perhaps by using variant A. phagocytophilum and E. chaffeensis isolates that may further validate and standardize this serological approach.
In order for these serological results to make sense, several ecological factors need to be considered. O. tsutsugamushi is transmitted through the bites of trombiculid mites, but not through the bites of ticks. However, the concurrence of antibodies to several vector-borne bacteria could be predicted, since both the trombiculid mites and ticks that transmit Ehrlichia and Anaplasma spp. share many of the same habitats. Likewise, an association of specific ticks and Ehrlichia or Anaplasma spp. is expected. A. phagocytophilum has been detected in Ixodes persulcatus ticks and in the blood of humans after tick bites in China (6, 30), consistent with the results of the present report. Although the I. persculcatus group that transmits A. phagocytophilum is present in South Korea, the classical tick vector for E. chaffeensis, Amblyomma americanum, is not. However, E. chaffeensis or a similar species has been detected in Amblyomma testudinarium and Haemaphysalis yeni ticks in South China (7), Boophilus microplus ticks in Tibet (27), and Ixodes ovatus ticks in Japan (23); and we have found evidence of both E. chaffeensis and A. phagocytophilum in both Haemaphysalis longicornis and I. persulcatus ticks from South Korea (17a). Although a definitive role of these causative agents and potential tick vectors in human infections cannot be assumed from these data, the presence of the causative agents and potential tick vectors with the capacity to bite humans suggests that the serological data reflect a previously unrecognized but emerging problem in South Korea and perhaps more broadly across Asia.
Many rickettsial diseases have been studied in South Korea, and the geographical distribution of O. tsutsugamushi was recently investigated. However, only one report has described the incidence of Ehrlichia or Anaplasma sp. infection in humans (16). To confidently confirm human exposure and the presence of HME and HGE in South Korea, much more study is needed, including the isolation and identification of Ehrlichia or Anaplasma strains from infected humans.
This study was supported by a grant of the Korea Health 21 R & D Project, Ministry of Health & Welfare of Korea (HMP-00-B-20200-0003), and by grant RO1-AI41213 from the U.S. National Institutes of Health to J.S.D. J.P. and K.-S.C. were supported in part by a grant from the Korea Science and Engineering Foundation.
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»