Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Clinical and Vaccine Immunology, May 2009, p. 726-732, Vol. 16, No. 5
1071-412X/09/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/CVI.00465-08
Copyright © 2009, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Animal Health Biotechnology, Temasek Life Sciences Laboratory, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117604, Singapore,1 Department of Pathology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore 169608, Singapore,2 Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore3
Received 10 December 2008/ Returned for modification 10 February 2009/ Accepted 13 March 2009
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
Rapid and sensitive laboratory and field tests for the diagnosis of H5N1 HPAI infection are essential for disease control. Conventional laboratory methods for H5N1 virus detection include virus isolation in embryonated eggs or Madin-Darby canine kidney (MDCK) cells, followed by subsequent HA and NA subtype identification using serological methods. Molecular detection methods such as reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR) have been widely applied for the laboratory diagnosis of influenza infections and HA subtype identification (11, 21, 22). In addition, several studies have reported the use of real-time PCR assays and DNA microarray analysis for detection of influenza virus in the laboratory (7, 11, 13, 17). However, both conventional and laboratory methods are technically demanding and are not suitable for on-site use in field investigations. The development of rapid H5 subtype influenza virus detection tests in dot ELISA (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay), AC-ELISA (antigen-capture ELISA), and chromatographic strip formats (5, 6, 10) using H5 monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) have been reported. However, these assays do not directly identify the N1 NA in the H5N1 viruses, and many can yield positive results with H5 avian influenza viruses with other NA subtypes (e.g., H5N2) that have never been reported to cause infection in humans due to the lack of the ability to identify the NA subtype. The identification of the NA subtype is largely done by RT-PCR (3, 20). NA inhibition assay is the conventional method for NA subtype identification (18). However, it is rarely used because the procedure is very cumbersome and NA subtype-specific antisera are not commercially available.
Here we describe an AC-ELISA for the rapid diagnosis of HPAI H5N1 virus infection, based on H5- and N1-specific MAbs that mediate positive identification of H5 HA and N1 NA in a single assay. The selection of MAbs for the development of this H5N1 AC-ELISA was based on detailed characterizations of their binding properties. The sensitivity and specificity of this assay were evaluated using multiple HPAI H5N1 strains and other subtypes of influenza A viruses as well as influenza B viruses. The H5N1 AC-ELISA described here is a proof of concept for the future development of a field test. Our results indicate that this antibody pair could be particularly useful for on-site use in field investigations of H5N1 infection, when incorporated into a rapid field test format based on dot ELISA, immunofiltration, or electrochemical biosensor technologies.
|
|
|---|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Influenza viruses tested by H5N1 AC-ELISAa
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Reassortant influenza viruses generated from reverse genetics
|
Production of recombinant neuraminidase protein (rNA). Viral RNA was extracted from allantoic fluid containing A/Indonesia/CDC669/06 (H5N1) using a commercial guanidium-phenol solution (Trizol; Invitrogen). The NA gene was amplified from the viral RNA by RT-PCR using N1-specific primers. The PCR product was cloned into a pGEX-4T-1 glutathione S-transferase fusion (GST) vector (GE Healthcare) and transformed into Escherichia coli BL21 competent cells for protein expression. The fusion protein expression was induced by addition of 1 mmol/liter IPTG (isopropyl-β-D-thiogalactopyranoside) to the culture; bacterial cells were harvested after 3 h of incubation and NA protein was subsequently purified using a gel eluter (Bio-Rad).
Production and characterization of MAbs. BALB/c mice were immunized subcutaneously twice, 2 weeks apart, with 25 µg of rNA protein (for N1 MAb production) in 0.1 ml of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) or 200 µl of inactivated A/Indonesia/CDC669/06 (H5N1) with an HA titer of 256 with an equal amount of adjuvant (SEPPIC, France). Mice were boosted with the same dose of rNA or H5N1 virus 3 days before splenocytes were collected and fused with SP2/0 cells (28). The fused cells were seeded in 96-well plates, and supernatants were screened by immunofluorescence assays as described below. The isotypes of antibodies secreted by cloned hybridoma cells were determined using a one-minute isotyping kit (Amersham Bioscience, England).
IFA. HA1-specific MAbs were identified by immunofluorescence assay (IFA) using Sf-9 insect cells infected with a recombinant baculovirus harboring the HA1-encoding region of the HA gene from A/Indonesia/CDC669/06 (H5N1) virus as described previously (16). Sf-9 or MDCK cells cultured in 96-well plates were infected with H5-HA1 recombinant baculovirus or with a panel of H5N1 and non-H5 subtype influenza viruses, respectively (Table 1). At 36 h (for Sf-9 cells) or 24 to 48 h (for MDCK cells) postinfection, the cells were rinsed with PBS, fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 30 min at room temperature, and washed three times with PBS. The fixed cells were incubated with hybridoma culture supernatant at 37°C for 1 h followed by incubation with a 1:40 dilution of fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-conjugated rabbit anti-mouse immunoglobulin (Dako, Denmark). Antibody binding was evaluated by wide-field epifluorescence microscopy (Olympus IX71). N1-specific hybridomas were identified by IFA in 293T cells transfected with a plasmid expressing the N1 gene of A/Indonesia/CDC669/06 (H5N1) by using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen Corp.).
HI assay. The hemagglutination inhibition (HI) assay was performed as described previously (2). Briefly, receptor-destroying enzyme-treated sera were serially diluted (twofold) in V-bottom, 96-well plates and mixed with an equal volume of virus. Plates were incubated for 30 min at room temperature, and 1% chicken red blood cell was added to each well. The HI endpoint was the highest serum dilution in which agglutination was not observed.
Selections of 2D9 MAb escape mutants. Serial 10-fold dilutions of A/Indonesia/CDC669/06 (H5N1) virus were mixed with an equal volume of 2D9 MAb (1 µg/µl) and incubated at room temperature for 30 min. The mixtures were inoculated onto MDCK monolayers and cultured for 7 days at 35°C in Dulbecco's minimal essential medium containing 1 µg/ml TPCK (N-tosyl-L-phenylalanine chloromethyl ketone)-treated trypsin (Sigma) and 0.001% DEAE-dextran (Sigma). The cell culture supernatant was subsequently collected for virus isolation and sequence analysis. Viral RNA was isolated using LS Trizol reagent (Invitrogen) as specified by the manufacturer. Reverse transcription and PCR were performed with specific primers for the HA gene of H5 subtypes. The PCR amplicon sequences were compared to those of the wild-type virus to establish the location of coding mutations.
Western blotting. Cell lysates of IPTG-induced E. coli cultures or 20 µl of viruses with a HA titer of 256 in allantoic fluid were separated by 12% sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. The proteins in the gel were then transferred onto a nitrocellulose membrane and blocked with 5% nonfat milk in PBST (1x PBS and 0.1% Tween 20) for 1 h at room temperature. The membrane was incubated with MAb hybridoma supernatant, rinsed with PBST, and incubated with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated rabbit anti-mouse immunoglobulin G (IgG) (Dako, Denmark) for 1 h at room temperature. Following washing with PBST, the membrane was developed by incubation with ECL reagents (Amersham Biosciences) as described previously (9).
Epitope mapping of 8H12 MAb. Three overlapping fragments encoding the open reading frame of the NA of A/Indonesia/CDC610/06 (H5N1) (Fig. 1, "A" to "C") were amplified by PCR and cloned into the pGEX-4T-1 GST fusion vector (GE Healthcare). The fusion peptides were expressed in E. coli as described above and analyzed by Western blotting. Three additional truncated peptides (Fig. 1, "F1" to "F3") were expressed and analyzed. A panel of eleven mutants of fragment F3 was generated by substitution of amino acids 438 to 448 (P438A, D439A, G440D, A441D, E442K, L443F, P444A, F445A, T446A, I447A, and D448A). The mutations were generated by site-directed mutagenesis with a commercial kit (QuikChange; Stratagene), and the introduced mutations were confirmed by sequence analysis.
![]() View larger version (7K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Epitope mapping of the 8H12 MAb. Three overlapping NA fragments of A/Indonesia/CDC610/06 (H5N1) (A, B, and C) and subfragments (F1 to F3) were expressed as GST fusion proteins and analyzed by Western blotting (WB) using 8H12 MAb.
|
Development of H5N1 AC-ELISA. Ninety-six-well, round-bottom microtiter plates (Nunc, Roskilde, Demark) were coated with 1 µg/well of 8H12 MAb in 100 µl of carbonate buffer (73 mM sodium bicarbonate and 30 mM sodium carbonate, pH 9.7) overnight at 4°C or 37°C for 2 h. The plates were washed twice with PBST, followed by two washes with PBS after each incubation with antibody or antigen. The antibody-coated plates were blocked by incubation with 100 µl of blocking buffer (PBS containing 5% skim milk) for 1 h at room temperature and then incubated at 37°C for 1 h with 100 µl of virus-containing samples diluted in PBST. Virus binding was detected by incubation for 1 h at 37°C with 100 µl of horseradish peroxidase-conjugated 2D9 MAb (800 ng) (in-house labeling; Roche). Chromogen development was mediated by the addition of 100 µl of freshly prepared substrate solution (o-phenylenediamine dihydrochloride; Sigma). The reaction was stopped by adding 0.1 N sulfuric acid, and the optical density at 490 nm was recorded. The sensitivity of the H5N1 AC-ELISA was determined based on the HA titer using selected H5N1 virus strains. Viruses were twofold serially diluted in PBST and subjected to AC-ELISA. The detection limit was determined by the optical density value that gave a signal-to-noise ratio of 3. The sensitivity of the H5N1 AC-ELISA was compared with that of a commercial kit specific for the nucleoprotein of influenza A virus (Rockeby avian influenza virus antigen test; Rockeby Biomed, Singapore).
|
|
|---|
![]() View larger version (64K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Immunofluorescent analysis of 8H12 (N1-specific) and 2D9 (H5-specific) MAbs. A MAb that recognizes the HA2 region of HA protein was included to confirm the presence of viruses in infected MDCK cells. NA protein expressions in 293T cells further confirm the specificity of 8H12 MAb, whereas Sf-9 cells infected with HA1 recombinant baculoviruses further confirm the specificity of 2D9 MAb.
|
![]() View larger version (9K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Analysis of 8H12 MAb specificity by Western blotting. Viruses (20 µl of virus with an HA titer of 256) with NA subtypes N1 to N9 were fractionated on 12% sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis gel and analyzed with a mixture of 8H12 (N1-specific) MAb and MAb targets of the conserved region of HA2 protein.
|
Epitope analysis. Sequence alignments of the available N1 to N9 subtype NA genes of influenza A viruses isolated from human and avian sources revealed that the AELPF epitope is highly conserved in N1 subtype viruses but absent in other subtypes (Table 3). The conservation rate of the 8H12 MAb epitope was calculated for 708 N1 fragments of H5N1 and 579 N1 fragments of H1N1 influenza strains. Seven of 708 and 20 of 579 of these viruses have a single amino acid substitution in the epitope AELPF. Thus, the AELPF epitope is conserved in 99% of H5N1 NA and 96.5% of H1N1 NA samples sequenced to date.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 3. Epitope analysis of the N1 epitope targeted by 8H12 MAb among N1 to N9 subtypes of NA
|
Specificity of H5N1 AC-ELISA.
The specificity of the H5N1 AC-ELISA was tested with a total of 41 HPAI H5N1 strains isolated from humans and avian species and 40 non-H5N1 subtype influenza virus strains, including 26 seasonal influenza virus strains (H1N1, H3N2, and B subtypes) circulating in humans. Viruses of H5N1 or HA subtypes not available in our laboratory were rescued by reverse genetics with the six internal genes from A/Puerto Rico/8/34. The reactivity and specificity of the H5N1 AC-ELISA were examined with 100 µl of allantoic fluid or MDCK cell culture supernatant containing the H5N1 strains adjusted to an HA titer of 16. Non-H5N1 viruses with HA titers of
16 were used in order to eliminate false-positive results. Table 4 shows the absorbance readings of H5N1 virus strains from different clades, covering clades 1, 2.2, 2.3, 0, 7, 4, and 8, and representative H5N1 Indonesia isolates, which belong to clade 2.1. Absorbances of all the 41 H5N1 strains tested were at least 10 times higher than that of the non-H5N1 subtype viruses, with an average absorbance of 1.2 (Table 4). No cross-reactivity was observed for any of the non-H5N1 subtype viruses tested, and the average absorbance reading was as low as 0.06 (Table 5).
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 4. Absorbance readings of H5N1 viruses tested by H5N1 AC-ELISA
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 5. Absorbance readings of non-H5N1 viruses tested by H5N1 AC-ELISA
|
![]() View larger version (12K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Sensitivity of H5N1 AC-ELISA. Tested viruses with an HA titer of 16 were twofold diluted and subjected to H5N1 AC-ELISA assay. Values represent the means of absorbances of duplicate wells from two independent tests. OD, optical density; dotted line, cutoff values.
|
|
|
|---|
Selection of the H5 HA- and N1 NA-specific MAbs for the development of the H5N1 AC-ELISA was based on detailed analyses of their binding properties. The selected H5-specific MAb 2D9 demonstrated high specificity to H5 HA in the HI assay and IFA. Neutralization escape mutants with MAb 2D9 showed substitutions at amino acid positions Arg193 and Ser227. These amino acids are two of the key residues in the H5 receptor-binding site of the globular head of the HA molecule (19). H5N1 HPAI viruses are classified into distinct phylogenic clades based on their phylogenetic divergence (27). The 2D9 MAb recognizes multiple clades of H5N1 viruses, including clades 0, 1, 2.1, 2.2, 2.3, 4, 7, and 8 in the H5N1 AC-ELISA. This result could suggest that the epitope-binding site of the 2D9 MAb is highly conserved in H5N1 viruses. Further investigation, however, is needed to determine the exact residues that constitute the 2D9 epitope.
The N1 NA-specific MAb (8H12) used in this study was found to recognize an epitope comprising the amino acid sequence AELPF in N1 NA. This epitope is located at positions 441 to 445, which is near the C terminus of the NA protein. In contrast to HA, which is anchored to the membrane by a hydrophobic amino acid near the C terminus, NA is anchored by a series of hydrophobic amino acids near the N terminus (1). Analysis of the AELPF epitope in 3,439 NA sequences of influenza A viruses revealed that the epitope is highly conserved in H5N1 viruses. The conservation rate of the epitope was found to be 99% in 708 analyzed H5N1 viruses isolated from avian or human species, whereas it was not found in the N2 to N9 subtypes of NA. Western blot analysis of 8H12 MAb against N1 to N9 NA subtypes further demonstrated the specificity of this MAb in recognizing only N1 NA.
The specificity of the H5N1 AC-ELISA was evaluated using 41 HPAI H5N1 strains and 40 non-H5N1 subtype influenza virus strains isolated from human and avian species. No cross-reactivity was observed for the 40 non-H5N1 viruses tested. It is noted that, although the 40 non-H5N1 viruses tested constitute only a small subset of the possible viruses and only limited HA and NA combinations were studied, the possibility of cross-reactivity of the H5N1 AC-ELISA with other subtype viruses is believed to be extremely low, as comprehensive analyses have demonstrated the high specificity of the selected H5- and N1-specific MAbs. Further evaluation of the H5N1 AC-ELISA on field samples, however, is needed to determine the specificity of the assay in a more quantitative way.
The sensitivity of the H5N1 AC-ELISA was determined to be higher than that of the Rockeby avian influenza virus antigen test (100 µl of HA titers of 1 to 2 versus 200 µl of an HA titer of 1.5). Furthermore, the sensitivity of the H5N1 AC-ELISA is believed to improve upon refinement of horseradish peroxidase-labeled detection of MAb (2D9) efficiency and removal of unlabeled MAbs, which were not performed in this experiment.
In conclusion, the H5N1 AC-ELISA developed in this study provides dual, positive identification of HA and NA subtypes for rapid detection of H5N1 HPAI viruses, thus eliminating the need for subsequent NA subtyping. This H5N1 AC-ELISA shows enough specificity and sensitivity for detection of multiple clades of H5N1 HPAI virus strains. This study suggests that the H5N1 AC-ELISA based on concurrent use of H5- and N1-specific MAbs described here could be formatted as a rapid field test based on dot ELISA, immunofiltration, or electrochemical biosensor technologies (14), which would greatly facilitate field investigations.
This work was supported by Temasek Life Sciences Laboratory, Singapore.
We declare no competing interests.
Published ahead of print on 25 March 2009. ![]()
|
|
|---|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»