Previous Article | Next Article 
Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology, March 1998, p. 135-138, Vol. 5, No. 2
1071-412X/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Decline of Measles-Specific Immunoglobulin M
Antibodies after Primary Measles, Mumps, and Rubella
Vaccination
Rita F.
Helfand,1,2,*
Howard E.
Gary Jr.,2
William L.
Atkinson,3
James D.
Nordin,4
Harry L.
Keyserling,1 and
William J.
Bellini2
Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
303221;
Division of Viral and
Rickettsial Diseases, National Center for Infectious
Diseases,2 and
National Immunization
Program,3 Centers for Disease Control
and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia 30333; and
Group Health
Foundation, Minneapolis, Minnesota 554404
Received 10 October 1997/Returned for modification 20 November
1997/Accepted 5 December 1997
 |
ABSTRACT |
Detection of measles-specific immunoglobulin M (IgM) has become the
standard diagnostic method for laboratory confirmation of measles. In
outbreaks, the interpretation of an IgM-positive result can be
complicated when persons with suspected measles receive a dose of
measles vaccine as part of outbreak control measures. This
investigation evaluated the decay of measles-specific IgM antibodies 1 to 4 months after primary vaccination with measles, mumps, and rubella
vaccine (MMRII). Serum samples were obtained from 536 infants
vaccinated when they were 15 months old as part of a study to assess
primary and secondary measles vaccine failure. Sixty serum specimens
per week were selected from specimens collected between 4 and 9 weeks
after MMRII vaccination; all 176 available serum specimens collected
between 10 and
16 weeks were included. Specimens were tested for the
presence of measles-specific IgM by an antibody-capture enzyme
immunoassay. The proportion of IgM-positive specimens dropped from 73%
at 4 weeks after vaccination to 52% at 5 weeks after vaccination and
then declined to 7% by 8 weeks after vaccination. Less than 10% of
children remained IgM positive between 9 and 11 weeks. An IgM-negative
result helps rule out the diagnosis of measles in a person with
suspected infection and a history of recent vaccination. The
interpretation of a positive IgM result from a person with a clinically
suspected case of measles and a recent history of measles vaccination
(especially within 8 weeks) is problematic, and the diagnosis of
measles should be based on epidemiologic linkage to a confirmed case or
on detection of wild-type measles virus.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
In the United States, the
surveillance definition of a confirmed case of measles is a clinically
compatible illness (fever of >101°F, generalized rash for
3 days,
and either cough, coryza, or conjunctivitis) plus either an
epidemiologic linkage to a confirmed case or laboratory confirmation of
recent measles infection (2). As measles vaccination
coverage increases and the number of large outbreaks declines, the case
definition is increasingly met through laboratory confirmation rather
than an epidemiologic linkage. Laboratory confirmation is commonly done
by detecting the presence of measles-specific immunoglobulin M (IgM)
antibodies in the sera of persons with clinically suspected measles.
Measles-specific IgM can usually be detected reliably between 3 and 28 days after a rash appears in persons with suspected measles by using an
IgM-capture enzyme immunoassay (EIA) (5). In outbreak
settings, however, persons with suspected measles may have recently
received a dose of measles vaccine as part of outbreak control
measures, making a positive IgM result difficult to interpret.
Currently, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
recommends that a positive IgM result from a person who has received
measles vaccine between 6 and 45 days prior to testing cannot be
interpreted (8). However, the timing of the decline of IgM
antibodies after measles vaccination has not been well
established (7). In this report, we describe the decay of
measles-specific IgM antibodies 1 to 4 months after primary
vaccination with measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine (MMRII).
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Preliminary study.
For this report, we identified sera from
two previous studies. In the first study, conducted between June 1992 and April 1993, children 12 to 18 months old received MMRII at the time
of enrollment and varicella vaccine 6 weeks later. Serum from each
child was drawn at 0, 6, and 12 weeks after primary vaccination with
MMRII. We used these sera to identify a pattern in the decay of
measles-specific IgM antibodies over time and to provide data to plan
the primary study.
Primary study.
The original purpose of the primary study,
conducted at two sites (A and B), was to evaluate primary and secondary
vaccine failure after vaccination with MMRII (1). Serum
samples were collected from 15- to 18-month-old children before primary
vaccination with MMRII and 1 to 4 months, 3 years, and 5 years after
vaccination. At site A, most of the first postvaccination blood samples
were collected between 4 and 9 weeks after vaccination, while the
postvaccination blood samples at study site B were collected later.
Because findings from the preliminary study suggested that the
most rapid IgM decay began before week 6, we used serum samples from
site A for the primary study.
Available serum samples were obtained from 536 infants from site A
vaccinated between January 1991 and December 1992. Sixty serum
specimens per week were selected from specimens collected between 4 and
9 weeks after MMRII vaccination; all 176 available serum specimens
collected between 10 and
16 weeks were included. For the samples
collected between 4 and 9 weeks after vaccination, samples were
selected to be as close to the nominal collection time as possible. All
samples collected on the target day after vaccination (e.g., day 28 for
week 4) were selected for testing, followed by those collected within 1 day of the target date, then by those collected within 2 days, and so
forth (Table 1), until 60 specimens per week were identified. If more
specimens than needed were available, the required number of samples
were selected at random.
The specimens from study site A had originally been frozen at
20°C
shortly after collection and shipped to CDC on dry ice. Upon arrival at
CDC, they were thawed and tested for the presence of measles-specific
IgG and refrozen at
20°C until testing for the present study was
conducted in 1997.
EIA testing.
As part of the original vaccine trials, testing
for measles-specific IgG antibodies was performed by an indirect EIA
described previously (6). For the preliminary and primary
studies, serum samples were tested for the presence of measles-specific
IgM antibodies by a previously described IgM-capture EIA
(6). Briefly, microtiter plates were coated with goat
anti-human IgM antibodies diluted in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS).
The plates were incubated for 1 h at 37°C and then washed. Next,
serum diluted 1:200 in PBS with 0.5% gelatin and 0.15% Tween 20 (PBS-GT) was added to four consecutive wells, followed by incubation
for 1 h at 37°C and then washing. Baculovirus-measles virus
nucleoprotein or sf9-uninfected cell control lysate diluted in PBS-GT
with 4% normal goat serum and 0.3% sodium deoxycholate was added to
duplicate cells, and the plates were incubated for 2 h at 37°C
and washed. The plates were then incubated with biotinylated monoclonal
antibody (83VIIKK2) in PBS-GT for 1 h at 37°C and washed.
Streptavidin-peroxidase in PBS-GT was added, and the plates were
incubated for 20 min and washed again. Tetramethylbenzidine substrate
was added for 15 min, and the reaction was stopped by acidification.
Optical densities for antigen-positive and -negative wells were then
determined photometrically.
IgM-capture EIA results were expressed as the average difference in
measured optical density values between duplicate wells of positive
antigen (P) and negative tissue culture control antigen (N) for each serum specimen (P-N). A positive
cutoff value was defined as a P-N value of
0.10 and a
P/N ratio of
3. A borderline value was defined as either
(i) 0.09
P-N < 0.10 and P/N
3 or (ii) P-N
0.10 and 2
P/N < 3.
 |
RESULTS |
Preliminary study.
Serum specimens from the second blood
collection were available for testing for IgM antibodies from 62 children (median age, 15.8 months; age range, 12.3 to 24.2 months).
These specimens were collected a median of 6.6 weeks after MMRII
vaccination (range, 6 to 11 weeks). Overall, 21% (13 of 62) of
children were IgM positive, 6.5% (4 of 62) had borderline IgM
results, and 72.6% (45 of 62) were IgM negative. Serum from the third
blood draw, collected a median of 13 weeks after vaccination (range, 12 to 18 weeks), was available for 60 children. For the third blood draw,
10% (6 of 60) were IgM positive, 1.7% (1 of 60) had borderline IgM
results, and 88.3% (53 of 60) were IgM negative.
Primary study.
The median age of children included in the
analysis was 15.2 months (range, 14.5 to 19.2 months; age information
was missing for five children). Two hundred ninety-seven (56%) of 532 children were male (gender was unknown for 4 children). Five hundred
twenty-eight of 531 (99.4%) samples tested were IgG positive for
measles. Table 1 shows the timing of
sample collection after vaccination.
Figure 1a illustrates the proportion of
samples that were IgM positive by week after vaccination. The
proportion that was IgM positive dropped from 73% at 4 weeks after
vaccination to 52% at 5 weeks after vaccination and then declined
to 7% by 8 weeks after vaccination. Figure 1b shows the optical
density (P-N) value for each sample plotted against week
after vaccination. Most samples were IgM negative by 8 weeks,
with a small percentage of children exhibiting low levels of IgM
positivity for approximately 4 more weeks. However, as seen in
Table 1, fewer samples were available for testing beginning with
week 10, making the estimates beyond this time less precise.

View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
(a) Percentage of specimens that were IgM positive over
time (weeks after MMRII vaccination). Vertical lines represent 95%
confidence boundaries. A week was defined as a multiple of 7 ± 3 days (e.g., week 10 = 67 to 73 days). (b) Difference in optical
densities of positive and negative (P-N) wells for each
child by week after MMRII vaccination. The heavy solid and dashed lines
show the 50th and 75th percentiles, respectively, for each week as
defined above. The horizontal dashed line represents the cutoff
P-N value of 0.10, which was used in combination with the
P/N ratio to determine whether the specimen was considered
IgM positive, borderline, or negative.
|
|
Comparison of the two studies.
The proportion of children with
IgM-positive results 6 to 7 weeks after vaccination in the two studies
was similar; 25% (13 of 53) of samples in the first study were IgM
positive compared with 20% (24 of 120) of samples in the second study
(P = 0.50 by Mantel-Haenszel chi-square test).
However, at 12 to 15 weeks, the rate of IgM positivity in the first
study (10%) was significantly higher than the rate of IgM positivity
in the second study (0%) (P = 0.002 by Mantel-Haenszel
chi-square test, controlling for week).
 |
DISCUSSION |
The results of the primary study illustrate that the proportion of
vaccine recipients with detectable IgM antibodies declines rapidly
between 4 and 8 weeks after vaccination. By 8 to 12 weeks, 10% or less
of samples remained IgM positive. The proportions of children who were
IgM positive at 12 to 15 weeks differed for the two studies for reasons
that are not clear. Data from both studies indicate that most IgM has
disappeared by 8 weeks and that a small percentage (10% or less) of
persons may remain IgM positive for an additional 1 to 2 months.
The finding that only 73% of the vaccinees were IgM positive (8%
borderline) at 4 weeks was unexpected. Earlier data from Erdman and
colleagues (4) using the IgM-capture EIA demonstrated that
97% children were IgM positive 3 weeks after vaccination. IgM
antibodies may peak at 3 weeks and be declining at 4 weeks. A study is
currently under way to test this hypothesis, and early data suggest
that this is the case (3). If so, the interval of highest
sensitivity for detecting measles-specific IgM antibodies after primary
vaccination may be very narrow. Even if this is the case, it should
still be possible to determine seroconversion by using specimens tested
for the presence of both measles-specific IgM and IgG antibodies;
persons who are IgM negative at 4 weeks or more after vaccination
should have developed measles-specific IgG by this time. In this study,
99.4% samples were IgG positive.
The results of this study should help health professionals interpret an
IgM test result from a person with clinically suspected measles who has
been recently vaccinated. A negative IgM result can help exclude
measles as a diagnosis. However, a positive result from a recently
vaccinated person is not diagnostic of a wild-type measles virus
infection. Moreover, the magnitude of the IgM response does not help to
distinguish between vaccine and wild-type measles virus infection. Our
results provide some guidelines on the period during which
vaccine-associated IgM is likely to be present. This information can be
used in conjunction with the clinical and epidemiologic information in
making a final interpretation of the result. For example, a positive
IgM result from a person with suspected measles known to have been
exposed 2 weeks earlier but who had been vaccinated 8 weeks earlier is
most likely to reflect a wild-type measles virus infection. On the
other hand, a positive result from a person who develops a rash 5 weeks
after measles vaccination may be difficult to interpret; in this case,
one cannot distinguish wild-type infection from vaccine infection based
on IgM results, and a diagnosis of measles should be based on an
epidemiologic linkage to a confirmed case or on the detection of
wild-type measles virus.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We thank the following persons for their contributions: Janet
Heath and Alissa Murray for laboratory testing, John O'Connor for
editorial support, Steve Redd for critical review of the manuscript, and Sheila Burns for coordinating study participants.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Respiratory and
Enteric Viruses Branch, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Rd., NE, Mailstop G-17, Atlanta, GA 30333. Phone: (404)
639-3596. Fax: (404) 639-4960. E-mail: rzh7{at}cdc.gov.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Atkinson, W.,
L. Markowitz,
A. Baughman,
B. Sullivan,
J. Nordin,
J. Heath,
D. Erdman,
A. Nelson, and P. Patricia.
1992.
Response to measles revaccination among children who fail to respond to the first dose of measles vaccine, abstr. 421, p. 181.
In
Program and abstracts of the 32nd Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C.
|
| 2.
|
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
1997.
Case definitions for infectious conditions under public health surveillance.
Morbid. Mortal. Weekly Rep.
46RR-10:1-64[Medline].
|
| 3.
| Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Unpublished data.
|
| 4.
|
Erdman, D.,
L. Anderson,
D. Adams,
J. Stewart,
L. Markowitz, and W. Bellini.
1991.
Evaluation of monoclonal antibody-based capture enzyme immunoassays for detection of specific antibodies to measles virus.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
29:1466-1471[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 5.
|
Helfand, R. F.,
J. L. Heath,
L. J. Anderson,
E. F. Maes,
D. Guris, and W. J. Bellini.
1997.
Diagnosis of measles with an IgM capture EIA: the optimal timing of specimen collection after rash onset.
J. Infect. Dis.
175:195-199[Medline].
|
| 6.
|
Hummel, K.,
D. Erdman,
J. Heath, and W. Bellini.
1992.
Baculovirus expression of the nucleoprotein gene of measles virus and utility of the recombinant protein in diagnostic enzyme immunoassays.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
30:2874-2880[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 7.
|
Markowitz, L. E., and S. L. Katz.
1994.
Measles vaccine, p. 229-276.
In
S. A. Plotkin, and E. A. Mortimer (ed.), Vaccines. W. B. Saunders, Philadelphia, Pa.
|
| 8.
|
Redd, S. C.,
M. Wharton, and R. Helfand.
1996.
Measles, p. 2:50-2:67.
In
Manual for the surveillance of vaccine-preventable diseases. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Ga.
|
Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology, March 1998, p. 135-138, Vol. 5, No. 2
1071-412X/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Helfand, R. F., Kebede, S., Gary, H. E. Jr., Beyene, H., Bellini, W. J.
(1999). Timing of Development of Measles-Specific Immunoglobulin M and G after Primary Measles Vaccination. CVI
6: 178-180
[Abstract]
[Full Text]