Previous Article | Next Article 
Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology, March 1998, p. 235-241, Vol. 5, No. 2
1071-412X/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
AIDS Vaccination Studies Using an Ex Vivo Feline
Immunodeficiency Virus Model: Homologous Erythrocytes as a Delivery
System for Preferential Immunization with Putative Protective
Antigens
Laura
Chiarantini,2
Donatella
Matteucci,1
Mauro
Pistello,1
Umberto
Mancini,2
Paola
Mazzetti,1
Claudia
Massi,1
Simone
Giannecchini,1
Isabella
Lonetti,1
Mauro
Magnani,2 and
Mauro
Bendinelli1,*
Retrovirus Center and Virology Section,
Department of Biomedicine, University of Pisa,
Pisa,1 and
Institute of Biochemistry,
University of Urbino, Urbino,2 Italy
Received 13 August 1997/Returned for modification 24 September
1997/Accepted 12 November 1997
 |
ABSTRACT |
Feline immunodeficiency virus (FIV) is a useful model for testing
of criteria for AIDS vaccine development. In the protocol we adopted,
we used a primary isolate of FIV as a source of antigen and, for
challenge, plasma from cats infected with the homologous virus never
passaged in vitro. Cat erythrocytes (RBC) were coated with the surface
components of freshly harvested and purified FIV by means of
biotin-avidin-biotin bridges and used to immunize specific-pathogen-free cats (four doses at monthly intervals; total
amount of FIV antigen administered per cat, approximately 14 µg).
Immunized cats developed moderate levels of antibodies directed mainly
to surface components of the virion and clearly evident
lymphoproliferative responses. Four months after the last dose of
immunogen, FIV-immunized cats and control cats immunized with bovine
serum albumin-coated RBC were challenged. Judged from the results of
the subsequent 12-month follow-up, FIV-immunized cats exhibited at
least some degree of protection. However, following rechallenge, most
of the FIV-immunized animals became virus positive in spite of a
booster immunogen dose given 2 months before the second challenge.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Feline immunodeficiency virus (FIV)
is extensively used as a model system to identify criteria for the
development of effective anti-human immunodeficiency virus vaccines.
Previous studies have demonstrated that vaccines based on whole
inactivated virus or fixed infected cells can afford protection against
experimental challenge with FIV. In contrast, vaccines based on
recombinant envelope proteins have given poor results (reviewed in
references 4, 14, 20, 31, and
40). This is surprising, as there is solid evidence
that epitopes present on envelope proteins are major targets for
neutralizing antibodies and other effectors of antiviral immune
responses, such as cytotoxic T lymphocytes (3, 7, 13, 18, 21,
34-37). Thus, the possibility exists that failure of subunit
vaccines to induce protective immunity is due to inappropriate
presentation of the relevant epitopes (29, 33).
In this study, we chose to immunize cats with homologous erythrocytes
(RBC) coated with the surface components of FIV particles by means of
biotin-avidin-biotin bridges (FIV-RBC) on the following premises: (i)
RBC of several mammals can be biotinylated with attachment of just a
few thousand biotin molecules without affecting their integrity and in
vivo survival (11, 24), (ii) inoculation of RBC coated with
antigens via a biotin-avidin-biotin bridge was shown to induce in vivo
immune responses similar to or greater than those obtained with
complete Freund's adjuvant (24, 25), and (iii) in a recent
study, immunization with minute amounts of a recombinant antigen (150 ng/mouse) bound to RBC protected mice against lethal and latent herpes
simplex virus type 1 infection (10). Moreover, we reasoned
that the biotin-avidin-biotin bridge used to couple antigens to RBC
might not only select in favor of the surface antigens of FIV but also
preserve, to a large extent, their native configuration. Recent studies
with primate lentiviruses have shown that the native configuration of
the surface glycoproteins (SUgp) is extremely important for their
immunological functions (reviewed in reference 29).
The results of our study have shown that FIV-RBC elicited significant
humoral and cell-mediated immune responses to FIV in spite of the small
amount of viral protein injected and that at least the humoral response
was preferentially directed to the SUgp. In addition, FIV-RBC-immunized
cats exhibited an enhanced, though short-lived, resistance to challenge
with ex vivo FIV.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Production, purification, and biotinylation of FIV for immunogen
preparation.
The Pisa-M2 isolate of FIV (FIV-M2) was grown in MBM
lymphoid T-cell cultures as previously described (28). To
preserve its structural integrity, the virus was concentrated from
clarified supernatants by use of a Minitan Filter System (Millipore,
Bedford, Mass.), sucrose gradient purified, and biotinylated
immediately after harvest from the cultures. For biotinylation, the
virus was suspended at 2 mg/ml in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS)
containing 1 M sucrose and treated with N-hydroxysuccinimido
(NHS)-biotin, a biotin derivative that reacts specifically with exposed
NH2 groups, as previously described (11, 25).
Briefly, 6 µl of a stock solution of 1-mg/ml NHS-biotin (Pierce,
Rockford, Ill.) was added to 1 ml of a virus suspension and the mixture
was incubated at 4°C for 1 h. The reaction was blocked by adding
Tris/HCl (pH 7.0) to a final concentration of 0.1 M, and after 10 min
at 4°C, the virus was disrupted by adding Triton X-100 to a final
concentration of 0.02% (vol/vol) and incubating the mixture at 4°C
for 15 min. Excess biotin was removed by diluting the viral suspension
to 25 ml with PBS and washing it twice with Centricon 10 (Amicon, Beverly, Mass.). Aliquots of biotinylated, disrupted FIV (0.395 mg of
protein/ml) were stored at
80°C until use.
Mock antigen.
Mock antigen consisted of bovine serum albumin
(BSA) biotinylated at 2 mg/ml exactly the same way as FIV and stored at
0.415 mg of protein/ml.
Biotinylation of cat RBC and quantitation of bound biotin.
Freshly drawn RBC from two specific-pathogen-free cats were washed
three times with cold PBS and biotinylated as previously described
(11, 24, 25). The number of biotin molecules bound to RBC
was determined by measuring the binding of [125I]avidin
(1.82 × 105 cpm/µg) as previously described
(11). The percentage of RBC that became biotinylated was
evaluated by using fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-conjugated
streptavidin as a probe. Briefly, 5 µl of an RBC suspension (3 to
5%) in PBS was incubated with 20 µl of FITC-streptavidin (1 mg/ml)
diluted 1:100 in PBS. After 30 min at 4°C, the RBC were washed twice
in PBS and resuspended to 2 ml; 104 events were analyzed in
a flow cytometer (FACScan; Becton Dickinson, Bedford, Mass.).
Coating of biotinylated RBC with FIV and mock antigen.
FIV-RBC and BSA-coated RBC (BSA-RBC) were prepared just before
inoculation into cats. Avidin (Boehringer GmbH, Mannheim, Germany) at
0.5 mg/ml was added to a 10% suspension of biotinylated RBC, and
following agitation at 4°C for 1 h, excess avidin was removed with three washes in PBS. RBC coupled with avidin-biotin were then used
to bind the biotinylated protein antigens. Two hundred micrograms of
biotinylated FIV or BSA was added to 10 ml of a 10% suspension of
prepared RBC. After 1 h at 4°C, the mixtures were washed three
times in abundant PBS to remove unbound components and resuspended at
10%.
Quantitation of FIV and mock antigen bound to RBC.
One
hundred micrograms of biotinylated FIV or biotinylated BSA was
iodinated with 3 µl of 125I (1 mCi/10 µl) by the
chloramine T method, and quantitation was performed by measuring the
radioactivity in a Beckman counter. The 125I-labeled,
biotinylated FIV (5.57 × 105 cpm/µg) and
125I-labeled, biotinylated BSA (1.25 × 105 cpm/µg) preparations thus obtained were used to
determine the amount of each protein that was bound by 1 ml of
biotinylated cat RBC with avidin as a bridge.
Immunizations and challenge.
Groups of four 7-month-old,
specific-pathogen-free cats (Iffa Credo, L'Arbresle, France) were
immunized with either FIV-RBC or BSA-RBC. The animals were housed
individually in our climatized animal facility under European Community
law conditions, examined once per week, and bled periodically under
slight anesthesia. The immunization schedule consisted of 4 doses of 2 ml of 10% coated RBC suspensions given intraperitoneally at monthly
intervals. The amounts of FIV and mock antigens received by each cat at
the different times are shown in Table 1.
Four months after the last immunizing dose, the cats were challenged
intravenously with 10 50% cat-infectious doses of FIV-M2 plasma
(28). Cats that did not become productively infected after
the first challenge (i.e., remained reisolation and serologically
negative; see below) were boosted 16 months later with their respective
immunogens and after 2 additional months were given a second challenge
using the same virus preparation and dose.
Analysis of anti-FIV immune response in vaccinated cats.
The
antibody response to FIV was studied by enzyme-linked immunosorbent
assay (ELISA) and immunoblotting. For ELISA, microwells were coated
overnight with 100 µl of gradient-purified, disrupted whole FIV-M2 at
2 µg/ml (28). After a postcoating step done with skim
milk, serially diluted cat sera were added to the plates. Bound
immunoglobulins G (IgG) were revealed with biotinylated mouse anti-cat
IgG serum, followed by an antibiotin peroxidase conjugate. Absorbance
was read at 450 nm. For immunoblotting analysis, purified, sodium
dodecyl sulfate (SDS)-disrupted FIV was separated by SDS-10%
polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) and transferred onto
nitrocellulose sheets. After extensive blocking with skim milk, the
blots were incubated with appropriately diluted cat sera. Bound
antibodies were visualized by enzyme immunoassay using peroxidase-conjugated mouse anti-cat IgG; the reaction was developed on
autoradiographic films (Hyperfilm-ECL; Amersham) by using the enhanced-chemiluminescense (ECL) detection system (Amersham). A serum
raised by hyperimmunization of mice with the peptide
517FNKTKAVEMVNIAGNWSCTS536, derived from a
conserved region of FIV Env and reactive with the SUgp in
immunoblotting (26), was also used in these studies. FIV
neutralizing antibodies were tested by using a lymphoid-cell-based assay as previously described (2). Cell-mediated immunity to FIV was monitored by a lymphocyte proliferation assay (28). Briefly, Ficoll-separated peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC; 1.5 × 105) were incubated with 1 µg of purified and
sonicated FIV in 200 µl of RPMI 1640 containing 10%
heat-inactivated, AB-positive human serum and 2 mM
L-glutamine for 4 days and then pulsed with
[3H]thymidine for 18 h. The stimulation index (SI)
was calculated as the ratio of radioactivity incorporated by PBMC in
the presence or absence of FIV antigen. Only SIs of
2 were considered
indicative of FIV-specific lymphoproliferation.
Follow-up of challenged cats.
Challenged cats were monitored
for FIV infection by serology, virus reisolation from PBMC, and
detection of proviral DNA by PCR. Diagnostic nested gag PCR
was performed on PBMC as previously described (28). Assay
sensitivity was 10 copies of the p34TF10 plasmid containing the whole
FIV-Pet genome (kindly provided by J. E. Elder, La Jolla, Calif.).
DNAs from uninfected cat PBMC and reagent controls were run in
parallel, and the positive control (DNA from infected cells) was
included in the second step only. At the end of the experiment, cat
PBMC were also examined for infectious virus and provirus loads.
Proportions of PBMC harboring infectious FIV were assessed by
quantitative coculture with MBM cells as previously described
(15). Proviral loads were quantitated by competitive PCR
using an internal standard derived from the gag gene
(32) and expressed as the number of proviruses in 1 µg of
PBMC DNA.
 |
RESULTS |
Characterization of FIV and mock immunogens.
We first measured
the proportion of cat RBC that became biotinylated after treatment with
NHS-biotin. This was necessary because the procedure used had not been
validated for cat RBC previously. Flow cytometric analysis using
FITC-streptavidin as a probe showed that the cat RBC were almost all
biotinylated and to similar extents (Fig.
1). Using 125I-avidin as a
probe, we also estimated that the average number of biotin molecules
coupled per single RBC was 30,703 ± 1,018 (mean ± standard
deviation [SD] of three independent preparations). We then determined
the amount of biotinylated FIV protein and BSA that became bound to
biotinylated cat RBC through the avidin bridge by using
125I-labeled, biotinylated antigens. Bound FIV protein was
0.8 ± 0.1 µg/ml of RBC, while bound BSA was 1.1 ± 0.1 µg/ml of RBC (means ± SD of five determinations). Based on
these results, it was calculated that the doses of FIV-RBC and BSA-RBC
used to immunize cats at the different time points contained between
2.08 and 3.74 µg of FIV proteins and between 2.62 and 5.50 µg of
BSA, respectively (Table 1). Thus, each FIV-RBC-immunized cat received
approximately 14 µg of FIV protein.

View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Validation of the procedure used for biotinylating cat
RBC. Biotin-positive cells were probed with FITC-streptavidin and
examined by flow cytometry. M1., biotin-positive cells.
|
|
We also attempted to characterize the components of the virus that
became biotinylated when whole FIV was treated with NHS-biotin. Freshly
prepared, gradient-purified FIV was biotinylated, disrupted with a
nonionic detergent exactly as described in Materials and Methods for
immunogen preparation, and electrophoresed. Western blotting with
streptavidin-peroxidase and ECL revealed three bands that exhibited
relatively high levels of biotinylation, two with apparent molecular
masses of 65 to 68 kDa, compatible with the SUgp molecule, and one with
a mass of 170 kDa. Importantly, no band that might indicate significant
biotinylation of the internal 25-kDa p25 capsid protein of FIV was
visible in these blots (Fig. 2C). On the
other hand, staining of the gels with Coomassie blue and
counterstaining with silver demonstrated components with apparent molecular masses similar to those seen by using streptavidin and also
other bands with lower masses (Fig. 2A). Note that whereas the 170-kDa
band was preferentially stained by Coomassie blue and not by silver,
the 65- to 68-kDa bands were preferentially stained by silver, which
suggests that they were glycoproteins (12). For comparison,
we also performed an autoradiographic analysis of gradient-purified FIV
that had been biotinylated, disrupted, and then labeled with
125I to a specific activity of 5.57 × 105
cpm/µg. As expected, the most abundant component in the FIV lysate, by far, was a 25-kDa protein corresponding to capsid protein p25 (Fig.
2B). Based on these results, we tentatively concluded that, in
accordance with the rationale of the experiment, biotin had bound
considerable amounts of the SUgp and little of the internal viral
proteins. This conclusion was corroborated by examining by
immunoblotting the specificities of the antibodies produced by cats
immunized with FIV-RBC (see below).

View larger version (101K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Characterization of the proteins biotinylated by
reacting whole FIV with NHS-biotin. The indicated viral preparations
were disrupted in SDS and subjected to SDS-10% PAGE. (A) Staining
with Coomassie blue and silver of a gel obtained with biotinylated
virus. (B) Autoradiography of a gel obtained with biotinylated FIV that
was 125I labeled after disruption (Kodak X-Omat AR film at
70°C in the presence of Du Pont Lightning-Plus intensifying
screens). (C) Staining with streptavidin of biotinylated FIV. The gel
was blotted onto nitrocellulose, incubated with horseradish
peroxidase-conjugated streptavidin, and examined by ECL.
|
|
Immune responses elicited by the FIV immunogen.
Throughout the experiment, the antibody response of immunized
cats was monitored by ELISA with disrupted FIV as the antigen. As shown
in Fig. 3A, immunization with FIV-RBC
elicited the production of anti-FIV antibodies in all of the cats.
Antibodies were first detected 2 months after initiation of
immunization; peaked at 3 months, when titers ranged between 1:400 and
1:1,000; and then declined, despite the administration of an additional
dose of immunogen. Thus, 4 months after completion of immunization,
when the animals were challenged, antibody titers ranged between 1:200 and 1:400. Sera collected at challenge were also examined by
immunoblotting for reactivity to denatured FIV proteins. As shown in
Fig. 4, the four cats immunized with
FIV-RBC (lanes A to D) exhibited various degrees of reactivity, but in
all cases, the predominant bands corresponded to proteins of about 70 kDa, compatible with FIV SUgp, and 170 kDa, while the band
corresponding to the p25 capsid antigen was relatively weak and
remained so even when the blots were developed for prolonged periods
(data not shown). This pattern was in stark contrast to that produced
by sera of FIV-infected cats (exemplified in lanes E and F of Fig. 4),
in which the p25 band was the most dominant by far, whereas
high-molecular-weight bands were much fainter than those observed with
FIV-RBC immunized cat sera. RBC-BSA-immunized cats were consistently
FIV seronegative by both ELISA (Fig. 3A) and immunoblotting (Fig. 4,
lane G). These antibody patterns were also compared with the reactivity
of a serum obtained by hyperimmunizing mice with a synthetic peptide of
the SUgp of FIV and known to stain this protein in immunoblotting. As
shown by lane H in Fig. 4, the protein recognized by this serum had an
apparent molecular mass similar to that of the protein recognized by
the sera of RBC-FIV-immunized cats. Moreover, when probed by a
glycoprotein-specific detection system, this protein proved to be
glycosylated (Fig. 4, lane L). Consistent with previous results
(28), the sera taken at the time of challenge were negative for virus neutralizing antibody, as determined in a lymphoid-cell-based assay (results not shown). Immunized cats were also monitored for
FIV-specific cell-mediated immunity by examining the
lymphoproliferative response of their PBMC to whole FIV lysate. As
shown by the representative results depicted in Fig.
5A, two of four FIV-RBC-immunized cats were positive. In contrast, the four BSA-RBC-immunized cats were constantly negative.

View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
ELISA antibody response to disrupted FIV antigen in
FIV-RBC-immunized and control cats. Solid symbols indicate individual
FIV-RBC-immunized animals. A single open symbol is used for
BSA-RBC-immunized cats, as they were all unreactive. The arrows
indicate the times when immunizing doses were administered, and the
solid arrowheads indicate the times of challenge. (A) Response to
primary immunization. (B) Response to a booster FIV-RBC dose given 20 months after completion of the primary immunization.
|
|

View larger version (59K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
Immunoblot analysis of sera of FIV-RBC-immunized and
control cats at the time of challenge. Purified FIV was subjected to
SDS-PAGE under reducing conditions, blotted onto nitrocellulose, and
reacted with sera from cats immunized with FIV-RBC (lanes A to D), with
sera from FIV-infected cats (lanes E and F), with one serum from a
BSA-RBC-immunized cat (lane G), and with an SUgp-specific (lane H) or
control (lane I) mouse serum. Lane L was stained for glycoproteins by
the ECL glycoprotein detection system in accordance with
manufacturer's instructions.
|
|

View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
Proliferative responses to FIV antigen of individual
cats immunized with FIV-RBC (solid bars) or BSA-RBC (open bars). (A)
Response at the time of first challenge (4 months after completion of
primary immunization). (B) Response at the time of second challenge (2 months after a booster dose of immunogen). The SI is the ratio of
radioactivity incorporated by PBMC in the presence of the antigen to
that incorporated in the absence of the antigen. Only values of 2
were considered indicative of FIV-specific lymphoproliferation. In the
absence of antigen, values ranged between 177 and 4,488 cpm in
individual cats.
|
|
Outcome of challenges.
The above findings demonstrated that
immunization with FIV-RBC elicited a significant antibody response
against FIV proteins, though it was considerably less pronounced than
that observed in a previous successful vaccination experiment in which
cats had been immunized with fixed, FIV-infected cells (28).
FIV-RBC-immunized cats also developed a cell-mediated response to FIV
that was of the same magnitude as that observed in a previous study
(28). To assess whether the immune response elicited by
FIV-RBC translates into significant protection, we challenged the
animals with the same viral strain used for vaccine preparation. The
stock of virus used was plasma of cats infected with FIV passaged only
in vivo, and the inoculum contained 10 50% cat-infective doses.
Table 2 shows that at the time of
challenge, all of the immunized cats were virus negative, as determined
by sensitive FIV culture and PCR analysis, thus showing that the
procedure used to prepare the FIV-RBC immunogen had effectively
inactivated FIV infectivity. Table 2 also shows the results of the
virological and serological assays performed on challenged cats at
selected times. In the mock-vaccinated group, two cats were repeatedly reisolation and/or serologically positive, as well as PCR positive, and
the remaining two cats were repeatedly PCR positive, though they showed
no signs of productive FIV replication. Thus, at the end of the
12-month postchallenge follow-up, two of four mock-immunized cats could
be scored as productively infected. In contrast, the four animals in
the FIV-RBC-vaccinated group showed no evidence of FIV infection
throughout the observation period, except for cat 2923, which was PCR
positive at 1 month, and, cat 2911 which was PCR positive at 12 months
postchallenge. Thus, at the end of the follow-up period, none of the
FIV-RBC-immunized cats could be scored as productively infected.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 2.
Virological and serological markers of FIV infection in
FIV-RBC-immunized and mock-immunized cats at the time of challenge and
at selected times thereafter
|
|
Sixteen months after the above-described challenge, the animals that
had escaped productive infection were given one booster dose of the
respective immunogens. The antibody and lymphoproliferative levels of
the FIV-RBC-immunized animals had, in fact, considerably declined by
this time (data not shown). The animals responded promptly to the
FIV-RBC booster, so that 2 months later, their anti-FIV ELISA antibody
reached higher levels than those observed at the same time after the
first challenge (Fig. 3B). This was confirmed by immunoblot analysis,
which also showed that the specificity of antibodies was similar to
that observed after primary immunization (data not shown). FIV-specific
lymphoproliferation was also positive in three of four
FIV-RBC-immunized cats (Fig. 5B). As expected, the control cats that
had received a booster of mock immunogen remained FIV unreactive (Fig.
3B and 5B). Two months after the booster, FIV-RBC- and
BSA-RBC-immunized cats were given a second FIV challenge. As shown in
Table 3, this challenge was fully successful since the two mock-immunized animals became productively infected within 1 month. Of the FIV-RBC-immunized animals, only one
remained virus free until the end of the 6-month follow-up period,
whereas the others became productively infected as readily as the
controls. At the end of the experiment, we also measured the infectious
virus and the proviral loads found to be associated with the PBMC of
infected cats and found no appreciable differences between FIV-RBC- and
mock antigen-immunized animals (Table 3).
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 3.
Virological and serological markers of FIV infection in
FIV-RBC-immunized and mock-immunized cats at the time of rechallenge
and at selected times thereafter
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
Previous studies have shown that vaccine-induced protection
against FIV is achievable, though the viral epitopes and the immune mechanisms involved have remained essentially unresolved (reviewed in
references 4, 14, 20, 31, and
40). Thus, vaccines composed of fixed cells or whole
inactivated virus derived from the FL4 cell line, which is chronically
infected with the Petaluma strain of FIV, have repeatedly protected
against challenge with tissue culture-adapted virus (5, 17, 19,
41). In addition, we have recently shown that a fixed-cell
vaccine prepared with the same primary isolate used in this study
effectively, albeit transiently, protected cats against cell-free and
cell-associated virus challenges obtained ex vivo, thus showing that
vaccine protection can also be efficacious against fully virulent
viruses similar to those which circulate in nature (27, 28).
By analogy with other viruses, it is generally believed that the
protective antigens of lentiviruses are mainly viral components exposed
at the virion surface (6, 16, 29, 30, 33). Characterization
of FIV antigens has corroborated this assumption, since all of the FIV
structures involved in antibody-mediated neutralization and at least
some of the epitopes recognized by cytotoxic T lymphocytes identified
to date are located in the SUgp (3, 7, 13, 18, 21, 34-37).
It is therefore paradoxical that attempts to vaccinate cats by using
recombinant SUgp or synthetic peptides have given poor results and have
sometimes enhanced FIV infection following challenge (22, 23, 35,
37, 39). Among the explanations put forward to explain the
failure of FIV subunit vaccines to protect and that of similar tested
vaccines to protect against other lentiviruses is that the SUgp
epitopes important for protection are conformational in nature and
that, to induce protective immunity, the relevant viral molecules have to be presented to the immune system in a configuration as similar as
possible to that on the native virion (29, 33). That this explanation is plausible is suggested by recent findings showing that
vaccination with immunoaffinity-purified SUgp obtained from the FL4
cell line, though less effective than vaccination with whole
inactivated FIV in protecting cats against viremia, did, nevertheless,
reduce the resulting viral loads (17).
Previous data have shown that coated homologous RBC represent an
interesting antigen delivery system (10, 25). In the present
study, we have used this approach to immunize cats with enriched,
native surface antigens of FIV in an attempt to favor the development
of protective immune responses. For immunogen preparation, the proteins
exposed on the intact virion were biotinylated by treating freshly
harvested, purified, whole FIV with an impermeant biotin derivative
specifically reactive with exposed NH2 groups. The virions
were then gently disrupted by using a detergent, and the biotinylated
proteins obtained were selectively bound to avidin-biotin-coated RBC,
which were then used to inoculate cats immediately after coating. The
total amount of FIV antigen administered per cat was minimal,
approximately 14 µg, and was therefore many-fold smaller than that
used in previous studies employing immunoaffinity-purified or
recombinant SUgp mixed with potent adjuvants (17, 23). Nonetheless, immunized cats developed clearly evident anti-FIV humoral
and cell-mediated immune responses. Anti-FIV antibodies were first
detected 1 month after the second dose of immunogen and peaked after
the third dose, though they never reached the titers observed with more
complex immunogens (27, 28). Antibodies, however, started to
decline soon in spite of the administration of a fourth dose of
immunogen, so that by 4 months after completion of the immunization
cycle, their titers were low. Interestingly, FIV-RBC-immunized animals
had immunoblotting profiles that differed considerably from those of
FIV-infected cats and even those of cats vaccinated with infected cells
(data not shown) in that they produced stronger bands specific for the
SUgp and much fainter bands against internal capsid antigen p25, thus
showing that FIV-RBC had preferentially stimulated the responses to the
surface antigens of FIV. However, the sera taken at the time of
challenge lacked detectable FIV neutralizing antibodies, similar to
what was observed following vaccination with fixed, infected cells
(28). The development of cell-mediated immunity in the
vaccines was monitored by examining the lymphoproliferative response of
PBMC on repeated occasions. As judged from the proportion of reactive
cats and from the SIs observed, this response was as well developed as
in previous studies in which we used more complex vaccines and the same
assay conditions (27, 28), thus suggesting that the delivery
system used may be especially effective in eliciting cell-mediated
immune responses, though further studies are needed to prove this
point.
To assess whether the immune responses evoked by FIV-RBC had protective
value, 4 months after completion of the immunization schedule,
FIV-RBC-immunized and control cats were challenged with ex vivo FIV.
All four controls became consistently FIV positive by PCR throughout
the 12-month follow-up, though only two became productively infected.
On the other hand, of the four FIV-RBC-vaccinated cats, none became
productively infected and two proved PCR positive only in one occasion
during the 12-month follow-up. Thus, although the results of the
experiment could not be considered conclusive due to the partial
success of the challenge, the outcomes in the groups of animals were
sufficiently different as to indicate that FIV-RBC-immunized cats not
only had responded immunologically to FIV but were also at least partly
protected from FIV challenge.
Sixteen months after the first challenge, the animals that had escaped
productive infection (four vaccinated and two mock vaccinated) were
given an additional dose of immunogen which elicited a rapid anamnestic
immune response. Anti-FIV antibodies, that had become barely detectable
with time, increased rapidly so that by 2 months, they reached levels
higher than those found at the same time after primary immunization,
and lymphoproliferative indices also increased. Two months after the
booster, the animals were rechallenged and the mock-vaccinated cats
rapidly became virus isolation, as well as PCR, positive. After this
challenge, three FIV-RBC-immunized cats became infected as promptly as
the controls and with similar viral loads, thus showing that there was
little, if any, residual protective immunity. Also, the protection against FIV induced by a fixed-cell vaccine has been shown to be
short-lived and difficult to recall once it has waned (27).
The present experiment was conducted by using a series of precautions
designed to avoid, or at least minimize, possible artifacts that might
be associated with the use of tissue culture-adapted virus for vaccine
preparation and challenge, such as reduced virulence of the challenge
virus (2, 40) and the presence of similar host cell
derived-antigens on the vaccine and the challenge virus (9,
38). Precautions included the use for the vaccine of a
preparation of a primary isolate of FIV propagated a limited number of
times in vitro and solely in nontransformed lymphoid cells and ex vivo
challenge with a virus never passaged in vitro. In previous experiments
using the same precautions (27, 28), cellular antigens were
ruled out as possible mediators of protective anti-FIV immunity. Thus,
it seems unlikely that host cell-derived antigens were significantly
involved in the observed protection. However, we also made direct
attempts to characterize the FIV antigens that were biotinylated and
therefore presumably present in the FIV-RBC inocula. By probing with
streptavidin, two proteins with apparent molecular masses of 65 to 68 kDa and one protein with a molecular mass of about 170 kDa, determined
by SDS-PAGE, were found to be highly biotinylated. The former proteins
had mobility and staining properties compatible with those of the SUgp
of FIV; thus, also in the light of the immunoblotting profiles exhibited by the FIV-RBC-immunized cats, we can conclude that the FIV
SUgp was well represented in the inocula. The 170-kDa protein was much
less abundant, as judged from the size of the streptavidin-stained
band, but was markedly immunogenic in cats, as shown by the immunoblots
of FIV-RBC-immunized cats. This protein was probably nonviral in
origin, since it had an electrophoretic mobility incompatible with
those of mature FIV-encoded proteins and was not seen when sera of
FIV-infected cats were used. Primate lentiviruses are known to
incorporate several cell-derived proteins in their envelope (1,
8), and it is feasible that also FIV does, though no direct
information about this issue exists. Thus, it is likely that the
170-kDa protein was cell derived. Further studies are needed to
characterize the host cell proteins incorporated by the FIV envelope.
The data also showed that internal capsid protein p25, by far the most
abundant component of the FIV virion, was poorly represented among the
biotinylated proteins, thus confirming that the method used had
preferentially biotinylated FIV surface components.
In conclusion, this study has shown that immunization of cats with
homologous RBC coated with minute amounts of FIV antigens via
biotin-avidin-biotin bridges induced clearly evident FIV-specific immune responses that, judged from immunoblotting profiles, were directed mainly to the SUgp. The results have also shown that, following primary immunization with this method, cats were at least
partially protected from ex vivo FIV challenge, thus confirming that
the surface antigens of FIV are of paramount importance for the
induction of protective immunity. Finally, the results have corroborated observations that vaccine-induced protection against FIV
tends to be short-lived and may be difficult to restimulate. Clearly,
novel approaches of immunization should be pursued that may provide a
response to these important limitations of current immunization
methods.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
This work was supported by grants from the Ministero della
Sanità
Istituto Superiore di Sanità (Progetto Allestimento
Modelli Animali per l'AIDS) and the Ministero della Università
Ricerca Tecnologica, Rome, Italy.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Virology
Section, Department of Biomedicine, University of Pisa, Via San Zeno
37, I-56127 Pisa, Italy. Phone: 39-50-553562. Fax: 39-50-556455. E-mail: bendinelli{at}biomed.unipi.it.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Arthur, L. O.,
J. W. Bess, Jr.,
R. C. Sowder II,
R. E. Benveniste,
D. L. Mann,
J.-C. Chermann, and L. E. Henderson.
1992.
Cellular proteins bound to immunodeficiency viruses: implications for pathogenesis and vaccines.
Science
258:1935-1938[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 2.
|
Baldinotti, F.,
D. Matteucci,
P. Mazzetti,
C. Giannelli,
P. Bandecchi,
F. Tozzini, and M. Bendinelli.
1994.
Serum neutralization of feline immunodeficiency virus is markedly dependent on passage history of the virus and host system.
J. Virol.
68:4572-4579[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 3.
|
Beatty, A. J.,
B. J. Willett,
E. A. Gault, and O. Jarrett.
1996.
A longitudinal study of feline immunodeficiency virus-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes in experimentally infected cats, using antigen-specific induction.
J. Virol.
70:6199-6206[Abstract].
|
| 4.
|
Bendinelli, M.,
M. Pistello,
S. Lombardi,
A. Poli,
C. Garzelli,
D. Matteucci,
L. Ceccherini-Nelli,
G. Malvaldi, and F. Tozzini.
1995.
Feline immunodeficiency virus: an interesting model for AIDS studies and an important cat pathogen.
Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
8:87-120[Abstract].
|
| 5.
|
Bishop, S. A.,
C. R. Stokes,
T. J. Gruffydd-Jones,
C. V. Whiting,
J. E. Humphries,
R. Osborne,
M. Papanastasopoulou, and D. A. Harbour.
1996.
Vaccination with fixed feline immunodeficiency virus (FIV) infected cells: protection, breakthrough and specificity of response.
Vaccine
14:1243-1250[Medline].
|
| 6.
|
Bolognesi, D. P.
1995.
The dilemma of developing and testing AIDS vaccines, p. 301-312.
In
G. M. Cooper, R. G. Temin, and B. Sugden (ed.), The DNA provirus: Howard Temin's scientific legacy. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C.
|
| 7.
|
Cammarota, G.,
D. Matteucci,
M. Pistello,
E. Nicoletti,
S. Giannecchini, and M. Bendinelli.
1996.
Reduced sensitivity to strain-specific neutralization of laboratory-adapted feline immunodeficiency virus after one passage in vivo: association with amino acid substitutions in the V4 region of the surface glycoprotein.
AIDS Res. Hum. Retroviruses
12:173-175[Medline].
|
| 8.
|
Capobianchi, M. R.,
S. Fais,
C. Castilletti,
M. Gentile,
F. Ameglio,
P. Cordiali Fei,
S. M. Santini, and F. Dianzani.
1994.
A simple and reliable method to detect cell membrane proteins on infectious human immunodeficiency virus type 1 particles.
J. Infect. Dis.
169:886-889[Medline].
|
| 9.
|
Chan, W. L.,
A. Rodgers,
C. Grief,
N. Almond,
S. Ellis,
B. Flanagan,
P. Silvera,
J. Bootman,
J. Stott,
K. Kent, and R. Bomford.
1995.
Immunization with class I human histocompatibility leukocyte antigen can protect macaques against challenge infection with SIVmac-32H.
AIDS
9:223-228[Medline].
|
| 10.
|
Chiarantini, L.,
R. Argnani,
S. Zucchini,
L. Stevanata,
P. Zabordi,
M. P. Grossi,
M. Magnani, and R. Manservigi.
1997.
Red blood cells as delivery system for recombinant HSV-1 glycoprotein B: immunogenicity and protection in mice.
Vaccine
17:276-280.
|
| 11.
|
Chiarantini, L., and M. Magnani.
1996.
Immobilization of enzymes and proteins on red blood cells, p. 143-152.
In
G. F. Bekerstaff (ed.), Methods in molecular biotechnology, vol. 1. Humana Press, Totowa, N.J.
|
| 12.
|
Dzaudu, J. K.,
M. E. Deh,
D. L. Barratt, and G. E. Wise.
1984.
Detection of erythrocyte membrane proteins, sialoglycoproteins, and lipids in the same polyacrylamide gel using a double-staining technique.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
81:1733-1737[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 13.
|
Egberink, H. F.,
L. Keldermans,
N. Schuurman,
J. Stam,
W. Hesselink,
A. van Vliet,
E. Verschoor,
M. Horzinek, and A. de Ronde.
1994.
Monoclonal antibodies to immunodominant and neutralizing domains of the envelope surface protein of feline immunodeficiency virus.
J. Gen. Virol.
75:889-893[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 14.
|
Elder, J. H., and T. R. Phillips.
1995.
Feline immunodeficiency virus as a model for development of molecular approaches to intervention strategies against lentivirus infections.
Adv. Virus Res.
45:225-247[Medline].
|
| 15.
|
Giannecchini, S.,
D. Matteucci,
P. Mazzetti, and M. Bendinelli.
1996.
Incubation time for feline immunodeficiency virus cultures.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
34:2036-2038[Abstract].
|
| 16.
|
Hilleman, M. R.
1995.
Whether and when an AIDS vaccine?
Nature Med.
1:1126-1129[Medline].
|
| 17.
|
Hosie, M. J.,
T. H. Dunsford,
A. de Ronde,
B. J. Willett,
C. A. Cannon,
J. C. Neil, and O. Jarrett.
1996.
Suppression of virus burden by immunization with feline immunodeficiency virus Env protein.
Vaccine
14:405-411[Medline].
|
| 18.
|
Hosie, M. J., and J. N. Flynn.
1996.
Feline immunodeficiency virus vaccination: characterization of the immune correlates of protection.
J. Virol.
70:7561-7568[Abstract].
|
| 19.
|
Hosie, M. J.,
R. Osborne,
J. K. Yamamoto,
J. C. Neil, and O. Jarrett.
1995.
Protection against homologous but not heterologous challenge induced by inactivated feline immunodeficiency virus vaccines.
J. Virol.
69:1253-1255[Abstract].
|
| 20.
|
Hosie, M. J., and J. K. Yamamoto.
1995.
Vaccination against FIV, p. 263-278.
In
B. Willett, and O. Jarrett (ed.), Feline immunology and immunodeficiency. Oxford University Press, Oxford, England.
|
| 21.
|
Lombardi, S.,
C. Garzelli,
C. La Rosa,
L. Zaccaro,
S. Specter,
G. Malvaldi,
F. Tozzini,
F. Esposito, and M. Bendinelli.
1993.
Identification of a linear neutralization site within the third variable region of the feline immunodeficiency virus envelope.
J. Virol.
67:4742-4749[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 22.
|
Lombardi, S.,
C. Garzelli,
M. Pistello,
C. Massi,
D. Matteucci,
F. Baldinotti,
G. Cammarota,
L. Da Prato,
P. Bandecchi,
F. Tozzini, and M. Bendinelli.
1994.
A neutralizing antibody-inducing peptide of the V3 domain of feline immunodeficiency virus envelope glycoprotein does not induce protective immunity.
J. Virol.
68:8374-8379[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 23.
|
Lutz, H.,
R. Hofmann-Lehman,
K. Bauer-Pham,
E. Holznagel,
F. Tozzini,
M. Bendinelli,
G. Reubel,
A. Aubert,
D. Davis,
B. Cox, and E. Young.
1995.
FIV vaccine studies. I. Immune response to recombinant FIV env gene products and outcome after challenge infection.
Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol.
46:103-113[Medline].
|
| 24.
|
Magnani, M.,
L. Chiarantini, and U. Mancini.
1994.
Preparation and characterization of biotinylated erythrocytes.
Biotechnol. Appl. Biochem.
20:335-345.
|
| 25.
|
Magnani, M.,
L. Chiarantini,
E. Vittoria,
U. Mancini,
L. Rossi, and A. Fazi.
1992.
Red blood cells as an antigen-delivery system.
Biotechnol. Appl. Biochem.
16:188-194[Medline].
|
| 26.
|
Massi, C.,
S. Lombardi,
E. Indino,
D. Matteucci,
C. La Rosa,
F. Esposito,
C. Garzelli, and M. Bendinelli.
1997.
Most potential linear B-cell epitopes of Env glycoproteins of feline immunodeficiency virus are immunologically silent in mice.
AIDS Res. Hum. Retroviruses
13:1121-1129[Medline].
|
| 27.
|
Matteucci, D.,
M. Pistello,
P. Mazzetti,
S. Giannecchini,
D. Del Mauro,
I. Lonetti,
L. Zaccaro,
C. Pollera,
S. Specter, and M. Bendinelli.
1997.
Studies of AIDS vaccination using an ex vivo feline immunodeficiency virus model: protection conferred by a fixed-cell vaccine against cell-free and cell-associated challenge differs in duration and is not easily boosted.
J. Virol.
71:8368-8376[Abstract].
|
| 28.
|
Matteucci, D.,
M. Pistello,
P. Mazzetti,
S. Giannecchini,
D. Del Mauro,
L. Zaccaro,
P. Bandecchi,
F. Tozzini, and M. Bendinelli.
1996.
Vaccination protects against in vivo-grown feline immunodeficiency virus even in the absence of detectable neutralizing antibodies.
J. Virol.
70:617-622[Abstract].
|
| 29.
|
Moore, J., and A. Trkola.
1997.
HIV type 1 coreceptors, neutralization serotypes, and vaccine development.
AIDS Res. Hum. Retroviruses
13:733-736[Medline].
|
| 30.
|
Moore, J. P., and D. D. Ho.
1995.
HIV-1 neutralization: the consequences of viral adaptation to growth on transformed T cells.
AIDS
9:S117-S136.
|
| 31.
|
Pedersen, N. C.
1993.
Feline immunodeficiency virus infection, p. 191-228.
In
J. A. Levy (ed.), The retroviruses, vol. 2. Plenum Press, New York, N.Y.
|
| 32.
|
Pistello, M.,
S. Menzo,
M. Giorgi,
L. Da Prato,
G. Cammarota,
M. Clementi, and M. Bendinelli.
1994.
Competitive polymerase chain reaction for quantitating feline immunodeficiency virus load in infected cat tissues.
Mol. Cell. Probes
8:229-234[Medline].
|
| 33.
|
Poignard, P.,
P. J. Klasse, and Q. J. Sattentau.
1996.
Antibody neutralization of HIV-1.
Immunol. Today
17:239-246[Medline].
|
| 34.
|
Richardson, J.,
I. Fossati,
A. Moraillon,
S. Castelot,
P. Sonigo, and G. Pancino.
1996.
Neutralization sensitivity and accessibility of continuous B cell epitopes of the feline immunodeficiency virus envelope.
J. Gen. Virol.
77:759-777[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 35.
|
Rigby, M. A.,
N. Mackay,
G. Reid,
R. Osborne,
J. C. Neil, and O. Jarrett.
1996.
Immunogenicity of a peptide from a major neutralising determinant of the feline immunodeficiency virus surface glycoprotein.
Vaccine
14:1095-1102[Medline].
|
| 36.
|
Siebelink, K. H. J.,
W. Huisman,
J. A. Karlas,
G. F. Rimmelzwaan,
M. L. Bosch, and A. D. M. E. Osterhaus.
1995.
Neutralization of feline immunodeficiency virus by polyclonal feline antibody: simultaneous involvement of hypervariable regions 4 and 5 of the surface glycoprotein.
J. Virol.
69:5124-5127[Abstract].
|
| 37.
|
Siebelink, K. H. J.,
E. Tijhaar,
R. C. Huisman,
W. Huisman,
A. de Ronde,
I. H. Darby,
M. J. Francis,
G. F. Rimmelzwaan, and A. D. M. E. Osterhaus.
1995.
Enhancement of feline immunodeficiency virus infection after immunization with envelope glycoprotein subunit vaccines.
J. Virol.
69:3704-3711[Abstract].
|
| 38.
|
Stott, E. J.
1991.
Anti-cell antibody in macaques.
Nature
353:393[Medline].
|
| 39.
|
Verschoor, E. J.,
M. J. Willemse,
J. G. Stam,
A. L. W. van Vliet,
H. Pouwels,
S. K. Chalmers,
M. C. Horzinek,
P. J. A. Sondermeijer,
W. Hesselink, and A. de Ronde.
1996.
Evaluation of subunit vaccines against feline immunodeficiency virus infection.
Vaccine
14:285-289[Medline].
|
| 40.
|
Willett, B. J.,
J. N. Flynn, and M. J. Hosie.
1997.
FIV infection of the domestic cat: an animal model for AIDS.
Immunol. Today
18:182-189[Medline].
|
| 41.
|
Yamamoto, J. K.,
T. Hohdatsu,
R. A. Holmsted,
R. Pu,
H. Louie,
H. A. Zochlinski,
V. Acevedo,
H. M. Johnson,
G. A. Soulds, and M. B. Gardner.
1993.
Experimental vaccine protection against homologous and heterologous strains of feline immunodeficiency virus.
J. Virol.
67:601-605[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology, March 1998, p. 235-241, Vol. 5, No. 2
1071-412X/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Corinti, S., Chiarantini, L., Dominici, S., Laguardia, M. E., Magnani, M., Girolomoni, G.
(2002). Erythrocytes deliver Tat to interferon-{gamma}-treated human dendritic cells for efficient initiation of specific type 1 immune responses in vitro. J. Leukoc. Biol.
71: 652-658
[Abstract]
[Full Text]