Previous Article | Next Article 
Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology, May 1998, p. 325-327, Vol. 5, No. 3
1071-412X/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Serological, Hematologic, and PCR Studies of Cattle
in an Area of Switzerland in Which Tick-Borne Fever (Caused
by Ehrlichia phagocytophila) Is Endemic
Nicola
Pusterla,*
Jeannine Berger
Pusterla,
Ueli
Braun, and
Hans
Lutz
Department of Veterinary Internal Medicine,
University of Zurich, CH-8057 Zurich, Switzerland
Received 2 September 1997/Returned for modification 5 November
1997/Accepted 9 March 1998
 |
ABSTRACT |
The purpose of this study was to examine the seasonal variations in
seroprevalence to Ehrlichia phagocytophila in cattle
pastured during the summer months in an area where tick-borne fever is endemic. The study was performed during a 1-year period from April 1996 to March 1997 and involved 34 cows, 22 pregnant heifers, and 14 calves.
Blood samples, collected from all 70 cattle once a month, were used to
determine serum immunoglobulin G titers by indirect immunofluorescence.
In addition, blood smears were examined for Ehrlichia
organisms, and PCR amplification was performed for the molecular
detection of E. phagocytophila. Prior to the pasture
period, the seroprevalence was 16%. Two weeks after the start of
pasturing, it was 43%, after which it progressively increased and
reached a maximum of 63% in September. The seroprevalence progressively decreased after the end of pasturing to a low of 23%.
The variation in antibody titers was similar to that of seroprevalence. E. phagocytophila organisms were detected in blood smears
of 7 animals and by nested PCR in 12. Only four cows, which were on the
pastures of endemicity for the first time, had clinical signs of
ehrlichiosis. This study demonstrated marked seasonal variations in
seroprevalence and in serum titers of antibody to E. phagocytophila in cattle. The incidence of clinical signs of
ehrlichiosis was increased in cattle grazing on the pastures of
endemicity for the first time.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Ehrlichia phagocytophila
is the cause of tick-borne fever, a disease of cattle characterized by
pyrexia, decreased milk production, respiratory symptoms, and abortion
(3). This obligate intracellular agent is transmitted
naturally by the tick Ixodes ricinus. The disease occurs in
most European countries, where its distribution is usually localized.
In Switzerland, tick-borne fever was first reported in the Bernese
Oberland (6). In a recent serological study involving 2,557 clinically healthy cattle from the eastern and central regions of
Switzerland, 32 natural foci of tick-borne fever were identified. These
foci represented areas with optimal conditions for the vector
(7). The seroprevalence was dependent on several factors,
including seasonal occurrence of ticks and pasture management. Clinical
cases peak during spring and autumn when ticks are most active. In
alpine regions, clinical cases are common during the early and late
pasture periods, when meadows in wooded areas are grazed. Clinical
cases are rare during midseason, when cattle are on alpine pastures
above the tree line (8).
The purpose of this study was to investigate seasonal variations of the
seroprevalence to E. phagocytophila in a region endemic for
this agent and to monitor the number of diseased cattle by use of
serial hematologic examinations and nested PCR.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Animals.
This study was performed from April 1996 to March
1997 and involved 34 cows, 22 pregnant heifers, and 14 calves from two
different farms in a region endemic for E. phagocytophila in
central Switzerland. The cattle belonged to the Swiss Brown breed and
were between 3 months and 12 years old at the start of the study.
During the winter the animals were housed in stalls. From the middle of
May until the end of September 1996, all 70 cattle were put on a 50-ha community pasture in a subalpine-to-alpine region, 1,250 to 1,700 m
above sea level. This pasture was surrounded by wooded areas and
contained brush and ferns. It was the first time that all of the
calves, two of the heifers, and eight of the cows had been on the
pastures of endemicity, whereas the remaining cattle had been there
during two or more pasture periods. During the pasture period, the
cattle were examined once a month for tick infestation, which was
scored as mild (<10 ticks/animal), moderate (10 to 30 ticks/animal),
or severe (>30 ticks/animal). The incidence of tick-borne fever was
monitored by the herdpersons, who notified us when cattle with clinical
signs of tick-borne fever were observed.
Serological and hematologic examinations.
At the beginning
of each month, blood was collected from all 70 cattle from a jugular
vein into evacuated glass tubes with and without anticoagulant (Becton
Dickinson Vacutainer; Aichele Medico AG). Serum samples were examined
for immunoglobulin G (IgG) to E. phagocytophila by indirect
immunofluorescence using E. phagocytophila as antigen (Swiss
strain) and fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated rabbit anti-bovine
IgG as conjugated antisera (RAB/FITC; Nordic Immunological Laboratories
b.v., Tilburg, The Netherlands). The cutoff titer was set at
20 as
described previously (7). Smears made from EDTA blood were
stained with May-Grünwald Giemsa stain, and 500 leukocytes were
examined under oil immersion for the presence of intracytoplasmic
inclusion bodies characteristic of E. phagocytophila.
Nested PCR.
Heparinized blood samples (10 ml) were collected
from each animal. The procurement of a leukocyte pellet, the isolation
of DNA, and the procedure of nested PCR were done as described
previously (9). Products from nested PCR were resolved on
1.2% agarose gels, stained with ethidium bromide, and examined under
UV illumination.
 |
RESULTS |
Prior to pasturing, 59 (84%) of the cattle had titers of <20 and
11 (16%) had titers of 20 or 40; the latter comprised six cows and
five heifers, which had been on the pastures of endemicity for at least
one pasture period. Two weeks after the start of pasturing, the
seroprevalence was 43%. During the following months, there was a
progressive increase in the seroprevalence, which reached a maximum of
63% at the end of the pasture period. After the pasture period, the
seroprevalence decreased and in March of the following year was 23%
(Table 1).
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 1.
Seroprevalence of 70 calves, heifers, and cows in an area
endemic for tick-borne fever from April 1996 to March 1997
|
|
There was an increase in titers parallel to the increase in
seroprevalence. Towards the end of the stable period, titers were generally as low as 40. Shortly after the start of the pasture period,
the titers began to increase and reached a maximum in August and
September. Thereafter, the titers decreased progressively and ranged
from 20 to 640 in November, from 20 to 160 in January, and from 20 to
40 in March (Table 2). There were no
differences in seroprevalence and titers between cattle that were
pastured for the first time and those that had been on the pastures of endemicity before.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 2.
Serum titers of IgG to E. phagocytophila in 70 calves, heifers, and cows in an area endemic for tick-borne fever
from April 1996 to March 1997
|
|
E. phagocytophila inclusion bodies were detected in blood
smears of five heifers and two cows (Table
3). In six animals this occurred 2 weeks
after the start of the pasture period, and in one it occurred 10 weeks
after the start. All animals were asymptomatic at the time of blood
collection. It was the second season for these heifers and the first
season for these cows on the pastures of endemicity.
Nested PCR yielded products of 928 bp amplified from E. phagocytophila DNA in 12 cattle (Table 3). These included the
seven cattle that had inclusion bodies and an additional heifer and four cows. The latter had been on the pastures of endemicity during at
least one previous summer, and the positive PCR product occurred 2 weeks after the move to the pasture. Clinical signs were not observed
in any of the cattle at the time of blood collection. The antibody
titer in animals positive by blood smear and/or PCR was
20 and
reached the highest level 30 to 60 days later. None of the 70 animals
had detectable positive blood smears or PCR results prior to pasturing
or during the following stall period.
Tick infestation was assessed as moderate in May and June, mild in July
and August, and severe in September. Four cows had clinical signs
typical of tick-borne fever (drop in milk yield and pyrexia) combined
with E. phagocytophila inclusion bodies in circulating
neutrophils and were treated with tetracycline. These cows were on the
pastures of endemicity for the first time. Two cows developed clinical
signs 1 day after the monthly blood collection, 2 and 10 weeks after
moving to the pastures of endemicity, respectively. In these two cows,
E. phagocytophila was identified by blood smear and PCR
(Table 3). One of the cows became ill 4 weeks after being moved to the
pastures of endemicity, and the other became ill 16 weeks after the
move. At the time of the subsequent blood collection 2 weeks later,
these two cows had negative blood smears and negative PCR results.
 |
DISCUSSION |
These investigations have demonstrated marked seasonal variations
in seroprevalence and serum titers of IgG to E. phagocytophila in cattle. The marked increase in seroprevalence in
June, merely 2 weeks after the move to the pastures of endemicity,
indicates that numerous cattle had contact with E. phagocytophila during this short period. Other cattle were
probably still in the incubation period. Previous studies have shown
that seroconversion occurs 6 to 11 days after infection under natural
as well as experimental conditions (9, 13). The progressive
increase in seroprevalence in the months of July and August can be
explained by the fact that these cattle, in contrast to other alpine
farming practices, were not moved to higher, tick-free meadows. The
peak in seroprevalence occurred in September, which can be explained by
a seasonal increase in tick activity. In Switzerland, ticks are most
active in spring and autumn, when temperatures and humidity are
favorable. During the summer months, ticks move away from the higher
parts of the vegetation to seek a more favorable microclimate near the
ground (1). The progressive decrease in seroprevalence
during the following stable period can be explained by the lack of
antigenic stimulation and the natural decline in the antibody
concentration over a period of approximately 7 months. A decline in
titers of this magnitude corresponds to a half-life of bovine IgG of 17 to 22 days (11). Reports on seasonal variations in
seroprevalence to E. phagocytophila in domestic animals are
rare. A study of sheep in Scotland and the northern parts of England
showed a peak in seroprevalence (31.4%) in the month of July
(13).
We could clearly demonstrate that infection with E. phagocytophila occurred predominantly at the beginning of the
pasture period. Although a single hematologic and nested-PCR
examination per month does not permit a quantitative statement
regarding disease incidence, we were able to draw several important
conclusions from this study. As in a previous report (9),
nested PCR proved more sensitive compared to examination of blood
smears for inclusion bodies. Particularly in the early and late stages
of the disease, the number of inclusions may be too small for detection
by light microscopy. Furthermore, only 2 of the 12 animals with
positive PCR had clinical signs of tick-borne fever. These two cows had not been on the pastures of endemicity before. In the other 10 cattle
(6 heifers and 4 cows that had been on the pastures of endemicity
previously), clinical signs of ehrlichiosis were either missed or not
apparent. This suggests that the initial exposure to a pasture of
endemicity increases the risk of clinical ehrlichiosis and that
immunity acquired in the previous pasture season may be insufficient to
prevent infection with E. phagocytophila but sufficient to
prevent clinical signs. Interestingly, clinical signs of ehrlichiosis
were not observed in calves, although they were on the pastures of
endemicity for the first time. However, in contrast to lactating cows
and pregnant heifers, calves are generally subjected to less intensive
management and not monitored as regularly. Furthermore, in young
cattle, ehrlichiosis has a milder course than in older cattle, provided
that secondary infection does not occur (2, 4, 5, 10, 12).
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
This study was supported by the Kommission zur Förderung
des akademischen Nachwuchses.
We thank Walter Gasser and Andreas Gasser for letting us use their
cattle.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Klinik fur
Wiederkauer- und Pferdemedizin, Universitat Zurich, Winterthurerstrasse 260, CH-8057 Zurich, Switzerland. Phone: (41) 1 635 83 51. Fax: (41) 1 635 89 06. E-mail: pusterla{at}vetmed.unizh.ch.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Aeschlimann, A.
1972.
Ixodes ricinus, Linné, 1758 (Ixodoidea; Ixodidae): Essai préliminaire de synthèse sur la biologie de cette espèce en Suisse.
Acta Trop.
29:321-340[Medline].
|
| 2.
|
Foggie, A.
1956.
The effects of tick-borne fever infection on the susceptibility of lambs to staphylococci.
J. Comp. Pathol.
66:278-285.
|
| 3.
|
Hudson, J. R.
1950.
The recognition of tick-borne fever as a disease of cattle.
Br. Vet. J.
106:3-17.
|
| 4.
|
Jamieson, S.
1947.
Some aspects of immunity to tick-borne fever in hoggs.
Vet. Rec.
59:201-202.
|
| 5.
|
McEwen, A. D.
1947.
Tick-borne fever in young lambs.
Vet. Rec.
59:198-201.
|
| 6.
|
Pfister, K.,
A. Roesti,
P. H. Boss, and B. Balsiger.
1987.
Ehrlichia phagocytophila als Erreger des Weidefiebers im Berner Oberland.
Schweiz. Arch. Tierheilk.
129:343-347.
|
| 7.
|
Pusterla, N.,
C. Wolfensberger,
H. Lutz, and U. Braun.
1997.
Serological testing on the occurrence of bovine ehrlichiosis in the Cantons Zürich, Schaffhausen, Thurgau, St. Gallen and Obwalden.
Schweiz. Arch. Tierheilk.
139:543-549.
|
| 8.
|
Pusterla, N.,
B. Steiger,
U. Schorno, and U. Braun.
1997.
Bovine ehrlichiosis in central Switzerland.
Schweiz. Arch. Tierheilk.
139:392-396.
|
| 9.
|
Pusterla, N.,
J. Huder,
C. Wolfensberger,
U. Braun, and H. Lutz.
1997.
Laboratory findings in cows after experimental infection with Ehrlichia phagocytophila.
Clin. Diagn. Lab. Immunol.
4:643-647[Abstract].
|
| 10.
|
Pusterla, N.,
U. Braun,
C. Wolfensberger, and U. Lutz.
1997.
Intrauterine infection with Ehrlichia phagocytophila in a cow.
Vet. Rec.
141:101-102[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 11.
|
Tizard, I.
1987.
Veterinary immunology. W. B.
Saunders Company, Philadelphia, Pa.
|
| 12.
|
Tuomi, J.
1967.
Experimental studies on bovine tick-borne fever.
Acta Pathol. Microbiol. Scand.
70:429-445[Medline].
|
| 13.
|
Webster, K. A., and G. B. Mitchell.
1988.
Use of counter immunoelectrophoresis in detection of antibodies to tick-borne fever.
Res. Vet. Sci.
45:28-30[Medline].
|
Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology, May 1998, p. 325-327, Vol. 5, No. 3
1071-412X/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
MAGNARELLI, L. A., IJDO, J. W., SHERMAN, B. A., BUSHMICH, S. L., LEVY, S. A., FIKRIG, E.
(2002). Antibodies to granulocytic ehrlichiae in cattle from Connecticut. J Med Microbiol
51: 326-331
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Pusterla, N., Huder, J. B., Lutz, H., Braun, U.
(1998). Detection of Ehrlichia phagocytophila DNA in Ixodes ricinus Ticks from Areas in Switzerland Where Tick-Borne Fever Is Endemic. J. Clin. Microbiol.
36: 2735-2736
[Abstract]
[Full Text]