Previous Article | Next Article 
Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology, May 1998, p. 375-381, Vol. 5, No. 3
1071-412X/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Physiologic-Chemoattractant-Induced Migration of
Polymorphonuclear Leukocytes in Milk
Natasha
Manlongat,1
T. J.
Yang,1,*
L.
S.
Hinckley,1
Robert B.
Bendel,2 and
H.
M.
Krider3
Department of
Pathobiology,1
Center for Environmental
Health,2 and
Department of Molecular and
Cell Biology,3 The University of Connecticut,
Storrs, Connecticut 06269-3089
Received 3 July 1997/Returned for modification 23 September
1997/Accepted 29 January 1998
 |
ABSTRACT |
The somatic cell count (SCC; leukocytes and epithelial cells) in
milk is used as an indicator of udder health status. A SCC above the
regulatory standard is generally considered as an indication of
mastitis. Therefore, milk with a SCC equal to or greater than the
regulatory limit cannot be sold to the public because it is unsuitable
for human consumption. This study was performed to determine whether
SCC levels above the regulatory limit observed in goats during late
lactation are a physiologic or a pathological response of the goat
mammary gland. Differential counts of cells in nonmastitic goat milk
samples during late lactation revealed that approximately 80% of the
cells were polymorphonuclear leukocytes (PMNs). In addition,
microchemotaxis assay results indicated that normal nonmastitic
late-lactation-stage goat milk is significantly higher
(P < 0.001) in PMN chemotactic activity than
early-lactation-stage goat milk, with a mean chemotactic activity of
14.9 and 42.7/mg of protein for early and late lactation stages,
respectively. Physicochemical analyses also suggest that the PMN
infiltration observed in normal late-lactation-stage goat milk is due
to a PMN chemotactic factor(s) that is different from the PMN
chemotactic factor(s) present in mastitic milk. Interestingly, the PMN
chemotactic factor in late-lactation-stage goat milk is highly acid
resistant (pH 2), suggesting that the factor is able to survive the
highly acidic gastric environment and may therefore be important in the augmentation of the immune systems of sucklings. These results indicate
that the chemotactic factor(s) present in the milk of normal
late-lactation-stage goats is nonpathological and may play a
physiologic regulatory role in mammary gland involution. Hence, the
regulatory standard for goat milk needs to be redefined in order to
reflect this.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Chemotactic cytokines have been
shown to modulate leukocyte infiltration in a variety of diseases
(4, 12, 46). In particular, chemokines, a group of
chemotactic cytokines whose hallmark is the conservation of four
cysteine residues, have been implicated in numerous inflammatory
conditions. Interleukin-8 (IL-8), monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 (MCP-1), and macrophage inflammatory protein 1 alpha (MIP-1
) have
been shown to be involved in diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis,
septic shock, gastric cancer, asthma, cystic fibrosis, inflammatory
bowel disease, alcoholic hepatitis, glomerulonephritis, and
atherosclerosis (2, 7, 24, 25, 30, 41). More recently, the
chemokine coreceptor CCR5 has been shown to be important for human
immunodeficiency virus entry into cells (43). Increasing
evidence also suggests that chemotactic cytokines are present in milk
(11, 13, 15, 38, 42). Skansen-Saphir and coworkers
(38) reported that lipopolysaccharide-stimulated milk
mononuclear cells (MNCs) induced extensive production of the
chemotactic cytokines IL-8 and tumor necrosis factor alpha in addition
to other cytokines. As evidenced by these studies, chemotactic cytokine
production is almost always associated with pathological conditions
(35). Few studies have focused on evidence suggesting
chemotactic cytokine involvement in normal physiologic processes.
During the course of mastitis, the release of chemotactic cytokines
results in the infiltration of somatic cells into the mammary gland.
"Somatic cells" is a term which refers to the leukocytes, specifically lymphocytes, macrophages, and polymorphonuclear leukocytes (PMNs), in addition to the small percentage of epithelial cells that is
present in milk (31). This local population of somatic cells
serves as one of the most important defense mechanisms of the mammary
gland against infection. Numerous studies have shown that the somatic
cell count (SCC) of mammary secretions is directly correlated to
infection status (8, 22, 36). As such, the SCC is used by
the dairy industry as a reliable indicator of mastitis and milk
quality. The major factor influencing the SCC is an infection of the
mammary gland (17, 31). The SCC of milk from an uninfected bovine udder is usually less than 200,000/ml. During inflammation however, the SCC of mammary secretions increases to millions per milliliter (31). According to official regulatory standards, analysis of bulk-tank milk samples from a given herd needs to be
performed once a month. Goat milk samples having SCCs of 1 million
cells/ml or higher on three consecutive tests are rejected and are
prohibited from being sold. Cow milk samples are rejected at a SCC
equal to or greater than 750,000 cells/ml.
Interestingly, numerous investigators have reported that SCC values
above the regulatory limit are commonly observed in nonmastitic goat
milk during late lactation. Dulin and coworkers (9) reported that total SCCs and the percentage of PMNs in goat milk increased as
lactation progressed for both infected and uninfected glands, and as a
result, the percentages of lymphocytes and macrophages decreased. These
findings have been confirmed by other researchers (20). A
study of uninfected goat milk revealed that milk samples from only
34.5% of producers were under the caprine regulatory limit of 1 million cells/ml (8). PMNs were prevalent in these samples,
comprising 87% of the leukocyte populations in late-stage milk,
despite the absence of infection. In another study, 71% of the samples
exceeded the regulatory limit during the last 3 months of lactation
(45). This phenomenon was observed despite the absence of
signs and symptoms of mastitis in any of the does with SCCs of over 1 million/ml. Bacteriological tests of the samples showed only a trace
(<5 CFU/ml) of mastitis-causing pathogens, if they were present at
all. More importantly, examination of late-lactation-stage mammary
gland tissue revealed that there was no histological or pathological
evidence of tissue injury in the does with SCCs of >0.9, 1.5, and 3.3 million/ml (44). These data indicated that high SCCs were
prevalent and that increased PMNs in goat milk during late lactation
contributed to the high SCCs.
Few studies have attempted to explain the basis for the increase in
SCCs and the predominance of PMNs during late lactation in goats
(8, 9, 44, 45). The physiologic cause(s) for this phenomenon
needs to be established. The aim of our study was to determine the
causes of the increase in SCCs and the prevalence of PMNs in
late-lactation-stage goat milk. Specifically, the focus was on the
detection of lactation stage-dependent leukocyte chemotactic activity
in mammary secretions of the goat. We provide evidence that a
physiologic chemotactic factor(s) in the mammary gland is responsible
for the increase in SCC and PMN infiltration in the mammary secretions
of goats in the absence of mastitis at the late lactation stage.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Milk samples.
Twelve 2-year-old Anglo-Nubian dairy goats
were used for these studies (10 from farm 1 and 2 from farm 2). All
animals received hay and water ad libitum and grain (Blue Seal Foods,
Inc., Londonderry, N.H.) twice a day. All the goats tested negative for
caprine arthritis and encephalitis virus and were clinically free of
mastitis throughout the sampling period. Samples with bacterial growths
on blood agar plates were designated as subclinical mastitic milk
samples. Samples with five or more colonies of the same type in
conjunction with a cell count of
1 million cells/ml were defined as
(clinical) mastitic samples (National Mastitis Council standard). All
mastitic samples (clinical and subclinical) were excluded from data
analysis unless otherwise stated. The goats were milked twice daily at the same time each day, and milk production was recorded daily. Mammary
gland secretions from udder halves of each animal were collected at
weekly intervals beginning at parturition and continuing until the end
of the lactation cycle (i.e., involution, beginning of the dry period,
or weaning). Aliquots of the weekly samples were then processed by the
Diagnostic Testing Services at the University of Connecticut for
bacteriological analysis and direct microscopic SCC. For the assay of
chemotactic activity, secretions were first centrifuged at 700 × g for 25 min. Following removal of the cell pellet and fat
layer, the milk was respun at 1,000 × g for 1 h,
the fat layer was removed, and the whey was then stored at
20°C.
Prior to being tested, the samples were thawed and centrifuged again at
1,500 × g for 10 min to remove any residual fat and
cell debris and then sterilized with a 0.45-µm-pore-size Millipore
membrane (Micron Separations Inc., Westborough, Mass.).
Milk cell enumeration.
The cellular portion of the milk was
separated from other milk components by centrifugation as described
above. The cell pellet was then washed twice in phosphate (0.01 M)-buffered saline (PBS) (pH 7.2) containing 10 mM glucose by
centrifugation at 500 × g for 10 min. Following the
washing, the cell viability was determined by the trypan blue exclusion
method. Slides for differential cell counting were then prepared by
cytocentrifugation and staining with Leukostat (Fisher Scientific,
Pittsburgh, Pa.). Two hundred cells per slide were identified and
counted as MNCs or PMNs.
Determination of protein concentration.
The total milk
protein concentration was determined by the bicinchoninic acid protein
assay (Pierce, Rockford, Ill.). The assay is based on the reaction of
copper with bicinchoninic acid. Dilutions of stock bovine serum albumin
(BSA) were used as protein standards, and the standard protocol
(incubation at 37°C for 30 min) was used. Absorbances were determined
at 562 nm on a SpectraMax 250 spectrophotometer (Molecular Devices,
Sunnyvale, Calif.).
Separation of MNCs by F-D.
Varying densities of
Ficoll-diatrizoate (F-D) were prepared by a technique modified from
Boyum (3). Briefly, 65 ml of a 9.5% solution of Ficoll
(type 400; Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, Mo.) was combined with 40 ml
of a 34% solution of sodium diatrizoate (Sigma Chemical Co.) and
adjusted to pH 7.2. The density was then determined with a hydrometer
(Fisher Scientific). Densities were adjusted to 1.090, 1.100, and 1.105 by the addition of sodium diatrizoate solution. The solutions were then
filter sterilized through a 0.45-µm-pore-size Millipore membrane. For
separation of MNCs, 3.0-ml aliquots of EDTA-treated caprine blood were
first centrifuged at 400 × g for 20 min. The buffy
coats were then isolated, diluted 1:4 with PBS, and layered over 3 ml
of F-D gradient with specific densities of 1.090, 1.100, and 1.105. Following centrifugation at 400 × g for 35 min, the
MNCs at the interface were collected and the numbers and percentages of
recovered lymphocytes and monocytes (approximately 98% lymphocytes and
2% monocytes) were compared.
PMN isolation.
For the assay of PMN chemotactic activity, 15 ml of EDTA-treated caprine blood was centrifuged at 400 × g for 20 min. Following the removal of the plasma, buffy
coat, and one-fourth of the erythrocyte pellet, PMNs were obtained by
lysing the remaining erythrocyte pellet with 10 ml of 0.2% sodium
chloride for 30 s, followed by 10 ml of 1.6% sodium chloride to
restore isotonicity. The PMNs obtained were then washed twice and
resuspended in PBS with glucose. The cell viability, as determined by
the trypan blue exclusion method, was consistently found to be over
95%. The cell preparation was approximately
97% PMNs. Heparin was
not used as an anticoagulant because it has been shown to bind
neutrophils and induce apoptosis (26).
Microchemotaxis assay of chemotactic activity in goat milk.
MNC and PMN populations isolated from caprine blood as described above
were resuspended in Hanks' balanced salt solution containing BSA
(0.05%) (Sigma Chemical Co.) at a concentration of 2 × 106 cells/ml. Chemotactic activities of goat milk from
different lactation stages were then assayed by using a 48-well
chemotaxis chamber (Neuroprobe, Cabin John, Md.) and a
polyvinylpyrrolidone-free micropore filter (pore size, 5 µm;
Poretics, Livermore, Calif.). Briefly, triplicate milk samples (30 µl) were added to the lower wells of the chamber, and responder cells
(PMNs and MNCs) were then added to the upper wells of the chamber
(105 cells/well). Mastitic goat milk and medium (Hanks'
balanced salt solution with 0.05% BSA) served as positive and negative
controls, respectively. Following incubation at 37°C for 30 min (for
PMNs) and 1 h and 30 min (for MNCs), the filter separating the
upper and lower chambers was removed.
After elimination of nonmigratory cells on the filter side in contact
with the upper well by using repeated washes with PBS and a wiper
blade, the filter was stained with Leukostat (Fisher Scientific). PMNs
and MNCs that migrated completely through the filter were counted with
an Olympus (Woodbury, N.Y.) AH-2 microscope and a model Q4-Cue-4 image
analyzer (Galai, Galai, Israel). The number of migrated cells was
determined by finding the binary threshold of the image acquired at a
total magnification of ×200. The results were expressed as the
mean ± standard deviation (SD) of triplicate chemotactic
differentials or triplicate chemotactic differentials per milligram of
protein, which are defined as follows: chemotactic differential = (number of cells migrated per field)
(number of cells migrating
randomly) and chemotactic differential per milligram of protein = (chemotactic differential × 103 × protein
concentration
1)/30, where 103 is the dilution
factor, 30 is the volume (in microliters) of goat whey loaded in the
microchemotaxis chamber, and protein concentration is measured in
milligrams per milliliter. For example, if the chemotactic differential
is 80 and the protein concentration is 75 mg/ml, then chemotactic
differential per milligram of protein = [80 × 103 × (1/75)]/30 = 35.56.
In order to determine whether goat milk induces chemotaxis or
chemokinesis of PMNs and MNCs, standard checkerboard analyses
were also
performed. Increasing dilutions of milk were placed
above and below the
filters so that various concentration gradients
were established across
the filters. After incubation, the filters
were analyzed as described
previously.
Physicochemical characterization of PMN chemoattractants in goat
milk. (i) Molecular mass.
For the assessment of possible
differences between the molecular masses of chemoattractants in normal
and mastitic milk, samples were dispensed into Microsep centrifugal
concentrators (Filtron, Northborough, Mass.) with cutoff filters of 3, 10, and 30 kDa and processed according to the manufacturer's
instructions. The chemotactic activities of various milk filtrate
fractions were then assayed by the microchemotaxis assay as described
previously. To examine the possibility that casein protein present in
the milk was responsible for any chemotactic activity detected in the
milk fractions, goat casein was also tested at the concentration present in normal milk (22 g/liter).
(ii) Heat stability.
The heat stability of normal and
mastitic milk fractions was assessed by heating the aliquots at 60°C
for 30 min. Chemotactic activities of the milk samples were then tested
as described above.
(iii) pH stability.
pH stability was assessed by treatment
of 1-ml aliquots of normal milk fractions with 1 N HCl or 1 N NaOH.
Extreme pH conditions (pH 2 and 11) were maintained for 30 min.
Subsequently, the pH was brought back to neutral with HCl and NaOH and
the milk fractions were concentrated to their original volumes by
ultrafiltration and then tested for chemotactic activity.
Statistical analysis.
Values for PMN and MNC chemotactic
activity per milligram of protein were analyzed by the mixed-model
analysis of variance (ANOVA) with the statistical software package SAS
(SAS Institute, Cary, N.C.) (both the GLM and MIXED procedures were
utilized). Sources of variations included the fixed effects of farm,
udder half, and stage of lactation and the random effects of individual goats. Expected mean squares with the random statement were
incorporated to establish the validity of the F tests in the
ANOVA, as some data were missing.
All mastitic samples were excluded from the analysis. Adjusted means
and standard errors are presented as appropriate estimates
of the means
of the population farm, udder half, and stage of
lactation and are
computed from the LSMEAN procedure in the MIXED
procedure in SAS.
Examination of the residuals indicated that
the log transformation
provided an appropriate transformation
of the data, as the residuals
were consistent with a normal distribution
(
P > 0.05 with the Shapiro-Wilk statistic).
 |
RESULTS |
SCC and milk volume.
In order to determine whether a
concentration effect was responsible for the increase in SCCs observed
by previous investigators, both milk volume and SCCs were analyzed
throughout the lactation cycle. As shown in Fig.
1, an inverse relationship between milk volume and SCC was observed. As the milk yield decreased toward the
late lactation stage, there was a concomitant increase in the SCC,
indicating that a concentration effect contributed, at least partially,
to the increase in the SCC during late lactation.

View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Concentration-dependent SCC increase in goat milk during
late lactation. The milk yield ( ) and SCC
( ) in goat milk were analyzed throughout the lactation
cycle. Milk yield values represent milk production of an udder half for
each animal per milking. SCCs were performed by the direct microscopic
SCC method. The data represent the mean ± the standard error of
the mean for 12 animals (n = 24 halves).
|
|
Differential counts of cells in goat milk.
To verify reports
by previous investigators on the increase in PMNs during late
lactation, we examined the leukocyte populations in milk throughout the
lactation cycle. Leukocyte populations in mammary secretions during the
lactation cycle are shown in Fig. 2.
During weeks 2 and 3 postpartum (transitional milk), MNCs were the
predominant cell type in milk (~80%). In contrast, normal (mature)
milk from the early lactation stage (weeks 4 to 18) was characterized
by slightly higher percentages of PMNs (~50%) than of MNCs
(~45%), although the differences were not significant (P > 0.05). A switch in leukocyte profiles occurred
during weeks 16 to 18. During this brief interval, MNCs were the
predominant cell population (~70%). A significant increase in the
proportion of PMNs (P < 0.05 compared to that in early
lactation) with a concomitant decrease in MNCs occurred during late
lactation (
19 weeks postpartum). During this stage, approximately
80% of the cells were PMNs (Fig. 2A and B).

View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Time course analysis of the cell populations in goat
milk during the lactation cycle. Leukostat-stained cytocentrifuge
smears of milk samples from each udder half were analyzed as either
PMNs or MNCs. Individual profiles of PMN ( ) (A) and MNC ( ) (B)
populations and a composite (C) are shown. The data represent the
mean ± SD for 12 animals (n = 24 halves).
|
|
Separation of MNCs by F-D.
Typical recovery rates for
peripheral blood MNCs obtained from F-D gradients with densities of
1.090, 1.100, and 1.105 were 15, 80, and 90%, respectively.
Leukocyte chemotactic activity in goat milk at different stages of
the lactation cycle. (i) Chemotaxis assay.
In order to determine
whether leukocyte chemotactic factors contributed to the observed
influx of leukocytes into milk, the PMN and MNC chemotactic
differential per milligram of protein of whey from different stages of
the lactation cycle was assayed. As shown in Fig.
3A, which contains the data from the
typical response of a majority of the herd, there was a significant
increase in PMN chemotactic activity during the late lactation stage
compared to that of early lactation. In contrast, as shown in Fig. 3B, which also contains the data for the typical response of a majority of
the herd, the MNC chemotactic activity was greater in milk from early
lactation.

View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
(A) Lactation stage-dependent PMN chemotactic activity
in goat mammary secretions. Goat milk was tested for its ability to
elicit PMN chemotaxis, as assayed by the microchemotaxis technique.
PMNs (105/well) were placed in the upper wells, and whey
was placed in the lower wells. After a 30-min incubation, the PMNs that
had migrated to the underside of the micropore filter were quantitated.
The data show the chemotactic differential per milligram of whey
protein of one animal and reflect the typical response of a majority of
the herd (n = 2 halves). Both left ( ) and right
( ) udder halves were analyzed. (B) Lactation stage-dependent MNC
chemotactic activity in goat mammary secretions. Goat milk was tested
for its ability to elicit MNC chemotaxis, as assayed by the
microchemotaxis technique. MNCs (105/well) were placed in
the upper wells, and whey was placed in the lower wells. After a 1.5-h
incubation, the MNCs that had migrated to the underside of the
micropore filter were quantitated. The data show the chemotactic
differential per milligram of whey protein of one animal and reflect
the typical response of a majority of the herd (n = 2 halves). Both left ( ) and right ( ) udder halves were analyzed.
|
|
(ii) Statistical analysis.
Using both the mean and maximum
chemotactic activities per milligram of protein, we performed a
repeated-measures ANOVA to investigate udder half, stage of lactation,
and farm differences, with the farm being the "between goat" factor
and udder half and stage of lactation being the "within goat"
factors. There were no significant udder half effects in the analysis
of PMN chemotactic activity. There was a significant
farm-by-stage-of-lactation interaction (P < 0.001)
with the mean PMN chemotactic activity per milligram of protein, with
the late-stage mean being higher in farm 1 than in farm 2. There were
no differences between the farms in maximum PMN chemotactic activity
per milligram of protein. In subsequent analyses, goats from the two
farms were used as a combined sample in order to estimate more
efficiently the statistical differences for udder half and stage of
lactation. Significant differences were found only for stage of
lactation, with the late stage being higher (P < 0.001) for both the mean PMN chemotactic activity per milligram of
protein and the maximum PMN chemotactic activity per milligram of
protein. The means and the adjusted geometric means (the antilog of the
adjusted mean) for PMN chemotactic activity per milligram of protein
and maximum PMN chemotactic activity per milligram of protein are shown
in Table 1.
There were no significant udder half effects or differences between the
farms for the mean and maximum MNC chemotactic activities
per milligram
of protein. Significant differences were found for
stage of lactation
with the maximum MNC chemotactic activity per
milligram of protein,
with that of the early stage being higher
(
P < 0.002)
than that of the late stage. There were no differences
between stages
of lactation for the mean MNC chemotactic activity
per milligram of
protein. The means and the adjusted geometric
means (antilog of the
adjusted mean) for MNC chemotactic activity
per milligram of protein
and maximum MNC chemotactic activity
per milligram of protein are shown
in Table
1.
Induction of leukocyte chemokinesis and chemotaxis by milk.
In
order to determine whether the observed leukocyte migration was due to
chemokinesis and/or chemotaxis, a checkerboard analysis was done. Table
2 shows the results of the PMN and MNC
checkerboard analyses. Chemokinesis is defined as increased random
migration in the absence of a gradient. In contrast, chemotaxis is
defined as directed migration along a positive concentration gradient. Migration of PMNs and MNCs increased when the concentration of milk was
increased equally above and below the filter (see the diagonals of
Table 2), suggesting that chemokinesis occurred. However, significant
increases in PMN and MNC migration were also seen when the milk
concentration was increased below the filter (see the verticals of
Table 2). Therefore, goat milk induced both the chemotaxis and
chemokinesis of PMNs and MNCs.
Physicochemical characterization of PMN chemoattractants in normal
and mastitic milk.
In order to determine whether the PMN
chemotactic factors present in normal and mastitic goat milk were
different, various whey fractions were assayed for chemotactic
activity. Table 3 is a summary of the
physicochemical characteristics of the chemoattractant(s) present in
mastitic milk and normal late-stage milk. The molecular masses of most
of the chemotactic factors present in mastitic milk were <10 and
3
kDa. In contrast, the molecular mass of the chemotactic factor(s)
present in normal late-stage milk was <30 and
10 kDa. Heat stability
tests showed that the <10-kDa mastitic milk fraction retained its
chemotactic activity following heating at 60°C for 30 min
(P < 0.05 compared to the untreated fraction). In
contrast, the chemotactic activity of the <30- and >10-kDa fraction
of normal late-stage milk was destroyed by heat treatment. Furthermore,
pH stability assays of normal late-stage milk fractions suggested that
the <30- and >10-kDa fraction was stable at pH 2 whereas it lost 74%
of its chemotactic activity at pH 11. Casein was also tested in the
microchemotaxis assay for its chemotactic ability. Results showed that
casein was not able to induce any PMN migration.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 3.
Physicochemical characteristics of PMN chemoattractants
in mastitic and normal late-lactation-stage milka
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
The local population of leukocytes (somatic cells) in the udder is
necessary for an animal to mount an effective immune response against
intramammary pathogens. The SCC has been shown to be directly correlated with infection status and is used in the dairy industry as a
reliable indicator of mastitis (8, 17, 22, 36). Interestingly, numerous investigators have reported that SCC increases and the predominance of PMNs is consistently observed in normal late-lactation-stage goat milk (19, 29, 32, 33). This study
provides a physiologic explanation for this phenomenon. Our work
demonstrates that there are physiologic chemoattractants which are
responsible for the increase in SCC and PMN infiltration that is
observed in normal late-lactation-stage goat milk. Furthermore, we
provide evidence which suggests that there are differences between the
chemotactic cytokine profiles of mastitic and normal late-lactation-stage milk.
Differential counts of leukocytes in normal milk reveal that MNCs are
the major cell population found in colostrum. This is consistent with
the concept that milk provides passive protection for the neonate
(6, 16) and has immunostimulatory capabilities (18,
40). During the late lactation stage, PMNs are the predominant cell type, despite the absence of infection. This confirms prior reports that an increase in PMNs is the cause of the increase in SCCs
during the late stage of lactation in goats (8, 9, 32, 37,
44). It is of interest to note that morphologic characteristics
of the phagocytic cells in goat milk and those of their blood
counterparts were different. Milk phagocytic cells contained numerous
vacuoles which distorted the shape of the cells, and extracellular
particles were present in the milk despite extensive washing. This
contributed to the complexity of differentiating the leukocyte
populations in goat milk, which was also experienced by previous
investigators (6, 14).
Examination of SCCs throughout the lactation cycle reveals that the SCC
is inversely related to the milk yield. This supports the prevalent
belief that a concentration effect is the main reason for the increase
in SCCs found during the late stage of lactation in goats in the
absence of infection (8, 44). However, chemotaxis assays of
goat milk show that there is a significant increase in PMN chemotactic
activity during the late stage of lactation even when the milk protein
concentration is taken into consideration. This suggests that a
decrease in milk volume is not the only cause of the observed rise in
SCCs. An increase in PMN chemotactic activity during this period is
also responsible for the dramatic increase in the SCC that is observed
in late-lactation-stage goat milk. Changes in PMN/MNC ratios at
different lactation stages are additional evidence that a concentration
effect is not the only cause of the SCC increase during late lactation.
These results challenge the predominant concept that infection status
is the only reason for an increase in the SCC in milk (8, 9, 17,
37). Based on our findings, we propose that a normal physiologic
program is responsible for the increase in SCCs (due to PMNs) that is observed during the late lactation stage in goats. In preparation for
the dry period (i.e., weaning or involution), PMN infiltration occurs
in order to participate in the involution process (apoptosis?) and to
provide protection for the mammary gland during the period when it is
most susceptible to intramammary infection. Susceptibility of the
mammary gland to infection is highest during the first 2 weeks of the
dry period (16, 31). In dairy cows, Jensen and Eberhart
(21) have previously reported that PMNs are the predominant
milk leukocyte population during the first week of the dry period.
Macrophages and lymphocytes then become the predominant cell
populations throughout the rest of the dry period. Hence, the
importance of the PMN population during the first week of involution
should be noted. PMNs in milk are able to phagocytize and destroy
bacteria and to remove tissue debris (34). Thus, the
activity of PMNs is the most important defense and cleaning mechanism
of the mammary gland (34). This concept reinforces our
belief that the observed increase in the PMN population in goats at the
late stage of lactation also serves a physiologic function for the
remodeling of the gland during the involution period.
Evaluation of the MNC chemotactic activity in goat milk showed that
milk MNC chemotactic activity was highest during the first few weeks of
early lactation (weeks 4 to 6). A transient increase in MNC chemotactic
activity also occurred during late lactation (week 20 or later). In
addition, PMN chemotactic activity increased significantly during late
lactation (week 20 or later). It is of interest to speculate that the
differential chemotactic activities detected at different stages of the
lactation cycle (a MNC activity during the early stage and a PMN
activity during the late stage) may be due to two entirely different
chemotactic factors, i.e., a programmed signaling mechanism in the
mammary gland induces the release of the MNC and PMN chemotactic
factors during early and late lactation, respectively. To further
support our hypothesis, conditioned media from a caprine mammary
epithelial cell (CMEC) line developed in our laboratory (28)
was tested for PMN chemotactic activity. Significant PMN chemotactic
activity was shown to be present in the conditioned media of CMECs.
Several investigators have previously shown that epithelial cells have
the capacity to release chemotactic factors (1, 10, 24). It
is tempting to speculate that a preprogrammed mechanism in the mammary
gland signals the epithelial cells or the MNCs (upon receiving signals from the mammary gland epithelial cells) to secrete a PMN chemotactic factor during late lactation, which then results in the influx of PMNs
into the milk. During late lactation and the first weeks of involution,
PMNs may serve as physiologic regulators for the early phase of the
involution process. Subsequently, MNCs are mobilized to participate in
the completion of the involution process. This is in agreement with the
results of prior investigators, who have observed that PMNs have the
capacity to release soluble mediators which are chemotactic for MNCs
upon exposure to a variety of stimuli (5). This process
results in the predominance of MNCs (macrophages and lymphocytes) in
the mammary gland during the involution stage. At that time, monocytes
are activated and are particularly aggressive at phagocytizing milk
residues and cell debris in the apoptotic or involuting mammary gland
(34).
The predominance of PMNs during the late lactation stage is interpreted
by many to be the result of an inflammation in the mammary gland.
However, our study revealed that goat mammary glands produced
chemotactic factors for PMNs and MNCs in the absence of any signs of
mastitis or bacteria in the milk. Histopathological studies of
late-lactation-stage goat mammary glands by other investigators showed
no signs of tissue injury (44) or changes in milk
composition (19). An increase in the SCC (due to PMNs) is
the only similarity between normal late-lactation-stage milk and
mastitic milk in the goat. However, the increase of PMNs in the milk
should not be perceived solely as evidence of infection of the mammary
gland. Smith and Goldman (39), who have observed high PMN
counts in colostrum (despite the absence of infection) from nonnursing
mothers, proposed that these maternal cells are potentially beneficial, and possibly serve to facilitate the development of immunocompetence in
the neonate. Hence, the reported mobilization of the PMN population (responsible for most of the increase in SCCs) during the late lactation stage may not be indicative of a pathological condition but
simply a normal physiologic regulatory mechanism in the mammary gland.
In support of our hypothesis, physicochemical analyses of the
chemotactic factors in normal late-lactation-stage and mastitic milk
were performed. The results suggest that different cytokines are
present in normal late-lactation-stage and mastitic milk. Molecular
mass (<10 and
3 kDa) and heat stability (chemotactic post-heat-treatment) tests suggest that most of the PMN chemotactic activity in mastitic milk may be due to the chemokine IL-8. Numerous reports have implicated IL-8 in various inflammatory conditions (2, 23, 24, 41). In contrast, the physicochemical
characteristics of the chemoattractant(s) present in normal
late-lactation-stage milk are different. Its molecular mass is <30 and
10 kDa, and the chemotactic activity is heat labile. Based on these
data, it is possible that the PMN chemotactic activity that was
detected in normal late-lactation-stage milk is a hitherto
uncharacterized factor or a factor related or similar to those detected
in human milk (27). Further analysis is needed to
definitively identify the chemotactic factor(s) in normal
late-lactation-stage milk. The pH stability test of the PMN chemotactic
factor present in normal late-lactation-stage milk indicates that it is
highly acid resistant (pH 2). This result suggests that the chemotactic
factor is able to survive the highly acidic environment of the
gastrointestinal tract of sucklings. Thus, passive acquisition of this
chemotactic factor may be of importance to the development of
sucklings.
In summary, we have provided evidence to suggest the presence of normal
lactation stage-dependent chemotactic factors in mammary secretions of
the goat, thereby implicating chemotactic cytokines as physiologic
regulators in the mammary gland. This may be the reason for the
increase in the SCC and the predominance of the PMN population that are
seen in the late lactation stage, despite the absence of infection. The
infiltration of PMNs into the mammary gland during this period seems to
be a normal physiologic homeostatic regulatory mechanism and is not a
result of a pathological process. Hence, the SCC regulatory standards
for goat milk need to be redefined in order to reflect this physiologic
phenomenon. Isolation, further purification, and physicochemical
characterization of the PMN chemotactic factor in normal
late-lactation-stage milk is needed to determine whether it is a novel
chemotactic cytokine.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
This work was supported by the American Dairy Goat Association
Research Foundation.
We are very grateful to Ann Engel, Lynn Miller, Kathy Orovitz, the
Roillards, and Lorraine Wheeler for assisting us in milk sample
collection.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of
Pathobiology, The University of Connecticut, 61 North Eagleville Rd., U-89, Storrs, CT 06269-3089. Phone: (860) 486-3739. Fax: (860) 486-2794. E-mail: TYang{at}UConnVM.UConn.Edu.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Bare-Martin, M. T.,
A. Vidrich,
D. H. Lynch, and S. R. Targan.
1995.
Divergent induction of apoptosis and IL-8 secretion in HT-29 cells in response to TNF- and ligation of Fas antigen.
J. Immunol.
155:4147-4154[Abstract].
|
| 2.
|
Bittleman, D. B.,
R. A. Erger, and T. B. Casale.
1996.
Cytokines induce selective granulocyte chemotactic responses.
Inflamm. Res.
45:89-95[Medline].
|
| 3.
|
Boyum, A.
1968.
Isolation of mononuclear cells and granulocytes from human blood.
Scand. J. Clin. Lab. Investig.
21:77-89[Medline].
|
| 4.
|
Callard, R., and A. Gearing.
1994.
The cytokine factsbook, p. 2-200.
Academic Press, Inc., San Diego, Calif.
|
| 5.
|
Cassatella, M. A.
1996.
Cytokines produced by polymorphonuclear neutrophils: molecular and biological aspects, p. 41-43.
Chapman and Hall, New York, N.Y.
|
| 6.
|
Crago, S. S.,
S. J. Prince,
T. G. Pretlow,
J. R. McGhee, and J. Metecky.
1979.
Human colostral cells. I. Separation and characterization.
Clin. Exp. Immunol.
38:585-597[Medline].
|
| 7.
|
Driscol, K. E.
1994.
Macrophage inflammatory proteins: biology and role in pulmonary inflammation.
Exp. Lung Res.
20:473-490[Medline].
|
| 8.
|
Droke, E. A.,
M. J. Paape, and A. L. Di Carlo.
1993.
Prevalence of high somatic cell counts in bulk tank goat milk.
J. Dairy Sci.
76:1035-1039[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 9.
|
Dulin, A. M.,
M. J. Paape,
W. D. Schultze, and B. T. Winland.
1983.
Effect of parity, stage of lactation, and intramammary infection on concentration of somatic cells and cytoplasmic particles in goat milk.
J. Dairy Sci.
66:2426-2433.
|
| 10.
|
Eckmann, L.,
M. F. Kagnoff, and J. Fierer.
1993.
Epithelial cells secrete the chemokine interleukin-8 in response to bacterial entry.
Infect. Immun.
61:4569-4574[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 11.
|
Eglinton, E. A.,
D. M. Roberton, and A. G. Cummins.
1994.
Phenotype of T cells, their soluble receptor levels, and cytokine profile of human breast milk.
Immunol. Cell Biol.
72:306-313[Medline].
|
| 12.
|
Fava, R.,
N. Olsen,
A. E. Postelwaite,
K. Broadley,
J. M. Davidson,
L. B. Nanney,
C. Lucas, and A. Townes.
1991.
Transforming growth factor- 1 (TGF- 1) induced neutrophil recruitment of synovial tissues: implications for TGF- -driven synovial inflammation and hyperplasia.
J. Exp. Med.
173:1121-1132[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 13.
|
Garofalo, R.,
S. Cheda,
F. Mei,
K. H. Palkowetz,
H. E. Rudloff,
F. C. Schmalstieg,
D. K. Rassin, and A. S. Goldman.
1995.
Interleukin-10 in human milk.
Pediatr. Res.
37:444-449[Medline].
|
| 14.
|
Garssen, G. J.,
A. M. Borgstein, and J. K. Olderbroek.
1990.
Total and differential somatic cells in milk of bST-treated cows. Report B-357.
Research Institute for Animal Production, Zeist, The Netherlands.
|
| 15.
|
Goldman, A. S.,
H. E. Rudloff, and F. C. Schmalstieg.
1991.
Are cytokines in human milk?
Adv. Exp. Med. Biol.
310:93-97[Medline].
|
| 16.
|
Guidry, A. J.
1985.
Mastitis and the immune system of the mammary gland, p. 29.
In
B. Larson (ed.), Lactation. Iowa State University Press, Ames.
|
| 17.
|
Harmon, R. J.
1994.
Physiology of mastitis and factors affecting somatic cell counts.
J. Dairy Sci.
77:2103-2112[Abstract].
|
| 18.
|
Head, J. R.
1977.
Immunobiology of lactation.
Semin. Perinatol.
1:195-210[Medline].
|
| 19.
|
Hinckley, L. S.
1983.
Somatic cell count in relation to caprine mastitis.
Vet. Med. Small Anim. Clin. Zeist The Netherlands
1983:1267-1269.
|
| 20.
|
Hinckley, L. S.
1996.
Cell count and ADGA research.
Am. Dairy Goat Assoc. News Events Zeist The Netherlands
2:14.
|
| 21.
|
Jensen, D. L., and R. J. Eberhart.
1981.
Total and differential cell counts in secretions of the nonlactating bovine mammary gland.
Am. J. Vet. Res.
42:743-747[Medline].
|
| 22.
|
Kalogridou-Vassiliadou, D.,
K. Manolkidis, and A. Tsigoida.
1992.
Somatic cell counts in relation to infection status of the goat udder.
J. Dairy Res.
59:21-28[Medline].
|
| 23.
|
Kay, A. B.
1989.
Inflammatory cells in bronchial asthma.
J. Asthma
26:335-344[Medline].
|
| 24.
|
Lindley, I. J. D.,
J. Westwick, and S. Kunkel (ed.).
1993.
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, vol. 351. The chemokines: biology of the inflammatory peptide supergene family II. , p. 210.
Plenum Press, New York, N.Y.
|
| 25.
|
Lukas, N. W.,
S. L. Junkel,
R. M. Strieter,
K. Warmington, and S. W. Chensue.
1993.
Role of macrophage inflammatory protein (MIP-1 ) in granulomatous inflammation, p. 215.
In
I. J. D. Lindley, J. Westwick, and S. Kunkel (ed.), Advances in experimental medicine and biology, vol. 351. The chemokines: biology of the inflammatory peptide supergene family II. Plenum Press, New York, N.Y.
|
| 26.
|
Manaster, J.,
J. Chezar,
R. Shurtz-Swirski,
G. Shapiro,
Y. Tendler,
B. Kristal,
S. M. Shasha, and S. Sela.
1995.
Heparin induces apoptosis in human peripheral blood neutrophils.
Br. J. Haematol.
94:48-52.
|
| 27.
|
Noda, K.,
M. Umeda, and T. Ono.
1984.
Transforming growth factor activity in human colostrum.
Gann
75:109-112[Medline].
|
| 28.
|
Pantschenko, A. G.,
T. J. Yang,
J. Woodcock-Mitchell, and S. L. Bushmich.
1997.
Establishment and characterization of a caprine mammary epithelial cell line, p. 37.
In
New England Animal Biotechnology Symposium. University of Connecticut, Storrs.
|
| 29.
|
Park, Y. W., and R. D. Humphrey.
1986.
Bacterial cell counts in goat milk and their correlations with somatic cell counts, percent fat, and protein.
J. Dairy Sci.
69:32-37.
|
| 30.
|
Petrek, M.,
R. M. Du Bois,
M. Sirova, and E. Wigl.
1995.
Chemotactic cytokines and their role in physiological and immunopathological reactions.
Folia Biol. (Prague)
41:263-283.
|
| 31.
|
Philpot, W. N., and S. C. Nickerson.
1991.
Mastitis: counterattack, p. 1-133.
Babson Bros. Co., Naperville, Ill.
|
| 32.
|
Politis, I.,
J. H. White,
K. O'Hare,
B. Zavizion,
J. Gilmore, and W. Caler.
1994.
Distribution of plasminogen activator forms in fractions of goat milk.
J. Dairy Sci.
77:2900-2906[Abstract].
|
| 33.
|
Rota, A. M.,
C. Gonzalo,
P. L. Rodriguez,
A. I. Rojas,
L. Martin, and J. J. Tovar.
1993.
Effects of stage of lactation and parity on somatic cell counts in milk of Verata goats and algebraic models of their lactation curves.
Small Ruminant Res.
12:211-219.
|
| 34.
|
Sandholm, M.,
T. Honkanen-Buzalski,
L. Kaartinen, and S. Pyorla.
1995.
The bovine udder and mastitis.
Gummerus Kirjapaino, Oy, Jväskylä, Finland.
|
| 35.
|
Schall, T. J.
1994.
The chemokines, p. 419-460.
In
A. Thomson (ed.), The cytokine handbook, 2nd ed. Academic Press Inc., San Diego, Calif.
|
| 36.
|
Schukken, Y.,
A. Weersink,
K. Leslie, and S. W. Martin.
1993.
Dynamics and regulation of bulk milk somatic cell counts.
Can. J. Vet. Res.
57:131-135[Medline].
|
| 37.
|
Sheldrake, R. F.,
R. J. Hoare, and V. Woodhouse.
1981.
Relationship of somatic cell counts and cell volume analysis of goat's milk to intramammary infection with coagulase-negative staphylococci.
J. Dairy Res.
48:393-403[Medline].
|
| 38.
|
Skansen-Saphir, U. A.,
A. Lindfors, and U. Andersson.
1993.
Cytokine production in mononuclear cells of human milk studied at the single-cell level.
Pediatr. Res.
34:213-216[Medline].
|
| 39.
|
Smith, C. W., and A. S. Goldman.
1968.
The cells of human colostrum. I. In vitro studies of morphology and functions.
Pediatr. Res.
2:103-109.
|
| 40.
|
Soder, O.
1987.
Isolation of interleukin-1 from human milk.
Int. Arch. Allergy Appl. Immunol.
83:19-23[Medline].
|
| 41.
|
Warner, J. O.
1992.
Immunology of cystic fibrosis.
Br. Med. Bull.
48:893-911[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 42.
|
Wirt, D. P.,
L. T. Adkins,
K. H. Palkowetz,
F. C. Schmalstieg, and A. S. Goldman.
1992.
Activated and memory T lymphocytes in human milk.
Cytometry
13:282-290[Medline].
|
| 43.
|
Wu, L.,
N. P. Gerard,
R. Wyatt,
H. Choe,
C. Parolin,
N. Ruffing,
A. Borsetti,
A. A. Cardoso,
E. Desjardin,
W. Newman,
C. Gerard, and J. Sodroski.
1996.
CD4-induced interaction of primary HIV-1 gp120 glycoproteins with the chemokine receptor CCR5.
Nature
384:179[Medline].
|
| 44.
|
Zeng, S. S., and E. N. Escobar.
1994.
Factors affecting somatic cell count of goat milk throughout lactation: parity and milk production, p. 16-19.
In
Somatic cells and milk of small ruminants: proceedings of international symposium. Bella, Italy. International Dairy Federation, Brussels, Belgium.
|
| 45.
|
Zeng, S. S., and E. N. Escobar.
1995.
Factors affecting somatic cell count of goat milk: breed and farm, p. 168-169.
In
National Mastitis Council 1995 annual meeting proceedings. National Mastitis Council, Inc., Arlington, Va.
|
| 46.
|
Ziff, M.
1989.
Role of endothelium in chronic inflammation.
Springer Semin. Immunopathol.
11:199-214[Medline].
|
Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology, May 1998, p. 375-381, Vol. 5, No. 3
1071-412X/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Salama, A. A. K., Such, X., Caja, G., Rovai, M., Casals, R., Albanell, E., Marin, M. P., Marti, A.
(2003). Effects of Once Versus Twice Daily Milking Throughout Lactation on Milk Yield and Milk Composition in Dairy Goats. J DAIRY SCI
86: 1673-1680
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Barber, M. R., Pantschenko, A. G., Hinckley, L. S., Yang, T. J.
(1999). Inducible and Constitutive In Vitro Neutrophil Chemokine Expression by Mammary Epithelial and Myoepithelial Cells. CVI
6: 791-798
[Abstract]
[Full Text]