Previous Article | Next Article 
Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology, September 1998, p. 711-716, Vol. 5, No. 5
1071-412X/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Serodiagnosis of Neosporosis in Individual Cows and Dairy Herds:
A Comparative Study of Three Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent
Assays
W.
Wouda,1,*
J.
Brinkhof,2
C.
van Maanen,2
A. L. W.
de Gee,1 and
A. R.
Moen1
Animal Health Service, 9200 AJ
Drachten,1 and
7400 AA
Deventer,2 The Netherlands
Received 11 March 1998/Returned for modification 12 May
1998/Accepted 23 June 1998
 |
ABSTRACT |
The performance of three enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA)
for detection of antibodies to Neospora caninum in
bovine sera was evaluated by using various categories of sera. Two
commercial ELISA methods, one based on chemically fixed intact
tachyzoites and one based on a sonicate lysate of whole
tachyzoites, were compared with an in-house ELISA based
on a detergent lysate of whole tachyzoites. A brief
description of the development of the latter ELISA is also given. There
was good agreement among all three tests with regard to postabortion
sera. By using acute-phase abortion sera from cows with confirmed
N. caninum-induced and non-N.
caninum-induced abortions, satisfactory levels of sensitivity and
specificity were calculated for all tests. In addition, similar test
results were obtained with postpartum samples from dams and calves.
However, considerable differences were found between test results
of sequential samples and cross-sectional and total-herd samples.
Apparently, these discrepancies were due to different sensitivities of
the tests for detection of low antibody levels in
chronically infected animals. It is suggested that these differences were primarily due to the use of different antigens and different test
sample dilutions. It is concluded that all tests are applicable as
an additional diagnostic tool in cases of abortion in cattle and
for monitoring of congenitally infected calves. For herd
screening, the lysate-based ELISAs appear to be more adequate because
of their higher sensitivities.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Neoporosis is a newly recognized
protozoan disease. The etiological agent was first isolated from a
paralyzed dog and was named Neospora caninum
(11). Later it was discovered that
Neospora-like protozoa may cause abortion in cattle
(27). The bovine and the canine parasite were shown to be
identical (16, 20). At present neosporosis is recognized as
a major cause of bovine abortion throughout the world (for a review,
see reference 13).
The diagnosis of the infection in aborted fetuses is primarily based on
the characteristic histological lesions and the immunohistochemical identification of the parasites in fetal tissues (1, 2, 32).
The complete life cycle of N. caninum is not known. At
present the only described mode of infection is transplacental,
from cow to calf (3, 17, 25, 31). This vertical transmission may contribute significantly to the persistence of the infection in the
herd (25, 31). Congenitally infected calves sporadically show neurological signs (3, 12) but usually are in good
health (25). However, several studies indicate that
chronically infected cows have an increased risk of abortion (21,
26, 29, 31). The only way to identify chronically infected
animals is by detection of antibodies in the blood.
The immunofluorescent antibody test (IFAT) has been widely used to
detect antibodies against N. caninum (9, 23) but
has subsequently been superseded by enzyme-linked
immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) (5, 7, 10, 14, 18, 19,
24, 30). Different antigens have been used in the various ELISAs:
extracted tachyzoite membrane proteins incorporated into
immunostimulating complexes (7),
whole-tachyzoite lysate antigens (10, 14, 24),
recombinant antigens (18, 19), and tachyzoite surface
antigens made available by chemical fixation of whole tachyzoites
onto the plates (30). A monoclonal antibody-based
competitive inhibition ELISA was developed by Baszler et al.
(5). Recently, Dubey et al. (12) evaluated IFAT
and ELISA performance in various laboratories, using sera from a herd
which had experienced an outbreak of N. caninum-induced abortions. They found considerable differences between different tests
and concluded that no test could be used to establish definitively that
N. caninum caused the abortion in an individual cow.
In this study, we compared three ELISA methods for detection of
bovine antibodies to N. caninum, using various
categories of sera. Two ELISAs, referred to as test A (MAST
Diagnostics, Bootel, United Kingdom) and test B (IDEXX
Laboratories, Westbrook, Maine), were obtained commercially,
and each was performed according to the manufacturer's instructions.
The third ELISA (test C) was developed at the laboratory of the Animal
Health Service (AHS). The aims of the study were (i) to determine the
diagnostic relevance of the three ELISA methods in abortion cases in
cattle and (ii) to evaluate their applicability for herd prevalence
studies and monitoring of congenital infections.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Commercial ELISA methods (tests A and B).
Test A was
described by Williams et al. (30). Test B was derived from
the ELISA originally described by Paré et al. (24). Both methods were performed entirely according to the manufacturer's instructions supplied with the kits. The recommended test sample dilutions (1:400 for test A and 1:100 for test B) were used. Positive and negative controls were provided with the kits (a high and a low
positive for test A and a single positive for test B). Results were
expressed as sample/positive control (S/P) ratios. For interpretation of the results, the cutoff values recommended by the manufacturers were
used. The main characteristics of each ELISA are summarized in Table
1.
AHS ELISA (test C). (i) Antigen preparation.
N.
caninum (isolate NC1) tachyzoites were cultured on Vero cells.
Monolayers were maintained in 75-cm2 or 162-cm2
tissue culture flasks at 37°C by using Hanks minimal essential medium
with L-glutamine and 5% inactivated horse serum and were passaged at 7-day intervals. The flasks were seeded with
107 to 109 tachyzoites. Infected cultures
were inspected daily with an inverted microscope. When numerous free
tachyzoites were seen in the medium and >80% of the monolayer was
destroyed, the remaining cells adhering to the plastic were scraped
into the culture medium by means of a rubber policeman. The suspension
was then homogenized by means of a Potter-Elvehjem device, followed by
filtration through a 5-µm-pore-size filter. Tachyzoites were washed
twice in sterile phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) by centrifugation (for
15 min at 1,000 × g). After removal of the
supernatant, the resulting pellet was resuspended in PBS. Tachyzoite
concentration (107 to 108 parasites per
ml) was estimated by using a hemocytometer. Tachyzoites were then
pelleted again through a 20% sucrose cushion in PBS for 1 h at
13,000 × g at 4°C. Tachyzoite pellets were suspended in PBS containing 1% (vol/vol) Triton X-100. After overnight
incubation at 4°C, sodium azide was added to a final concentration of
0.025%, and the antigen preparation was aliquoted and stored at
20°C.
(ii) ELISA technique.
Optimal ELISA concentrations for
coating and conjugate concentration were determined by means of
checkerboard titration. For coating, Nunc Polysorp microtiter plates
were used. Determination of the cutoff value was based on the mean
extinction plus 3 times the standard deviation for 50 bovine sera from
herds with no history of N. caninum abortions and was
further refined by using a frequency distribution of extinction values
obtained by assaying N. caninum-infected herds and herds not
suspected of having N. caninum infection. After assays at
dilutions of 1:50, 1:100, 1:200 and 1:400, a dilution of 1:50 was
chosen for test sera because optimal sensitivity was achieved at this
dilution.
Possible cross-reactivity of the ELISA with related parasites was
determined by using sera from calves experimentally infected with
Toxoplasma gondii, Sarcocystis cruzi,
Cryptosporidium parvum, Babesia bovis,
Babesia bigemina, Babesia divergens, and
Eimeria alabamensis. A transient response was found for a
B. bovis-infected calf, which was sampled serially
during 65 days postinfection. In one sample taken 3 weeks
postinfection, this reaction was above the cutoff level of the test,
but at 4 weeks postinfection it had decreased below this level. None of
the other sera from these experimentally infected calves showed
reactivity in the ELISA.
Categories of test sera. (i) Postabortion samples.
Postabortion sera were collected from 59 dairy cows which aborted
fetuses with histological evidence of N. caninum infection (immunohistochemically confirmed) and from 16 cows which aborted fetuses with no histological evidence of N. caninum
infection and for which other agents were identified: Actinomyces
pyogenes (n = 9), Listeria
monocytogenes (n = 2), Salmonella
dublin (n = 2), Escherichia coli
(n = 1), Chlamydia sp. (n = 1), and bovine herpesvirus 1 (n = 1). All sera were
obtained from dairy farms in the northern part of the Netherlands. Sera
were collected within 14 days after the abortion. All fetuses had been
submitted to the laboratory of the AHS and had been examined by using a
standard protocol as described previously (32).
(ii) Postpartum samples.
Precolostral blood samples were
collected from 20 calves born to dams which had previously aborted
N. caninum-infected fetuses. Samples were taken immediately
after parturition and before nursing. In addition, blood and colostrum
samples were taken from the dams.
(iii) Sequential calf samples.
Sequential sera were taken
from two calves (calves 1 and 2) which had high precolostral antibody
levels, indicating congenital infection, and from two calves (calves 3 and 4) that were seronegative at birth but received colostrum from
seropositive dams. Sampling was started immediately after birth and was
continued at 3-week intervals for 8 to 10 months.
(iv) Sequential samples from aborting cows.
Sequential sera
were taken at 3- to 4-week intervals from six cows which had aborted
N. caninum-infected fetuses. Two cows (cows 32 and 38) had
aborted during an abortion storm. Cross-sectional samples had been
taken from the herd (herd 1; see below) immediately after the onset of
the abortion storm. Cows 32 and 38 aborted 3 and 10 days, respectively,
after the herd sampling and were monitored for 6 months. Four cows
(cows 21, 37, 45, 93) which had abortions caused by N. caninum were identified in different herds in which abortions were
sporadic. These four cows were monitored until calving. Cow 93, which
was not reinseminated, was monitored for another 12 months postpartum.
(v) Cross-sectional and total-herd samples.
In two dairy
herds (herds 1 and 2) with acute N. caninum abortion
outbreaks, 20% of the animals (51 and 31 animals, respectively) were
bled immediately after the onset of the outbreak. In three herds (herds
3 through 5) with histories of ongoing N. caninum abortions,
suggesting endemic neosporosis, sera were collected from all animals
(190, 115, and 72 animals, respectively). In one herd (herd 6) with no
history of N. caninum abortions, sera were obtained from all
80 cows. The sera from this herd were used for the estimation of test
specificity.
Analysis of data.
The sensitivities of the tests were
calculated by using sera from 59 cows which aborted N. caninum-infected fetuses (confirmed by immunohistochemistry) as
the "gold standard." The specificities of the tests were assessed
by using sera from 16 cows with abortions in which other
(non-Neospora) abortifacients were identified and from
80 cows (from herd 6) which had no history of N. caninum abortions. Exact confidence intervals for sensitivity and specificity were calculated by using a binomial distribution. Agreement between tests was assessed by calculating the kappa statistic (28). Antibody levels were compared between etiological groups by using a
chi-square test.
 |
RESULTS |
Postabortion samples.
The proportions of positive postabortion
samples for each ELISA are presented in Table
2. One of the 59 cows in the N. caninum abortion group was negative in all three tests.
Postpartum samples.
The proportions of positive postpartum
samples for each ELISA are presented in Table
3.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 3.
Proportions of positive samples taken postpartum from
calves, cows, and colostrum, as determined with three different ELISAs
for detection of antibodies to N. caninum
|
|
The distribution of the S/P ratios of the postpartum sample sets, as
assessed with test A, is presented in Fig.
1. Similar distributions were obtained
with tests B and C. The values for cow-and-calf sample set 7 were below
the cutoff in test A but above the cutoff in tests B and C (data not
shown). With all tests it was found that positive calves had positive
dams and negative calves had negative dams.

View larger version (50K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Precolostral N. caninum antibodies (ELISA
test A) in 20 calves compared with serum and colostrum antibodies of
their dams, which had histories of N. caninum abortions
(colostrum samples 4 and 14 are missing).
|
|
Sequential calf samples.
Results obtained in each ELISA for
sequential samples from two congenitally infected calves and two calves
with colostrum-derived antibodies are presented in Fig.
2.

View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Profiles of antibodies to N. caninum, as
determined with three different ELISAs, in two congenitally infected
calves (calves 1 and 2) and two calves (calves 3 and 4) which received
colostrum from N. caninum-seropositive dams.
|
|
Sequential samples from cows which aborted N. caninum-infected fetuses.
Results obtained in each ELISA for
sequential samples from aborting cows are presented in Fig.
3 (data from two cows monitored for 6 months) and Fig. 4 (data from four cows
monitored until calving or longer). Cows 21, 45, and 93 gave birth to
calves which had high levels of precolostral antibodies to N. caninum, indicating congenital infection (data not shown), whereas
cow 37 gave birth to a seronegative calf.

View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Profiles of immune response to N. caninum, as
determined with three different ELISAs, in two cows which aborted
during an abortion storm.
|
|

View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
Profiles of immune response to N. caninum in
four cows that aborted, as determined with three different ELISAs
during 1 to 2 years postabortion. These cows were from herds in which
abortions were sporadic.
|
|
Cross-sectional and total-herd samples.
Considerable
differences were found between the various ELISAs when the
cross-sectional and total-herd samples were tested (Table
4). In particular, the assessed
seroprevalences of the three herds (herds 3 through 5) with endemic
neosporosis showed great variations depending on which ELISA was used
(Table 4). For all six herds, there was a high level of agreement
between tests B and C (
= 0.83). Agreement of test A with tests B
and C was low (
= 0.39 for test B and
= 0.34 for test C; these values increased to 0.47 and 0.42, respectively, if the samples that
were suspect with test A were included in the calculation).
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 4.
Proportions of positive samples with three different
ELISAs in five dairy herds with N. caninum abortions and
one herd with no history of N. caninum abortions
|
|
Sensitivity and specificity.
Sensitivity and specificity
estimates for the three ELISAs, obtained by using 75 postabortion sera
and 80 sera from a herd not suspected of having N. caninum infection, are presented in Table
5.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 5.
Sensitivities and specificities of three ELISAs for
detection of antibodies to N. caninum based on
postabortion sera and sera from a herd in which N. caninum is not suspected
|
|
Labor intensiveness.
There were no significant differences
between the three ELISAs in labor intensiveness with respect to
personnel required, the length of the assay, and numbers of samples run
at a given time.
 |
DISCUSSION |
Good agreement between the three ELISAs was found with
postabortion sera, as shown in Table 2. Antibodies were detected in a
high proportion of cows which had recently aborted N. caninum-infected fetuses. These results were similar to those
obtained by IFAT by other researchers testing acute-phase abortion sera
(22). Sensitivity and specificity estimates with the
postabortion sera were satisfactory for all tests. Sensitivity was
slightly lower in test A, but this was not statistically significant.
Likewise, precolostral calf sera gave similar results in all three
ELISAs (Table 3).
However, considerable differences among the tests were found in the
antibody profiles of serial samples (Fig. 2 through 4) and in the
seroprevalences based on cross-sectional and total-herd sampling (Table
4). Apparently, the sensitivity of test A was inadequate to detect low
antibody levels in some animals during chronic stages of the infection.
Several factors may have contributed to these discrepant results. In
the first place, the sample dilution may have been important. In test A
a dilution of 1:400 was used, whereas in tests B and C dilutions of
1:100 and 1:50, respectively, were used. Secondly, differences in
antigen preparation may have played a role. In test A intact
tachyzoites were used, and therefore mainly external-membrane antigen determinants and possibly secretory antigens adhering to the
surface were exposed. In the other two tests whole-tachyzoite lysates were prepared either by sonication (test B) or by detergent solubilization (test C). Lysates contain soluble cytoplasmatic antigens
as well as membrane antigens. It has been suggested that antibodies to
soluble cytoplasmic antigens are be formed later in the course of
infection, whereas membrane antigens are likely to be recognized first
(15). This could account for the longer duration of
reactivity with a lysate-based ELISA, compared to a membrane
antigen-based ELISA. In addition, the recognized antigens of N. caninum may vary among cows (4, 5). This could explain the fact that one of the four aborting cows from herds with sporadic abortions was mainly negative in test A, which is in strong contrast with the data from tests B and C (Fig. 4). In the third place, the use
of different conjugates may have contributed to the variation in test
results. In the two commercial tests an anti-immunoglobulin G (IgG)
conjugate was used, whereas in test C an anti-Ig conjugate was
used. However, differences were particularly evident during the chronic stage of infection, when probably only IgG was
detectable. Other researchers have also found discrepant results with
different ELISAs, particularly for low antibody titers, but they did
not determine the sensitivities and specificities of the different tests (12).
In some cows a sharp rise in antibodies was evident during gestation,
most clearly with test A. Such a rise was seen in cows 38 (Fig. 3) and
in cows 21, 45, and 93 (Fig. 4). This increasing immune response
suggests a recrudescence of the infection (26). This may
have caused the intrauterine infection of these cows' calves, as
evidenced by the presence of precolostral antibodies (3, 17, 25,
26, 31). The birth of a seronegative calf to cow 37, which showed
no increase in antibodies during gestation in any test, corroborates
this hypothesis.
Specificity is not easy to assess, because of the lack of a negative
"gold standard." All the 16 control sera from cows which aborted
due to identified causes other than N. caninum were
negative for N. caninum in tests A and C, but 2 samples
were positive in test B. This might suggest a lower specificity of
test B. However, it is conceivable that a cow which aborts due to
a cause other than N. caninum may still be infected
with N. caninum. The additional use of sera from a herd
with no abortion history for assessment of specificity in this study is
debatable, as some of the positive samples had high optical density
values, suggesting that these were true positives.
Antibodies to the closely related parasites T. gondii
(5, 8) and Sarcocystis spp. (5) have
been observed to cross-react with multiple N. caninum
antigens by immunoblot assay. Therefore, Baszler et al. (5)
state that any serological assay with whole Neospora
organisms as an antigen source has the potential for reduced
specificity. However, other researchers observed negligible binding of
immunodominant Neospora proteins with anti-T.
gondii sera in immunoblot analyses (6). Also,
Paré et al. (24) did not find cross-reactions between
anti-Toxoplasma sera in their Neospora ELISA,
from which a commercial ELISA (test B) was derived. Only Björkman
et al. (7) mentioned poor specificity due to cross-reacting
Toxoplasma antibodies with a crude-antigen ELISA, compared
to an ELISA utilizing extracted tachyzoite proteins
incorporated into immunostimulating
complexes. Dubey et al. (14) observed a weak response
to N. caninum in the sera of calves
experimentally infected with S. cruzi, using a
tachyzoite lysate ELISA. In the present study we did not find
detectable cross-reactivity in the ELISA developed at the AHS (test C)
with antisera to T. gondii and S. cruzi or with
sera to C. parvum, B. bigemina,
B. divergens, or E. alabamensis. Only
in a B. bovis-infected cow was a transient reaction
seen, exceeding the cutoff point in 1 sample in a series of 11. Since
we used an anti-Ig conjugate, this transient reaction may be explained
by a
less specific
IgM response. Therefore, we consider
insufficient specificity not a practical problem in herd screening for neosporosis with this test. The chemically fixed intact
tachyzoite ELISA (test A) was developed to circumvent the problem
of cross-reactivity of lysate antigen-based tests (30), but
it appears from this study that its use may underestimate the
seroprevalence of N. caninum in herds.
We suggest that the use of the detergent in the antigen
preparation of test C resulted in the solubilization of additional antigens, which produced a high sensitivity. Similar results were obtained with solubilization of T. gondii antigens
(15). Apparently, the released antigens did not
cross-react with antibodies to related parasites. Based on the data
obtained, the ELISA developed in our laboratory appears to be a highly
sensitive and sufficiently specific test for detection of N. caninum antibodies in cattle.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
Reference sera to N. caninum-related
parasites were kindly provided by A. J. Trees, Liverpool School of
Tropical Medicine (T. gondii, S. cruzi, C. parvum, and B. divergens), C. Björkman, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
(E.alabamensis), T. Schetters, Intervet,
Boxmeer, The Netherlands (B. bovis and
B. divergens), and A. Cornelissen, University of
Utrecht, The Netherlands (B. bovis). We acknowledge the
technical support of A. van der Meulen, J. H. Venekamp, and H. Westra. The useful comments of Y. H. Schukken and J. Paré on
the manuscript are greatly appreciated.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Animal Health
Service, P.O. Box 361, 9200 Drachten, The Netherlands. Phone: 31 512 570700. Fax: 31 512 520013. E-mail:
w.wouda{at}gdvdieren.nl.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Anderson, M. L.,
P. C. Blanchard,
B. C. Barr,
J. P. Dubey,
R. L. Hoffman, and P. A. Conrad.
1991.
Neospora-like protozoan infections as a major cause of abortion in California dairy cattle.
J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc.
198:241-244[Medline].
|
| 2.
|
Barr, B. C.,
M. L. Anderson,
J. P. Dubey, and P. A. Conrad.
1991.
Neospora-like protozoal infections associated with bovine abortions.
Vet. Pathol.
28:110-116[Abstract].
|
| 3.
|
Barr, B. C.,
P. A. Conrad,
R. Breitmeyer,
K. Sverlow,
M. L. Anderson,
J. Reynolds,
A. E. Chauvet,
J. P. Dubey, and A. A. Ardans.
1993.
Congenital Neospora infection in calves born from cows that had previously aborted Neospora-infected fetuses: four cases (1990-1992).
J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc.
202:113-117[Medline].
|
| 4.
|
Barta, J. R., and J. P. Dubey.
1992.
Characterization of anti-Neospora caninum hyperimmune rabbit serum by Western blot analysis and immunoelecton microscopy.
Parasitol. Res.
78:689-694[Medline].
|
| 5.
|
Baszler, T. V.,
D. P. Knowles,
J. P. Dubey,
J. M. Gay,
B. A. Mathison, and T. F. McElwain.
1996.
Serological diagnosis of bovine neosporosis by Neospora caninum monoclonal antibody-based competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
34:1423-1428[Abstract].
|
| 6.
|
Bjerkas, I.,
M. C. Jenkins, and J. P. Dubey.
1994.
Identification and characterization of Neospora caninum tachyzoite antigens useful for diagnosis of neosporosis.
Clin. Diagn. Lab. Immunol.
1:214-221[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 7.
|
Björkman, C.,
O. J. M. Holmdahl, and A. Uggla.
1997.
An indirect enzyme-linked immunoassay (ELISA) for demonstration of antibodies to Neospora caninum in serum and milk of cattle.
Vet. Parasitol.
68:251-260[Medline].
|
| 8.
|
Cole, R. A.,
D. S. Lindsay,
J. P. Dubey,
M. A. Toivio-Kinnucan, and B. L. Blagburn.
1994.
Characterization of a murine monoclonal antibody generated against Neospora caninum tachyzoites by use of Western blot analysis and immunoelectron microscopy.
Am. J. Vet. Res.
55:717-722.
|
| 9.
|
Conrad, P. A.,
K. Sverlow,
M. Anderson,
J. Rowe,
R. BonDurant,
G. Tuter,
R. Breitmeyer,
C. Palmer,
M. Thurmond,
A. Ardans,
J. P. Dubey,
G. Duhamel, and B. Barr.
1993.
Detection of serum antibody responses in cattle with natural or experimental Neospora infections.
J. Vet. Diagn. Investig.
5:572-578[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 10.
|
de Gee, A. L. W.,
W. Wouda,
A. R. Moen, and F. van Knapen.
1995.
Antibody response of cattle after natural infection with Neospora, p. 136.
In
Proceedings of the Fourth International Veterinary Immunology Symposium.
|
| 11.
|
Dubey, J. P.,
A. L. Hattel,
D. S. Lindsay, and M. J. Topper.
1988.
Neonatal Neospora caninum infection in dogs: isolation of the causative agent and experimental transmission.
J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc.
193:259-263.
|
| 12.
|
Dubey, J. P.,
M. C. Jenkins,
D. S. Adams,
M. M. McAllister,
R. Anderson-Sprecher,
T. V. Baszler,
O. C. Kwok,
N. C. Lally,
C. Björkman, and A. Uggla.
1997.
Antibody responses of cows during an outbreak of neosporosis evaluated by indirect fluorescent antibody test and different enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays.
J. Parasitol.
83:1063-1069[Medline].
|
| 13.
|
Dubey, J. P., and D. S. Lindsay.
1996.
A review of Neospora caninum and neosporosis.
Vet. Parasitol.
67:1-59[Medline].
|
| 14.
|
Dubey, J. P.,
D. S. Lindsay,
D. S. Adams,
J. M. Gay,
T. V. Baszler,
B. L. Blagburn, and P. Thulliez.
1996.
Serologic responses of cattle and other animals infected with Neospora caninum.
Am. J. Vet. Res.
57:329-336[Medline].
|
| 15.
|
Hughes, H. P.,
F. van Knapen,
H. J. Atkinson,
A. H. Balfour, and D. L. Lee.
1982.
A new soluble antigen preparation of Toxoplasma gondii and its use in serological diagnosis.
Clin. Exp. Immunol.
49:239-246[Medline].
|
| 16.
|
Jardine, J. E.
1996.
The ultrastructure of bradyzoites and tissue cysts of Neospora caninum in dogs: absence of distinguishing morphological features between parasites of canine and bovine origin.
Vet. Parasitol.
62:231-240[Medline].
|
| 17.
|
Jenkins, M. C.,
W. Wouda, and J. P. Dubey.
1997.
Serological response over time to recombinant Neospora caninum antigens in cattle after a neosporosis-induced abortion.
Clin. Diagn. Lab. Immunol.
4:270-274[Abstract].
|
| 18.
|
Lally, N. C.,
M. C. Jenkins, and J. P. Dubey.
1996.
Evaluation of two Neospora caninum recombinant antigens for use in an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for the diagnosis of bovine neosporosis.
Clin. Diagn. Lab. Immunol.
3:275-279[Abstract].
|
| 19.
|
Louie, K.,
K. W. Sverlow,
B. C. Barr,
M. L. Anderson, and P. A. Conrad.
1997.
Cloning and characterization of two recombinant Neospora protein fragments and their use in serodiagnosis of bovine neosporosis.
Clin. Diagn. Lab. Immunol.
4:692-699[Abstract].
|
| 20.
|
Marsh, A. E.,
B. C. Barr,
K. Sverlow,
M. Ho,
J. P. Dubey, and P. A. Conrad.
1995.
Sequence analysis and comparison of ribosomal DNA from bovine Neospora to similar coccidial parasites.
J. Parasitol.
81:530-535[Medline].
|
| 21.
|
Moen, A. R.,
W. Wouda,
M. F. Mul,
E. A. M. Graat, and T. van Werven.
1998.
Increased risk of abortion following Neospora caninum abortion outbreaks: a retrospective and prospective cohort study in four dairy herds.
Theriogenology
49:1301-1309[Medline].
|
| 22.
|
Otter, A.,
M. Jeffrey,
S. F. E. Scholes,
B. Helmick,
J. W. Wilesmith, and A. J. Trees.
1997.
Comparison of histology with maternal and fetal serology for the diagnosis of abortion due to bovine neosporosis.
Vet. Rec.
141:487-489[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 23.
|
Paré, J.,
S. K. Hietala, and M. C. Thurmond.
1995.
Interpretation of an indirect fluorescent antibody test for diagnosis of Neospora sp. infection in cattle.
J. Vet. Diagn. Investig.
7:273-275[Free Full Text].
|
| 24.
|
Paré, J.,
S. K. Hietala, and M. C. Thurmond.
1995.
An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for serological diagnosis of Neospora sp. infection in cattle.
J. Vet. Diagn. Investig.
7:352-359[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 25.
|
Paré, J.,
M. C. Thurmond, and S. K. Hietala.
1996.
Congenital Neospora caninum infection in dairy cattle and associated calfhood mortality.
Can. J. Vet. Res.
60:133-139[Medline].
|
| 26.
|
Paré, J.,
M. C. Thurmond, and S. K. Hietala.
1997.
Neospora caninum antibodies in cows during pregnancy as a predictor of congenital infection and abortion.
J. Parasitol.
83:82-87[Medline].
|
| 27.
|
Thilsted, J. P., and J. P. Dubey.
1989.
Neosporosis-like abortions in a herd of dairy cattle.
J. Vet. Diagn. Investig.
1:205-209[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 28.
|
Thrusfield, M.
1995.
Veterinary epidemiology, 2nd ed., p. 280-282.
Blackwell Science Ltd., London, United Kingdom.
|
| 29.
|
Thurmond, M. C., and S. K. Hietala.
1997.
Effect of congenitally acquired Neospora caninum infection on risk of abortion and subsequent abortions in dairy cattle.
Am. J. Vet. Res.
58:1381-1385[Medline].
|
| 30.
|
Williams, D. J. L.,
J. McGarry,
F. Guy,
J. Barber, and A. J. Trees.
1997.
Novel ELISA for detection of Neospora-specific antibodies in cattle.
Vet. Rec.
140:328-331[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 31.
|
Wouda, W.,
A. R. Moen, and Y. H. Schukken.
1998.
Abortion risk in progeny of cows after a Neospora caninum epidemic.
Theriogenology
49:1311-1316[Medline].
|
| 32.
|
Wouda, W.,
A. R. Moen,
I. J. R. Visser, and F. van Knapen.
1997.
Bovine fetal neosporosis: a comparison of epizootic and sporadic abortion cases and different age classes with regard to lesion severity and immunohistochemical identification of organisms in brain, heart and liver.
J. Vet. Diagn. Investig.
9:180-185[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology, September 1998, p. 711-716, Vol. 5, No. 5
1071-412X/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Baszler, T. V., Adams, S., Vander-Schalie, J., Mathison, B. A., Kostovic, M.
(2001). Validation of a Commercially Available Monoclonal Antibody-Based Competitive-Inhibition Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay for Detection of Serum Antibodies to Neospora caninum in Cattle. J. Clin. Microbiol.
39: 3851-3857
[Abstract]
[Full Text]