Previous Article | Next Article 
Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology, March 1999, p. 236-242, Vol. 6, No. 2
1071-412X/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Specific Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assays for Quantitation
of Antibody-Cytokine Fusion Proteins
J.
Gan,1
K.
Kendra,2
M.
Ricci,1
J. A.
Hank,1
S. D.
Gillies,3 and
P. M.
Sondel1,4,5,*
Lexigen Pharmaceuticals Corp., Lexington, Massachusetts
02173,3 and Department of Human
Oncology,1 Medical Oncology Section,
Department of Medicine,2 Department of
Pediatrics,4 and Department of
Medical Genetics,5 University of Wisconsin,
Madison, Wisconsin 53792
Received 22 May 1998/Returned for modification 9 July 1998/Accepted 5 November 1998
 |
ABSTRACT |
Preliminary testing has shown in vitro and in vivo that antitumor
activity can be obtained with fusion proteins linking tumor-reactive monoclonal antibodies to cytokines, such as granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor or interleukin 2 (IL-2). Preclinical and
clinical testing of these reagents requires their in vitro and in vivo
quantitation and pharmacokinetic evaluation. We have focused on the
detection of a fusion protein which links one human IL-2 molecule to
the carboxy terminus of each heavy chain of the tumor-reactive
human-mouse chimeric anti-GD2 antibody, ch14.18. We have developed
enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) to evaluate intact
tumor-reactive fusion proteins. By these ELISAs we can reliably measure
nanogram quantities of intact ch14.18-IL-2 fusion protein and
distinguish the intact protein from its components (ch14.18 and IL-2)
in buffer, mouse serum, and human serum with specificity and
reproducibility. The measurement of intact ch14.18-IL-2 fusion protein
is not confounded by free IL-2 or free ch14.18 when 100 ng or less of
total immunoglobulin per ml is used during the assay procedure. Our
results indicate that these ELISAs are suitable for preclinical and
clinical testing and with slight modifications are applicable to the
analysis of a variety of other fusion proteins.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Through molecular engineering,
proteins can be altered to enhance their bioactivities. Fusion
proteins, designed to combine antibodies with cytokines (2, 3, 5,
6, 13, 16, 17, 19), antibodies with cytokine receptors
(1), or cytokines with toxins (8), are currently
being evaluated in preclinical and clinical studies (18).
The ch14.18-interleukin 2 (IL-2) and hu14.18-IL-2 proteins are two such
engineered, antitumor antibody-cytokine fusion proteins (3).
Human recombinant IL-2 has been linked to the anti-GD2 human-mouse
chimeric or humanized forms of the 14.18 antibody (ch14.18 or hu14.18)
at the carboxy terminus of the immunoglobulin heavy chain. The
ch14.18-IL-2 fusion protein was shown to enhance in vitro killing of
autologous GD2-positive human melanoma cells by a tumor-infiltrating
lymphocyte cell line (3). In vivo, ch14.18-IL-2 markedly
inhibited the growth of established hepatic metastases in severe
combined immunodeficient (SCID) mice, previously reconstituted with
human lymphokine-activated killer cells (15), and in
immunocompetent mice bearing syngeneic GD2+ tumors (10).
Increasing interest in the use of antibody-cytokine fusion proteins
such as these in the treatment of malignant diseases warrants a
systematic approach for quantifying and assessing their immunopharmacological effects in preclinical and clinical trials.
Many of the standard methods of protein quantitation lack specificity.
For example, spectrophotometric assays are confounded by other proteins
in the serum (Bradford, Lowry, or bicinchoninic acid protein assay
systems), and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) quantitating
immunoglobulin G (IgG) are unable to distinguish the intact fusion
protein from the parent immunoglobulin. The assays described in this
report specifically quantitate and distinguish the intact fusion
protein from its breakdown or composite products, by utilizing capture
reagents directed against one functional group and detection ligands
which combine with the other active moiety. The potential use of
bioengineered fusion proteins in vivo necessitates the development of
assays which accurately determine the quantity of intact fusion
protein. The assays presented here should be useful for both in vitro
and in vivo evaluations of a wide variety of fusion proteins used in
both preclinical and clinical testing.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Immunologic reagents. (i) Antibody-IL-2 fusion proteins.
Antibody-cytokine fusion proteins used in this study include
ch14.18-IL-2 and hu14.18-IL-2 (obtained from Toby Hecht of the National
Cancer Institute [NCI], Frederick, Md.), CC49-IL-2 (obtained from
Jeff Schlom of the NCI), and KS1/4-IL-2 (Lexigen Pharmaceuticals). The
ch14.18-IL-2 fusion protein contains a mouse-human chimeric IgG1 with
an anti-GD2 recognition domain and a human IL-2 molecule at the carboxy
terminus of each heavy chain (3). The purification of the
ch14.18-IL-2 fusion protein used in these studies was performed at the
Monoclonal Antibody and Recombinant Protein facilities (NCI), and two
independently purified batches (lot numbers 1 and 31403) were used as
indicated. Stock concentrations of these two lots, based on ELISAs of
their IgG content, were 1.15 and 0.4 mg/ml, respectively. hu14.18-IL-2
was obtained at a concentration of 1.0 mg/ml and stored until use. The
CC49-IL-2 fusion protein is a single-chain antibody-cytokine fusion
protein. It contains the antigen recognition domain from the murine
monoclonal antibody (Mab) CC49, a human IgG1 heavy chain, and human
IL-2 (22). The CC49-IL-2 protein was purified from culture
supernatants of expressing cells (22, 14) and maintained as
a stock solution at a concentration of 200 µg/ml. KS1/4-IL-2 is a
humanized antibody-IL-2 fusion protein which is similar in structure to
the hu14.18-IL-2 molecule but uses the humanized form of the mouse
KS1/4 pan-carcinoma antibody (26). The stock of high
pressure liquid chromatography-purified KS1/4-IL-2 determined by
spectrophotometric measurement was at a concentration of 1 mg/ml.
Concentrations of immunoglobulins were verified by using an ELISA for
IgG content. The purity and structural integrity of the proteins were
verified by electrophoretic and Western blot analyses. All fusion
proteins were stored at
80°C until use.
(ii) Anti-idiotype antibodies.
The anti-idiotype antibodies
used include Mab 1A7 (provided by K. Foon and M. Chatterjee of the
University of Kentucky, Lexington, and Titan Pharmaceuticals, Inc.), a
murine IgG1, which recognizes the hypervariable region of the ch14.18
Mab (20), and A.I. 49-3, a monoclonal anti-idiotype antibody
against the mouse CC49 antibody obtained from J. Schlom (NCI). These
were stored at
80°C until use.
(iii) Other immunoreagents.
ch14.18 is a mouse-human Mab
which recognizes the GD2 antigen found on melanomas and neuroblastomas.
The antibody was produced at Repligen Inc. (Boston, Mass.) for the NCI
and stored at a stock concentration of 5.34 mg/ml, at
80°C until
use. Mab CC49, a gift from Jeff Schlom, is a murine Mab which
recognizes the tumor-associated antigen TAG-72 (11, 23). The
IL-2 (recombinant human) standard was provided in the IL-2 ELISA kit
(Immunotech, Marseille, France). Human recombinant IL-2 (Hoffmann-La
Roche, Nutley, N.J.) was reconstituted with phosphate-buffered saline
(PBS) at a concentration of 600,000 IU/100 µl and stored at 4°C
until use. Purified human IgG1 was obtained from Sigma (St. Louis,
Mo.); its concentration was 1 mg/ml based on the reading of optical
density at 280 nm (OD280).
SDS-PAGE.
The purity and structural integrity of the
ch14.18-IL-2 fusion protein were evaluated by discontinuous sodium
dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) under
denaturing conditions. Samples were solubilized at 95°C for 5 min in
a loading buffer containing Tris, SDS, and 2-mercaptoethanol (Bio-Rad,
Hercules, Calif.) and then loaded onto polyacrylamide gels.
Electrophoresis was performed in a 0.75-mm-thick 12% separating gel
topped with a 5% stacking gel, for 2 h under 15 mA of constant
current, with a Tris-glycine buffer system (9) in a model SE
260 Mighty Small II vertical electrophoresis unit (Hoefer/Pharmacia,
Piscataway, N.J.). After electrophoresis, the gel was removed, fixed
for 15 min in isopropanol-acetic acid fixing solution, and then stained
with Coomassie brilliant blue R-250 for 2 to 3 h with gentle
shaking. The gel was destained in a methanol-acetic acid-water
solution, analyzed, and photographed. Titrations done with ch14.18-IL-2
indicated that this method can detect concentrations as low as 250 ng
of protein per lane (data not shown).
Western blotting.
For the specific evaluation of the fusion
protein components, a semidry blotting system was used. After
electrophoresis, as described above, the gel was washed for 5 min in a
transfer buffer (Tris-glycine-methanol) (25), placed on an
Immobilon-P polyvinylidene difluoride transfer membrane (Millipore,
Bedford, Mass.), saturated with methanol, and transferred onto five
layers of 3MM filter paper (Whatman, Maidstone, England) saturated with
the transfer buffer. The gel was covered with another five layers of
filter paper saturated with the transfer buffer, and transfer was
carried out for 1.5 h under 200 mA of constant current in the
Multiphor II NovaBlot unit (Pharmacia/LKB). After transfer the gel was
removed from the transfer membrane, the membrane was washed three times in Tris-buffered saline (TBS) buffer (100 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.5], 0.9%
NaCl), and blocked overnight in 5% nonfat dry milk in TBS at 4°C on
a rocking platform. The next day the blotting membrane was washed for
15 min with TBS and then incubated with shaking for 3 h at 25°C
with sheep anti-human IgG1 antibody coupled to horseradish peroxidase
(The Binding Site, Birmingham, England), diluted to a concentration of
2 µg/ml in TBS-0.05% Tween 20, to immunoprobe the IgG1 component of
the fusion protein. After incubation, the blot was washed three times
for 5 min with TBS and visualized with Super Signal chemiluminescent
substrate (Pierce, Rockford, Ill.) for 5 min at room temperature (RT).
Excess substrate was removed, and the blot was wrapped with plastic
wrap and placed on New RX GCU X-ray film (Fuji Photo Film Co., Tokyo,
Japan) for 30 s. The films were developed in an automatic
developer, analyzed for the presence of specific bands, and then
photographed. By this method we could visualize as little as 62 ng of
specific protein per lane, based on our titration experiments performed with the purified ch14.18-IL-2 fusion protein (data not shown).
ELISA procedures. (i) 1A7-IL-2 ELISA (fusion protein-specific
ELISA).
C8 Maxisorp Nunc Immunomodules (Nunc, Roskilde, Denmark)
were coated overnight at 4°C with 120 µl of 1A7, a mouse monoclonal anti-idiotype to 14.G2a antibody, per well at a concentration of 2 µg/ml in 15 mM carbonate buffer, pH 9.6 (Fig.
1A). After being washed three times with
PBS-Tween, the wells were blocked for 3 h at RT with 200 µl of
5% nonfat dried milk dissolved in PBS per well. After being washed
further with PBS-Tween, plates were kept at 4°C in PBS-Tween until
use. To analyze samples, PBS-Tween was removed and 100 µl of
standards or experimental samples prepared in sample buffer (PBS-Tween
plus 2% milk) per well was added, and the plates were incubated in a
moist chamber overnight at 4°C. Plates were then washed five times
with PBS-Tween, followed by the addition of 100 µl of goat anti-human
IL-2 antibody coupled to biotin (R & D Systems, Minneapolis, Minn.),
diluted to a concentration of 0.035 µg/ml in 0.1 M Tris-HCl
containing 0.05% Tween 20. Plates were then incubated in a humidified
chamber for 3 h at RT and washed five times with Tris-Tween, and
ExtrAvidin-alkaline phosphatase (Sigma, St. Louis, Mo.) diluted 1:5,000
in Tris-Tween (according to the manufacturer's specification) was
added. After a 1-h incubation at RT, samples were washed five times
with Tris-Tween. Staining was performed by adding 100 µl of
p-nitrophenyl phosphate (Sigma) as a substrate at a
concentration of 1 mg/ml in diethanolamine buffer. The sample was
incubated with the substrate at RT in the dark, and the conversion to
the colored product was measured at 30, 60, and 75 minutes, at an OD of
405 nm with a 492-nm reference wavelength (OD405/492) on a
model EAR 400 AT ELISA reader (SLT, Salzburg, Austria) equipped with
SOFT-2000 software. The ODs obtained were used to determine
concentrations of the intact fusion protein. A standard curve ranging
from 0 to 115 ng/ml was generated by using known concentrations of the
ch14.18-IL-2 fusion protein (lot number 1).

View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
ELISAs used to evaluate structures of
immunoglobulin-cytokine fusion proteins. In each panel the ch14.18-IL-2
fusion protein is represented by the immunoglobulin structure with its
paired idiotype (black boxes) at the antibody binding domains and a
human IL-2 (black circles) attached to the carboxy terminus of the
human immunoglobulin heavy chains. (A) 1A7-IL-2 assay uses a mouse
monoclonal anti-idiotype antibody, 1A7 (which recognizes the idiotype
component of the ch14.18 Mab), to coat the plate. After the addition of
standard dilutions (or unknown quantities) of the ch14.18-IL-2 fusion
protein and washing of the plate, the reporter antibody, biotinylated
goat anti-human IL-2, is added. This assay can specifically detect the
intact fusion protein in human or mouse serum. Neither purified ch14.18
nor purified IL-2 is detectable in this assay. Av-AP, avidin coupled to
alkaline phosphatase. (B) IL-2-IgG1 ELISA uses plates coated with
rabbit antibody to human IL-2. The reporter antibody is a sheep
anti-human IgG1 conjugated with horseradish peroxidase (HRP). (C) IgG1
ELISA uses a goat anti-human IgG to coat the plate. The reporter
antibody is a sheep anti-human IgG1 conjugated with horseradish
peroxidase (HRP). This ELISA quantitates the total IgG1 present,
including free IgG1 as well as the IgG1 immunoglobulin component of the
fusion protein. (D) IL-2 ELISA uses a mouse monoclonal anti-human IL-2
capture antibody and a mouse monoclonal anti-human IL-2 antibody
conjugated with acetylcholinesterase (ACH) as the reporter antibody.
Both free IL-2 and the IL-2 component of the ch14.18-IL-2 fusion
protein can be detected with this assay.
|
|
(ii) IL-2-IgG1 ELISA (fusion protein-specific ELISA).
C8
Maxisorp Nunc Immunomodules (Nunc) were coated overnight at 4°C with
120 µl of rabbit anti-human IL-2 antibody (Endogen, Woburn, Mass.)
per well at a concentration of 2 µg/ml in 15 mM carbonate buffer, pH
9.6 (Fig. 1B). After being washed three times with PBS-Tween, the wells
were blocked for 3 h at RT with 200 µl of 5% nonfat dried milk
dissolved in PBS per well. The plates were washed with PBS-Tween and
kept filled with buffer at 4°C until use. For the assay, 100 µl of
standards (dilutions of ch14.18-IL-2 lot number 1) or samples was added
to each well and incubated overnight at 4°C in a humidified chamber.
Following incubation, plates were washed five times with 0.1 M
Tris-Tween, and 100 µl of sheep anti-human IgG1 antibody coupled to
horseradish peroxidase (0.4 µg/ml) per well (The Binding Site) was
added. Incubation was done for 3 h at RT, plates were then washed
five times, and tetramethyl benzidine substrate (DAKO, Carpinteria,
Calif.) was added (100 µl/well, as provided by the company). After
incubation with shaking for 30 min at RT, the reaction was stopped with
50 µl of 2 N H2SO4 per well, and plates were
read at 450 nm with a 570-nm reference wavelength with a model EAR 400 AT ELISA reader (SLT), equipped with SOFT-2000 software for analysis.
(iii) IgG1 ELISA.
C8 Maxisorp Nunc Immunomodule microtiter
wells (Nunc) were coated overnight at 4°C with 150 µl of goat
anti-human IgG antibody (Southern Biotech Associates, Birmingham, Ala.)
per well at a concentration of 2 µg/ml in 15 mM carbonate buffer, pH
9.6 (Fig. 1C). After being washed three times with PBS containing
0.05% Tween 20, the wells were blocked for at least 1 h at RT
with 5% nonfat dried milk dissolved in PBS. The plates were washed
with PBS-Tween and kept at 4°C in PBS-Tween until use. To analyze
samples, PBS-Tween was removed, 100 µl of standards or samples was
added to the wells, and the samples were incubated overnight (18 h) at
4°C in a humidified chamber. The wells were then washed five times
with 0.1 M Tris-Tween. Sheep anti-human IgG1 antibody coupled to
horseradish peroxidase (100 µl/well) (The Binding Site) was added at
a concentration of 0.4 µg/ml, and the plates were incubated for
3 h at 25°C. Then the plates were washed five times before the
addition (100 µl/well) of tetramethyl benzidine substrate (DAKO).
After incubation with shaking for 30 min at RT, 50 µl of a stop
solution (2 N H2SO4) per well was added, and
the plates were read at 450 nm with a 570-nm reference wavelength in a
model EAR 400 AT ELISA reader (SLT), equipped with SOFT-2000 software for analysis. Chimeric antibody ch14.18 from a stock at a concentration of 5.34 mg/ml was used as a standard in this assay.
(iv) IL-2 ELISA.
The commercially available human IL-2 ELISA
kit (Immunotech) was used. The assay was performed according to the
specifications in the manufacturer's manual. This kit was calibrated
against the World Health Organization international standard for IL-2 and contained microtiter plates coated with a mouse monoclonal anti-human IL-2 antibody. Monoclonal anti-human IL-2 linked to acetylcholinesterase was used as the reporter antibody in this assay
(Fig. 1D). Bound enzymatic activity was measured after the addition of
a chromogenic substrate provided in the kit.
(v) A.I. 49-3-IL-2 ELISA.
The A.I. 49-3-IL-2 assay was
prepared as described above for the 1A7-IL-2 ELISA (Fig. 1A), except
that A.I. 49-3, a Mab against the idiotype of the CC49 Mab, was used to
coat the wells instead of the 1A7 antibody (schema not shown). The
remaining steps of the assay protocol were exactly the same as those
followed for the 1A7-IL-2 ELISA (Fig. 1A).
Mouse and human sera.
Pooled mouse serum was obtained from
Sigma and stored at 4°C. After informed consent had been obtained,
human serum was obtained from nine healthy volunteer donors, pooled,
and stored at 4°C.
 |
RESULTS |
Purity of the ch14.18-IL-2 fusion protein. (i) SDS-PAGE.
To
define the standards used in the 1A7-IL-2 and IL-2-IgG1 ELISA systems,
the purities of the different ch14.18-IL-2 preparations were assessed
by SDS-PAGE. Three separate batches of ch14.18-IL-2 (lots 1 and 31403 and an aliquot from a sample which was maintained in the presence of
fetal calf serum) were evaluated by electrophoresis under reducing
conditions with purified ch14.18 and molecular size markers as
standards (Fig. 2A). The protein bands
located below 30 kDa correspond to the antibody light chains (Fig. 2A, lanes 2 to 5); bands visible at 67 kDa represent the heavy chains of
the ch14.18 antibody attached to IL-2 (lanes 3 and 4 and traces in lane
5). The 50-kDa band corresponds to the heavy chain of the chimeric
antibody (Fig. 2A, lanes 2 and 5). The lot 1 preparation of
ch14.18-IL-2 (Fig. 2A, lane 3) had greater purity of intact ch14.18
heavy chains linked to IL-2 than that of lot 31403 (lane 4). The extra
band noted in the lot 31403 sample (50 kDa) is consistent with a
fraction of the heavy chains in this preparation lacking a complete
IL-2 molecule. The immunoglobulin light chain (25 kDa) appears similar
in each of the different lots of ch14.18-IL-2 fusion protein and in the
ch14.18 antibody.

View larger version (50K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
(A) Evaluation of the purities of different ch14.18-IL-2
fusion protein preparations by SDS-PAGE. Lane 1, molecular size markers
(94, 67, 43, 30, and 20 kDa); lane 2, purified ch14.18; lane 3, ch14.18-IL-2 (lot 1); lane 4, ch14.18-IL-2 (lot 31403); lane 5, lower-molecular-weight derivative of the ch14.18-IL-2 fusion protein
(an aliquot from a partially purified batch of ch14.18-IL-2 that had
been obtained from a cell line which was maintained in the presence of
fetal calf serum). (B) Western blot analysis with anti-human IgG1
antibody conjugated with horseradish peroxidase. Lane 1, purified
ch14.18; lane 2, ch14.18-IL-2 (lot 1); lane 3, ch14.18-IL-2 (lot
31403); lane 4, lower-molecular-weight derivative of the ch14.18-IL-2
fusion protein.
|
|
(ii) Western blot analysis.
The components of the fusion
protein detected by SDS-PAGE were further defined by Western blot
analysis (Fig. 2B). Recognition of the heavy chains by anti-human
IgG1-horseradish peroxidase indicates that the 67-kDa bands noted in
the ch14.18-IL-2 samples contain human immunoglobulin (Fig. 2B, lanes 2 and 3 and a faint band in lane 4). These correspond to the IgG heavy
chain linked to IL-2. Bands visible in the 50-kDa area correspond to
the heavy chain of the chimeric antibody (Fig. 2B, lanes 1 and 4). The
band visible in the 30-kDa area (Fig. 2B, lane 1) represents reactivity against a smaller-molecular-size derivative of the heavy chain seen
only in the ch14.18 stock preparation and not in the ch14.18-IL-2 or
KS1/4-IL-2 fusion protein preparations or in the human IgG1 or mouse
IgG1 controls, and it is distinct from the immunoglobulin light chain
(data not shown).
Standardization and performance characteristics of the 1A7-IL-2
ELISA which quantitates intact fusion protein. (i) Standard
curves.
Figure 3 shows the typical
standard curve obtained by using the lot 1 preparation of ch14.18-IL-2
as a standard for the 1A7-IL-2 ELISA. The minimal detection limit in
this assay was calculated based on the mean ODs plus 2 standard
deviations for readings done on samples containing the buffer and 0 ng
of fusion protein per ml. This OD was then compared to the ODs obtained
from the mean of nine separate replicate curves (Fig. 3). The
background level of absorbance remained low in the buffer
(PBS-Tween-milk) (OD405/492 = 0.02). The calculated minimal
detection limit was thus found to be 0.26 ng/ml.

View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Standard curve from the 1A7-IL-2 ELISA. Serial dilutions
of ch14.18-IL-2 (lot 1) in PBS-Tween buffer were evaluated in several
replicate quantitations with this ELISA system. OD readings were
determined at 405/492 nm. The graph demonstrates a representative curve
from a typical assay.
|
|
(ii) Intra-assay precision (precision within an assay).
Three
samples of fusion protein at concentrations in the low, intermediate,
and high ranges of the standard curve, dissolved in sample buffer, were
assayed 20 times on one plate to assess intra-assay precision (Table
1).
(iii) Interassay precision (precision between assays).
Seven
different samples of fusion protein were assayed in duplicate in nine
separate runs to assess interassay precision (Table 2). The concentrations of ch14.18-IL-2
(lot 1), used to generate the standard curve for these ELISAs, were in
the range of 0 to 115.0 ng/ml, based on an OD280 reading
indicating the total protein concentration. As determined by a
densitometer evaluation of the gel after SDS-PAGE (Fig. 1), the lot 1 protein is >95% pure. The mean concentrations of ch14.18-IL-2
measured in nine replicate experiments with the 1A7-IL-2 ELISA are
listed along with the calculated coefficients of variation (CV)
(standard deviation/mean). These assays demonstrate the reliability of
the 1A7-IL-2 ELISA in quantifying the ch14.18-IL-2 fusion protein at
concentrations ranging from 0.26 to 115 ng/ml.
(iv) Effects of serum.
In order to examine the usefulness of
this method for measuring levels of intact fusion protein in serum,
aliquots of the ch14.18-IL-2 (lot 1) placed in either mouse serum,
human serum, or PBS-Tween-milk buffer were evaluated in the 1A7-IL-2
ELISA. Table 3 lists the background OD
readings obtained with mouse serum or buffer, as well as the OD
readings resulting from the presence of intact fusion protein in
undiluted serum or buffer. These OD readings indicated that equivalent
concentrations of fusion protein were detectable in buffer and mouse
serum, with no effect of mouse serum on background OD readings.
Undiluted human serum (Table 3) increased the background OD reading.
Dilutions of the human serum of 1:2 or greater eliminated this
nonspecific color development, enhancing the specificity of the OD
reading. These data indicate that the 1A7-IL-2 system is useful for the quantitation of the ch14.18-IL-2 fusion protein in buffer, mouse serum,
and human serum.
(v) Recovery (dilution test).
Levels of fusion protein were
spiked in three different matrices (sample buffer, 50% human serum,
and 50% mouse serum), and the protein was serially diluted to create
three sets of four samples throughout the range of the assay for the
evaluation of recovery in the 1A7-IL-2 ELISA (Table
4).
Validity of comparative quantitation.
A known concentration of
ch14.18-IL-2 fusion protein (lot 31403) was tested in the 1A7-IL-2
(Fig. 1A), IgG (Fig. 1C), and IL-2 (Fig. 1D) ELISAs, to determine if
quantitative comparisons between these three assays are valid (Table
5). The expected concentration, based on
the known amount and molecular weight of the fusion protein and the
proportion of its IgG1 and IL-2 components, was calculated for each
ELISA. The observed mean was determined in each assay. These data
indicate that a quantitative comparison of the concentrations of the
ch14.18-IL-2 fusion protein is possible with these three assays. The
sensitivity of the IL-2 ELISA to detect the intact fusion protein was
lower than that of the other two assays, with the IL-2 ELISA detecting
only 76% of the expected product.
Specificity of the intact fusion protein ELISAs.
The
specificities of the IL-2-IgG1 ELISA (Fig. 1B) and 1A7-IL-2 ELISA (Fig.
1A) were tested. The IgG1 ELISA was used to verify the concentrations
of Mabs ch14.18 and CC49 and those of their respective fusion proteins,
ch14.18-IL-2 and CC49-IL-2. The IL-2 ELISA with recombinant human IL-2
as a standard was used to detect IL-2, the IL-2 portion of the
ch14.18-IL-2 fusion protein, and the IL-2 portion of the CC49-IL-2
fusion protein (Table 6). Samples were
diluted in PBS-Tween-milk to fall into the effective range of the
standard curves.
As shown in Table
6, the IL-2-IgG1 ELISA, the 1A7-IL-2 ELISA, and the
A.I. 49-3-IL-2 ELISA each measured only intact fusion
protein; free
IL-2, free ch14.18, and free CC49 were not detectable
in these ELISAs.
The anti-GD2 fusion proteins, ch14.18-IL-2 and
hu14.18-IL-2, were both
recognized in the 1A7-IL-2 ELISA, while
all the fusion proteins tested
were detectable in the IL-2-IgG1
ELISA. As expected, only the anti-TAG
72 fusion protein (CC49-IL-2)
was detected in the A.I. 49-3-IL-2 ELISA.
The chimeric IgG1 antibodies,
ch14.18 and CC49, were also detectable,
as expected, in the IgG1
ELISA. Thus, the IgG1 ELISA is one of the
least selective ELISAs
evaluated in this study for detecting the intact
fusion protein,
as any protein with a human IgG1 component can be
specifically
detected. This IgG ELISA could potentially overestimate
the concentration
of intact fusion protein if a sample believed to
contain the intact
fusion protein also contained the free
immunoglobulin component
of the fusion protein lacking the cytokine.
Intact fusion proteins
can be quantitated without the confounding
influence of free immunoglobulin
or free IL-2 by using the IL-2-IgG1
ELISA system, thus providing
a level of selectivity. As shown in Table
6, the use of anti-idiotype
antibodies in these assays (i.e., 1A7-IL-2
and A.I. 49-3-IL-2
systems) can further improve the specificity in
quantitating these
antibody-IL-2 fusion
proteins.
Competition.
While the above data demonstrate the ability of
these ELISAs to discriminate between the different proteins when they
are assayed separately, the quantitation of fusion protein may be necessary when fusion proteins are mixed with other immunoglobulins (as
in human serum) or with components of the fusion protein. Furthermore,
potential therapies with these fusion proteins might involve the
coadministration of fusion protein with soluble IL-2 or with the Mab
itself. Thus, it is desirable to be able to quantitate the fusion
protein even in the presence of free IL-2 or Mab. Competition experiments were performed to determine the range in which the intact
fusion protein could accurately be assessed, based on the total amount
of protein added per well and the proportion of intact ch14.18-IL-2
fusion protein in each well. When a concentration of 100 ng of protein
per ml was used, decreasing concentrations of the fusion protein could
be accurately detected in the presence of increasing concentrations of
ch14.18 antibody (Table 7). Mixing 100 ng
of ch14.18-IL-2 per ml with ch14.18 to increase the total protein
concentration to either 140, 180, or 420 ng/ml results in an increase
in the ch14.18/ch14.18-IL-2 ratio (Table 7). This causes a confounding
influence on the accuracy of the detection of the ch14.18-IL-2 fusion
protein. This likely reflects the partial saturation of the bound 1A7
molecules on the plate when more than 100 ng of ch14.18 or ch14.18-IL-2
per ml is added. This indicates the importance of limiting the
immunoglobulin concentration to less than 100 ng/ml, to avoid exceeding
the capacity of the system. Similar experiments were performed to test
the influence of free IL-2 on the quantitation of ch14.18-IL-2 in the
1A7-IL-2 ELISA. Increasing concentrations of IL-2 (7.5, 15.0, and 60.0 ng/ml) were mixed with 80 ng of ch14.18-IL-2 per ml which contained
13.3 ng of IL-2 per ml as part of the fusion protein (lot 31403) and evaluated in the 1A7-IL-2 ELISA. In this case, there was no influence of free IL-2 on the assay (data not shown).
 |
DISCUSSION |
As other immunoglobulin-derived fusion proteins are entering
preclinical and clinical testing, assays are needed to study the
pharmacokinetics of these proteins. Our study demonstrates the
sensitivities, specificities, and reliabilities of ELISAs that require
the corecognition of each component of the fusion protein (ch14.18-IL-2
and CC49-IL-2). The concentration of intact fusion protein can be
assessed with greater accuracy and specificity by using the IL-2-IgG1
ELISA than by using the other usual methods of protein quantitation.
Our analyses of some partially purified preparations (Fig. 2) and
evaluation of plasmin-induced cleavage products (3) indicate
that some of these fusion proteins may be subject to degradation that
could influence fusion protein function. In order to assess the
possibility of in vivo degradation in preclinical (murine or primate)
and clinical testing, accurate assays to detect the intact fusion
protein in serum are essential. Also, since the adequate dilution of
test samples (Table 7) can prevent free ch14.18 and free IL-2 from
affecting the ability of the 1A7-IL-2 ELISA to quantitate the intact
fusion protein, these ELISAs may also provide simple, reliable methods
for evaluating the concentrations of intact antibody-cytokine fusion
proteins, even in the presence of some of the degradative products
potentially expected to occur in vivo.
The use of ELISAs to measure either antibodies or cytokines from
patients receiving biologic therapies has been well documented (7,
24). The unique structure of fusion proteins, such as the
ch14.18-IL-2 fusion protein, allows us to use antibodies directed against each component of the fusion protein in a sandwich ELISA to
detect only the intact fusion protein. The incorporation of the
anti-idiotype antibody in the sandwich ELISA allows us to specifically
detect the ch14.18-IL-2 fusion protein which still retains its
idiotypic determinant. Several advantages of this method of analysis
include (i) the specificity with which one can measure the intact
protein in both buffer and serum, (ii) the simplicity with which one
can reliably test samples of relatively small volumes, and (iii) the
extrapolation of this system to similar genetically engineered
proteins. Both the IL-2-IgG1 ELISA and the 1A7-IL-2 ELISA are useful in
quantitating the intact fusion protein; however, the 1A7-IL-2 ELISA is
particularly useful in testing for proteins in human serum because of
its enhanced specificity and low background, thus providing an assay
for future clinical trial use. The separate assays allowing the
detection of total IL-2 (IL-2 ELISA) and total ch14.18 antibody (IgG
ELISA) are also very useful. By subtracting the values obtained in the
1A7-IL-2 ELISA from the data obtained in these two assays, it is
possible to calculate the levels of free IL-2 and free ch14.18 antibody (data not shown). A comparison of the concentration of the intact fusion protein with that of its components can provide a reliable means
of evaluating the clearance and degradation of the intact fusion
protein, even in the presence of some degraded products potentially
expected to occur in vivo. Other similarly constructed fusion proteins
can also be evaluated by modifications of these methods. When an
anti-idiotype antibody is not available, antibody-cytokine fusion
proteins can be quantitated with the IL-2-IgG ELISA.
One of the potentially confounding variables in these assays is the
effect of the amount of total ch14.18 protein per well on the
sensitivity of the 1A7-IL-2 assay. Our data suggest that the saturation
of 1A7 (capture antibody) occurs in this system at a concentration of
100 ng of ch14.18 antibody per ml. Thus, when the total concentration
of ch14.18 and ch14.18-IL-2 exceeds 100 ng/ml, the ch14.18 molecules
can interfere with the accurate detection of ch14.18-IL-2. Samples
containing a mixture of ch14.18 antibody and ch14.18-IL-2 fusion
protein need to be diluted to a concentration of <100 ng of total
ch14.18 per ml to prevent an underestimation of the ch14.18-IL-2 fusion
protein concentration.
The assays developed here provide an accurate means for the specific
measurement of intact fusion proteins by simultaneously detecting
both components of the fusion protein molecule. These studies have
focused on the detection of antibody-cytokine fusion proteins,
particularly the ch14.18-IL-2 immunocytokine, the humanized form of
which has just entered clinical testing (5a). Slight modifications of the ELISAs presented here should allow the specific detection of any intact immunocytokine, by requiring the simultaneous corecognition of the fusion protein's antibody idiotype and its cytokine. As new genetically engineered fusion proteins are developed for clinical testing, their in vitro and in vivo evaluations should be
facilitated by adaptations of these methods, allowing the accurate quantitation of the intact molecules and distinguishing them from their components.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We acknowledge the kind provision of reagents by Toby Hecht and
Jeff Schlom, NCI; Ken Foon and Malaya Chatterjee, University of
Kentucky; and Titan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. We also thank Ralph Reisfeld (of The Scripps Research Institute), Mark Albertini and Charles Nicolet (University of Wisconsin
Madison), and Richard Hong
(University of Vermont
Burlington) for helpful discussions.
This research was supported by grants RPG-82-001-16 of the American
Cancer Society and grants CA-332685-15, CA-14520-25, CA-68334-02, CA-0961-08, and CA-0961-09 of the National Cancer Institute.
J. Gan and K. Kendra contributed equally to this work.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: K4/448 CSC, 600 Highland Ave., Madison, WI 53792. Phone: (608) 263-9069. Fax: (608) 263-4226. E-mail: pmsondel{at}facstaff.wisc.edu.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Baker, D.,
D. Butler,
B. J. Scallon,
J. K. O'Neill,
J. L. Turk, and M. Feldmann.
1994.
Control of established experimental allergic encephalomyelitis by inhibition of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) activity within the central nervous system using monoclonal antibodies and TNF receptor-immunoglobulin fusion proteins.
Eur. J. Immunol.
24:2040-2048[Medline].
|
| 2.
|
Bogers, W. M.,
F. Lang,
K. E. Parker,
B. LeMauff,
I. Anegon,
Y. Jacques, and J. P. Soulillou.
1994.
Rat interleukin-2 immunoglobulin M fusion proteins are cytotoxic in vitro for cells expressing the IL-2 receptor and can abolish cell-mediated immunity in vivo.
Transplantation
58:932-939[Medline].
|
| 3.
|
Gillies, S. D.,
E. B. Reilly,
K. M. Lo, and R. A. Reisfeld.
1992.
Antibody-targeted interleukin 2 stimulates T-cell killing of autologous tumor cells.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
89:1428-1432[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 4.
|
Gillies, S. D.,
D. Young,
K. Lo, and S. Roberts.
1993.
Biological activity and in vivo clearance of antitumor antibody/cytokine fusion proteins.
Bioconjug. Chem.
4:230-235[Medline].
|
| 5.
|
Hand, P. H.,
S. V. S. Kashmiri, and J. Schlom.
1994.
Potential for recombinant immunoglobulin constructs in the management of carcinoma.
Cancer
73(Suppl.):1005-1113.
|
| 5a.
| Handgretinger, R. (Tübingen, Germany).
Personal communication.
|
| 6.
|
Hu, P.,
J. L. Hornick,
M. S. Glasky,
A. Yun,
M. N. Milkie,
L. A. Khawli,
P. M. Anderson, and A. L. Epstein.
1996.
A chimeric Lym-1/interleukin 2 fusion protein for increasing tumor vascular permeability and enhancing antibody uptake.
Cancer Res.
56:4998-5004[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 7.
|
Ida, N.,
S. Sakurai,
K. Hosoi, and T. Kunitomo.
1992.
A highly sensitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for the measurement of interleukin-8 in biological fluids.
J. Immunol. Methods
156:27-38[Medline].
|
| 8.
|
Jabara, H. H.,
D. Vercelli,
L. C. Schneider,
D. P. Williams,
F. S. Genbauffe,
L. R. Poisson,
C. A. Waters, and R. S. Geha.
1995.
Interleukin-4 receptor expression by human B cells: functional analysis with a human interleukin-4 toxin, DAB389IL-4.
J. Allergy Clin. Immunol.
95:893-900[Medline].
|
| 9.
|
Laemmli, U. K.
1970.
Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4.
Nature (London)
227:680-685[Medline].
|
| 10.
|
Lode, H. N.,
R. Xiang,
N. M. Varki,
C. S. Dolman,
S. D. Gillies, and R. A. Reisfeld.
1997.
Targeted interleukin-2 therapy for spontaneous neuroblastoma metastases to bone marrow.
J. Natl. Cancer Inst.
89:1586-1594[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 11.
|
Milenic, D. E.,
T. Yokota,
D. R. Filpula,
M. A. J. Finkelman,
S. W. Dodd,
J. F. Wood,
M. Whitlow,
P. Snoy, and J. Schlom.
1991.
Construction, binding properties, metabolism and tumor targeting of a single-chain Fv derived from the pancarcinoma monoclonal antibody CC49.
Cancer Res.
51:6363-6371[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 12.
|
Morrison, S. L.,
L. A. Wims, and V. T. Oi.
1988.
Genetically engineered antibody molecules: new tools for cancer therapy.
Cancer Investig.
6:185-192[Medline].
|
| 13.
|
Naramura, M.,
S. D. Gillies,
J. Mendelsohn,
R. A. Reisfeld, and B. M. Mueller.
1994.
Mechanisms of cellular cytotoxicity mediated by a recombinant antibody-IL2 fusion protein against human melanoma cells.
Immunol. Lett.
39:91-99.
|
| 14.
|
Nicolet, C. M.,
J. K. Burkholder,
J. Gan,
J. Culp,
S. V. S. Kashmiri,
J. Schlom,
N.-S. Yang, and P. M. Sondel.
1995.
Expression of a tumor-reactive antibody-interleukin 2 fusion protein after in vivo particle-mediated gene delivery.
Cancer Gene Ther.
2:161-170[Medline].
|
| 15.
|
Pancook, J. D.,
J. C. Becker,
S. D. Gillies, and R. A. Reisfeld.
1996.
Eradication of established hepatic human neuroblastoma metastases in mice with severe combined immunodeficiency by antibody-targeted interleukin-2.
Cancer Immunol. Immunother.
42:88-92[Medline].
|
| 16.
|
Reisfeld, R. A., and S. D. Gillies.
1996.
Antibody-interleukin 2 fusion proteins: a new approach to cancer therapy.
J. Clin. Lab. Anal.
10:160-166[Medline].
|
| 17.
|
Sabzevari, H.,
S. D. Gillies,
B. M. Mueller,
J. D. Pancook, and R. A. Reisfeld.
1994.
A recombinant antibody-interleukin 2 fusion protein suppresses growth of hepatic human neuroblastoma metastases in severe combined immunodeficiency mice.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
91:9626-9630[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 18.
|
Saleh, M. N.,
M. B. Khazaeli,
R. H. Wheeler,
R. P. Bucy,
T. Liu,
M. P. Everson,
D. H. Munn,
J. Schlom, and A. F. LoBuglio.
1995.
Phase II trial of murine monoclonal antibody D612 combined with recombinant human monocyte colony-stimulating factor (rhM-CSF) in patients with metastatic gastrointestinal cancer.
Cancer Res.
55:4339-4346[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 19.
|
Savage, P.,
A. So,
R. A. Spooner, and A. A. Epentos.
1993.
A recombinant single chain antibody interleukin-2 fusion protein.
Br. J. Cancer
67:304-310[Medline].
|
| 20.
|
Sen, G.,
M. Chakraborty,
K. A. Foon,
R. A. Reisfeld, and M. Bhattacharya-Chatterjee.
1997.
Preclinical evaluation in nonhuman primates of murine monoclonal anti-idiotype antibody that mimics the disialoganglioside GD2.
Clin. Cancer Res.
3:1969-1976[Abstract].
|
| 21.
|
Shin, S. U., and S. L. Morrison.
1989.
Production and properties of chimeric antibody molecules.
Methods Enzymol.
178:459-478[Medline].
|
| 22.
|
Shu, L.,
C.-F. Qi,
J. Schlom, and S. V. S. Kashmiri.
1993.
Secretion of a single-gene-encoded immunoglobulin from myeloma cells.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
90:7995-7999[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 23.
|
Slavin-Chiorini, D. C.,
P. H. Horan Hand,
S. V. S. Kashmiri,
B. Calvo,
S. Zaremba, and J. Schlom.
1993.
Biologic properties of CH2 domain-deleted recombinant immunoglobulins.
Int. J. Cancer
53:97-103[Medline].
|
| 24.
|
Thavasu, P. W.,
S. Longhurst,
S. P. Joel,
M. L. Slevin, and F. R. Balkwill.
1992.
Measuring cytokine levels in blood: importance of anticoagulants, processing, and storage conditions.
J. Immunol. Methods
153:115-134[Medline].
|
| 25.
|
Towbin, H.,
T. Staehelin, and J. Gordon.
1979.
Electrophoretic transfer of proteins from polyacrylamide gels to nitrocellulose sheets: procedure and some applications.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
76:4350-4354[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 26.
|
Xiang, R.,
H. N. Lode,
C. S. Dolman,
T. Dreier,
N. M. Varki,
X. Qian,
K.-M. Lo,
Y. Lan,
M. Super,
S. D. Gillies, and R. A. Reisfeld.
1997.
Elimination of established murine colon carcinoma metastases by antibody-interleukin 2 fusion protein therapy.
Cancer Res.
57:4948-4955[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology, March 1999, p. 236-242, Vol. 6, No. 2
1071-412X/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
King, D. M., Albertini, M. R., Schalch, H., Hank, J. A., Gan, J., Surfus, J., Mahvi, D., Schiller, J. H., Warner, T., Kim, K., Eickhoff, J., Kendra, K., Reisfeld, R., Gillies, S. D., Sondel, P.
(2004). Phase I Clinical Trial of the Immunocytokine EMD 273063 in Melanoma Patients. JCO
22: 4463-4473
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Imboden, M., Murphy, K. R., Rakhmilevich, A. L., Neal, Z. C., Xiang, R., Reisfeld, R. A., Gillies, S. D., Sondel, P. M.
(2001). The Level of MHC Class I Expression on Murine Adenocarcinoma Can Change the Antitumor Effector Mechanism of Immunocytokine Therapy. Cancer Res.
61: 1500-1507
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Ozkaynak, M. F., Sondel, P. M., Krailo, M. D., Gan, J., Javorsky, B., Reisfeld, R. A., Matthay, K. K., Reaman, G. H., Seeger, R. C.
(2000). Phase I Study of Chimeric Human/Murine Anti-Ganglioside GD2 Monoclonal Antibody (ch14.18) With Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor in Children With Neuroblastoma Immediately After Hematopoietic Stem-Cell Transplantation: A Children's Cancer Group Study. JCO
18: 4077-4085
[Abstract]
[Full Text]