Previous Article | Next Article 
Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology, July 1999, p. 599-605, Vol. 6, No. 4
1071-412X/99/$04.00+0
Use of Recombinant Flagellin Protein as a Tracer
Antigen in a Fluorescence Polarization Assay for Diagnosis of
Leptospirosis
Nasreen I.
Bughio,*
Min
Lin, and
Om P.
Surujballi
Canadian Food Inspection Agency, Animal
Diseases Research Institute, Nepean, Ontario, Canada K2H 8P9
Received 3 August 1998/Returned for modification 19 November
1998/Accepted 26 April 1999
 |
ABSTRACT |
The objective of the present study was to investigate the
usefulness of a recombinant flagellar protein, FlaB, of
Leptospira interrogans serovar pomona in the
serodiagnosis of leptospirosis by the fluorescence polarization assay
(FPA). The recombinant protein FlaB was purified to homogeneity by a
combination of nickel-nitriloacetic acid agarose chromatography,
electrophoresis, and electroelution. Purified FlaB was labeled with
fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC). Western blotting was performed by
using bovine sera with microscopic agglutination test (MAT) titers of
antibodies against L. interrogans serovar
pomona and L. bergpetersenii serovars
hardjo and sejroe to confirm the antigenicity
of FlaB. Western blot analysis demonstrated that labeled as well as
unlabeled FlaB was recognized by the positive sera tested, indicating
the broad serovar cross-reactivity of this protein. It also indicated
that labeling with FITC did not affect the antigenicity. By using
FITC-labeled FlaB as a tracer antigen, a homogeneous FPA was developed
to detect antileptospiral antibodies in bovine sera. A population of
208 MAT-positive and 208 MAT-negative serum samples was tested by FPA.
The FPA cutoff was determined by receiver operating characteristic
analysis. By FPA, 83.7% of the MAT-positive serum samples were
positive and 81.2% of the MAT-negative serum samples were negative.
Compared to the results of MAT, the positive predictive value of FPA
was 81.7% and the negative predictive value of FPA was 83.3%. The FPA
is a simple and rapid technique for the detection of
anti-Leptospira antibodies.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Leptospirosis is a zoonotic
infection which exhibits a broad spectrum of clinical manifestations,
ranging in severity from acute to chronic with multiorgan syndrome to
fatal (16). Leptospirosis affects wild rodents and domestic
animals such as cattle, swine, horses, sheep, goats, and dogs
(17). Animals with infections with leptospires also
represent occupational hazards to farmers, butchers, and veterinarians
(15, 16). The pathogenic leptospires were formerly
classified as Leptospira interrogans, but the genus has
recently been reorganized and pathogenic leptospires are now identified
in seven species of Leptospira (59). These
bacteria are divided into 23 serogroups and are subdivided into
approximately 212 serovars on the basis of common cross-reacting
agglutinins (16, 18).
The diagnosis of leptospirosis depends either on the detection of
antibodies in the sera or the presence of the organisms in tissues or
body fluids (6, 16, 58). Since the isolation of leptospires
is difficult and laborious, serological diagnosis is extensively used.
The microscopic agglutination test (MAT) is the most commonly used
diagnostic test (11). Several other techniques, such as the
passive hemagglutination test (40), the immunofluorescence
test (4), and enzyme immunoassays (55, 58), have
also been investigated. However, these assays have significant
drawbacks, such as the use of a battery of live leptospires, with an
associated risk of a laboratory-acquired infection, and the involvement
of multiple reagents and steps (16, 23, 44, 48, 49, 54, 55).
There is a need for a diagnostic laboratory test which can detect
anti-Leptospira antibodies in biological fluids with high
sensitivity and specificity and which can be performed within a short
period of time. Although the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)
(44, 48) meets most of the desired requirements, improved
simplicity and rapidity are still needed.
Dandliker et al. (13) introduced a homogeneous fluorescence
polarization assay (FPA) that is sensitive, specific, and rapid and
that requires few reagents. Fluorescence polarization is a measure of
the time-averaged rotational motion of fluorescent molecules. When a
fluorescently labeled antigen binds to the antibody, its fluorescence
polarization will increase due to the larger hydrodynamic volume of the
antigen-antibody complex (17, 35, 47).
Nielsen et al. (41) reported on the development of an FPA
with fluorescein-labeled Brucella abortus O polysaccharide
as a tracer antigen for the detection of Brucella antibodies
in bovine sera. Those investigators demonstrated that FPA is a highly
accurate assay with a sensitivity and a specificity of 99.02 and
99.96%, respectively. In a similar study, Lin et al. (33)
reported on the use of fluorescein-labeled Mycobacterium
bovis secretory protein MPB70 as a tracer antigen in an FPA. Those
investigators indicated that FPA is able to detect anti-MPB70
antibodies in the sera of infected animals but not in the sera of
uninfected animals.
Information on the nature and identity of leptospiral antigens is
important for elucidation of their significance in the immunity to
leptospirosis and the pathogenesis and diagnosis of leptospirosis. Leptospires have a characteristic corkscrew-like movement which is
mediated by two periplasmic flagella inserted subterminally into the
protoplasmic cylinder (16). Sequence analyses of flagellar genes and proteins from several spirochetes show that there are two
distinct classes of proteins, the FlaA and FlaB proteins, in the
filament. FlaA proteins are associated with the sheath surrounding a
core which is composed of FlaB proteins (38, 42, 45).
Electrophoresis has revealed that the periplasmic flagella are composed
of three prominent proteins: proteins with molecular masses of 31 and
37 kDa and a 33- and 34-kDa doublet (8, 31). Nunes-Edwards
et al. (43) identified several proteins with molecular masses of between 30 and 67 kDa from L. interrogans serovar
hardjo. However, the significance of these proteins in the
diagnosis or pathogenesis of leptospirosis or immunity to infection is
not yet clear.
Recently, a 35-kDa protein from L. interrogans serovar
pomona which is recognized by mono- and polyclonal
anti-Leptospira antibodies has been identified. This protein
was identified as the flagellin protein FlaB, and a gene encoding
L. interrogans serovar pomona FlaB protein was
cloned (34) and expressed in Escherichia coli
(36).
The objectives of the present study were (i) to investigate the
application of the recombinant protein FlaB in the diagnosis of
leptospirosis and (ii) develop a sensitive and specific, yet simple and
rapid assay for the serological screening of large numbers of
leprospiral sera. This paper reports on the purification of recombinant
protein FlaB and development and preliminary analysis of a homogeneous
FPA for the diagnosis of leptospirosis. The performance of FPA in terms
of its diagnostic sensitivity and specificity relative to the results
of MAT was determined by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Production of recombinant FlaB protein.
In this study, the
expression construct pHTFlaB, which was generated as described
previously (36), was used to produce the recombinant FlaB
protein in E. coli DH5
. Briefly, Luria-Bertani broth (500 ml) supplemented with ampicillin (100 µg/ml) was inoculated with 5 ml
of an overnight culture of the E. coli harboring pHTFlaB. Cultures were grown at 37°C in a incubator (Environ Shaker) until an
optical density at 590 nm of 0.8 to 1.0 (approximate time, 4 to 5 h) was achieved. Expression of FlaB was initiated by the addition of
isopropyl-
-D-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) at a final concentration of 0.6 mM. Cultures were incubated for an additional 3 h to allow maximal protein expression. The cells were harvested by centrifugation at 10,000 × g for 20 min at 4°C.
The cell pellet was stored at
80°C until further analysis. In order
to confirm protein expression, a 1.0-ml aliquot of the E. coli culture was taken before and after the addition of IPTG and
was analyzed by electrophoresis.
SDS-PAGE and Western blotting.
Sodium dodecyl sulfate
(SDS)-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) was performed by the
method of Laemmli (32) in 12% (wt/vol) resolving and 4%
(wt/vol) stacking polyacrylamide gels with a mini-PROTEAN II gel
apparatus (Bio-Rad). After electrophoresis, the proteins were either
stained with Coomassie brilliant blue or electrophoretically
transblotted (57) onto a nitrocellulose membrane (NC)
(Bio-Rad) with a Trans-Blot Cell (Hoeffer Scientific) at 100 V for
2.5 h with cooling (7). The NC was blocked overnight with Tris-buffered saline (TBS) supplemented with Tween 20 (10 mM
Tris-HCl, 140 mM NaCl [pH 7.4], 0.5% Tween) (TBS-T) plus 5% heat-inactivated horse serum (Armour, Kankakee, Ill.). After blocking, the NC was reacted with diluted bovine antiserum (1:100) for 3 h
at room temperature and then with anti-bovine immunoglobulin G (IgG)
conjugated with horseradish peroxidase (1:5,000). The NC was washed
(five times) between each reaction step with TBS-T. Bound conjugate was
visualized with a horseradish peroxidase substrate kit (Bio-Rad). The
molecular masses of the separated proteins were determined by
comparison with those of prestained protein standards (Bio-Rad).
Nickel-chelate affinity chromatography.
The recombinant
protein FlaB was partially purified by affinity chromatography on a
nickel-nitriloacetic acid (Ni-NTA)-agarose column (27, 28,
36) according to the manufacturer's instructions (Qiagen).
Briefly, IPTG-induced E. coli cells harboring pHTFlaB were
resuspended in 10 ml of buffer A (8 M urea, 0.1 M
Na2HPO4, 0.01 M Tris-HCl [pH 8.0]), lysed for
1 h at room temperature with continuous stirring, and then kept
overnight at 4°C. Insoluble material was removed by centrifugation at
27,000 × g for 40 min at 4°C. The supernatant was
applied to an Ni-NTA column (1 by 7.5 cm) preequilibrated with buffer
A. The E. coli proteins were eluted by sequential washing
with 50 ml each of buffer B (8 M urea, 0.1 M
Na2HPO4, 0.01 M Tris-HCl, 1 M NaCl [pH 6.3])
and buffer C (which had the same composition as buffer B except that it
was at pH 5.9). Selective elution of the FlaB protein was achieved with
buffer D (which had the same composition as buffer C except that it
contained 80 mM imidazole). The fractions were collected, and the
absorbance was measured at 280 nm in a spectrophotometer (Pharmacia LKB
Ultrospec plus). All eluted fractions were subjected to SDS-PAGE to
confirm the presence of the FlaB protein. The peak fractions containing
the FlaB protein were pooled and stored at
20°C.
Electroelution.
Following Ni-NTA affinity chromatography,
the partially purified FlaB preparation was subjected to SDS-PAGE as
described above. Individual protein bands were visualized by staining
with Tris-Coomassie buffer (0.125 M Tris-HCl [pH 6.8] containing
0.2% Coomassie brilliant blue) and destaining with 0.125 M Tris-HCl
(pH 6.8) containing 0.1% SDS and 1 mM EDTA. The FlaB protein band was
excised and electroeluted (1, 20) with a Bio-Rad model 422 Electroelutor (25) at a constant current of 10 mA/tube for 4 to 6 h at room temperature with elution buffer (25 mM Tris-HCl,
192 mM glycine, 0.1% SDS [pH 8.5]). The purified FlaB was
concentrated in an Ultrafiltration Stirred Cell (Amicon) fitted
with a PM-10 (25 mm) ultrafiltration membrane (Amicon). Purified
FlaB was dialyzed overnight against 0.02 M phosphate-buffered saline
(PBS; pH 7.2) containing 0.01% SDS. This sample was used as an antigen
for fluorescein labeling.
FITC labeling.
Purified FlaB (650 µg in 1 ml) mixed with
0.3 ml of fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC; 1 mg/ml) in 0.15 M sodium
phosphate buffer (pH 9.5) was routinely used. The reaction mixture was
incubated for 3 h at 37°C. In order to separate free dye from
the labeled FlaB protein, the reaction mixture was applied to a
Sephadex G-25 column (1 by 23 cm; Pharmacia) that had been
preequilibrated with 0.1 M sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.0). The
absorbance of the fractions was monitored at 492 nm (Pharmacia LKB
Ultrospec plus). The eluted fractions were pooled and analyzed by
SDS-PAGE. The protein bands were visualized with UV light
(Transilluminator; VWR Scientific) followed by staining with Coomassie
brilliant blue. The FITC-labeled recombinant protein FlaB was used as a tracer antigen in an FPA.
Serum samples.
A total of 416 field bovine serum samples
were examined by FPA for the detection of antileptospiral antibodies.
All serum samples were supplied by the Animal Diseases Research
Institute, Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada. All of the positive and
negative serum samples were initially tested once by MAT
(53). All serum samples that had been stored at
20°C
prior to processing were equilibrated to room temperature before
testing by FPA.
MAT.
MAT was performed by a modification of a previously
described method (11). Live 4-day-old Leptospira
cultures (Leptospira serovars hardjo,
pomona, sejroe, canicola,
icterohaemorrhagiae, and grippotyphosa) were used
as antigens. The endpoint titer was the highest dilution of serum that
agglutinated at least 50% of the leptospires. Agglutination at a serum
dilution of 1:100 was considered positive.
FPA.
FPA was carried out on an FPM-1 fluorescence
polarization analyzer (Jolley Consulting and Research, Inc., Grayslake,
Ill.). The baseline for the tracer antigen alone was established with 0.1 M PBS (pH 7.2). Serum samples were diluted (1:50) in 0.01 M PBS
containing 0.1% sodium azide and 0.05% lithium dodecyl sulfate. Two
milliliters of diluent was dispensed into a glass tube (12 by 75 cm).
Test serum (0.04 ml) was then added to the diluent tube and the
contents were mixed thoroughly. Each sample was blanked in the
fluorescence polarization analyzer. The predetermined amount of the
tracer antigen (0.02 ml) was then added to the serum sample and the
contents were mixed thoroughly. The mixture was allowed to equilibrate
for 10 to 30 min at room temperature. Following the equilibration
period, the fluorescence polarization was measured as millipolarization
units (mP) in a fluorescence polarization analyzer. In this study, the
same lot of labeled FlaB tracer antigen was used for all FPAs.
Protein determination.
The concentration of FlaB was
determined with a bicinchoninic acid protein assay kit (Pierce) by
using bovine serum albumin as the standard, as described previously
(50).
Data analysis.
The Excel 7.0 program (Microsoft) and ROC
analysis (37) were used to evaluate the performance of FPA
for the detection of antileptospiral antibodies. The ROC curve plots
the relative sensitivity (true-positive ratio) versus relative
specificity (false-positive ratio) while the cutoff value for a
positive or negative result is varied and is completely independent of
disease prevalence. The area under the ROC curve provides a
quantitative assessment of a test's diagnostic performance. The 95%
confidence intervals are calculated as indicators of the precision of
the relative sensitivity and relative specificity estimates. ROC
analysis analyzes the diagnostic performance for the full range of
cutoff points and thus eliminates the bias resulting from selection of
a single value (24).
 |
RESULTS |
Recombinant protein overproduction and purification.
SDS-PAGE
analysis of the total lysate of E. coli harboring pHTFlaB
demonstrated that the recombinant FlaB protein showed up as a strong
band at the expected 31-kDa position (Fig.
1, lane 2) in the cells induced with
IPTG. However, FlaB was not detected in the E. coli extracts
grown in the absence of IPTG (Fig. 1, lane 1). It was observed that
FlaB was contaminated with several high- and low-molecular-mass
proteins of E. coli (Fig. 1, lanes 2 and 3).

View larger version (67K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Expression and purification of recombinant FlaB protein.
Samples from each step in the purification process were subjected to
SDS-PAGE. Lane 1, soluble lysate of uninduced E. coli; lane
2, soluble lysate of induced E. coli; lane 3, crude extract
of induced cells prior to Ni-NTA affinity chromatography; lane 4, protein eluted from the Ni-NTA column with 80 mM imidazole; lane 5, purified FlaB following electroelution. The positions of the molecular
mass markers are indicated. Lanes 1 and 2 contain total cell proteins
from 1 ml of culture with an A590 of 0.2. The
recombinant protein FlaB is indicated with an arrowhead.
|
|
The expression of the L. interrogans serovar pomona
flaB gene in E. coli (36) resulted in the
FlaB fusion protein with a polyhistidine tag at the N terminus which
facilitates purification. Ni-NTA affinity chromatography was used as
the first step in the purification of FlaB from the bacterial cell
lysate. The proteins were eluted in progressively acidic steps. The
elution profile at 280 nm showed two well-separated peaks. SDS-PAGE
analysis demonstrated the presence of E. coli proteins in
the fractions of the first peak and the presence of a strong band in
the 31-kDa region (which corresponds to the molecular mass of FlaB) in
the second peak. Affinity-purified FlaB was found to be contaminated
with one higher-molecular-mass band and one lower-molecular-mass band
(Fig. 1, lane 4).
FlaB was further purified by electroelution. The elution time for
maximal recovery of FlaB was 6 h. A purified product represented by a strong single band at the 31-kDa position was obtained, with no
detectable contaminating protein bands (Fig. 1, lane 5). Purified FlaB
was concentrated, dialyzed, and labeled with fluorescein dye.
FITC labeling.
Analysis of Sephadex G-25 gel filtration
chromatography fractions at 492 nm revealed the presence of two
distinct peaks. The fractions of the first peak contained a bluish
green fluorescent eluate. The second peak contained free FITC. The
covalent attachment of FITC to FlaB was confirmed by SDS-PAGE. The gels
exposed to UV light prior to staining revealed the presence of at least
two fluorescently labeled FlaB protein bands at the 31-kDa site (Fig. 2A, lanes 1 and 3), which corresponds to
the position of unlabeled FlaB (Fig. 2B, lane 2). However, it was
observed that unlabeled FlaB migrated as a single band with an apparent
molecular mass of 31 kDa (Fig. 2B, lane 2). The fractions of the first
peak containing FITC-labeled FlaB were pooled and used as the tracer
antigen.

View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
SDS-PAGE analysis of FITC-labeled and unlabeled
recombinant FlaB protein. (A) A photograph of the gel taken under UV
illumination. (B) The same gel after Coomassie blue staining. Lane 1, reaction mixture (FlaB plus FITC) following 3 h of incubation at
37°C; lane 2, unlabeled FlaB; lane 3, FITC-labeled FlaB after gel
filtration chromatography. The recombinant protein FlaB is indicated
with an arrowhead.
|
|
Western blotting.
The antigenicities of labeled and unlabeled
FlaB were examined by Western blotting with bovine sera containing
antibodies against L. interrogans serovar
pomona and Leptospira borgpetersenii serovars hardjo and sejroe. Sera from
uninfected animals were used as negative controls. Western blot
analysis revealed that both labeled and unlabeled FlaB proteins were
recognized by antibodies against various Leptospira serovars
(Fig. 3A to C). In the case of unlabeled
FlaB, a serum sample with a high titer of antibodies against L. interrogans serovar pomona, as determined by MAT,
recognized a single band at the 31-kDa site (Fig. 3A, lane 1). However,
in the case of labeled FlaB, the same serum sample reacted with at least two FlaB protein bands at the 31-kDa position (Fig. 3, lane 2)
with the same intensity. Similar patterns were obtained with serum
samples with high titers of antibodies against L. borgpetersenii serovars hardjo and sejroe
(Fig. 3B and C, respectively). This suggests that the purified
unlabeled and labeled FlaB proteins were immunologically active and
that the immunogenicity of the epitope was not altered by modification
with fluorescein. The MAT-negative serum samples did not react with
labeled or unlabeled FlaB.

View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Western blot analysis of unlabeled FlaB (lanes 1) and
FITC-labeled FlaB (lanes 2). Recombinant protein was electrophoresed on
an SDS-12% polyacrylamide gel, transblotted onto an NC, and
immunostained with bovine sera containing antibodies against L. interrogans serovar pomona (A), L. borgpetersenii serovar hardjo (B), and L. borgpetersenii serovar sejroe (C). Ten microliters of
labeled and unlabeled protein was loaded into each lane. The
recombinant protein FlaB is indicated with an arrowhead.
|
|
FPA.
FPA was performed with fluorescein-labeled FlaB as a
tracer antigen. A mean fluorescence millipolarization value (mP) value of 147 mP (n = 4) was obtained when the fluorescence
polarization of the tracer antigen diluted in PBS was measured.
Initially, five MAT-positive and four MAT-negative bovine serum samples
(diluted 1:50) were analyzed by FPA. In the presence of the tracer
antigen, the MAT-positive sera gave mean mP values ranging from 201 to 214 (n = 5). In the presence of the tracer antigen, the
MAT-negative sera gave mean mP values of between 151 and 155 (n = 4), which was very close to the mP value obtained
with the tracer antigen alone. When the same serum samples were tested
by Western blotting with the tracer antigen, the presence or absence of
antileptospiral antibodies was confirmed. It was demonstrated that
Western blotting results were in agreement with FPA results. These
results suggested the feasibility of using FITC-labeled recombinant
FlaB as a tracer antigen for the detection of antileptospiral
antibodies by FPA.
A total of 416 field serum samples were then tested by FPA. A total of
208 serum samples which were MAT positive for at least one of the
Leptospira serovars, pomona, sejroe,
canicola, icterohaemorrhagiae, grippotyphosa, or hardjo, were used to estimate
the relative sensitivity of FPA, and 208 serum samples which were MAT
negative for the serovars listed above were used to estimate the
relative specificity of FPA. The relative sensitivity and relative
specificity were calculated by ROC analysis at different cutoff points.
In this study, a large area (0.90; 95% confidence interval = 0.856 to 0.918) was observed under the ROC curve for FPA (data not
shown), suggesting that FPA could be a useful test for the
serodiagnosis of leptospirosis. It was demonstrated that at low cutoff
points, FPA has a high relative sensitivity and high negative
predictive values; however, the relative specificity and positive
predictive values were low. At higher cutoff points, although the
relative specificity and positive predictive values were high, the
relative sensitivity and negative predictive values were low. The
optimum cutoff point for FPA from the ROC curve was 161 mP, which
yielded a relative sensitivity value of 83.7 ± 0.01% and a relative
specificity value of 81.2% ± 0.01% (Table
1). The positive predictive value was
81.7% and the negative predictive value was 83.3% (Table 1). The
distribution of data obtained with the 416 serum samples that were
positive or negative for antileptospiral antibodies is shown in Fig.
4. The sample numbers (y axis)
were plotted against the mP value (x axis). An area of
overlap between MAT-positive and MAT-negative samples was observed, in
that some MAT-negative serum samples had high mP values by FPA.

View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
Distribution of 416 MAT-positive ( ) and -negative
( ) bovine serum samples tested by FPA for the presence of
antileptospiral antibodies. Total serum sample numbers (y
axis) were plotted against mP values (x axis), which is a
measure of the fluorescence polarization.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
In the present study, we report on the development and preliminary
evaluation of a novel immunoassay, FPA, for the detection of
antileptospiral antibodies in a panel of bovine sera with a fluorescein-labeled recombinant protein, FlaB, as the tracer antigen. The FPA has been applied to the quantitation of analytes,
investigations of protein-protein interactions, ligand binding, and
enzymatic activity, and monitoring of the interaction between antibody
and its epitope (5, 12, 14, 20, 21, 26, 29, 30, 35, 41, 46, 51,
52).
The first aim of this study was to produce highly purified recombinant
protein FlaB. By using a combination of Ni-NTA affinity chromatography,
electrophoretic separation by SDS-PAGE, and electroelution, FlaB
protein was recovered in a homogeneous and antigenically active form.
The role of protein FlaB in the immune response to Leptospira is not yet known. Chang and Faine (9)
demonstrated that leptospiral flagella are highly immunogenic. Several
studies have reported that leptospiral flagella are recognized by
antibodies induced by natural and experimental leptospirosis in animals
and humans, and antiflagellar sera have been shown to agglutinate the
whole leptospires (2, 10, 19, 22).
The second goal of this study was to label purified FlaB with
fluorescein and examine if it could be used as a tracer antigen for the detection of antileptospiral antibodies by an FPA. Some discrepancies in the migration of labeled and unlabeled FlaB
on SDS-polyacrylamide gels were observed. The labeled
FlaB seem to comprise at least two bands; however, unlabeled
FlaB appeared as a single band. The reason for this difference is
unclear. It is possible that the modification of FlaB with FITC may
have resulted in at least two populations of labeled proteins with
different degrees of substitution.
Western blots of FITC-labeled and unlabeled FlaB were performed with
bovine serum samples with titers against Leptospira serovars pomona, hardjo, and sejroe, as
determined by MAT, to confirm the antigenicity of FlaB. It was observed
that the labeled as well as the unlabeled FlaB proteins demonstrated
similar reactivities to the MAT-positive sera, indicating the broad
antigenic cross-reactivity of this recombinant protein. It also
indicated that labeling with fluorescein did not affect the antigenicity.
To evaluate the relative sensitivity and relative specificity of FPA, a
total of 416 field bovine serum samples were used. All serum samples
were initially tested once by MAT against Leptospira serovars pomona, sejroe, canicola,
icterohaemorrhagiae, grippotyphosa, and
hardjo. The majority of positive serum samples reacted to Leptospira serovar pomona, with other commonly
reacting serovars being Leptospira serovars
sejroe, hardjo, and canicola. The
relative sensitivity and relative specificity were calculated at
different cutoff points by ROC analysis. The area under the ROC curve
indicates the ability of FPA to discriminate the sera with and without
antibodies. The larger the area under the ROC curve the better the test
discriminates. A perfectly informative test has an area of 1.0, whereas
a noninformative test has an area of 0.5 or less (24, 41).
In this study, a large area (0.90; 95% confidence interval = 0.856 to 0.918) was observed under the ROC curve for FPA, suggesting
that FPA could be a useful test for the serodiagnosis of leptospirosis.
A cutoff point of 161 mP yielded the best combination of relative
sensitivity (83.7%) and relative specificity (81.2%). However, the
overall relative sensitivity may be increased up to 99.5% (with a
corresponding relative specificity of 15.9%) if the cutoff is
established at a lower point (121 mP). The overall relative specificity
may be increased to up to 99.0% (with a corresponding relative
sensitivity of 7.7%) if the cutoff is established at a higher point
(192 mP). The frequency distribution histogram for 416 MAT-positive and MAT-negative bovine serum samples demonstrated an area of overlap between MAT-positive and MAT-negative samples, in that some
MAT-negative serum samples had high mP values by FPA. One explanation
for this overlap could be that MAT-negative sera may contain
nonagglutinating antibodies which were detected by FPA but not by MAT
since MAT detects agglutinating antibodies only.
It must be stressed that these results were obtained from measurements
performed with serum samples kept at
20°C for a period of 2 to 3 years. It must also be noted that the antisera used in this study are
defined as positive or negative for particular Leptospira
serovars on the basis of MAT results alone. Due to the difficulty and
expense associated with the culture of Leptospira, culture-positive or culture-negative serum samples are not available.
In our study, some MAT-positive bovine serum samples were found to be
negative by FPA and some MAT-negative serum samples were found to be
positive by FPA. The results could be inconsistent for a number of
reasons, including the presence of nonspecific components in the serum
samples or the presence of antibodies of an isotype(s) not recognized
by MAT. Several studies (2, 3, 22, 53) have demonstrated
that the agglutinins produced are mainly IgM. Some other studies
(22, 56) have reported that very few animals and humans with
leptospirosis produce IgG agglutinins that can be measured by MAT;
however, the presence of IgG antibodies was detectable by ELISA.
Presumably, they were directed against nonagglutinating antigens
(39).
This report presents an efficient method for the purification of
flagellin recombinant protein FlaB from E. coli. The
purification procedures presented here are rapid and easy to perform
and provide the recombinant protein at a good recovery rate and a high
purity. This procedure can readily be scaled up, therefore allowing the production of sufficient antigen for immunological and biochemical studies. We are encouraged by the fact that FlaB appears to retain most
of the features of its native properties even after the multiple-step purification procedure. The analysis of our FPA data reveals that this
test could be a valuable addition to the existing methods for the
diagnosis of leptospirosis. MAT is the standard reference method for
the serodiagnosis of leptospirosis. MAT is laborious and
time-consuming; requires multiple serovars of fresh, live bacteria and
the maintenance of a large number of stock cultures to provide
antigens, which increases the risk of laboratory-acquired infection;
requires specialized laboratory facilities; and is a sensitive detector
of IgM antibodies alone. In addition, the interpretation of the results
is subjective, and there is no field application. ELISA is simple and
easily automated, but it is time-consuming and expensive. FPA has
several advantages over MAT and ELISA: (i) FPA is safe since it uses
fluorescein-labeled proteins instead of live bacteria of multiple
serovars as the antigen(s); (ii) it is a homogeneous assay, with no
blocking, washing, or antigen immobilization steps required; (iii) it
uses a single reagent; (iv) it is relatively low cost; (v) it is
simple; (vi) it is fast; (vii) it is a sensitive detector of IgM, IgG,
and IgA; (viii) its results can be assessed objectively; and (ix) due
to its rapidity and ease, it can be adapted as a field test. These
qualities indicate that FPA may be a useful technique for diagnosis and
epidemiological studies of leptospirosis. We are in the process of
conducting a large-scale validation study in order to further
investigate the performance of FPA. Statistical analysis of the results
obtained with a larger panel of sera may result in a reevaluation of
the cut-off point and the relative sensitivity and relative specificity values.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We are indebted to Klaus Nielsen, Donna Hutchings, and Brian
Brooks for helpful comments. We also thank David Gall for excellent assistance with the statistical analysis and Pat Smith for help with FPA.
The work was supported in part by Diachemix Corporation (Grayslake,
Ill.).
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Canadian Food
Inspection Agency, Animal Diseases Research Institute, 3851 Fallowfield Rd., Nepean, Ontario, Canada K2H 8P9. Phone: (613) 228-6698. Fax: (613)
228-6667. E-mail: bughion{at}em.agr.ca.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Acil, Y.,
J. Brinckmann,
P. Behrens,
P. K. Muller, and B. Batge.
1997.
Semipreparative isolation of collagen types I, II, III and V by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and electroelution.
J. Chromatogr.
758:313-318.
|
| 2.
|
Adler, B., and S. Faine.
1979.
Antibodies against leptospiral axial filament in human anti-Leptospira sera.
FEMS Microbiol. Lett.
11:387-400.
|
| 3.
|
Adler, B.,
A. M. Murphy,
S. A. Locarnini, and S. Faine.
1980.
Detection of specific anti-leptospiral immunoglobulins M and G in human serum by solid-phase enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
11:452-457[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 4.
|
Appassakij, H.,
K. Silpapojakul,
R. Wansit, and J. Woodtayakorn.
1995.
Evaluation of the immunofluorescent antibody test for the diagnosis of human leptospirosis.
Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg.
52:340-343.
|
| 5.
|
Bentley, K. L.
1985.
Fluorescence polarization: a general method for measuring ligand binding and membrane microviscosity.
BioTechniques
5:356-366.
|
| 6.
|
Bolin, C. A.
1996.
Diagnosis of leptospirosis: a reemerging disease of companion animals.
Semin. Vet. Med. Surg.
11:166-171.
|
| 7.
|
Bughio, N. I.,
G. M. Faubert, and R. K. Prichard.
1993.
Characterization and biological activities of monoclonal antibodies against Brugia pahangi tubulin.
Int. J. Parasitol.
7:913-918.
|
| 8.
|
Champion, C. I.,
J. N. Miller,
M. A. Lovett, and D. R. Bianco.
1990.
Cloning, sequencing and expression of two class B endoflagellar genes of Treponema pallidum subsp. pallidum encoding the 34.5 and 31.0 kDa proteins.
Infect. Immun.
58:1697-1704[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 9.
|
Chang, A., and S. Faine.
1973.
Effect of anti-cell and anti-axial filament sera on Leptospira.
Aust. J. Exp. Biol. Med. Sci.
52:549-568.
|
| 10.
|
Chapman, A. J.,
B. Adler, and S. Faine.
1988.
Antigens recognized by the human immune response to infection with L. interrogans serovar hardjo.
J. Med. Microbiol.
25:269-278[Abstract].
|
| 11.
|
Cole, J. R.,
C. R. Sulzer, and A. R. Pursell.
1973.
Improved microtechnique for the leptospiral microscopic agglutination test.
Appl. Microbiol.
25:976-980[Medline].
|
| 12.
|
Dandliker, W. B.,
M. Hsu, and W. P. Vanderlaan.
1980.
Fluorescence polarization immunoreceptor assays.
Lab. Res. Met. Biol. Med.
4:65-88.
|
| 13.
|
Dandliker, W. B.,
R. J. Kelly,
J. Dandliker, et al.
1973.
Fluorescence polarization immunoassay: theory and experimental method.
Immunochemistry
10:219-227[Medline].
|
| 14.
|
Eksborg, S.,
F. Albertioni,
C. Rask,
O. Beck,
C. Palm,
H. Schroeder, and C. Peterson.
1996.
Methotrexate plasma pharmacokinetics: importance of assay method.
Cancer Lett.
108:163-169[Medline].
|
| 15.
|
Faine, S.
1991.
Leptospirosis, p. 367-393.
In
A. S. Evans, and P. S. Brachman (ed.), Bacterial infections of humans: epidemiology and control. Plenum Publishing Corporation, New York, N.Y.
|
| 16.
|
Faine, S.
1994.
Leptospira and leptospirosis.
CRC Press, Inc., Boca Raton, Fla.
|
| 17.
|
Fairbrother, J. M.
1985.
Antibody response to genus- and serovar-specific leptospiral antigen in Leptospira-infected cows.
Am. J. Vet. Res.
46:1422-1426[Medline].
|
| 18.
|
Farr, R. W.
1995.
Leptospirosis.
Clin. Infect. Dis.
21:1-8[Medline].
|
| 19.
|
Farrelly, H. E.,
B. Adler, and S. Faine.
1987.
Opsonic monoclonal antibodies against lipopolysaccharide antigens of Leptospira interrogans serovar hardjo.
J. Med. Microbiol.
23:1-7[Abstract].
|
| 20.
|
Ferns-Bridget, R.,
P. W. Tuke, and C. H. Sweenie.
1996.
Characterization of a panel of monoclonal antibodies raised against recombinant HCV core protein.
J. Med. Virol.
50:221-229[Medline].
|
| 21.
|
Goetschy, J. F.,
O. Letourneur,
N. Cerletti, and M. A. Horisberger.
1996.
The unglycosylated extracellular domain of type-II receptor for transforming growth factor beta.
Eur. J. Biochem.
241:355-362[Medline].
|
| 22.
|
Graves, S. R., and S. Faine.
1970.
Antileptospiral agglutinins produced in rabbits.
Bull W. H. O.
43:579-587[Medline].
|
| 23.
|
Gussenhoven, G. C.,
M. A. Hoor,
M. G. A. Goris,
W. J. Terpstra,
R. A. Hartskeerl,
B. W. Mol, and H. L. Smits.
1997.
Lepto-dipstick, a dipstick assay for detection of Leptospira-specific immunoglobulin M antibodies in human sera.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
35:92-97[Abstract].
|
| 24.
|
Han, U. K., and H. Y. Kim.
1998.
Determination of class II and class III skeletal patterns: ROC analysis on various cephalometric measurements.
Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop.
113:538-545[Medline].
|
| 25.
|
Harrington, M. G.
1990.
Elution of protein from gels.
Methods Enzymol.
182:488-495[Medline].
|
| 26.
|
Helene, C.,
F. Brun, and M. Yaniv.
1969.
Fluorescent study of interactions between valyl-tRNA synthtase and valine-specific tRNAs from E. coli.
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
37:393-398[Medline].
|
| 27.
|
Hochuli, E.
1990.
Purification of recombinant proteins with metal chelate absorbent, p. 87-98.
In
J. K. Setlow (ed.), Genetic engineering, principle and method. Plenum Publishing Corporation, New York, N.Y.
|
| 28.
|
Holzinger, A.,
K.S. Phillips, and T. E. Weaver.
1996.
Single step purification/solubilization of 6× His-tagged proteins on Ni-NTA agarose.
News Qiagen
4:14-15.
|
| 29.
|
Jolley, M. E.,
S. D. Stroupe,
K. S. Schwenzer,
C. J. Wang,
M. Lu-Steffes,
H. D. Hill,
S. R. Popelka,
J. T. Holen, and D. M. Lelso.
1981.
Fluorescence polarization immunoassay. III. An automated system for therapeutic drug determination.
Clin. Chem.
9:1575-1579.
|
| 30.
|
Jolley, M. E.
1981.
Fluorescence polarization immunoassay for the detection of therapeutic drug levels in human plasma.
J. Anal. Toxicol.
5:236-240[Medline].
|
| 31.
|
Kelson, J. S.,
B. Adler,
A. J. Chapman, and S. Faine.
1987.
Identification of leptospiral flagellar antigens by gel electrophoresis and immunoblotting.
J. Med. Microbiol.
26:47-53[Abstract].
|
| 32.
|
Laemmli, U. K.
1970.
Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4.
Nature (London)
227:680-685[Medline].
|
| 33.
|
Lin, M.,
E. A. Sugden,
M. E. Jolley, and K. Stilwell.
1996.
Modification of the Mycobacterium bovis extracellular protein MPB70 with fluorescein for rapid detection of specific serum antibodies by fluorescence polarization.
Clin. Diagn. Lab. Immunol.
4:438-443.
|
| 34.
|
Lin, M.,
O. P. Surujballi,
K. Nielsen,
S. Nadin-Davis, and G. Randell.
1997.
Identification of a 35 kilodalton serovar-cross-reactive flagellar protein, FlaB, from Leptospira interrogans by N-terminal sequencing, gene cloning and sequence analysis.
Infect. Immun.
65:4355-4359[Abstract].
|
| 35.
|
Lin, M., and K. Nielsen.
1997.
Binding of the Brucella abortus lipopolysaccharide O-chain fragment to a monoclonal antibody.
J. Biol. Chem.
272:2821-2827[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 36.
|
Lin, M.,
N. Bughio, and O. Surujballi.
1999.
Expression in Escherichia coli of flaB, the gene coding for a periplasmic flagellin of Leptospira interrogans serovar pomona.
J. Med. Microbiol.
48:1-6[Medline].
|
| 37.
|
Metz, C. E.
1978.
Basic principles of ROC analysis.
Semin. Nucl. Med.
8:283-298[Medline].
|
| 38.
|
Mitchison, M.,
J. I. Rood,
S. Faine, and B. Adler.
1991.
Molecular analysis of the Leptospira borgpetersenii gene encoding an endoflagellar subunit protein.
J. Gen. Microbiol.
137:1529-1536[Medline].
|
| 39.
|
Morris, J. A., and S. N. Hussaini.
1974.
Characterisation of the antibodies detected by the MAT for bovine leptospirosis.
J. Hyg. Camb.
73:425-432.
|
| 40.
|
Morris, J. A.,
J. E. Gill, and S. N. Hussaini.
1977.
An examination of antibodies active in the indirect hemagglutination test for bovine leptospirosis.
Br. Vet. J.
133:17-24[Medline].
|
| 41.
|
Nielsen, K.,
D. Gall,
M. E. Jolley,
G. Leishman,
S. Balsevicus,
P. Smith,
P. Nicoletti, and F. Thomas.
1996.
A homogeneous fluorescence polarization antibody assay for detection of antibody to Brucella abortus.
J. Immunol. Methods
195:161-168[Medline].
|
| 42.
|
Norris, S. J.,
N. W. Charon,
R. G. Cook,
M. D. Fuentes, and R. J. Limberger.
1988.
Antigenic relatedness and N-terminal sequence homology define two classes of major periplasmic flagellar proteins of Treponema pallidum subspecies pallidum and Treponema phagedenis.
J. Bacteriol.
170:4072-4082[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 43.
|
Nunes-Edwards, P. L.,
A. B. Thiermann,
P. J. Bassford, and L. V. Stamm.
1985.
Identification and characterization of the protein antigens of Leptospira interrogans serovar hardjo.
Infect. Immun.
48:492-497[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 44.
|
Pappas, M. G.,
W. R. Ballou,
M. R. Gray,
E. T. Takafuji,
R. N. Miller, and W. T. Hockmeyer.
1985.
Rapid diagnosis of leptospirosis using the IgM-specific dot-ELISA: comparison with MAT.
Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg.
34:346-354.
|
| 45.
|
Parales, J. J., and E. P. Greeberg.
1991.
N-terminal amino acid sequences and amino acid compositions of the Spirocheta aurantia flagellar filament polypeptides.
J. Bacteriol.
173:1357-1359[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 46.
|
Perrin, F.
1921.
Polarization de la lumiere de fluorescence. Vie moyenne des molecules dans l'etat excite.
J. Phys. Radium
7:390-401.
|
| 47.
|
Rhys-Williams, A. T.
1988.
Fluorescence polarization immunoassays, p. 135-147.
In
W. P. Collins (ed.), Complementary immunoassays. John Wiley, Chichester, United Kingdom.
|
| 48.
|
Silva, M. V.,
P. M. Nakamura,
E. D. Camargo,
L. Batista,
A. J. Vaz,
E. C. Romero, and A. P. Brandao.
1997.
Immunodiagnosis of human leptospirosis by dot-ELISA for the detection of IgM, IgG and IgA antibodies.
Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg.
56:650-655.
|
| 49.
|
Smith, C. R.,
P. J. Ketterer,
M. R. McGowan, and B. G. Corney.
1994.
A review of laboratory techniques and their use in the diagnosis of Leptospira interrogans serovar hardjo infection in cattle.
Aust. Vet. J.
71:290-294[Medline].
|
| 50.
|
Smith, P.,
R. I. Krohn,
G. T. Hermanson,
A. K. Mallia,
F. Gartner,
M. D. Provenzano,
E. K. Fujimoto,
N. M. Goeke,
B. J. Olson, and D. C. Klenk.
1985.
Measurement of protein using bicinchoninic acid.
Anal. Biochem.
150:76-85[Medline].
|
| 51.
|
Spencer, R. D.
1981.
Application of fluorescence polarization in clinical assays.
Clin. Biochem. Anal.
10:143-170.
|
| 52.
|
Steinmann, L., and W. Thormann.
1996.
Characterization of competitive binding, fluorescent drug immunoassays based on micellar electrokinetic capillary chromatography.
Electrophoresis
17:1348-1356[Medline].
|
| 53.
|
Surujballi, O. P.,
R. M. Marenger,
M. D. Eaglesome, and E. A. Sugden.
1997.
Development and initial evaluation of an indirect ELISA for the detection of L. interrogans serovars hardjo antibodies in bovine sera.
Can. J. Vet. Res.
61:260-266[Medline].
|
| 54.
|
Terpstra, W. J.,
G. S. Lighthart, and G. J. Schoone.
1980.
Serodiagnosis of human leptospirosis by ELISA.
Zentbl. Bakteriol. Parasitenkd. Infektionskr. Hyg Abt. 1 Orig. Reihe A
247:400-405.
|
| 55.
|
Thiermann, A. B., and L. A. Garrett.
1983.
Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for the detection of antibodies to Leptospira interrogans serovars hardjo and pomona in cattle.
Am. J. Vet. Res.
44:884-887[Medline].
|
| 56.
|
Tong, M. J.,
E. B. Rosenberg,
B. A. Voteri, and C. T. Che.
1971.
Immunological response in leptospirosis. Report of three cases.
Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg.
20:625-630.
|
| 57.
|
Towbin, H.,
T. Staehelin, and J. Gordon.
1979.
Electrophoretic transfer of proteins from polyacrylamide gels to nitrocellulose sheet. Procedure and some applications.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
76:4350-4354[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 58.
|
Watt, G.,
M. L. Alquiza,
L. P. Padre,
M. L. Tuazaon, and L. W. Laughlin.
1988.
The rapid diagnosis of leptospirosis: a prospective comparison of the dot-ELISA and the genus-specific microscopic agglutination test at different stages of illness.
J. Infect. Dis.
157:840-842[Medline].
|
| 59.
|
Yasuda, P. H.,
A. G. Stiegerwalt,
K. R. Sulzer,
A. F. Kaufmann,
F. Rogers, and D. J. Brenner.
1987.
Deoxyribonucleic acid relatedness between serogroups and serovars in the family Leptospiraceae with proposals for seven new Leptospira species.
Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol.
37:407-415.
|
Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology, July 1999, p. 599-605, Vol. 6, No. 4
1071-412X/99/$04.00+0
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Flannery, B., Costa, D., Carvalho, F. P., Guerreiro, H., Matsunaga, J., Da Silva, E. D., Ferreira, A. G. P., Riley, L. W., Reis, M. G., Haake, D. A., Ko, A. I.
(2001). Evaluation of Recombinant Leptospira Antigen-Based Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assays for the Serodiagnosis of Leptospirosis. J. Clin. Microbiol.
39: 3303-3310
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Lin, M., Lin, F., Mallory, M., Clavijo, A.
(2000). Deletions of Structural Glycoprotein E2 of Classical Swine Fever Virus Strain Alfort/187 Resolve a Linear Epitope of Monoclonal Antibody WH303 and the Minimal N-Terminal Domain Essential for Binding Immunoglobulin G Antibodies of a Pig Hyperimmune Serum. J. Virol.
74: 11619-11625
[Abstract]
[Full Text]