Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology, January 2000, p. 114-118, Vol. 7, No. 1
Center for Molecular Medicine and Infectious
Diseases, Department of Biomedical Sciences and Pathobiology,
Virginia-Maryland Regional College of Veterinary Medicine, Virginia
Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia
24061,1 and Instituto de Biotecnologia,
Centro de Investigacion en Ciencias Veterinarias, Instituo Nacional
de Tecnologia Agropecuaria, Provincia Buenos Aires,
Argentina2
Received 16 August 1999/Returned for modification 27 September
1999/Accepted 4 November 1999
Using the shuttle vector pMCO2 and the vaccinia virus wild-type WR
strain, we constructed a recombinant virus expressing an 18-kDa outer
membrane protein of Brucella abortus. BALB/c mice inoculated with this virus produced 18-kDa protein-specific antibodies, mostly of immunoglobulin G2a isotype, and in vitro stimulation of
splenocytes from these mice with purified maltose binding
protein-18-kDa protein fusion resulted in lymphocyte proliferation and
gamma interferon production. However, these mice were not protected against a challenge with the virulent strain B. abortus
2308. Disruption of the 18-kDa protein's gene in vaccine strain
B. abortus RB51 did not affect either the strain's
protective capabilities or its in vivo attenuation characteristics.
These observations suggest that the 18-kDa protein plays no role in
protective immunity.
Brucellosis is a zoonotic disease
caused by the members of genus Brucella, which are
gram-negative, facultatively intracellular bacteria. In domestic and
wild mammals, brucellosis often results in abortions and infertility.
Humans usually acquire the infection by consuming contaminated dairy
products or by coming in contact with an infected animal's tissues and
secretions (1). In humans the disease manifests itself as a
chronic infection with undulant fever and general malaise. It is
generally accepted that cell-mediated immunity (CMI) is necessary for
effective protection against brucellosis, although antibodies,
especially against the O side chain of the lipopolysaccharide, appear
to enhance resistance against infection, at least in certain host
species (2, 3). Attenuated, live Brucella strains
such as Brucella abortus RB51 and 19 and Brucella melitensis Rev 1 are being used as vaccines to control brucellosis in domestic animals. However, these vaccines are not suitable for
humans; strains 19 and Rev 1 can cause disease in humans and there is
no study ascertaining the safety of strain RB51, although human
infections with this vaccine strain have not been reported. An
efficient and safe vaccine is needed for the prophylaxis of human
brucellosis, which is a major zoonotic health risk in many countries
(8, 27) and a potential tool for biological warfare (5,
12).
Immune mechanisms operative in protection against brucellosis can be
discerned by using a mouse model of vaccination and challenge infection. Development of resistance to brucellosis has been associated with the induction of a Th1-type immune response (21).
However, with the exception of L7/L12 ribosomal protein and Cu/Zn
superoxide dismutase, which have been shown to induce certain levels of
protection (18, 19, 23), the specific proteins involved in
the stimulation of a protective response have not been identified. A
potential candidate for protective antigens is an 18-kDa (referred to
as 19 kDa by some researchers) lipoprotein present on the surface of
Brucella (14, 25). Infected mice, sheep, goats,
and dogs develop antibodies to this antigen, indicating the
immunological recognition of the 18-kDa protein in brucellosis of
several animal species (14, 25). Humans infected with either
B. abortus or B. melitensis also develop
antibodies to this antigen (14). Preliminary studies carried
out in our laboratory detected CMI responses to this protein in strain
RB51-vaccinated mice. In order to develop an efficient recombinant
vaccine for humans, we are studying the possibility of using vaccinia
virus as a delivery vector for Brucella proteins of
protective potential. In the present work, we constructed a recombinant
vaccinia virus that can express the 18-kDa protein and characterized
the specific humoral and selected CMI responses of mice vaccinated with
this virus. Our studies indicated that mice vaccinated with the
recombinant virus developed Th1-type immune responses to the 18-kDa
protein. However, these immune responses did not lead to any level of
protection against challenge infection with virulent B. abortus 2308. Further, using vaccine strain B. abortus
RB51 with an interrupted gene for the 18-kDa protein, we showed that
the 18-kDa protein does not appear to have any protective role in brucellosis.
Expression of B. abortus 18-kDa protein by recombinant
vaccinia virus.
The gene for the 18-kDa protein was initially
obtained from a genomic library of B. abortus 19 (unpublished data) and was subsequently sequenced (GenBank accession
no. L42959). Further, the complete open reading frame of this gene
(from nucleotides 282 to 833 of sequence L42959) was previously PCR
amplified and cloned into plasmid pBK-CMV (Stratagene, La Jolla,
Calif.). From this plasmid, the 18-kDa antigen gene was excised with a KpnI digestion and subcloned into a vaccinia shuttle vector,
pMCO2 (4). The pMCO2 plasmids containing the gene for the
18-kDa protein in the proper as well as in the reverse orientation with regard to the promoter were used in making the recombinant vaccinia viruses. The vaccinia virus recombinants were produced according to
previously described methods (4, 6, 26). The recombinant vaccinia viruses containing the gene for the 18-kDa protein in proper
and reverse orientation were designated v18-1 virus and v18-2 virus,
respectively. The 18-kDa protein expression in the v18-1 virus- but not
the v18-2 virus-infected cell culture lysates was confirmed by Western
blot analysis with sera from B. abortus RB51-vaccinated mice
and rabbit antiserum to the 18-kDa protein. The rabbit antiserum was
prepared according to procedures described elsewhere (13).
However, this protein was slightly higher in molecular weight than the
native 18-kDa protein from B. abortus (Fig. 1A). This is
probably because of the intact prokaryotic signal sequence of the
18-kDa protein and/or glycosylation of the expressed protein; a region
containing weak homology with the consensus eukaryotic N-glycosylation
site was identified in the deduced amino acid sequence of the 18-kDa
protein by computer analysis.
Immune responses of mice inoculated with the recombinant vaccinia
virus.
Two separate mouse experiments were performed. In each
experiment, four groups of eight BALB/c female mice (Charles River Laboratories, Wilmington, Mass.) of 6 to 8 weeks of age were used. The
mice of two groups were each injected with a 107-CFU median
tissue culture infective dose of either v18-1 or v18-2 virus. In the
first experiment an intraperitoneal route was used for inoculating
animals with the vaccinia viruses, whereas in the second experiment an
intradermal route was used. As a positive control, one group was
injected with 108 CFU of B. abortus RB51, and as
a negative control, another group was injected with saline alone. All
mice were bled at 6 weeks postinoculation (p.i.) to obtain sera for
enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and Western blot analyses.
Three mice from each group of experiment 1 were sacrificed at 12 to 14 weeks p.i., and their splenocytes were used for in vitro CMI assays. At
7 weeks p.i., five mice from each group were challenge-infected with
2 × 104 CFU of B. abortus 2308 intraperitoneally. Two weeks after the challenge infection, the mice
were killed, bacteria from their spleens were recovered, and CFU counts
were determined. In conducting research using animals, the
investigators adhered to guidelines set forth by a committee of the
Institute of Laboratory Animal Resources, National Research Council
(7a).
1071-412X/0/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Characterization of Specific Immune Responses of Mice Inoculated
with Recombinant Vaccinia Virus Expressing an 18-Kilodalton Outer
Membrane Protein of Brucella abortus
![]()
ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Text
References
![]()
TEXT
Top
Abstract
Text
References
(Gibco BRL, Bethesda, Md.) as a fusion with maltose binding protein
(MBP) by using expression vector pMalC2 (New England
Biolabs Inc., Beverly, Mass.). The fusion protein (MBP-18-kDa protein)
was purified by affinity chromatography on amylose resin. To achieve
this, the gene for the 18-kDa protein was amplified by PCR from the
genomic DNA of B. abortus 2308. A primer pair consisting of
one forward primer (5' GGA TCC CAG AGC TCC CGG CTT GGT 3') and one
reverse primer (5' AAG CTT CCC TCT TCA TCG TTT CCG 3') was designed
based on the nucleotide sequence of the 18-kDa protein gene sequence.
The forward primer of the gene was selected such that the coding
sequences for the signal peptide part of the antigen were not included
in the amplification. PCR and cloning of the amplified product in
pMalC2 were performed as previously described
(28). The protein expression and purification were performed
according to the manufacturer's suggested procedure. Expression of the
MBP-18-kDa protein fusion was confirmed by a Western blot analysis
with the 18-kDa protein-specific rabbit antiserum. Similarly purified
recombinant MBP was used as a control in the lymphocyte proliferation assays.
) quantification
assays were performed as previously described (28). Splenocytes were cultured in the presence of 5 µg of recombinant MBP-18-kDa protein, 5 µg of MBP, 10 µg of B. abortus
RB51 crude extract (28), 0.5 µg of concanavalin A, or no
additives (unstimulated control). After culturing for 5 days,
supernatants of the cultures were collected for quantitating IFN-
by
a sandwich ELISA, the cells were pulsed with 1 µCi of
[3H]thymidine/well for 18 h and harvested onto glass
fiber filters, and the radioactivity was measured in a liquid
scintillation counter. The assays were performed in triplicate. Results
of the proliferation assay were expressed as a stimulation index (mean
counts per minute from wells of test antigen/mean counts per minute of
unstimulated control wells).
Mice that were inoculated with either the v18-1 virus or B. abortus RB51 developed antibody and CMI responses to the 18-kDa protein. Western blots shown in Fig. 1
demonstrate that mice inoculated with v18-1 or v18-2 virus developed
IgG antibodies to the vaccinia viral proteins but only the v18-1 virus-
or B. abortus RB51-inoculated mice developed antibodies to
the 18-kDa protein of B. abortus. As shown in Table
1, IgG2a was the predominant isotype of
antibody to the 18-kDa protein in mice inoculated with either the v18-1 virus or B. abortus RB51. However, the 18-kDa
protein-specific IgG and IgG2a levels were highest in mice vaccinated
with B. abortus RB51. In contrast to the mice inoculated
with v18-1 virus, the mice inoculated with strain RB51 had essentially
no specific IgG1 isotype antibodies to the 18-kDa protein.
|
|
(Table 2) upon stimulation with
either MBP-18-kDa protein or strain RB51 antigen extract. Splenocytes
from the control mice (v18-2 virus or saline injected) did not respond
to stimulation with either strain RB51 antigen extract or MBP-18-kDa
protein. Splenocytes from mice inoculated with v18-1 virus or strain
RB51 responded with similar levels of IFN-
production upon
stimulation with MBP-18-kDa protein. However, when stimulated with
strain RB51 antigen extract, splenocytes from strain RB51-inoculated
mice produced much higher levels of IFN-
than those from the v18-1
virus-inoculated mice. A similar tendency was also observed in the
lymphocyte proliferation assay.
|
|
Effect of disruption of the gene for the 18-kDa protein on
protective capabilities of strain RB51.
Since the mice inoculated
with v18-1 virus were not protected against the challenge infection, we
verified the lack of a potential protective role for the 18-kDa protein
in strain RB51. We disrupted the gene encoding the 18-kDa protein by
inserting a kanamycin cassette. This was achieved by cloning a 994-bp
DNA fragment containing the gene for the 18-kDa protein (GenBank
accession no. L42959) in EcoRI and NcoI sites of
pRSETC (Invitrogen) to generate pRS18. A kanamycin cassette obtained
from pUC4K (Pharmacia Biotech, Piscataway, N.J.) was inserted into the
SacI site present within the open reading frame (72 bp from
the start codon) of the 18-kDa protein gene to create pRS18
kan. The
pRS18
kan plasmid was electroporated into B. abortus RB51
(16) to replace the native gene by homologous recombination. The kanamycin-resistant colonies were screened for the
presence of the kanamycin cassette and the disruption of the gene for
the 18-kDa protein by Southern blot hybridization according to methods
previously described (reference 15 and data not
shown). The disruption mutant was designated RB51
18kDa. To determine
the infectivity and protectivity characteristics of strain RB51
18kDa
and to compare them with those of strain RB51, experiments with mice
were performed as previously described (17, 20). Strain
RB51
18kDa did not express the 18-kDa protein, as determined by the
Western blot analysis (data not shown). Our studies also revealed that
the ability of strain RB51
18kDa to survive within mice was similar
to that of strain RB51 (data not shown), indicating that the disruption
had no influence on the in vivo survival of this vaccine strain. Mice
inoculated with strain RB51
18kDa produced neither antibody nor CMI
responses to the 18-kDa protein, yet they were protected to the same
extent as the strain RB51-inoculated mice (data not shown).
by splenocytes of these mice upon in vitro stimulation with the
specific antigen demonstrated a Th1 response to the 18-kDa protein.
However, these immune responses did not result in protection against a
challenge infection with virulent B. abortus 2308. We do not
expect the 18-kDa protein-specific antibodies to have a protective
role, since passive transfer of strain RB51-induced antibodies, which include antibodies to the 18-kDa protein, did not confer protection to
challenge with B. abortus 2308 (11). The lack of
protection could be due to inappropriate posttranslational processing
of the vaccinia virus-expressed 18-kDa protein resulting in an altered antigenicity or loss of crucial CMI-inducing protective epitopes. As
previously mentioned, the 18-kDa protein in Brucella appears to be a lipoprotein (25); this lipid modification would not have occurred in the vaccinia virus-expressed 18-kDa protein. Also, any
glycosylation of the 18-kDa protein might have affected the antigen
processing by the host antigen-presenting cells. Nevertheless, disruption of the 18-kDa protein gene in vaccine strain B. abortus RB51 had no influence on the strain's ability to
induce protection in vaccinated mice. Since strain RB51
18kDa was
constructed by inserting a kanamycin cassette at 72 bp (24 codons)
downstream of the start site of the gene for the 18-kDa protein, this
mutant is capable of synthesizing a peptide consisting of the first 24 amino acids of the 18-kDa protein. The first 20 of these 24 amino acids
form the signal peptide sequence of the 18-kDa protein (14, 25). In Brucella, this signal peptide is cleaved off
and the rest of the polypeptide is subjected to lipid modification
(25). Therefore, there is a possibility that this signal
peptide contains crucial protective epitopes and we failed to detect
this immune response in mice inoculated with our disruption mutant
since our recombinant 18-kDa fusion protein also lacked these 24 amino
acids. However, ongoing studies in our laboratory indicate that
overexpression of the 18-kDa protein with its signal sequence in strain
RB51 did not enhance its protective ability, while overexpression of known protective antigens did (Vemulapalli et al., unpublished results). Taken together, it appears that the 18-kDa outer membrane protein of B. abortus is not involved in mediating
protective immunity, although it is able to induce low levels of
IFN-
production from specific immune lymphocytes. Production of
IFN-
by specific antigen stimulation of lymphocytes is considered to
be important in protection, since it is able to activate macrophages
which are able to contain Brucella replication (29,
30).
Based on the results of this study and in accordance with other
published findings (9, 10, 24), it appears that many Brucella proteins to which infected or vaccinated animals
develop appropriate immune responses may not play a crucial role in
host-acquired protective immune mechanisms to brucellosis. Until a
reliable in vitro assay that correlates positively with the protective potential of a Brucella protein is developed, the present
trial-and-error strategy is the only means available to verify the
protective role of a Brucella protein antigen.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
This project was supported by the U.S. Army Medical Research, Development, Acquisition and Logistics Command (Prov.) under contract no. DAMD 17-94-C-4042.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Center for Molecular Medicine and Infectious Diseases, Department of Biomedical Sciences and Pathobiology, Virginia-Maryland Regional College of Veterinary Medicine, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 1410 Prices Fork Rd., Blacksburg, VA 24061. Phone: (540) 231-7757. Fax: (540) 231-3426. E-mail: rvemulap{at}vt.edu.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Acha, P., and B. Szyfres. 1980. Zoonoses and communicable diseases common to man and animals, p. 28-45. Pan American Health Organization, Washington, D.C. |
| 2. | Araya, L. N., P. H. Elzer, G. E. Rowe, F. M. Enright, and A. J. Winter. 1989. Temporal development of protective cell-mediated and humoral immunity in BALB/c mice infected with Brucella abortus. J. Immunol. 143:3330-3337[Abstract]. |
| 3. |
Araya, L. N., and A. J. Winter.
1990.
Comparative protection of mice against virulent and attenuated strains of Brucella abortus by passive transfer of immune T cells or serum.
Infect. Immun.
58:254-256 |
| 4. |
Carroll, M. W., and B. Moss.
1995.
E. coli -glucuronidase (GUS) as a marker for recombinant vaccinia viruses.
BioTechniques
19:352-355[Medline].
|
| 5. | Carus, W. S. 1998. Biological warfare threats in perspective. Crit. Rev. Microbiol. 24:149-155[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 6. |
Chakrabarti, S.,
K. Brechling, and B. Moss.
1985.
Vaccinia virus expression vector: coexpression of -galactosidase provides visual screening of recombinant virus plaques.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
5:3403-3409 |
| 7. | Coligan, J. E., A. M. Kruisbeek, D. H. Marulies, E. M. Shevach, and W. Strober (ed.). 1991. Current protocols in immunology, vol. 2. , p. 8.4.1-8.10.6. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, N.Y. |
| 7a. | Committee on Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. 1985. Guide for the care and use of laboratory animals. National Institutes of Health publication no. 86-23. National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md. |
| 8. | Corbel, M. J. 1997. Brucellosis: an overview. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 3:213-221[Medline]. |
| 9. | Denoel, P. A., T. K. Vo, V. E. Weynants, A. Tibor, D. Gilson, M. S. Zygment, J. N. Limet, and J. J. Letesson. 1997. Identification of the major T-cell antigens present in the Brucella melitensis B115 protein preparation, Brucellergene OCB. J. Med. Microbiol. 46:801-806[Abstract]. |
| 10. | Guilloteau, L. A., K. Laroucau, N. Vizcaino, I. Jacques, and G. Dubray. 1999. Immunogenicity of recombinant Escherichia coli expressing the omp31 gene of Brucella melitensis in BALB/c mice. Vaccine 17:353-361[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 11. |
Jimenez de Bagues, M. P.,
P. H. Elzer,
S. M. Jones,
J. M. Blasco,
F. M. Enright,
G. G. Schurig, and A. J. Winter.
1994.
Vaccination with Brucella abortus rough mutant RB51 protects BALB/c mice against virulent strains of Brucella abortus, Brucella melitensis, and Brucella ovis.
Infect. Immun.
62:4990-4996 |
| 12. | Kaufmann, A. F., M. I. Meltzer, and G. P. Schmid. 1997. The economic impact of a bioterrorist attack: are prevention and postattack intervention programs justifiable? Emerg. Infect. Dis. 3:83-94[Medline]. |
| 13. | Knudsen, K. A. 1985. Proteins transferred to nitrocellulose for use as immunogens. Anal. Biochem. 147:285-288[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 14. | Kovach, M. E., P. H. Elzer, G. T. Robertson, R. L. Chirhart-Gilleland, M. A. Christensen, K. M. Peterson, and R. M. Roop, II. 1997. Cloning and nucleotide sequence analysis of a Brucella abortus gene encoding an 18 kDa immunoreactive protein. Microb. Pathog. 22:241-246[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 15. | Latimer, E., J. Simmers, N. Sriranganathan, R. M. Roop II, G. G. Schurig, and S. M. Boyle. 1992. Brucella abortus deficient in copper/zinc superoxide dismutase is virulent in BALB/c mice. Microb. Pathog. 12:105-113[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 16. | McQuiston, J. R., G. G. Schurig, N. Sriranganathan, and S. M. Boyle. 1995. Transformation of Brucella species with suicide and broad host-range plasmids. Methods Mol. Biol. 47:143-148[Medline]. |
| 17. |
McQuiston, J. R.,
R. Vemulapalli,
T. J. Inzana,
G. G. Schurig,
N. Sriranganathan,
D. Fritzinger,
T. L. Hadfield,
R. A. Warren,
N. Snellings,
D. Hoover,
S. M. Halling, and S. M. Boyle.
1999.
Genetic characterization of a Tn5-disrupted glycosyltransferase gene homolog in Brucella abortus and its effect on lipopolysaccharide composition and virulence.
Infect. Immun.
67:3830-3835 |
| 18. | Oliveira, S. C., and G. A. Splitter. 1996. Immunization of mice with recombinant L7/L12 ribosomal protein confers protection against Brucella abortus infection. Vaccine 14:959-962[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 19. |
Onate, A. A.,
R. Vemulapalli,
E. Andrews,
G. G. Schurig,
S. Boyle, and H. Folch.
1999.
Vaccination with live Escherichia coli expressing Brucella abortus Cu/Zn superoxide dismutase protects mice against virulent B. abortus.
Infect. Immun.
67:986-988 |
| 20. | Schurig, G. G., R. M. Roop, T. Bagchi, S. M. Boyle, D. Buhrman, and N. Sriranganathan. 1991. Biological properties of RB51: a stable rough strain of Brucella abortus. Vet. Microbiol. 28:171-188[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 21. | Splitter, G., S. Oliveira, M. Carey, C. Miller, J. Ko, and J. Covert. 1996. T lymphocyte mediated protection against facultative intracellular bacteria. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 54:309-319[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 22. | Stevens, T. L., A. Bossie, V. M. Sanders, R. Fernandez, R. L. Coffman, T. R. Mosmann, and E. S. Vitetta. 1988. Regulation of antibody isotype secretion by subsets of antigen-specific helper T cells. Nature 334:255-258[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 23. | Tabatabai, L. B., and G. W. Pugh, Jr. 1994. Modulation of immune responses in Balb/c mice vaccinated with Brucella abortus Cu-Zn superoxide dismutase synthetic peptide vaccine. Vaccine 12:919-924[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 24. |
Tibor, A.,
I. Jacques,
L. Guilloteau,
J. M. Verger,
M. Grayon,
V. Wansard, and J. J. Letesson.
1998.
Effect of P39 gene deletion in live Brucella vaccine strains on residual virulence and protective activity in mice.
Infect. Immun.
66:5561-5564 |
| 25. | Tibor, A., E. Saman, P. de Wergifosse, A. Cloeckaert, J. N. Limet, and J. J. Letesson. 1996. Molecular characterization, occurrence, and immunogenicity in infected sheep and cattle of two outer membrane proteins of Brucella abortus. Infect. Immun. 64:100-107[Abstract]. |
| 26. | Toth, T. E., J. A. Cobb, S. M. Boyle, R. M. Roop, and G. G. Schurig. 1995. Selective humoral immune response of Balb/C mice to Brucella abortus proteins expressed by vaccinia virus recombinants. Vet. Microbiol. 45:171-183[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 27. | Trujillo, I. Z., A. N. Zavala, J. G. Caceres, and C. Q. Miranda. 1994. Brucellosis. Infect. Dis. Clin. N. Am. 8:225-241[Medline]. |
| 28. |
Vemulapalli, R.,
A. J. Duncan,
S. M. Boyle,
N. Sriranganathan,
T. E. Toth, and G. G. Schurig.
1998.
Cloning and sequencing of yajC and secD homologs of Brucella abortus and demonstration of immune responses to YajC in mice vaccinated with B. abortus RB51.
Infect. Immun.
66:5684-5691 |
| 29. |
Zhan, Y., and C. Cheers.
1993.
Endogenous gamma interferon mediates resistance to Brucella abortus infection.
Infect. Immun.
61:4899-4901 |
| 30. |
Zhan, Y.,
J. Yang, and C. Cheers.
1993.
Cytokine response of T-cell subsets from Brucella abortus-infected mice to soluble Brucella proteins.
Infect. Immun.
61:2841-2847 |
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. | Clin. Microbiol. Rev. | Infect. Immun. |
|---|---|---|
| J. Clin. Microbiol. | J. Virol. | ALL ASM JOURNALS |