Previous Article | Next Article 
Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology, January 2000, p. 96-100, Vol. 7, No. 1
1071-412X/0/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Cocaine Differentially Modulates Chemokine
Production by Mononuclear Cells from Normal Donors and Human
Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1-Infected Patients
Madhavan P. N.
Nair,1,*
Kailash C.
Chadha,2
Ross G.
Hewitt,3
Supriya
Mahajan,1
Ann
Sweet,1 and
Stanley A.
Schwartz1
State University of New York at Buffalo,
Buffalo General Hospital, Buffalo, New York
142031; Roswell Park Cancer Institute,
Buffalo, New York 142632; and State
University of New York at Buffalo, Erie County Medical Center,
Buffalo, New York 142143
Received 21 April 1999/Returned for modification 24 June
1999/Accepted 20 September 1999
 |
ABSTRACT |
Earlier studies have supported a significant role for cocaine in
the susceptibility to and the progression of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection. Recently, several unique HIV-1 entry
coreceptors (e.g., CCR5 and CCR3) and a trio of HIV-1-specific suppressor chemokines, namely, RANTES (regulated-upon-activation T
expressed and secreted), macrophage inflammatory protein 1
(MIP-1
) and MIP-1
, were identified. Although cocaine has been linked to the immunopathogenesis of HIV-1 infection, the corresponding cellular and molecular mechanism(s) have not been well defined. We
hypothesize that cocaine mediates these pathologic effects through the
downregulation of HIV-1-suppressing chemokines and/or upregulating
HIV-1 entry coreceptors in HIV-1-infected subjects, resulting in
disease progression to AIDS. Our results show that cocaine selectively
downregulates endogenous MIP-1
secretion by normal peripheral blood
mononuclear cells (PBMC), while cocaine did not affect the MIP-1
production by PBMC from AIDS patients. Cocaine also selectively
suppresses lipopolysaccharide-induced MIP-1
production by PBMC from
HIV-infected patients. Further, cocaine significantly downregulates
endogenous MIP-1
gene expression, while it upregulates HIV-1 entry
coreceptor CCR5 by normal PBMC. These studies suggests a role for
cocaine as a cofactor in the pathogenesis of HIV infection and support
the premise that cocaine increases susceptibility to and progression of
HIV-1 infection by inhibiting the synthesis of HIV-1 protective
chemokines and/or upregulating the HIV-1 entry coreceptor, CCR5.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) mainly infects CD4+ T (T-helper) lymphocytes and
macrophages. Although the CD4 molecule is the primary receptor for
virus entry, several studies have shown that, in addition to CD4, other
coreceptors may be required for efficient viral entry. Recently, a
major HIV-1 coreceptor and
-chemokine receptor, CCR5, was identified
for macrophage (M)-tropic HIV-1 strains (2, 10).
Chemokines are chemoattractant cytokines that have gained major
attention because of their specific inhibitory effects on HIV-1
infection (6). Members of the
-chemokine family, RANTES, macrophage inflammatory protein 1
(MIP-1
), and MIP-1
were
shown to inhibit infection of target cells by primary M-tropic virus strains, but not T-cell (T)-tropic virus strains (6, 10). Recent studies showed that these chemokines specifically block the CCR5
coreceptor and thereby inhibit the entry of HIV-1 into target cells
(6, 10, 11; for a review, see reference
14). These studies clearly demonstrate that the
-chemokines and the HIV-1 entry coreceptor, CCR5, are important host
factors that can influence susceptibility to M-tropic HIV-1 infection.
Cocaine is one of the most widely abused drugs in the United States. In
1994, according to the National Household Survey on Drug Abuse, an
estimated 1.4 million Americans were current cocaine users (NIDA Notes,
September/October, 1995). The last decade has witnessed a great,
entangled epidemic of cocaine abuse and HIV-1 infections. In vivo and
in vitro studies indicate that cocaine alters cytokine production and
cell trafficking, stimulates susceptibility of peripheral blood
leukocytes to HIV-1 infection, and increases viral titers in the brain,
thus facilitating disease progression (6, 8, 13; for
a review, see reference 25). However, the molecular
mechanisms underlying these effects of cocaine on HIV-1 infections
remain poorly understood. Given the substantial literature describing
the association of cocaine use with the susceptibility to and the
progression of HIV-1 infections and the exciting recent studies
demonstrating the potential role of chemokines, it is reasonable to
hypothesize that cocaine can modulate the HIV-suppressing chemokines
and their receptors. The present study examines the effect of cocaine
on MIP-1
synthesis by lymphocytes from normal and HIV-infected
subjects and MIP-1
gene expression by normal peripheral blood
mononuclear cells (PBMC).
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Blood donors were apprised of this study, and consents were
obtained in accordance with the policies of the appropriate
institutions and the National Institutes of Health. Peripheral blood
samples from healthy, HIV-negative individuals and also from
HIV-1-infected patients were drawn into a syringe containing heparin
(20 U/ml). The HIV-infected subjects were recruited from the
Immunodeficiency Services Clinic of the Erie County Medical Center and
were at different stages of the disease. The mean CD4 and CD8 numbers of HIV-1-infected patients were 273.1 ± 227.2 (standard deviation [SD]) and 958.1 ± 554.4 (SD)/mm3, respectively.
Monocyte numbers in HIV-1-infected subjects varied from 296 to
1,000/mm3 with a mean of 499.4 ± 252.1 (SD).
HIV-1-infected subjects were not using cocaine at the time of the
study, and their age varied from 25 to 40 years. Mononuclear cells from
uninfected and HIV-infected subjects were isolated from heparinized
venous blood by using a modified method of Boyum (5). Blood
was diluted with an equal volume of normal saline and was centrifuged
at 400 × g for 30 min at 18°C over a cushion of
Ficoll-Hypaque. The PBMC band was harvested, washed three times with
saline, and resuspended in RPMI 1640 medium containing 25 mM HEPES
buffer supplemented with 5% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum
(Gibco/BRL, Gaitherburg, Md.), 80 mg of gentamicin per ml (Schering,
Kenilworth, N.J.), and 300 µg of fresh glutamine per ml. Tissue
culture-treated, polystyrene, sterile, nonpyrogenic 12-well cell
culture plates (Costar, Corning, N.Y.) were used to culture cells in
1-ml quantities. Triplicate cultures containing 3 × 106 cells/ml received different concentrations of cocaine.
Cocaine hydrochloride was provided by the National Institute on Drug
Abuse (Rockville, Md.) and used at 10
6,
10
9, and 10
12 M final concentrations.
Cocaine was originally dissolved in sterile distilled water and was
subsequently diluted in Hanks' balanced salt solution to the required
concentrations. Control and treated cultures were incubated at 37°C
for 24 h in 5% CO2 and 95% air. The cultures were
centrifuged at 900 × g for 10 min, and the culture supernatants were examined for MIP-1
by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).
MIP-
levels in culture supernatants were measured by a quantitative
sandwich ELISA technique by using the Quantikine Kit (R&D Systems,
Minneapolis, Minn.) as described by the manufacturer. Briefly, 200 µl
of diluted culture fluid or control standard sample was added to each
well containing 50 µl of assay diluent and then incubated for
1.5 h at room temperature. Plates were vigorously washed three
times with wash buffer, and then 200 µl of MIP-1
conjugate was
added and incubated for 1.5 h at room temperature. The plates were
washed again, and 200 µl of substrate solution was added and
incubated at room temperature for 20 min. The reaction was terminated
by adding 50 µl of stop solution, and the plates were measured for
absorbance at 450 nm by using an ELISA plate reader (Flow
Laboratories). The concentration of MIP-1
in the culture
supernatants was determined by comparing the absorbancy of the samples
with absorbancy curves obtained with standard samples run
simultaneously with test samples and expressed as picograms per milliliter.
RNA isolation.
Cell cultures treated with various
concentrations of cocaine were harvested at 8 h, and cytoplasmic
RNA was extracted by an acid guanidinium thiocyanate-phenol-chloroform
method as described elsewhere (9). The rational for
selecting an 8-h time period for in vitro treatment of PBMC with
cocaine was based on previous experiments which produced maximum
modulatory effects on MIP-1
and CCR5 gene expression. Briefly,
cultured cells were pelleted by centrifugation and resuspended in a 4 M
solution of guanidinium thiocyanate. Cells were pipetted 7 to 10 times
to lyse them and then were phenol-chloroform extracted in the presence
of sodium acetate. After centrifugation, the RNA was precipitated from
the aqueous layer by isopropanol. An equal volume of isopropanol was added, and the mixture was kept at
20°C for 1 h and then
centrifuged to pellet the RNA. The pellet was resuspended in the
guanidinium solution, and an equal volume of isopropanol was added. The
solution was kept at
20°C for 1 h and then centrifuged again
to pellet the RNA. The pellet was washed once with 75% ethanol to
remove any remaining guanidinium. The final pellet was dried and
resuspended in diethyl pyrocarbonate-treated water, the amount of RNA
was determined, and the mixture was stored at
70°C until used in further experiments.
RT-PCR.
After extraction, RNA was reverse transcribed to
make a DNA copy for use in PCR. The reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR)
analyses were performed by using a Perkin-Elmer kit (catalog number
N808-0143) according to the directions of the manufacturer. Briefly, 1 µg of RNA was added to a tube containing 5 mM Mg Cl2, a 1 mM concentration of each deoxynucleoside triphosphate (A, C, G, and T),
50 mM KCl, 10 mM Tris (pH 8.3), 2.5 µM oligo(dT), 20 U of RNasin, and
50 U of murine leukemia virus RT. The mixture was incubated at room temperature for 10 min, and the temperature was raised to 42°C for 35 min, then heated to 99°C for 5 min, and placed on ice until used in
the PCR reaction. For the PCR, the newly synthesized cDNA was tested
with housekeeping
-actin control primers separately or together with
the second set of specific primers. To each tube was added a 10-µl
sample of the RT product in a final mixture of 2 mM MgCl2,
10 mM Tris (pH 8.3), and 50 mM KCl, plus 0.02 mM concentrations of both
the 5' and 3' primers and 2.5 U of Taq polymerase. The
mixture was overlaid with mineral oil and placed in a thermocycler for
30 cycles of 95°C for 30 s, 60°C for 30 s, and 74°C for
1 min. A 60°C incubation was done for 5 min prior to the start of the
30 cycles. A 10-µl sample of each of the PCR reactions was analyzed
on 1.2% agarose gels containing ethidium bromide with a phi X174
DNA/HaeIII-digested molecular weight standard to determine
the fragment sizes. Bands were visualized under UV light and
photographed by using Polaroid film. Densitometric scans of the
experimental signals in each lane were normalized to the corresponding
housekeeping
-actin gene signals to correct for gel loading error,
if any (experimental optical density [OD]/
-actin OD × 100),
and the corrected OD values from the untreated control lane were
compared to the corrected OD values of the treated lanes. Decreases or
increases from control values were calculated as follows: % change = (corrected experimental OD/corrected control OD) × 100. The following primer sequences were used in the experiments:
-actin, 5'-GTGGGGCGCCCCAGGCACCA-3' (upstream) and
5'-CTCCTTAATGTCACGCACGATTTC-3' (downstream) (548 bp);
MIP-1
, 5'-CCAAACCAAAAGAAGCAAGC-3' (upstream) and
5'-AGAAACAGTGACAGTGGACC-3' (downstream) (320 bp); and CCR5, 5'-CTCGGATCCGGTGGAACAAGATGGATTAT-3' (upstream) and
5'-CTCGTCGACATGTGCACAACTCTGACTG-3' (downstream) (1,117 bp).
 |
RESULTS |
Cocaine selectively suppresses endogenous MIP-1
production by
normal lymphocytes.
The data presented in Table
1 demonstrate that cocaine selectively
inhibited the endogenous production of MIP-1
by lymphocytes from
normal subjects and not from HIV-infected patients in a dose-dependent manner. PBMC from normal subjects cultured in medium alone produced 153 pg of MIP-1
per ml. PBMC cultured with cocaine at 10
6
M concentration produced significantly lower level of MIP-1
(76 pg/ml; 50% inhibition, P < 0.03) compared to control
culture (153 pg/ml). Cocaine at 10
9 and
10
12 M concentrations also produced lower levels of
MIP-1
(87 pg/ml, 43% inhibition, P < 0.06, and 99 pg/ml, 34% inhibition, P < 0.13, respectively)
compared to control culture (153 pg/ml), although these inhibitions
were statistically not significant. PBMC from HIV-1-infected patients
cultured in medium alone produced 210 pg/ml of MIP-1
. PBMC from
HIV-1-infected subjects cultured with cocaine at similar concentrations
of 10
6, 10
9, and 10
12 M
produced 210, 223, and 195 pg of MIP-1
per ml, respectively. The
mean percent inhibitions compared to the untreated controls were 0 (P < 0.9), 6 (P < 0.9), and 7% (P < 0.8), respectively, for the 10
6, 10
9,
and 10
12 M cocaine concentrations. These results
demonstrate that cocaine selectively downregulates endogenous
production of HIV protective chemokines by normal PBMC, while cocaine
at a similar concentration did not affect MIP-1
production by PBMC
from HIV-1-infected subjects.
Cocaine selectively suppresses LPS-induced
-chemokine production
by lymphocytes from HIV-infected patients.
The data presented in
Table 2 show the effect of cocaine on
lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced MIP-1
production by lymphocytes from normal donors and HIV-infected patients. Lymphocytes from uninfected and HIV-1-infected patients cultured in medium alone produced similar levels of MIP-1
(155 and 142 pg/ml, respectively; P < 0.16). Addition of LPS (10 µg/ml) to cultures of
lymphocytes from uninfected donors significantly enhanced MIP-1
production to 1,529 pg/ml (P < 0.0001) compared to an
untreated culture (155 pg/ml). Lymphocytes (from HIV-1-infected
patients) cultured with similar concentrations of LPS also produced
enhanced levels of MIP-1
(1,490 pg/ml, P < 0.0001)
compared to untreated control culture (142 pg/ml). Cocaine did not
affect LPS-induced MIP-1
production by normal lymphocytes. Normal
PBMC cultured with LPS plus 10
6, 10
9, and
10
12 M cocaine produced 1,479, 1,500, and 1,471 pg/ml,
respectively, compared to 1,529 pg/ml produced by culture treated with
LPS alone. In contrast, cocaine significantly suppressed LPS-induced
MIP-1
production by PBMC from HIV-1-infected patients in a
dose-dependent manner; the levels of MIP-1
produced were 930 (P < 0.007), 1,153 (P < 0.04), and
1,184 (P < 0.04) pg/ml, respectively, for
10
6, 10
9, and 10
12 M cocaine
compared to 1,490 pg/ml produced by PBMC from HIV-infected patients
treated only with LPS. These results demonstrate that cocaine
selectively suppresses LPS-induced MIP-1
production by PBMC from
HIV-infected patients, while leaving cells from normal donors
unaffected.
Cocaine modulates the expression of the chemokine MIP-1
and its
receptor gene, CCR5, by PBMC from normal donors.
Several chemokine
receptors also serve as entry coreceptors for HIV, and this function
can be blocked by their natural chemokine ligands. The chemokine,
MIP-1
, can suppress HIV-1 infection of permissive target cells.
Conversely, drugs of abuse such as cocaine are associated with
increased replication of HIV-1. Since cocaine significantly
downregulated MIP-1
production by normal PBMC, we undertook the
following experiments to determine whether cocaine can enhance
susceptibility to HIV infection by upregulating HIV coreceptor gene
expression and/or inhibiting HIV-suppressing chemokine gene expression.
PBMC were cultured with or without 10
6 to
10
9 M cocaine for 8 h. Total RNA was extracted and
subjected to RT-PCR assay by using specific primers for MIP-1
and
the housekeeping gene,
-actin. Figure
1A demonstrates that treatment of PBMC
with cocaine suppressed transcription of the MIP-1
gene. cDNA from amplified PCR products by using
-actin primers migrated to the expected region of 548 bp. MIP-1
-specific PCR products banded at the
expected region of 320 bp. Lane M reflects molecular size markers.
Cocaine at 10
6 M (lane 2, OD = 17.3),
10
9 M (lane 3, OD = 23.0), and 10
12 M
concentration (lane 4, OD = 27.4) downregulated MIP-1
gene expression in a dose-dependent manner compared to the control culture
(lane 1, OD = 31.6). Figure 1B shows the percent change of OD
values from Fig. 1A. Cocaine at 10
6, 10
9,
and 10
12 M suppressed MIP-1
gene expression in a
dose-dependent manner; the percent suppression levels were 45.2, 25.9, and 18.0%, respectively, for 10
6 M (lane 2),
10
9 M (lane 3), and 10
12 M (lane 4)
compared to the untreated control culture (lane 1).

View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
(A) Cocaine suppresses MIP-1 gene expression by
lymphocytes as measured by RT-PCR. PBMC (3 × 106/ml)
from normal donors were treated with 10 6 and
10 9 M cocaine for 8 h, mRNA extracted, reverse
transcribed, amplified with MIP-1 and the housekeeping gene
-actin primers, and electrophoresed. cDNA from amplified PCR
products of MIP-1 and -actin banded at 320 and 548 bp,
respectively. Lanes: M, molecular weight markers; 1, untreated control;
2, cocaine at 10 6 M; 3, cocaine at 10 9 M;
4, cocaine at 10 12 M. These data represent results from a
single experiment. The experiment was repeated independently four times
with PBMC from four different subjects with similar results. (B)
Quantitation of changes in MIP-1 gene expression. The percent
changes in the laser densitometry readings of the photographic
negatives of experimental values after normalization with respective
-actin values were determined and then compared with control values
from Fig. 1A. Lanes: 1, untreated control; 2, cocaine at
10 6 M; 3, cocaine at 10 9 M; 4, cocaine at
10 12 M.
|
|
Figure
2A shows the effects of cocaine on
gene expression of the CCR5 chemokine receptor and HIV coreceptor.
Normal PBMC were
cultured with 10
6 or 10
9 M
cocaine for 8 h. RNA was extracted and reverse transcribed,
and
cDNA was amplified by PCR by using primers specific for the
housekeeping gene

-actin and CCR5. Lanes 1 and 2 reflect
cultures
treated with cocaine at 10
6 and
10
9 M, respectively, while lane 3 represents the
untreated control
culture. Housekeeping

-actin cDNA (lower panel)
migrated, as
expected, to the 548-bp region. Treatment of cultures
with cocaine
did not affect the constitutively expressed

-actin
gene (lanes
1 and 2) and was comparable to the control (lane 3). The
CCR5
PCR product banded at the expected region of 1,117 bp. Control
PBMC (lane 3) incubated in medium alone for 8 h demonstrated
detectable
CCR5 gene expression (lane 3, OD = 11.5). Cultures
treated with
cocaine at 10
6 (lane 2, OD = 50) and
10
9 M (lane 1, OD = 36) upregulated CCR5 gene
expression compared
to the control culture (lane 3, OD = 11.5).
Data presented in
Fig.
2B show the percent change of the OD values from
those in
Fig.
2A. Cocaine significantly upregulated CCR5 gene
expression
in a dose-dependent manner compared to the control
culture; the
levels of percent upregulation were 334 and 213%,
respectively,
for 10
6 M (lane 2) and 10
9 M
(lane 1) compared to the untreated control culture (lane 3).

View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
(A) Cocaine upregulates CCR5 gene expression by
lymphocytes as measured by semiquantitative RT-PCR. RNA from PBMC
(3 × 106/ml) cultures either untreated or treated
with cocaine for 8 h were reverse transcribed and amplified with
CCR5 primers and electrophoresed. Lanes: 1, cocaine at
10 6 M; 2, cocaine at 10 9 M; 3, untreated
control. These data represent results from a single experiment. The
experiment was repeated independently four times with PBMC from four
different subjects with similar results. (B) Quantitation of changes in
CCR5 gene expression. The percent changes in the densitometry reading
of the photographic negatives after normalization with respective
-actin values were determined and then compared with the control
values from Fig. 2A. Lanes: 1, cocaine at 10 6 M; 2, cocaine at 10 9 M; 3, untreated control. Cocaine
significantly upregulated CCR5 gene expression in dose-dependent manner
(lanes 1 and 2) compared to the control (lane 3).
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
Several human and animal studies have demonstrated that various
recreational drugs, including cocaine, alcohol, and opiates, exert
immunomodulating activities and therefore could serve as cofactors in
susceptibility to HIV-1 infections (for a review, see references
18 and 19). After sexual
transmission, intravenous substance abuse is the second greatest risk
factor for HIV-1 infection (12, 15). The advent of the
cocaine abuse epidemic during the last decade has coincided with and
also has had profound effects on the AIDS epidemic (19).
Various investigators have shown that crack (cocaine in smokeable form)
use is more closely linked to HIV-1 infection than heroin injection in
the United States (7, 12, 17), and crack cocaine is
independently associated with clinical progression to AIDS
(25). Previous studies showed that cocaine enhanced the
replication of HIV-1 in a cell culture system and suggest a link
between cocaine use and HIV-1 disease progression (3, 22,
26). Thus, this "co-factor hypothesis" is supported by a
number of clinical studies, animal models, and in vitro investigations
(3, 19, 25, 26).
Paxton and colleagues (20) showed that CD4+ T
lymphocytes from subjects who remained uninfected despite repeated
high-risk sexual exposures were resistant to in vitro infection by
M-tropic HIV-1 isolates; this result was associated with the secretion of high levels of CC chemokines. Using experimental vaccines in monkey
models, several investigators demonstrated the correlation of increased
chemokine levels with protection from lentivirus infections (1,
16, 23). RANTES, MIP-1
, and MIP-1
were also shown to
selectively inhibit cell fusion mediated by HIV-1 envelope
glycoproteins (2). These studies clearly demonstrate that
-chemokines play a significant role in resistance to HIV-1 infection
and its clinical progression to AIDS. From these observations showing
that cocaine is a major risk factor for exposure and increased susceptibility to HIV-1 infection and that
-chemokines manifest significant anti-HIV-1 effects, we hypothesize that cocaine
downregulates
-chemokine gene expression and production by
lymphocytes from HIV-1-infected subjects, thereby fostering progression
of the disease. Our results demonstrate that cocaine selectively
suppresses LPS-induced MIP-1
production by PBMC from HIV-infected
patients, while leaving cells from normal donors unaffected. These
studies suggest that, although lymphocytes from HIV-infected patients who are not using cocaine can produce normal levels of MIP-1
in
response to external stimuli, lymphocytes from HIV-infected patients
who use cocaine may produce lower levels of MIP-1
in response to
external stimuli such as infections, thereby increasing the risk of
acquisition or progression of HIV-1 infection. Cocaine did not
significantly inhibit the endogenous production of MIP-1
by PBMC
from HIV-infected patients. In our studies, despite a varying number of
monocytes present in HIV-1-infected subjects, the control levels of
MIP-1
produced by PBMC from these patients were similar to those in
uninfected subjects, suggesting that although monocytes are robust
producers of MIP-1
, other cells also produce MIP-1
and may be
targets for the cocaine's effect. An interesting paradox exists
regarding the selective effects of cocaine on PBMC from HIV-infected
patients and normal donors. While cocaine did not affect constitutive
production of MIP-1
by cells from HIV-infected patients, it
suppressed constitutive MIP-1
production by normal PBMC. By
contrast, however, cocaine suppressed LPS-induced MIP-1
production
by PBMC from HIV-infected patients, leaving LPS-induced MIP-1
production by normal cells unaffected. Nevertheless, our data support a
model wherein cocaine may be a cofactor in increasing the
susceptibility of cocaine users to infection with HIV-1 and, once
infected, hastening the progression of the disease (25).
Although PBMC from HIV-infected patients produce levels of MIP-1
comparable to normal cells in response to external stimuli such as
other concomitant infections, they are selectively sensitive to the
immunosuppressive effects of cocaine. Our results suggest that one
mechanism of cocaine-associated immunosuppression in HIV-infected
subjects may be cocaine-mediated inhibition of the production HIV
protective chemokine(s) by PBMC.
Recently Biti and coworkers (4) observed that in patients
with active HIV infections, the virus uses an expanded range of
coreceptors, including the chemokine receptors CCR3, CCR2b, CCR5, and
CXCR4; this adaptation was associated with progression to AIDS. The
emergence of HIV variants with these coreceptors was correlated with a
switch from a non-syncytium-inducing to a syncytium-inducing phenotype
and resistance to virus inhibition by the chemokine ligands of these
receptors. A recent study also shows an increased frequency of
CCR5-positive perivascular mononuclear cells and macrophages in the
brains of HIV-1-infected subjects with encephalitis (24). In
our investigations we demonstrate that cocaine can upregulate CCR5 gene
expression by PBMC in a dose-dependent manner. These studies support
our hypothesis that cocaine is a cofactor in susceptibility to HIV
infection and disease progression. Cocaine may mediate these effects by
two previously unrecognized, interrelated and self-reinforcing
mechanisms: upregulation of HIV entry coreceptors and inhibition of
host-protective chemokines.
In summary, our studies demonstrate that cocaine can inhibit the
production of the HIV-suppressing chemokine, MIP-1
, and HIV-1 entry
coreceptor, CCR5, by normal PBMC. Cocaine also selectively inhibits
LPS-induced MIP-1
production by PBMC from AIDS patients. Our studies
on the modulation of
-chemokines by cocaine in HIV-1-infected subjects may yield new information on the role of drugs of abuse in the
natural history of HIV-1 infections. These findings open up an entirely
new area for potential therapeutic strategies using (i) inexpensive
synthetic blockers of the HIV-1 entry coreceptor and chemokine
receptors (CCR5), (ii) custom-designed vaccines to increase the levels
of HIV-1-suppressing chemokines, and/or (iii) specific cocaine receptor
antagonists in drug addicts with HIV-1 infection. These studies are
currently under way in our laboratory. Further, studies on the
modulation of chemokines by cocaine and the reversal or blocking of
these effects by receptor-specific antagonist may open up new
perspectives for the development of unique therapeutic approaches to
patients with HIV-1 infections.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
Supported by National Institutes of Health grants RO3 NIDA
1119-01, RO1 NIMH 47225,1 and RO1 DA 010632-01A1 and a grant from the
Margaret Duffy and Robert Cameron Troup Memorial Fund of the Buffalo
General Hospital.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Buffalo General
Hospital, Division of Allergy/Immunology/Rheumatology, 100 High St., Buffalo, NY 14203. Phone: (716) 859-2985/2215. Fax: (716) 859-2999. E-mail: mnair{at}acsu.buffalo.edu.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Abimiku, A. G.,
G. Franchini,
J. Tartaglia,
K. Aldrich,
M. Myagkiikh,
P. D. Markham,
P. Chong,
M. Klein,
M. P. Kieny, and E. Paoletti.
1995.
HIV-1 recombinanat poxvirus vaccine induces cross-protection against HIV-2 challenge in rheses macaques.
Nat. Med.
1:321-329[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 2.
|
Alkhatib, G.,
C. Combadiere,
C. C. Broder,
Y. Feng,
P. E. Kennedy,
P. M. Murphy, and E. A. Bergert.
1996.
CC CKR5: a RANTES, MIP-1a, MIP-1b receptor as a fusion cofactor for macrophage-tropic HIV-1.
Science
272:1955-1958[Abstract].
|
| 3.
|
Bagasra, O., and R. J. Pomerantz.
1993.
Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 replication in peripheral blood mononuclear cells in the presence of cocaine.
J. Infect. Dis.
168:1157-1164[Medline].
|
| 4.
|
Biti, R.,
R. Ffrench, and J. Young.
1997.
HIV-1 infection in an individual homozygous for the CCR5 deletion allele.
Nat. Med.
3:252[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 5.
|
Boyum, A.
1968.
Isolation of mononuclear cells and granulocytes from human blood.
Scand. J. Clin. Investig.
21:77-89.
|
| 6.
|
Broder, C. C., and R. G. Collman.
1997.
Chemokine receptors and HIV.
J. Leukoc. Biol.
62:20-29[Abstract].
|
| 7.
|
Chaisson, R. E.,
P. Bacchetti,
D. Osmond,
B. Brodie,
M. A. Sandie, and A. R. Moss.
1989.
Cocaine use and HIV infection in intravenous drug users in San Francisco.
JAMA
261:561-566[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 8.
|
Chiappelli, F.,
M. A. Kung,
P. Nguyen,
P. Villanueva,
P. Shapshak,
C. McCoy,
N. Weatherby,
B. Page,
F. Stitt,
D. Mash,
S. Shah,
L. Netsch,
G. Beall,
S. Kruger,
J. Purser,
M. Sanwo, and A. Saitoh.
1996.
Progression to AIDS among HIV-seropositive cocaine alcohol drug abusers, p. 23.
4th Annual Symposium on AIDS, San Juan, Puerto Rico.
|
| 9.
|
Chomczynski, P., and N. Saachi.
1987.
Single step method of RNA isolation by acid guanidinium thiocyanate-phenol-chloroform extraction.
Anal. Biochem.
162:156-159[Medline].
|
| 10.
|
Cocchi, F.,
A. L. DeVico,
A. Garzino-Demo,
S. K. Arya,
R. C. Gallo, and P. Lusso.
1995.
Identification of RANTES, MIP-1a MIP-1b as the major HIV suppressive factors produced by CD8+ T cells.
Science
270:1811-1815[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 11.
|
Combadiere, C.,
S. K. Ahuja,
H. L. Tiffany, and P. M. Murphy.
1996.
Cloning and funtional expression of a CCR-5, a human monocyte CC chemokine receptor selective for MIP-1 and MIP-1 and RANTES.
J. Leukoc. Biol.
60:147[Abstract].
|
| 12.
|
Des Jarlais, D. C.,
S. R. Friedman, and R. L. Stoneburner.
1988.
Development of AIDS, HIV seroconversion and potential cofactors for T4 cell loss in a cohort of intravenous drug users.
Rev. Infect. Dis.
10:151-158[Medline].
|
| 13.
|
Donahoe, R. M.
1990.
Drug abuse and AIDS: causes for the connection.
NIDA Res. Monogr.
96:181-191[Medline].
|
| 14.
|
Garzino-Demo, A.,
A. L. Devico,
F. Cocchi, and R. C. Gallo.
1998.
Beta chemokines and protection from HIV.
AIDS Res. Hum. Retrovir.
14:S177-S184.
|
| 15.
|
Hahn, R. A.,
I. M. Onarato,
T. S. Jones, and J. Dougherty.
1989.
Opiates, opioids, and addiction.
JAMA
261:2677-2684[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 16.
|
Heeney, J.,
R. Jonker,
W. Koorstra,
R. Dubbes,
H. Niphuis,
A. M. DiRienzo,
M. L. Gougeon, and L. Montagnier.
1993.
The resistance of HIV-infected chimpanzees to pregression to AIDS correlates with absence of HIV-related T cell dysfunction.
J. Med. Primatol.
22:194-200[Medline].
|
| 17.
|
Hubbard, R. L.,
M. E. Marden,
E. Cavanaugh,
J. V. Rachal, et al.
1988.
Role of drug-abuse treatment in limiting the spread of AIDS.
Rev. Infect. Dis.
10:377-384[Medline].
|
| 18.
|
Kreek, M.
1996.
Opiates, opioids, and addiction.
Mol. Psychiatry
1:232-254[Medline].
|
| 19.
|
Larrat, E. P., and S. Zierler.
1993.
Entangled epidemics: cocaine use and HIV disease.
J. Psychoactive Drugs
25:207[Medline].
|
| 20.
|
Paxton, W. A.,
S. R. Martin,
D. Tse,
T. R. O'Brien,
J. Skurnick,
N. L. VanDevanter,
N. Padian,
J. F. Braun,
D. P. Kotler,
S. M. Wolinsky, and R. A. Koup.
1996.
Relative resistance to HIV-1 infection of CD4 lymphocytes from persons who remain uninfected despite multiple high-risk sexual exposures.
Nat. Med.
2:412-417[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 21.
|
Pellegrino, T., and B. M. Bayer.
1998.
In vivo effects of cocaine on immune cell function.
J. Neuroimmunol.
83:139-147[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 22.
|
Peterson, P. K.,
G. Gekker,
C. C. Chao,
R. Schut,
J. Verhoef,
C. K. Edelman,
A. Erice, and H. H. Balfour, Jr.
1992.
Cocaine amplifies HIV-1 replication in cytomegalovirus-stimulated peripheral blood mononuclear cell cocultures.
J. Immunol.
149:676-680[Abstract].
|
| 23.
|
Putkonen, P.,
C. Nilsson,
L. Walther,
L. Ghavamzadeh,
K. Hild,
K. Broliden,
G. Biberfeld, and R. Thorstensson.
1994.
Efficacy of inactivated whole HIV-2 vaccines with various adjuvants in cyno molgens monkeys.
J. Med. Primatol.
23:89-94[Medline].
|
| 24.
|
Vallat, A.,
U. DeGirolami,
J. He,
A. Mhashilkar,
W. Marasco,
B. Shi,
F. Gray,
J. Bell,
C. Keohane,
T. Smith, and D. Gabuzda.
1998.
Localization of HIV-1 co-receptors CCR5 and CXCR4 in the brain of children with AIDS.
Am. J. Pathol.
152:167-178[Abstract].
|
| 25.
|
Webber, M. P.,
E. E. Schoenbaum,
M. N. Gourevitch,
D. Buono, and R. S. Klein.
1999.
A prospective study of HIV disease progression in female and male drug users.
AIDS
4:257-262.
|
| 26.
|
Zhang, L.,
D. Looney,
D. Taub,
S. L. Chang,
D. Way,
M. H. Witte,
M. C. Graves, and M. Fiala.
1998.
Cocaine opens the blood-brain barrier to HIV-1 invasion.
J. Neurobiol.
4:619-626.
|
Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology, January 2000, p. 96-100, Vol. 7, No. 1
1071-412X/0/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Roth, M. D., Whittaker, K. M., Choi, R., Tashkin, D. P., Baldwin, G. C.
(2005). Cocaine and {sigma}-1 receptors modulate HIV infection, chemokine receptors, and the HPA axis in the huPBL-SCID model. J. Leukoc. Biol.
78: 1198-1203
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Gekker, G., Hu, S., Wentland, M. P., Bidlack, J. M., Lokensgard, J. R., Peterson, P. K.
(2004). {kappa}-Opioid Receptor Ligands Inhibit Cocaine-Induced HIV-1 Expression in Microglial Cells. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.
309: 600-606
[Abstract]
[Full Text]