Previous Article | Next Article 
Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology, November 2000, p. 987-989, Vol. 7, No. 6
1071-412X/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Molecular Confirmation of Human Immunodeficiency
Virus (HIV) Type 2 in HIV-Seropositive Subjects in South
India
R.
Kannangai,1
S.
Ramalingam,1
K. J.
Prakash,1
O. C.
Abraham,2
R.
George,3
R. C.
Castillo,4
D. H.
Schwartz,4
M. V.
Jesudason,5 and
G.
Sridharan1,*
Departments of Clinical
Virology,1 Internal Medicine Unit
I,2 Dermatology,3
and Clinical Microbiology,5 Christian
Medical College Hospital, Vellore, India, 632004, and
Department of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, The
Johns Hopkins School of Hygiene and Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland
212054
Received 4 February 2000/Returned for modification 24 April
2000/Accepted 6 September 2000
 |
ABSTRACT |
Nested PCRs for human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) and
HIV-2 were compared with immunoblot test results. Twelve of 13 immunoblot-positive HIV-2 samples were positive by PCR. There were five
INNO-LIA (Innogenetics, Zwijnaarde, Belgium) and/or HIVBLOT 2.2 (Genelabs, Singapore) samples that tested positive for dual infection.
HIV-1 PCR was positive in all samples, while HIV-2 PCR was positive in
two and RIBA (Chiron Corporation, San Diego, Calif.) was positive for
HIV-2 in three samples. Thus the prevalence of HIV-2 is accurately
estimated by the use of immunoblotting, but that of HIV-1 and -2 dual
infection may be overestimated.
 |
TEXT |
Human immunodeficiency virus type 2 (HIV-2) was first detected in West Africa, where it is seen as a major
problem (2, 9, 10, 18). In Asia, 95% of the reported HIV-2
cases come from India (17, 19). The prevalence of HIV-2 in
India varies regionwise, ranging between 2 and 33% of all HIV
infections; these reports identify HIV-2 infection serologically
(1, 11, 13, 20). Some reports indicate that immunoblotting
may overestimate the prevalence of HIV-2 and HIV-1 and -2 dual
infections (14, 16); thus, it is important to use molecular
techniques for confirmation. We used a PCR to ascertain true HIV-2
infection in seropositive individuals and evaluated the Chiron RIBA
HIV-1/HIV-2 strip immunoblot assay.
All study participants were diagnosed HIV positive at the Christian
Medical College Hospital in Vellore, a tertiary-care center in southern
India. Initial diagnoses were performed during the period of 1993 to
1999, as patients checked into the hospital with some other ailments or
with a suspicion of HIV infection. Contact information was available on
only 67 HIV-2-positive individuals, of whom only 16 (24%) responded.
In addition, two individuals were contacted while in the hospital. The
final study group included 15 males and 3 females belonging to the four
southern Indian states. At the time of sample collection, 14 of the 18 (77.8%) individuals were asymptomatic and only two (pure HIV-2) were
on antiretroviral therapy. Thirty HIV-1 immunoblot- and PCR-positive
samples were also tested to assess the specificity of the HIV-2 nested
PCR (nPCR). DNA was extracted from peripheral blood mononuclear
cells (PBMC) using the High Pure viral nucleic acid kit
(Boehringer-Mannheim, Ottweiler, Germany).
Nested PCR was done to amplify the V3-to-V5 and V3 regions of the
env gene sequence for HIV-1 and HIV-2, respectively (3, 4), from all 18 HIV-infected individuals. The Expand
High-Fidelity PCR system (Boehringer-Mannheim) was used for the first
amplification of the HIV-2 PCR. Five microliters of the extracted DNA
was subjected to first-round amplification; wherever the PCR was
negative, it was repeated by increasing the input DNA to 20 µl. The
expected size of HIV-1 PCR product was 700 bp, while that of HIV-2 was 542 bp. All products were detected by gel electrophoresis.
All 18 study subjects were tested using the line immunoassay (LIA) or
HIVBLOT 2.2 kits; 13 were positive for HIV-2 by the kit criteria and 5 showed bands specific for HIV-1 and HIV-2. Hence these five individuals
were diagnosed as having dual infections. All 13 HIV-2-positive samples
showed concordant results in RIBA and LIA and/or HIVBLOT 2.2. In
contrast, of the five dual-reactive samples by LIA and/or HIVBLOT 2.2, only three were positive for both HIV-1 and HIV-2 by RIBA. The
remaining two samples were positive only for HIV-1. Information,
including clinical status and CD4 counts of the dual infection, is
shown in Table 1.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 1.
The clinical status and CD4 counts of 5 HIV-1 and -2 dual-infected individuals and comparison of LIA and/or HIVBLOT 2.2 patterns with RIBA reactivity and PCR findings
|
|
The LIA and/or HIVBLOT (n = 13) HIV-2-positive samples
tested negative by HIV-1-specific PCR, while 12 (92.3%) of these
samples tested positive by HIV-2 PCR. Two of these samples were
amplified only after increasing the DNA input to 20 µl, while one
sample remained PCR negative. In the one HIV-2 sample which was not
amplified, the presence of human DNA was confirmed by amplification of
HLA genome DQ alpha-specific sequences using the GH26 and GH27 primers (5). All 30 HIV-1 PCR-positive samples were negative for
HIV-2.
The five HIV-1 and -2-positive (by LIA and/or HIVBLOT 2.2) individuals
also tested positive by HIV-1 PCR. Only three of these were positive
for HIV-2 by RIBA, and two of these three were also positive by HIV-2
PCR (Table 2). Figure
1 shows the agarose gel with the PCR
product analysis of dually reactive samples.

View larger version (78K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Gel Doc (Bio-Rad, Hercules, Calif.) picture showing
specific bands for HIV-1 (700 bp) and HIV-2 (542 bp) on a 2.5% agarose
gel with DNA Molecular Weight Marker IX (72-1353). Lanes 1, 3, 5, 9, and 11 show bands specific for HIV-1, amplified from the dual-reactive
samples. Lanes 2 and 4 show HIV-2 PCR product of the dually positive
samples, while lanes 6, 10, and 12 show the three HIV-2 PCR-negative
samples. Lanes 14 and 15 show product from pure HIV-1 and HIV-2
samples, respectively. Lane 8 is the molecular weight marker. Lanes 7 and 13 are distilled-water PCR controls.
|
|
HIV-2 nPCR may have certain limitations, mainly due to low replicative
capacity of the virus and low proviral copy numbers in the PBMC of
infected individuals. The sensitivity of PCR for detecting proviral DNA
in serologically detected HIV-2 varied from 52 to 84% in earlier
studies in which Taq DNA polymerase was used for
amplification (6-8, 18, 21). An improved PCR method, using
XL PCR (Perkin-Elmer Applied Biosystems, Alameda, Calif.) in the first
round followed by a nested PCR to amplify a sequence within HIV-2
env, increased sensitivity to 95% (3). Our study
also used the same primer sets that were previously employed
(3). Since the first-round primers are from the
most-conserved region in pol, the chance of amplification
increases through long terminal repeat including env, even
though the strains show variation in the env sequence. In
contrast to the V3 region of HIV-1, the V3 region of HIV-2 is more
conserved. This PCR technique successfully amplified HIV-2 DNA from two
patients who were on triple-drug antiretroviral therapy for 4 to 6 months and who could reasonably be expected to have extremely low viral
burdens. Considering these factors, this technique can be considered a
highly sensitive method for the detection of HIV-2 DNA from PBMC. Since
the closely related virus HIV-1 is not amplified, this HIV-2 nPCR is
highly specific.
The primary motivation for using a PCR-based diagnosis of HIV-2
infection is that in serologically detected HIV-1- and -2-positive samples, dual reactivity may be due to one of the following reasons in
addition to true dual infection: extensive cross-reactivity of
antibodies of either HIV type, infection by one virus and exposure to a
second one, and infection with a putative intermediate virus (10). The earlier reports on PCR confirmation of
dual-positive samples showed a PCR-positive rate varying from 18 to
62% (6, 14-16). Immunoblot data from this institution (the
Christian Medical College Hospital), collected between 1993 and 1997, showed a prevalence of 2.1% for dual infections among the HIV
infections, which was higher than that of HIV-2 infection alone (1.8%)
(11). Reports from western parts of India showed prevalence
rates in high-risk groups varying from 5 to 20% for dual infection, by
serological methods. Such high proportions of dual infection might be
inconsistent with HIV-2 infection serving a protective role against
HIV-1 infection (22). However, because of cross-reactivity
in immunoblotting, these figures may be falsely high. Although PCR is
considered the "gold standard" for the detection of HIV-2, RIBA
appears to be more specific in detecting HIV-2 than the other two
immunoblot assays. Despite the limitations of the sample size, in
conclusion we think that immunoblots may overestimate the prevalence of
HIV-2 and that the data require reassessment with PCR testing.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of
Clinical Virology, Christian Medical College Hospital, Vellore 632004, India. Phone: 91 (416) 222102. Fax: 91 (416) 232035. E-mail:
gsridhar{at}viro.cmc.ernet.in or
g_sridharan_in{at}yahoo.com.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Babu, P. G.,
N. K. Saraswathi,
F. Deva Priya, and T. J. John.
1993.
The detection of HIV-2 infection in southern India.
Indian J. Med. Res.
97:49-52[Medline].
|
| 2.
|
Brain, F.,
S. M'boup,
F. Denis,
P. Kanki,
J. S. Allan, and T. H. Lee.
1985.
Serological evidence of virus related to simian T-lymphotrophic retrovirus III in residents of West Africa.
Lancet
ii:1387.
|
| 3.
|
Damond, F.,
I. Loussert-Ajaka,
C. Apetrei,
D. Descamps,
S. Souquière,
A. Leprêtre,
S. Matheron,
F. Brun-Vezinet, and F. Simon.
1998.
Highly sensitive method for amplification of human immunodeficiency virus type 2 DNA.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
36:809-811[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 4.
|
Delwart, E. L.,
B. Hering,
A. G. Rodrigo, and J. I. Mullins.
1995.
Genetic subtyping of human immunodeficiency virus using heteroduplex mobility assay.
PCR Methods Appl.
4:S202-S216[Medline].
|
| 5.
|
Erlich, H. A., and T. L. Bugawan.
1990.
HLA DNA typing, p. 261-271.
In
M. A. Innis, D. H. Elfand, J. J. Sninsky, and T. J. White (ed.), PCR protocols: a guide to methods and application. Academic Press, San Diego, Calif.
|
| 6.
|
George, J. R.,
C. Yih-Ou,
B. Parekh,
K. Brattegaard,
V. Brown,
E. Boateng, and K. M. De Cock.
1992.
Prevalence of HIV-1 and HIV-2 mixed infection in Cote d'Ivoire.
Lancet
340:337-338[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 7.
|
Grankvist, O.,
U. Bredberg-Raden,
A. Gustafsson,
J. Albert,
P. A. Albino,
A. Andreasson,
A. Naucler,
G. Biberfeld, and G. Wadell.
1992.
Improved detection of HIV-2 DNA in clinical samples using a nested primer-based polymerase chain reaction.
J. Acquir. Immune Defic. Syndr.
5:286-293.
|
| 8.
|
Grez, M.,
U. Dietrich,
P. Ralfe,
H. von Briessen,
J. K. Maniar,
G. Mahambre,
E. L. Delwart,
J. I. Mullins, and H. Rübsamen-Waigmann.
1994.
Genetic analysis of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 and type 2 (HIV-1 and HIV-2) mixed infections in India reveals a recent spread of HIV-1 and HIV-2 from a single ancestor for each of these viruses.
J. Virol.
68:2161-2168[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 9.
|
Harrison, L. H.,
A. P. Da Silva,
H. D. Gayle,
P. Albino,
R. George,
S. Lee-Thomas,
M. A. Rayfield,
F. D. Castillo, and W. L. Heyward.
1991.
Risk factors for HIV-2 infection in Guinea-Bissau.
J. Acquir. Immune Defic. Syndr.
4:1155-1160.
|
| 10.
|
Kanki, P.
1995.
Epidemiology and natural history of human immunodeficiency virus type 2, p. 127-135.
In
V. T. Devita, S. Hellman, and S. A. Rosenberg (ed.), AIDS biology, diagnosis, treatment and prevention. Lippincott-Raven Publishers, Philadelphia, Pa.
|
| 11.
|
Kannangai, R.,
S. Ramalingam,
R. C. Castillo,
P. G. Babu,
T. J. John,
G. Sridharan, and D. H. Schwartz.
1999.
HIV-2 status in southern India.
Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg.
93:30-31[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 12.
|
Kannangai, R.,
K. J. Prakash,
S. Ramalingam,
O. C. Abraham,
K. P. Mathews,
M. V. Jesudason, and G. Sridharan.
2000.
Peripheral CD4+/CD8+ T-lymphocyte counts estimated by an immunocapture method in the normal healthy south Indian adults and HIV seropositive individuals.
J. Clin. Virol.
17:101-108[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 13.
|
Kulkarni, S.,
M. Thakar,
J. Rodrigues, and K. Banerjee.
1992.
HIV-2 antibodies in serum samples from Maharashtra state.
Indian J. Med. Res.
95:213-215[Medline].
|
| 14.
|
Leonard, G.,
A. Chaput,
V. Courgnud,
A. Sangare,
F. Denis, and C. Brechot.
1993.
Characterization of dual HIV-1 and HIV-2 serological profiles by polymerase chain reaction.
AIDS
7:1185-1189[Medline].
|
| 15.
|
Peeters, M.,
G. M. Gershy-Damet,
K. Fransen,
K. Koffi,
M. Coulibaly,
E. Delaporte,
P. Piot, and G. van der Groen.
1992.
Virological and polymerase chain reaction studies of HIV-1/HIV-2 dual infection in Cote d'Ivoire.
Lancet
340:339-340[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 16.
|
Pieniazek, D.,
J. M. Peralta,
J. A. Ferreira,
J. W. Krebs,
S. M. Owen,
F. S. Sion,
C. F. R. Filho,
A. B. Sereno,
C. A. Morais de Sa,
B. G. Weniger,
W. L. Heyward,
O. Chin-Yih,
N. J. Pieniazek,
G. Schochetman, and M. A. Rayfield.
1991.
Identification of mixed HIV-1/HIV-2 infections in Brazil by polymerase chain reaction.
AIDS
5:1293-1299[Medline].
|
| 17.
|
Pfutzner, A.,
U. Dietrich,
U. Von Eichel,
H. Briesen,
H. D. Brede,
J. K. Maniar, and H. Rubsamen-Waigmann.
1992.
HIV-1 and HIV-2 infection in a high-risk population in Bombay, India: evidence for the spread of HIV-2 and presence of divergent HIV-1 subtype.
J. Acquir. Immune Defic. Syndr.
5:972-977.
|
| 18.
|
Richard, D.,
A. Wilkins,
P. T. N'gum,
R. Hayes,
G. Morgan,
A. P. Da Silva, and H. Whittle.
1994.
The effects of HIV-2 infection in a rural area of Guinea-Bissau.
AIDS
8:977-982[Medline].
|
| 19.
|
Rubsamen-Waigmann, H.,
H. V. Brisen,
J. K. Maniar,
P. K. Pao,
C. Scholz, and A. Pfutzner.
1991.
Spread of HIV-2 in India.
Lancet
337:550[Medline].
|
| 20.
|
Rubsamen-Waigmann, H.,
J. Maniar,
S. Grete,
H. D. Brede,
U. Dietrich,
G. Mahambre, and A. Pfutzner.
1994.
High proportion of HIV-2 and HIV-1/2 double-reactive sera in two Indian states, Maharashtra and Goa: first appearance of an HIV-2 epidemic along with an HIV-1 epidemic outside of Africa.
Zentbl. Bakteriol.
280:398-402.
|
| 21.
|
Simon, F.,
S. Matheron,
C. Tamalet,
I. Loussert-Ajaka,
S. Bratczak, and J. M. Pepin.
1993.
Cellular and plasma viral load in patients infected with HIV-2.
AIDS
7:1411-1417[Medline].
|
| 22.
|
Travers, K.,
S. Mboup,
R. Marlink,
A. Gueve-Ndiaye,
T. Siby,
I. Thior,
I. Traore,
A. Dieng-Sarr,
J. Sankale,
C. Mullins,
I. Ndoye,
H. Chung-Cheng,
M. Essex, and P. Kanki.
1995.
Natural protection against HIV-1 infection provided by HIV-2.
Science
268:1612-1615[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology, November 2000, p. 987-989, Vol. 7, No. 6
1071-412X/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Vijayakumar, T.-S., David, S., Selvaraj, K., Viswanathan, T., Kannangai, R., Sridharan, G.
(2005). Performance of a Rapid Immunochromatographic Screening Test for Detection of Antibodies to Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 (HIV-1) and HIV-2: Experience at a Tertiary Care Hospital in South India. J. Clin. Microbiol.
43: 4194-4196
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Leano, P. S., Kageyama, S., Espantaleon, A., Maniar, J., Iwasaki, M., Saple, D., Yoshihara, N., Kurimura, T., Agdamag, D. M.
(2003). Introduction of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 2 Infection in the Philippines. J. Clin. Microbiol.
41: 516-518
[Abstract]
[Full Text]