Previous Article | Next Article 
Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology, March 2001, p. 251-257, Vol. 8, No. 2
1071-412X/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/CDLI.8.2.251-257.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Cloning and Characterization of the Gene Encoding the Glutamate
Dehydrogenase of Streptococcus suis Serotype 2
Ogi
Okwumabua,*
Julia
S.
Persaud, and
P. G.
Reddy
Department of Pathobiology, College of
Veterinary Medicine, Nursing and Allied Health, Tuskegee
University, Tuskegee, Alabama 36088
Received 29 June 2000/Returned for modification 19 October
2000/Accepted 15 November 2000
 |
ABSTRACT |
Given the lack of effective vaccines to control Streptococcus
suis infection and the lack of a rapid and reliable molecular diagnostic assay to detect its infection, a polyclonal antibody was
raised against the whole-cell protein of S. suis type 2 and used to screen an S. suis gene library in an effort to
identify protective antigen(s) and antigens of diagnostic importance. A clone that produced a 45-kDa S. suis-specific protein was
identified by Western blotting. Restriction analysis showed that the
gene encoding the 45-kDa protein was present on a 1.6-kb pair
DraI region on the cloned chromosomal fragment. The
nucleotide sequence contained an open reading frame that encoded a
polypeptide of 448 amino acid residues with a calculated molecular mass
of 48.8 kDa, in close agreement with the size observed on Western
blots. A GenBank database search revealed that the derived amino acid sequence is homologous to the sequence of glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH)
protein isolated from various sources, including conserved motifs and
functional domains typical of the family 1-type hexameric GDH proteins,
thus placing it in that family. Because of these similarities, the
protein was designated the GDH of S. suis.
Hybridization studies showed that the gene is conserved among the
S. suis type 2 strains tested. Antiserum raised against the
purified recombinant protein was reactive with a protein of the same
molecular size as the recombinant protein in S. suis
strains, suggesting expression of the gene in all of the isolates and
antigenic conservation of the protein. The recombinant protein was
reactive with serum from pigs experimentally infected with a virulent
strain of S. suis type 2, suggesting that the protein might
serve as an antigen of diagnostic importance to detect S. suis infection. Activity staining showed that the S. suis GDH activity is NAD(P)H dependent but, unlike the
NAD(P)H-dependent GDH from various other sources, that of S. suis utilizes L-glutamate rather than
-ketoglutarate as the substrate. Highly virulent strains of S. suis type 2 could be distinguished from moderately virulent and
avirulent strains on the basis of their GDH protein profile following
activity staining on a nondenaturing gel. We examined the cellular
location of the protein using a whole-cell enzyme-linked immunosorbent
assay and an immunogold-labeling technique. Results showed that the
S. suis GDH protein is exposed at the surface of
intact cells.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Streptococcus suis
type 2 is one of the causative agents of meningitis, arthritis,
septicemia, endocarditis, encephalitis, abortions, polyserositis,
bronchopneumonia, and sudden death in pigs (5, 6, 29, 36).
S. suis has also been recovered from other animal species
(5, 8). In humans, S. suis type 2 can cause
meningitis, endocarditis, septicemia, and permanent deafness. All
reported human cases of S. suis infection have been associated with slaughterhouse workers handling infected pork, and
deaths have been reported among those workers (2, 27). For
these reasons, attention has been focused on understanding the
molecular mechanism of the disease process, identifying protective antigens that may be useful in the development of a subunit vaccine, and identifying antigens and the DNA region(s) that may be used in
developing a rapid and sensitive molecular diagnostic assay for the
detection of S. suis infection.
Strains of S. suis are divided into serotypes according to
polysaccharide capsular antigens. Thirty-five capsular serotypes (types
1/2 and 1 through 34) have been identified (10, 11, 16, 25). Of the 35 serotypes, type 2 is the most frequently isolated serotype from pigs with disease, but strains belonging to other serotypes such as types 1/2, 1, 7, 9, and 14 can also cause
disease (23, 36). However, not all strains of S. suis type 2 are virulent, and there is variation in the virulence
of those strains that are virulent. The economic impact of
S. suis infection on the swine industry is substantial
due to a lack of effective means to control the infection
(36), which, in turn, is largely due to a lack of
understanding of the protective antigen(s) and pathogenic mechanism(s)
and limited information on the genetics of the organism and
the presence of many different serotypes with diverse genetic makeups (24, 36). A more thorough understanding of
S. suis genetics will help in the development of new
approaches to control S. suis infection.
We report the cloning, sequencing, and characterization of the gene
encoding a 45-kDa antigen from a virulent strain of S. suis type 2 and show that the protein is surface exposed and
conserved among S. suis type 2 strains tested and that it
belongs to the NAD(P)H-dependent glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) enzyme
family. We also show that serum from pigs experimentally infected with a virulent strain of S. suis type 2 reacted with the 45-kDa
recombinant protein, making it a good candidate for the development of
a serological assay to detect S. suis infection. To our
knowledge, this is the first report on the cloning and characterization
of a major enzyme of S. suis involved in intermediary metabolism.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Bacterial strains, plasmids, and media.
S. suis
type 2 strain 1933, a virulent field isolate recovered from a pig with
meningitis, was obtained from M. M. Chengappa (Kansas State
University, Manhattan, Kans.) and was used for the genomic library
construction. Other S. suis isolates used in this study were
obtained from the same source, and the degrees of pathogenicity of most
of the isolates have been described previously (35). pUC19
propagated in Escherichia coli DH5
was used as the
library expression vector. Plasmid, pGEM (Promega, Madison, Wis.) was used for DNA-sequencing purposes. Luria Berteni broth or agar was used
to grow E. coli strains. Todd-Hewitt broth supplemented with
0.6% yeast (Difco Laboratories, Detroit, Mich.) was used to grow the
S. suis strains. When appropriate, AMP was used at 60 µg/ml for E. coli. All cultures were grown at 37°C.
Chemicals and enzymes.
Restriction enzymes, T4 DNA ligase,
and calf intestinal alkaline phosphatase were purchased either from
Promega or New England Biolabs (Beverly, Mass.) and were used as
recommended by the manufacturer. Molecular-grade chemicals were
purchased from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, Mo.) or from Fisher
Scientific Co. (Pittsburgh Pa.). The digoxigenin-labeled DNA
molecular-weight marker II and digoxigenin-11-dUTP DNA-labeling kit and
detection system were from Boehringer Mannheim (Indianapolis, Ind.).
S. suis case serum samples were obtained from P. Halbur
(Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa). The serum samples were from six
pigs experimentally infected with a virulent strain of S. suis type 2 (ISU VDL isolate 40634/94).
Construction and screening of a recombinant DNA library and
restriction mapping.
Genomic DNA was isolated by a previously
described method (24) from a 30-ml culture of S. suis type 2 strain 1933 cells grown on Todd Hewitt broth
containing 0.6% yeast. The DNA was digested with SpeI, and
fragments were fractionated by agarose gel electrophoresis. Fragments
in the size range of 2 to 23 kb were excised from the gel, purified by
electroelution, and ligated into a pUC19 plasmid cloning vector that
was digested to completion with XbaI. The recombinant
plasmids were transformed into E. coli DH5
by
electroporation. Transformed cells were plated onto Luria Bertani agar
containing 60 µg of AMP (Ap60),
isopropyl-
-D-thiogalactopyranoside (4 µl of a 20%
solution), and X-Gal (40 µl of a 20-mg/ml solution), respectively,
and grown at 37°C overnight. Resulting white colonies were
transferred to a fresh plate and grown as above. One loopful of each
colony was solubilized in 100 µl of 1× sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)
sample buffer by heating for 5 min at 100°C. The preparation was
centrifuged for 2 min to remove cellular debris, and the supernatant
containing proteins was used for Western blot analysis with a 1:500
dilution of polyclonal antibody raised against whole-cell protein of
S. suis type 2 as the primary antibody followed by a 1:1,000
dilution of anti-rabbit immunoglobulin G (IgG) conjugated with
horseradish peroxidase. Blots were developed with hydrogen peroxide and
4-chloro-1-naphthol (4CN). A colony designated DH5
(pOT401) was
identified and characterized. The S. suis DNA insert in
plasmid pOT401 was mapped by restriction analysis using standard
protocols (28).
Nucleotide sequence determination and analysis.
The complete
nucleotide sequences of both strands of the 1.6-kb DNA insert in
plasmid pOT410 were determined by the dideoxy-chain termination method
(30) using an automated nucleotide sequencer (Applied
Biosystems, Foster City, Calif.). The nucleotide sequence and the
deduced amino acid sequence were analyzed with the MacVector software
(Oxford Molecular Group, Inc., Campbell, Calif.). Sequence similarity
searches were performed with GenBank sequences by using the BLAST
network service.
Electrophoresis and Southern blotting.
Genomic DNA (3 µg)
from S. suis type 2 strains was digested with
DraI restriction endonuclease. Restriction fragments were separated on a 0.8% agarose gel (Promega) in Tris-borate-EDTA buffer
(90 mM Tris, 90 mM borate, 2 mM EDTA [pH 8.0]) and transferred to a
positively charged nylon membrane (Boehringer Mannheim) using the
method of Southern (34). Following DNA transfer, the nylon membrane was rinsed briefly in 6× SSC (1× SSC is 0.15 M NaCl, 0.015 M
sodium citrate), air dried, and UV cross-linked to the DNA (GS gene
linker; Bio-Rad, Richmond, Calif.).
Probe preparation and hybridization.
The 689-bp
NcoI-PstI internal DNA fragment from pOT410 was
labeled using a nonradioactive labeling system (Genius System; Boehringer Mannheim) that incorporated digoxigenin-11-dUTP by random
priming as specified by the manufacturer. Prehybridization (2 h) and
hybridization (16 h) were done at 65°C. Washes and hybrid detection
were done according to the manufacturer's instruction with a Genius II
nonradioactive labeling and detection kit (Boehringer Mannheim).
Overexpression of the recombinant protein.
The DNA insert in
pOT410 was cloned in frame into a pBAD/Myc-His version B
expression vector to create pOT411. pOT411 was transformed into
E. coli TOP10-competent cells and overexpressed by following
the manufacturer's protocol (Invitrogen).
Antigen and polyclonal antibody preparation.
Antigen was
prepared as described elsewhere (14) with slight
modifications. Following overexpression of protein in E. coli cells carrying plasmid pOT411, cells were solubilized in 1×
SDS sample buffer by heating at 100°C for 5 min followed by
centrifugation for 2 min to pellet cellular debris. Proteins in the
supernatant were separated on SDS-10% polyacrylamide preparative gels,
stained with Coomassie brilliant blue, and destained with a
methanol-acetic acid-water mixture. The 45-kDa band then was excised
from the gels and electroeluted. The protein concentration was
determined using the method of Lowry et al. (21), with
bovine serum albumen as a standard. Monospecific polyclonal antibody
against the recombinant 45-kDa protein was obtained by immunizing New
Zealand White rabbits (Shelton's Bunny Barn Rabbits, Waverly Hall,
Ga.) subcutaneously at multiple sites with approximately 210 µg of
purified protein emulsified 1:1 in Fruend complete adjuvant. The
rabbits received one booster injection with the same antigen
concentration emulsified 1:1 with Freund's incomplete adjuvant 14 days
later and then were bled 7 days after the the booster was administered.
Sera were filter sterilized and stored at
30°C until used.
GDH activity staining.
Cultures were grown overnight in 50 ml of Todd Hewitt or tryptic soy broth and centrifuged at 5,000 × g for 10 min at 4°C to pellet cells. Supernatant was
discarded, and cells were resuspended in 1 ml of 50 mM Tris buffer (pH
8.0) and then disrupted by sonication (4°C) at a setting of 2.5, using two 30-s bursts with 10-s cooling intervals (Sonic Dismembrator,
model F60; Fisher Scientific). Following sonication, samples were
transferred to 1.5-ml Eppendorf tubes and centrifuged at 14,000 rpm
(Eppendorf centrifuge 54-15C) for 2 min at room temperature. Fifteen
microliters (approximately 165 µg) of the cell-free extract was
subjected to nondenaturing polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, modified
by omitting SDS and
-mercaptoethanol. The acrylamide concentrations
were 3.5 and 7.5% (wt/vol) in the stacking and resolving gels,
respectively. Following electrophoresis, gels were incubated in 25 ml
of staining solution consisting of 0.5 mM NAD(P)H or NAD, 50 mM
Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 20 mM L-glutamate, 0.3 mg of Nitro Blue
Tetrazolium per ml, and 0.05 mg of phenazine methosulfate (1,
38) per ml. In another set of experiments,
L-glutamate was replaced with 50 mM
-ketoglutarate. GDH
activity appeared as a dark band against a clear background.
Western immunoblotting.
Cell-free extracts prepared as
described above were vacuum concentrated (15-fold), and 15 µl of each
sample was used for Western blot analysis (20, 28). The
proteins were combined in a reaction mixture with a 1:500 dilution of
the polyclonal antibody raised against the purified 45-kDa GDH protein,
followed by a horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG
antibody (ICN) diluted 1:1,000. Bound antibodies were detected
colorimetrically with hydrogen peroxide and 4CN. To screen pig antisera
for antibody against the 45-kDa antigen, a 1:100 dilution of the pig
sera was used as the primary antibody followed by a 1:1,000 dilution of alkaline phosphatase-conjugated affinity-purified anti-swine IgG (Rockland Immunochemicals, Gilbertsville, Pa.). Blots were developed with a 5-bromo-4-chloro-indolyl phosphate-nitroblue tetrazolium salt mixture.
Whole-cell ELISA and immunogold labeling.
A whole-cell
enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was performed essentially as
described elsewhere (26) with plates coated with whole
cells of S. suis type 2 strain 1933. Whole cells were
combined in reaction mixtures with a 1:500 dilution of the polyclonal
antibody raised against the purified 45-kDa GDH protein followed by a
1:1,000 dilution of horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-rabbit
immunoglobulins (ICN Immunochemicals, Inc., Irvine, Calif.). Peroxidase
activity was measured by the addition of
2,2'-azinobis(3-ethylbenzthiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) peroxidase
substrate (Sigma) to each well. Following incubation for 1.5 h at
room temperature, the optical density at 405 nm was read with an ELISA
microplate reader. Negative controls included wells containing
preimmune rabbit serum as the primary antibody, wells without antibody,
and wells without antigen. Values were considered positive when the
optical density at 405 nm was twice or more the reading obtained for
control wells.
For immunogold labeling postembedding, S. suis cells were
first fixed for 30 min at room temperature in 1% paraformaldehyde and
0.2% glutaraldehyde made in 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) and stored
in the same fixative solution overnight at 4°C. After four washes,
cells were postfixed in 1% osmium tetroxide for 2 h at room
temperature. Washed cells were dehydrated in increased concentrations
of ethanol and embedded in Durcupan ACM resin. Ultrathin sections (70 nm) were cut, placed on nickel grids, and etched with 3% hydrogen
peroxide for 5 min. After lysin treatment, grids were floated on a
blocking solution of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS [pH 7.4])
containing 5% nonfat dried milk and 0.1% bovine serum albumin for 30 min and incubated at 4°C overnight in a 1:50 dilution of the
polyconal antibody raised against the purified 45-kDa GDH protein. For
the control, the primary antibody was replaced with preimmune rabbit
serum. A second control that omitted the primary antibody was also
used. After washing, grids were incubated for 2 h in a 1:40
dilution of goat anti-rabbit antibody conjugated to 10-nm gold
particles (Sigma) that had been centrifuged to eliminate aggregates.
The grids were washed twice in PBS (5× concentration) and then in
regular PBS (three times, 5 min per wash), incubated in 2%
glutaraldehyde, and washed again in PBS and distilled water,
respectively (five times, 2 min each). The sections were stained for 35 min in 4% aqueous uranyl acetate and for 3 min in 0.4% aqueous lead.
The grids then were Formvar coated, and sections were visualized with a
Philips 301 transmission electron microscope (FEI Co., Hillsboro,
Oreg.).
 |
RESULTS |
Identification and localization of the gdh gene.
The gene library yielded a colony designated E. coli
DH5
(pOT401) that produced a 45-kDa protein which reacted to the
polyclonal antibody raised against whole-cell protein of S. suis type 2. The protein was not present in the negative control,
indicating that it originated from the cloned S. suis DNA
fragment. Other reactive bands were considered to be E. coli
protein bands that cross-reacted with the antibody as judged by the
result in the negative control lane (Fig.
1). On these bases, the 45-kDa
protein was chosen and characterized. A series of deletion
subclones was generated in order to define the location of the
gdh structural gene and the promoter elements for
transcriptional initiation. Subcloning localized the gene to within a
1.6-kb DraI region on the cloned chromosomal fragment (Fig.
2). The gene encoding the protein was
well expressed from both the original recombinant plasmid pOT401 and
the plasmid pOT410, which contains the 1.6-kb DraI insert
DNA in the reverse orientation in pUC19. This indicated that the
gdh gene was expressed from promoter elements located within
the cloned DNA fragment.

View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Immunoblot (Western blot) analysis with the polyclonal
antibody raised against whole-cell proteins of S. suis
type 2. Lanes: M, rainbow molecular weight marker (Amersham); 1, E. coli DH5 (pUC19) negative control; 2, E. coli DH5 (pOT401). The location of the 45-kDa GDH protein is
indicated by the arrow.
|
|

View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Restriction map and characteristics of subclones derived
from pOT401. Restriction endonuclease sites are indicated above the top
line. Clones were analyzed for expression of recombinant protein by
Western immunoblot with the polyclonal antibody raised against
whole-cell proteins of S. suis type 2 as the primary
antibody. Subclones in which recombinant GDH was detected are denoted
by a plus sign. Clones with no detectable recombinant GDH are denoted
by a minus sign.
|
|
Nucleotide sequence analysis.
Analysis of the nucleotide
sequence of the cloned gene revealed that it contains an open reading
frame that codes for a protein of 448 amino acid residues with a
calculated molecular mass of 48.8 kDa (data not shown). This is in
close agreement with the 45-kDa molecular mass observed by Western blot
analysis (Fig. 1). Potential promoter sequences and a ribosome
binding site were located upstream from the open reading frame on the
basis of homology with published concensus sequences (9, 12,
32). The protein lacks a signal sequence (31, 37)
and has an isoelectric point of 5.3. A hydrophilicity plot
(19) revealed several regions of high hydrophilicity and
few short hydrophilic regions compared with regions of hydrophobicity
(data not shown). The calculated G+C content of the gdh gene
was 41.5%, in agreement with the G+C content reported for S. suis (38 to 42% [18]). An 11-bp inverted repeat
was found downstream of the stop codon between positions 1692 and 1703 and positions 1711 and 1721.
A GenBank database search revealed that the derived amino acid
sequence shared identity (48 to 59%) with GDH proteins isolated
from a
variety of organisms, all of which fall into family 1.
Highly conserved
domains characteristic of the family-1 hexameric
GDHs such as
KFLGFEQ (amino acid positions 108 through 114), RPEATGY
(positions 208 through 214), GSGNVAQYAVQKATELG
(positions 240
through 256), DSNG (positions 274 through
277), and EKYD (positions
418 through 421) were present, but several
amino acid substitutions
were apparent (
3). Because of
these similarities the protein
was designated the GDH of
S. suis. On the nucleotide level, the
gdh gene of
S. suis is not homologous with similar genes or any
bacterial gene in
the GenBank data
base.
Construction and overexpression of the GDH protein.
To produce
a sufficient quantity of the GDH protein for antibody production,
S. suis DNA inserted in plasmid pOT410 was cloned in frame
into the pBAD/Myc-His version B expression vector,
overexpressed, and gel purified. The purified protein gave a prominent
45-kDa band (Fig. 3) and was used to
generate polyclonal antibody in rabbit cells.

View larger version (79K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Overexpression and purification of the 45-kDa
recombinant GDH protein. The protein was overexpressed and purified as
described in Materials and Methods. An SDS-10% polyacrylamide
gel stained with Coomassie brilliant blue R-250 is shown. Lanes: M,
rainbow molecular size marker in kilodaltons; 1, whole-cell
lysate of pOT411 transformant of E. coli TOP10 uninduced; 2, whole-cell lysate of E. coli transformed with pOT411 and
induced with arabinose; 3 and 4, different amounts of the recombinant
protein purified from pOT411 transformant of E. coli
TOP10.
|
|
Conservation of the gdh gene and its product.
Because genetic diversity and antigenic variation have been shown to
exist among isolates of the same serotype (24), we wanted
to determine whether the gene and its product are conserved among
S. suis type 2 strains. When 10 isolates were used in
Southern blot analysis with a 689-bp NcoI-PstI
fragment probe derived from within the gdh gene, the probe
hybridized to a 1.6-kb fragment in all of the strains, suggesting
that the gene originated from S. suis and is conserved in
the strains tested (Fig. 4). When the
genomic DNA of S. suis type 2 strain 1933 was digested with several restriction enzymes that do not cut within the gdh
gene, followed by Southern analysis with the 689-bp probe, only one band was visible, indicating that the gene is present in the
chromosome of S. suis as a single copy (data not shown).

View larger version (79K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
Southern blot of chromosomal DNA from different strains
of S. suis type 2 digested with DraI and
hybridized to the 689-bp NcoI-PstI fragment
internal to the GDH gene. Lanes: M, digoxigenin- labeled molecular
weight markers II and III; 1, S. suis 1933; 2, S. suis 86-3977B; 3, S. suis AAH6; 4, S. suis 95-13626; 5, S. suis DH5; 6, S. suis
89-1591; 7, S. suis D930; 8, S. suis 95-7220;
9, S. suis 0891; 10, S. suis 88-5955.
|
|
To determine whether
S. suis type 2 strains encode
antigenically similar GDH proteins, seven different strains were used
in
Western blot analysis with the polyclonal antibody raised
against
the purified 45-kDa GDH protein. Results showed that a protein
in
S. suis strains and in
E. coli cells carrying
the
gdh gene
reacted specifically to the antibody, giving a
band of identical
molecular mass (Fig.
5). This indicated that the gene is
expressed
by all of the isolates and that the protein is antigenically
conserved
in the strains tested.

View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
Western immunoblot analysis of cell-free extracts of
S. suis type 2 strains with the polyclonal antibody raised
against the purified 45-kDa GDH recombinant protein. Lanes: M, rainbow
molecular size marker (Amersham) in kilodaltons; 1, S. suis
1933; 2, S. suis AAH6; 3, S. suis DH5; 4, S. suis type strain; 5, S. suis 88-5955; 6, S. suis 95-13626; 7, S. suis 89-1591, and 8, E. coli DH5 (pOT410).
|
|
GDH activity of recombinant and native GDH.
Because the
recombinant protein was identified as a GDH enzyme by amino acid
homology, it was of interest to analyze the recombinant and native GDH
proteins for biological activity. GDH zymograms with
L-glutamate and
-ketoglutarate as substrates,
respectively, were used to characterize the biological activity of the
recombinant and native GDH molecules. Cell-free extracts of E. coli carrying the gdh gene [DH5
(pOT410)] and
seven different strains of S. suis type 2 with known degrees
of virulence were electrophoresed in a nondenaturing
polyacrylamide gel and stained as described in Materials and
Methods. A GDH zymogram with L-glutamate as
the substrate and NAD(P)H as the cofactor showed a single band
signifying the S. suis GDH in samples containing recombinant
GDH or native GDH (Fig. 6). When NAD was
supplied as the cofactor, no apparent GDH activity was detected in any
of the samples. Substitution of
-ketoglutarate for
L-glutamate with either NAD(P)H or NAD as the cofactor also
did not result in apparent GDH activity (Table 1), suggesting that a single GDH was
present. In the protein profile, the migration distance of native GDH
from S. suis strain 1933, the source of the cloned fragment,
and S. suis type culture strain including E. coli
carrying the recombinant gdh gene were the same (Fig. 6,
lanes 1, 4, 8, and 9), whereas the remaining isolates tested had a
different migration pattern (Fig. 6, lanes 2, 3, and 5 to 7),
suggesting the existence of two conformational types of GDH among the
strains tested. It is interesting that isolates in lanes 1, 4, and 9 are highly virulent, whereas isolates in lanes 2, 3, and 5 to 7 are either weakly virulent or nonvirulent (35). This
analysis, although not exhaustive, indicated that highly virulent
strains of S. suis type 2 may be distinguished from
moderately virulent and avirulent isolates on the basis of their GDH
protein profile following activity staining on a nondenaturing gel.

View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 6.
Activity staining of GDH showing NADPH-dependent GDH
activity on acrylamide gel. L-Glutamate was used as
substrate for detection of GDH activity. Lanes: 1, S. suis
1933; 2, S. suis 88-5955; 3, S. suis DH5; 4, S. suis type strain; 5, S. suis 95-13626; 6, S. suis 89-1591; 7, S. suis AAH6; 8, E. coli DH5 (pOT410); and 9, S. suis 1933.
|
|
Reactivity of the recombinant GDH protein with serum from
pigs.
Figure 7 shows the reactivity
of serum samples from pigs experimentally infected with S. suis type 2 to the recombinant 45-kDa GDH protein on immunoblot.
All samples produced detectable signal against the recombinant antigen.
This result illustrates the potential use for the recombinant GDH
protein in the development of a serodiagnostic assay for S. suis disease.

View larger version (67K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 7.
Immunoblot analysis of pig sera and their
reactivities against the purified recombinant GDH protein. Lanes:
M, molecular size marker in kilodaltons; 1 through 6, serum from
pigs infected with S. suis type 2; 7, polyclonal
antibody raised in a rabbit against the purified recombinant GDH
protein (positive control); and 8, preimmune serum from the rabbit used
to raise antibody against the purified protein (negative control). The
location and size of the GDH protein are indicated by the arrow.
|
|
Cellular location of the Streptococcus GDH
protein.
Whole-cell ELISA and immunogold-labeling techniques were
performed to determine whether the polyclonal antibody generated against the purified streptococcal GDH protein was able to recognize its specific epitopes at the surface of the organism. For negative control, the primary antibody was replaced with preimmune rabbit serum.
When examined using a whole-cell ELISA technique, the antibody bound
strongly to the epitope at the surface of the organism, with a value of
1.55. Absorption of the antibody with whole homologous cells clearly
diminished the reaction of the antibody with the antigen (value of
0.88) indicating that the GDH antibodies had been removed by
absorption. Preimmune serum gave a value of 0.414 (Fig.
8). These results suggest that the GDH
protein is exposed on the surface of intact cells.

View larger version (96K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 8.
Binding properties of the anti-S. suis GDH
polyclonal antibody to intact cells as determined by the whole-cell
ELISA technique. Live intact S. suis type 2 strain 1933 cells were incubated with (a) the polyclonal antibody raised against
the purified GDH protein, (b) polyclonal antibody absorbed with
whole-cell extracts of S. suis type 2 strain 1933, and (c)
preimmune rabbit antiserum.
|
|
To confirm the ELISA results, an immunogold-labeling technique was
employed. An electron micrograph showed that the gold particles
were
associated with the surface of the cells. Additionally, the
gold
particles were also associated with the interior region of
the cells.
Preimmune serum prepared from the rabbit used for the
production of
anti-
S. suis GDH antibody (negative control) failed
to label
the thin section (Fig.
9). No labeling
was also noted
when primary antibody was omitted (data not shown).
Consistent
with the whole-cell ELISA technique results, these results
indicated
that the GDH protein is exposed on the surface of
S. suis cells.



View larger version (318K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 9.
Visualization of GDH proteins with an immunogold
ultrathin-section transmission electron microscope. Thin sections were
prepared from S. suis cells and probed with primary
antibodies to GDH protein (A and B) or preimmune rabbit serum (C).
Representative gold particles on the surface of the cells are indicated
by arrows; the bar equals 200 nm.
|
|
Nucleotide sequence accession number.
The GenBank
accession number for the sequence reported in this paper is
AF229683.
 |
DISCUSSION |
GDH has been shown previously to be an important diagnostic
antigen, and it has also been correlated to virulence of certain bacteria (15, 22). Additionally, GDHs have been shown to
play a key role in nitrogen metabolism (33). This is the
first enzyme of S. suis type 2 involved in intermediary
metabolism to be cloned, sequenced, and characterized.
The gdh gene is located within a 1.6-kb DraI DNA
fragment and appears to be transcribed from a promoter located within
the cloned DNA fragment, since expression is not dependent on
insertional orientation. In agreement with this notion, sequences
typical of concensus promoters are present upstream of the translation start point.
Genetic heterogeneity has been shown to exist among isolates of the
same S. suis serotype (24). It was therefore of
interest to note that all of the strains tested by DNA-DNA
hybridization studies contained the gdh gene (Fig. 4) and
that the product of the gene is similar both antigenically and in
molecular mass in the strains tested by Western immunoblot under
denaturing conditions (Fig. 5). Under nondenaturing conditions,
activity staining also showed that all strains tested contained the
same type of GDH. However, two different patterns as judged by the
electrophoretic mobility of the proteins on the nondenaturing gel were
observed (Fig. 6). Because the protein sizes are identical when
analyzed in a denatured compared to nondenatured state, we believe that the observed difference may be the result of differences in
conformation (folding) of the proteins in their native form or amino
acid substitutions. S. suis strains have been classified
into three groups (highly virulent, moderately virulent, and avirulent)
based on their degree of pathogenicity (35). The
pathogenicity of the strains used in this study are known
(35). Although a limited number of strains were tested,
highly virulent strains (Fig. 6, lanes 1, 4, and 9) have banding
patterns that differ from those of moderately virulent or avirulent
strains. We do not know whether this enzyme contributes to certain
metabolic properties that distinguish highly virulent from moderately
virulent and avirulent strains of S. suis type 2. It is
interesting that group 1 highly virulent Clostridium botulinum strains responsible for most cases of human botulism are
distinguishable from group II strains, which are nonvirulent or weakly
virulent, on the basis of their NAD-dependent L-glutamate dehydrogenase activity (15). It is therefore possible that
such might be the case with S. suis type 2.
GDHs are of interest because they are highly conserved and exhibit an
extremely low rate of point mutations relative to many other proteins
(7). Additionally, GDHs have been successfully used in the
diagnosis of certain bacterial infection. For example, infection of
Clostridium difficile, an important nosocomial pathogen which causes pseudomembranous colitis, can be diagnosed by means of the
GDH-based latex agglutination tests marketed by Becton Dickinson
Microbiology Systems (Culturette CDT) and Meridian Diagnostics (Meritec-C. difficile) (22). The GDH of
S. suis is antigenic, is conserved in the strains tested,
and reacts with serum from animals with S. suis type 2 infection, thus making it a potential candidate for development of a
serological assay to detect S. suis infection.
In general, bacterial GDH enzymes are located in the cytoplasm or the
cytoplasmic membrane of the cell (4, 33). However, the GDH
of Porphyromonas gingivalis has been shown to be surface associated (17). We have shown in this work that the GDH
protein of S. suis is also surface exposed. This finding may
explain why rabbits and pigs inoculated with log phase live whole-cell
S. suis elicited a strong immune response to the GDH protein
within a few days.
Glutamate and
-ketogluterate are the substrates of two different
reactions (forward or reverse) performed by GDH enzymes. In the forward
reaction, GDH utilizes
-ketogluterate as the substrate and NAD(P)H
as a cofactor to produce L-glutamate. In the reverse reaction, GDH utilizes L-glutamate as the substrate and NAD
as a cofactor to produce
-ketogluterate (4, 33). In
contrast to the NAD(P)H-dependent GDHs from various sources which
utilize
-ketoglutarate as the substrate, the S. suis GDH
is active only when L-glutamate is used as the substrate
with NAD(P)H as the cofactor (Table 1). This suggest that the GDH of
S. suis may be regulated in a different way from the GDH
from other sources and that a different L-glutamate pathway
may exist in S. suis. Griffith and Carlsson
(13) previously demonstrated that the GDH of streptococci
is regulated in a way not previously described for bacteria.
In conclusion, we have cloned and characterized the gene encoding the
GDH of S. suis type 2. Availability of the cloned gene will
make it possible to construct mutant strains expressing little or no
GDH, which could be used to determine whether this protein could be
correlated to S. suis pathogenicity as in the case with C. botulinum types A, B, and F (group 1) (15).
It will also facilitate studies on the factors affecting the gene
regulation and expression.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
This work was supported by the Department of Health and
Human Services, Health Research Service Administration, Center
for Excellence and Minority Veterinary Medical Education
grant 5D34MB00001-12.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of
Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Nursing and Allied
Health, Tuskegee University, Tuskegee, AL 36088. Phone: (334) 724-4507. Fax: (334) 727-8009. E-mail: oogi{at}acd.tusk.edu.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Abrahams, G. L., and V. R. Abratt.
1998.
The NADH-dependent glutamate dehydrogenase enzyme of Bacteroides fragilis Bfl is induced by peptides in the growth medium.
Microbiology
144:1659-1667[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 2.
|
Arends, J. P., and H. C. Zanen.
1988.
Meningitis caused by Streptococcus suis in humans.
Rev. Infect. Dis.
10:131-137[Medline].
|
| 3.
|
Benachenhou-Lahfa, N.,
P. Forterre, and B. Labedan.
1993.
Evolution of glutamate dehydrogenase genes: evidence for two paralogous protein families and unusual branching patterns of the archaebacteria in the universal tree of life.
J. Mol. Evol.
36:335-346[Medline].
|
| 4.
|
Brunhuber, N. M. W., and J. S. Blanchard.
1994.
The biochemistery and enzymology of amino acid dehydrogenases.
Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol.
29:415-467[Medline].
|
| 5.
|
Chanter, N.,
P. W. Jones, and T. J. L. Alexander.
1993.
Meningitis in pigs caused by Streptococcus suis a speculative review.
Vet. Microbiol.
36:39-55[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 6.
|
Chengappa, M. M.,
R. L. Maddux,
W. L. Kadel,
S. C. Greer, and C. E. Herrin.
1986.
Streptococcus suis infection in pigs: incidence and experimental reproduction of the syndrome, p. 25-38.
In
Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Association of Veterinary Diagnosticians Inc. Reynolds Printing Co., Brookings, S.Dak.
|
| 7.
|
Creighton, T. E.
1984.
Proteins. Structures and molecular principles.
W. H. Freeman & Co., New York, N.Y.
|
| 8.
|
Devries, L. A.,
B. Sustronck,
T. Maenhouth, and F. Haesebrouck.
1990.
Streptococcus suis meningitis in a horse.
Vet. Rec.
127:68[Medline].
|
| 9.
|
Ferretti, J. J., and R. Curtis III (ed.).
1987.
Compilation of nucleotide sequences that signal the initiation of transcription and translation in streptococci., p. 293.
In
Streptococcal genetics American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C.
|
| 10.
|
Gottschalk, M.,
R. Higgins,
M. Jacques,
M. Beaudoin, and J. Henrichson.
1991.
Characterization of six new capsular types (23 through 28) of Streptococcus suis.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
29:2590-2594[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 11.
|
Gottschalk, M.,
R. Higgins,
M. Jacques,
K. R. Mittal, and J. Henrichsen.
1989.
Description of 14 new capsular types of Streptococcus suis.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
27:2633-2636[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 12.
|
Graves, M. C., and J. C. Rabinowitz.
1986.
In vivo and in vitro transcription of the Clostridium pasteurianum ferrodoxin gene.
J. Biol. Chem.
261:11409-11415[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 13.
|
Griffith, C. J., and J. Carlsson.
1974.
Mechanism of ammonia assimilation in streptococci.
J. Gen. Microbiol.
82:253-260[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 14.
|
Haase, E. M.,
J. L. Zmuda, and F. A. Scannapieco.
1999.
Identification and molecular analysis of rough-colony-specific outer membrane proteins of Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans.
Infect. Immun.
67:2901-2908[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 15.
|
Hammer, B. A., and E. A. Johnson.
1988.
Purification, properties, and metabolic roles of NADH-glutamate dehydrogenase in Clostridium botulinum 113B.
Arch. Microbiol.
150:460-464[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 16.
|
Higgins, R.,
M. Gottschalk,
M. Boudreau,
A. Lebrun, and J. Henrichsen.
1995.
Description of six new capsular types (29-34) of Streptococcus suis.
J. Vet. Diagn. Investig.
7:405-406[Free Full Text].
|
| 17.
|
Joe, A.,
C. S. Murray, and B. C. McBride.
1994.
Nucleotide sequence of a Porphyromonasgingivalis gene encoding a surface-associated glutamate dehydrogenase and construction of a glutamate dehydrogenase-deficient isogenic mutant.
Infect. Immun.
62:1358-1368[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 18.
|
Kilper-Balz, R., and K. H. Schleifer.
1987.
Streptococcus suis sp. nov., nom. rev.
Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol.
37:160-162[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 19.
|
Kyte, I., and R. F. Dolittle.
1982.
A simple method for displaying the hydropathic character of a protein.
J. Mol. Biol.
157:105-132[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 20.
|
Laemmli, U. K.
1970.
Cleavage of structural proteins during assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4.
Nature
227:680-695[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 21.
|
Lowry, O. H.,
N. J. Rosebrough,
A. R. Farr, and R. J. Randall.
1951.
Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent.
J. Biol. Chem.
193:265-275[Free Full Text].
|
| 22.
|
Lyerly, D. M.,
L. A. Barroso, and T. D. Wilkins.
1991.
Identification of the latex test-reactive protein of Clostridium difficile as glutamate dehydrogenase.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
29:2639-2642[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 23.
|
MacLennan, M.,
G. Foster,
K. Dick,
W. J. Smith, and B. Nielsen.
1996.
Streptococcus suis serotypes 7, 8, and 14 from diseased pigs in Scotland.
Vet. Rec.
139:423-424[Free Full Text].
|
| 24.
|
Okwumabua, O.,
J. Staats, and M. M. Chengappa.
1995.
Detection of genomic heterogeneity in Streptococcus suis isolates by DNA restriction fragment length polymorphisms of rRNA genes (ribotyping).
J. Clin. Microbiol.
33:968-972[Abstract].
|
| 25.
|
Perch, B.,
K. B. Pedersen, and J. Henrichsen.
1983.
Serology of capsulated streptococci pathogenic for pigs:six new serotypes of Streptococcus suis.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
19:993-996.
|
| 26.
|
Plante, M.,
N. Cadieux,
C. R. Rioux,
J. Hamel,
B. R. Brodeur, and D. Martin.
1999.
Antigenic and molecular conservation of the gonococcal NspA protein.
Infect. Immun.
67:2855-2861[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 27.
|
Robertson, I. D., and D. K. Blackmore.
1989.
Occupational exposure to Streptococcus suis type 2.
Epidemiol. Infect.
103:157-164[Medline].
|
| 28.
|
Sambrook, J.,
E. F. Fritsch, and T. Maniatis.
1989.
Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 2nd ed.
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
|
| 29.
|
Sanford, S. E., and R. Higgins.
1992.
Streptococcal diseases, p. 588-590.
In
A. Lemon, et al. (ed.), Diseases of swine, 7th ed. Iowa University Press, Ames, Iowa.
|
| 30.
|
Sanger, F.,
S. Nicklen, and A. R. Coulson.
1977.
DNA sequencing with chain-terminating inhibitors.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
74:5463-5467[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 31.
|
Sarvas, M.
1986.
Protein secretion in bacilli.
Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol.
125:103-125[Medline].
|
| 32.
|
Shine, J., and J. Dalgarno.
1974.
The 3'-terminal sequence of Escherichia coli 16S ribosomal RNA: complementary to non-sense triplets and ribosome binding sites.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
71:1342-1346[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 33.
|
Smith, E. L.,
B. M. Austen,
K. M. Blumenthal, and J. F. Nyc.
1975.
Glutamate dehydrogenases, p. 293-367.
In
P. D. Boyer (ed.), The Enzymes, vol. 2. Academic Press, New York, N.Y.
|
| 34.
|
Southern, E. M.
1975.
Detection of specific sequences among DNA fragments separated by gel electrophoresis.
J. Mol. Biol.
98:503-517[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 35.
|
Staats, J. J.,
B. L. Plattner,
J. Nietfeld,
S. Dritz, and M. M. Chengappa.
1998.
Use of ribotyping and hemolysin activity to identify highly virulent Streptococcus suis type 2 isolates.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
36:15-19[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 36.
|
Staats, J. J.,
I. Feder,
O. Okwumabua, and M. M. Chengappa.
1997.
Streptococcus suis: past and present.
Vet. Res. Commun.
21:381-407[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 37.
|
Watson, M. E. E.
1984.
Compilation of published signal sequences.
Nucleic Acids Res.
12:5145-5159[Free Full Text].
|
| 38.
|
Wen, Z., and M. Morrison.
1996.
The NAD(P)H-dependent glutamate dehydrogenase activities of Prevotella ruminicola B14 can be attributed to one enzyme (GdhA), and gdhA expression is regulated in response to the nitrogen source available for growth.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
62:3826-3833[Abstract].
|
Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology, March 2001, p. 251-257, Vol. 8, No. 2
1071-412X/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/CDLI.8.2.251-257.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Gruening, P., Fulde, M., Valentin-Weigand, P., Goethe, R.
(2006). Structure, Regulation, and Putative Function of the Arginine Deiminase System of Streptococcus suis. J. Bacteriol.
188: 361-369
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Tanous, C., Chambellon, E., Sepulchre, A.-M., Yvon, M.
(2005). The Gene Encoding the Glutamate Dehydrogenase in Lactococcus lactis Is Part of a Remnant Tn3 Transposon Carried by a Large Plasmid. J. Bacteriol.
187: 5019-5022
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Okwumabua, O., Chinnapapakkagari, S.
(2005). Identification of the Gene Encoding a 38-Kilodalton Immunogenic and Protective Antigen of Streptococcus suis. CVI
12: 484-490
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Jobin, M.-C., Martinez, G., Motard, J., Gottschalk, M., Grenier, D.
(2005). Cloning, Purification, and Enzymatic Properties of Dipeptidyl Peptidase IV from the Swine Pathogen Streptococcus suis. J. Bacteriol.
187: 795-799
[Abstract]
[Full Text]