Previous Article | Next Article 
Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology, March 2001, p. 357-362, Vol. 8, No. 2
1071-412X/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/CDLI.8.2.357-362.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Infectivity-Neutralizing and
Hemagglutinin-Inhibiting Antibody Responses to Respiratory Coronavirus
Infections of Cattle in Pathogenesis of Shipping Fever
Pneumonia
Xiaoqing
Lin,
Kathy L.
O'Reilly,
Mamie L.
Burrell, and
Johannes
Storz*
Department of Veterinary Microbiology and
Parasitology, School of Veterinary Medicine, Louisiana State
University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana
Received 15 September 2000/Returned for modification 9 November
2000/Accepted 21 December 2000
 |
ABSTRACT |
Respiratory bovine coronaviruses (RBCV) emerged as an infectious
agent most frequently isolated from respiratory tract samples of cattle
with acute respiratory tract diseases. Infectivity-neutralizing (IN)
and hemagglutinin-inhibiting (HAI) antibodies induced by RBCV
infections were monitored in sequential serum samples collected from
cattle during a naturally evolving and experimentally monitored epizootic of shipping fever pneumonia (SFP). Cattle nasally shedding RBCV at the beginning of the epizootic started with low levels of serum
IN and HAI antibodies. An increase in serum IN antibody after day 7 led
to reduction of virus shedding in nasal secretions by the majority of
the cattle between days 7 and 14. A substantial rise in the serum HAI
antibody was observed during the initial phase among the sick but not
the clinically normal cattle which were infected with RBCV. The RBCV
isolation-positive cattle that developed fatal SFP had minimal serum IN
and HAI antibodies during the course of disease development. Cattle
that remained negative in RBCV isolation tests entered this epizootic
with high levels of serum IN and HAI antibodies, which dramatically
increased during the next two weeks. Protection against SFP was
apparently associated with significantly higher levels of serum IN
antibodies at the beginning of the epizootic. The RBCV-neutralizing
activity is associated with serum immunoglobulin G (IgG), particularly
the IgG2 subclass, while RBCV-specific HAI antibody is related to both
serum IgG and IgM fractions.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Numerous wild-type coronavirus
strains were recently isolated from nasal swab samples and lung tissues
of cattle with signs of acute respiratory tract distress including a
severe form of shipping fever pneumonia (SFP) (25-28).
These virus isolates multiplied only in the G clone of human rectal
tumor-18 cells, but not in Georgia bovine kidney and bovine turbinate
cells, permissive for most of previously described respiratory viruses
of cattle, and they were identified as respiratory bovine coronaviruses (RBCV).
The role of coronaviruses as bovine enteropathogens was first
recognized in the 1970s when they were isolated from diarrheic samples
of neonatal calves with severe gastroenteritis (16). Coronaviruses were also implicated in winter dysentery of adult cattle,
principally dairy cattle, and occasionally in pneumoenteritis of young
calves (2, 20). These coronaviruses are referred to as
enteropathogenic bovine coronaviruses (EBCV).
The following phenotypic and genotypic properties differentiated RBCV
from EBCV. (i) The RBCV were isolated in the first G clone cell passage
without the use of trypsin enhancement (25-28). Trypsin
activation was required for the isolation of wild-type EBCV
(32). (ii) The RBCV have high cell-fusing activity for the
G clone cells in the neutral pH ranges. (iii) The RBCV agglutinate only
mouse and rat but not chicken red blood cells (RBC), while the
prototype EBCV agglutinate both rodent and chicken RBC
(29). (iv) The RBCV have high acetylesterase (AE) activity
at 37°C, whereas the AE function of EBCV is much more active at
39°C (13). (v) Comparative analysis of wild-type RBCV
and EBCV at the 3' genomic region (9.5 kb) revealed that RBCV-specific
nucleotide and amino acid changes are disproportionally concentrated
within the hemagglutinin-esterase (HE) gene, the spike (S) gene, and the genomic region between the S and envelope (E) genes
(1).
Bovine coronaviruses (BCV) belong to the Coronaviridae
family of the order Nidovirales and are large, enveloped,
positive-stranded RNA viruses with a genome of about 31 kb (6,
11). The viral RNA genome is associated with the nucleocapsid
phosphoprotein (N) to form a helical nucleocapsid. Four structural
proteins are part of the lipoprotein envelope: (i) membrane
glycoprotein (M), (ii) S glycoprotein, (iii) HE glycoprotein, and (iv)
the recently identified E protein. Specific monoclonal antibodies
(MAbs) against EBCV glycoproteins S and HE inhibited virus infectivity,
indicating that both glycoproteins elicit neutralizing antibodies in
EBCV infections (4, 5, 9). The
N-acetyl-9-O-acetylneuraminic acid was identified
as the receptor determinant to which both S and HE bind in initiating
infection and in agglutinating rodent erythrocytes. The S glycoprotein
is considered to be the major viral structural protein to bind to the
neuraminic acid-containing receptors (22, 23). Binding of
HE glycoprotein to this determinant residue on the cell surface was
suggested to function as a prereceptor interaction for EBCV (19,
24). The HE of EBCV also has receptor-destroying enzyme (RDE)
function which is mediated by the AE potentially eluting adsorbed
virions (24, 29). MAbs differentiated HE functions into
hemagglutinin (HA) and RDE activities through relatively low activity
inhibiting HA but high titers of activity inhibiting the RDE (30,
35).
Antibodies against EBCV infections of cattle were analyzed in bovine
sera by immunodiffusion, immunoblotting, and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (7, 8, 14, 33). Recent studies of sequential humoral immune responses to RBCV infections of cattle suggested that antibodies against S and HE glycoproteins play significant roles in clearing the infectious virus and in inducing protection against the virus infections (14). The purpose
of this investigation was to assess the kinetics of
infectivity-neutralizing (IN) and HA-inhibiting (HAI) antibodies
against RBCV in sera of immunologically mature cattle during a
naturally evolving epizootic of SFP, to define the correlation of IN
and HAI activities with previously reported immunoisotype responses,
and to relate the findings with isolation of RBCV from respiratory
tracts during disease development and clearance of the virus during the
recovery phase.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Experimental design.
As reported 105 6- to 8-month-old
cattle were included in the epizootic occurring in 1997 (25,
26) and subjected to nasal and blood sampling and testing at the
time of assembly at an order-buyer barn (day 0), after transport (day
7), and weekly throughout the pathogenesis of SFP (days 14, 21, 28, and
35). Nasal swab samples were taken for virological and bacteriological
studies, while blood samples for serum harvest were collected for
immunological investigation. These cattle were classified into five
response groups based on clinical signs of respiratory tract diseases
and results of RBCV isolation (14, 25, 26). Response group
1 included 72 cattle that exhibited clinical signs of respiratory tract
disease and were nasally shedding RBCV on day 0, day 7, or both. Seven
cattle shedding RBCV on day 7 were randomly chosen from this response
group for testing in this study. Response group 2 contained five test
cattle that secreted RBCV in nasal discharges without adverse
respiratory signs. Ten cattle of response group 3 developed severe
pneumonia and died on days 7 to 11, and nine that nasally shed RBCV
were selected. Eighteen cattle remained RBCV isolation negative. Eleven
of them were included in response group 4 because they had fever and
other respiratory signs, while the remaining seven calves (response
group 5) remained clinically healthy during the 5-week investigation.
Samples of seven representative cattle from response groups 4 and 5 were serologically analyzed. Sequential serum samples from the selected
35 cattle were analyzed for their IN and HAI antibodies.
Cell line, virus isolate, and virus purification.
The G
clone of HRT-18 cells was used at the 24th passage level for RBCV
propagation. A wild-type strain, RBCV-97TXSF-Lu15-2, was used at its
second passage for antigen preparation after initial isolation from the
lung tissue of a calf that died on day 8 (25). A stock of
RBCV-97TXSF-Lu15-2 was prepared after partial purification was
performed according to the method of Zhang et al. (35).
Infectivity neutralization assay.
Serum samples were diluted
1:4 in Dulbecco's modified minimal essential medium (Sigma Chemical
Co., St. Louis, Mo.) with 4.5 g of glucose per liter buffered with 44 mM NaHCO3 and supplemented with penicillin (100 U/ml)-streptomycin (100 µg/ml) (Sigma Chemical Co.), heat inactivated
at 56°C for 30 min, and then prepared as quadruplicates in serial
twofold dilutions at 50 µl/well on 96-well flat-bottom cell culture
plates (Costar, Corning, N.Y.). Serum 1745, with an IN antibody titer
of 128, and BCV-antibody free serum from a normal calf with an IN titer of <8 were included as positive and negative controls, respectively (31, 33). The RBCV-97TXSF-Lu15-2 stock was diluted in
Dulbecco's modified minimal essential medium to 100 50% cell culture
infective doses and added at 50 µl/well. After the serum-virus
mixture was reacted at 25°C for 30 min, 100 µl of G clone cell
suspension containing 1,000 cells was dropped into each well. The
plates were incubated at 37°C in a 5% CO2 incubator and
examined daily with an inverted microscope for RBCV-characteristic
cytopathic changes, extensive cell fusion, for 4 to 5 days. The IN
titers in serum were expressed as the reciprocal of the serum dilution that completely inhibited cytopathic changes in 50% of the quadruplicates.
Assays for HA and RDE.
The assays for HA and RDE were
performed as reported (29, 30) with washed rat RBC
prepared as suspensions of 0.5% in phosphate-buffered saline at pH
7.4, containing 0.05% bovine serum albumin.
Test for HAI.
Serum samples were diluted 1:4 in
phosphate-buffered saline (pH 7.4; containing 0.05% bovine serum
albumin), heat inactivated at 56°C for 30 min, and then prepared as
serial twofold dilutions in 50-µl aliquots on 96-well V-bottom
microtiter plates (Costar, Cambridge, Mass.). Again, serum 1745, with
an HAI antibody titer of 128, was included as a positive control, while
BCV antibody-free serum from a normal calf with an HAI antibody titer
of <8 was used as negative control (31, 33). The
partially purified stock of RBCV-97TXSF-Lu15-2 was diluted to contain 8 to 16 U of both HA and RDE and was used as an antigen. Fifty
microliters of the antigen was added to each serum dilution.
Serum-antigen mixtures reacted at 25°C for 30 min, and then the 0.5%
(vol/vol) rat RBC suspension was added in a volume of 50 µl. The
plates were shaken to disperse the RBC suspensions and incubated at
6°C for 2 h. The serum HAI antibody titers were expressed as the
reciprocal of the highest dilution of serum sample that completely
inhibited the aggregation of rat RBC.
Data analysis and statistical methods.
The serum IN and HAI
antibody titers were transformed to base 2 logarithms for statistical
analysis. All data were presented as means ± standard errors of
the mean (SEM). The IN and HAI activities of response groups were
compared by an analysis of variance of repeated measures designed with
a split-plot arrangement of treatments. Pairwise comparisons of
treatment and day differences were conducted with Scheffe's test.
Interaction effects were examined with pairwise t tests of
least-square means for preplanned comparisons of treatments at specific
days. All tests were considered significant at a probability of
P < 0.05.
A total of 171 serum samples were collected from these 35 test cattle
and analyzed for their IN antibody, HAI antibody, and immunoisotype
levels (14). The IN or HAI activities were paired with HAI
antibody, IN antibody, or immunoisotype levels for each serum sample.
Serum samples with identical IN or HAI antibody levels were transformed
to base 2 logarithms and grouped together. There were 33, 12, 11, 28, 30, 29, 14, 8, and 6 as well as 6, 26, 18, 24, 16, 24, 29, 26, and 2 serum samples for the nine specific IN and HAI antibody levels,
respectively. To evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of the IN and
HAI antibody assays, these groups of HAI antibody, IN antibody, or
immunoisotype levels were compared with specific IN or HAI activities
by linear regression analysis with the SAS system. They were presented
as means ± SEM, and P values of <0.05 were considered
statistically significant.
 |
RESULTS |
The IN and HAI activities of serial serum samples against
RBCV-97TXSF-Lu15-2 strain.
Isolation results for RBCV and overt
signs of respiratory tract disease divided the 105 cattle of this
experimentally assessed epizootic of SFP into five response groups
(14, 25, 26). Overall kinetics of serum IN and HAI
antibody levels between the seven sick cattle of response group 1 and
the five clinically normal cattle of response group 2 did not show
significant differences (Fig. 1A, B, F, and
G). Levels of serum IN and HAI antibodies against RBCV were initially as low as 2.29 ± 0.18 and 3.71 ± 0.52 for cattle in response group 1 and 2.80 ± 0.80 and
3.60 ± 0.51 for cattle in response group 2, respectively. A
significant increase in the level of IN antibody in serum was observed
for all these cattle after day 7, reaching 4.86 ± 0.80 (P
<0.0001) and 4.60 ± 0.51 (P = 0.0152) on
day 14 for cattle in response group 1 and 2 and then remaining high
(Fig. 1A and B). An increase in the level of serum HAI antibody was
statistically significant for the cattle in response group 1 between
days 0 and 21 (P = 0.007), while a substantial rise in
the level of serum HAI antibody was not detected for the cattle in
response group 2 during this experiment (P = 0.1072)
(Fig. 1F and G).

View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Levels of IN and HAI activities against
RBCV-97TXSF-LU15-2 strain in serum samples of cattle that were nasally
shedding RBCV on day 7 and were clinically sick (A and F), that
secreted RBCV in nasal discharges without adverse respiratory signs (B
and G), that nasally shed RBCV and developed fatal pneumonia (C and H),
and that remained RBCV isolation negative with mild respiratory signs
(D and I) or without any adverse clinical signs (E and J). Data are
means ± SEM (error bars) (n = 7, 5, 9, 7, and 7 for A + F, B + G, C + H, D + I, and E + J,
respectively).
|
|
Nine RBCV isolation-positive cattle of response group 3 which developed
fatal SFP had low IN and HAI levels on day 0, which were 2.00 ± 0.00 and 3.56 ± 0.18, respectively (Fig. 1C and H). No increases
in the serum IN antibody level were detected, but the HAI antibody
level rose minimally during the 7-day course of disease development.
Significant differences were not observed in the kinetics of serum IN
and HAI antibody levels between response groups 4 and 5 (Fig. 1D, E, I,
and J), but they were all remarkably higher than those in response
groups 1 and 2 (Fig. 1A, B, F, and G). The level of IN antibody in
serum significantly increased during the first 2 weeks; reached
6.86 ± 0.94 (P < 0.0001) and 8.00 ± 0.44 (P = 0.0003) on day 14 for cattle in response groups 4 and 5, respectively; and then remained at high levels (Fig. 1D and E).
The serum IN antibody levels for cattle in response group 5 were 5.71 ± 0.75 on day 0 and 6.71 ± 0.52 on day 7, which were significantly
higher than those for cattle in response group 4, which were 4.14 ± 0.63 on day 0 (P = 0.0122) and 5.43 ± 0.48 on day 7 (P = 0.0395). The level of HAI antibody in serum was
initially at 5.00 ± 0.76 and 5.57 ± 0.65; dramatically increased
to 8.29 ± 0.36 (P < 0.0001) and 8.43 ± 0.20 (P < 0.0001) by day 7 for cattle in response group 4 and 5, respectively; and remained high (Fig. 1I and J).
Correlation of serum IN and HAI activities with
immunoglobulin M (IgM), IgG1, and IgG2 levels.
The results
for comparisons between serum IN activity and HAI level are shown
in Fig. 2A and E. The correlation between
serum IN activity and corresponding HAI level was especially
significant (P = 0.0001) and was excellent, with a
coefficient of determination (R2) of 0.923 for
IN level versus HAI level (Fig. 2A) and 0.866 for HAI level versus IN
level (Fig. 2E).

View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Correlation of serum IN antibody level versus levels of
HAI antibody (A), IgM (B), IgG1 (C), and IgG2 (D) in serum and serum
HAI antibody level versus levels of serum IN antibody (E), IgM (F),
IgG1 (G), and IgG2 (H) in serum. The mean ± SEM (error bars) for 33, 12, 11, 28, 30, 29, 14, 8, and 6 serum samples are shown for base 2 logarithms of IN antibody titers of 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10, respectively in panels A, B, C, and D. The means ± SEM (error bars)
for 6, 26, 18, 24, 16, 24, 29, 26, and 2 serum samples are shown for
base 2 logarithms of HAI antibody titers of 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, and
10, respectively in panels E, F, G, and H.
|
|
The correlation between the serum IN activity with IgM, IgG1, and IgG2
levels is presented in Fig. 2B, C, and D, respectively. The best
correlation existed with the IgG2 level, which had a P value
of 0.0001 and an R2 of 0.919 (Fig. 2D). The
correlation of the serum IN activity with IgG1 level was slightly lower
(R2 = 0.890), but the results were still in
excellent agreement and especially significant (P = 0.0001)
(Fig. 2C). The correlation between the IN activity and IgM level
was the lowest (R2 = 0.416) and not
remarkable (P = 0.0131) (Fig. 2B).
The serum HAI activity was also compared with IgM, IgG1, and IgG2
levels (Fig. 2F, G, and H). Serum IgG1 and IgG2 levels were highly
correlated with serum HAI activity, with an R2
value of 0.923 and 0.907 and a P value of 0.0006 and
0.0001, respectively (Fig. 2G and H). The correlation of IgM with the serum HAI activity was much higher (R2 = 0.895)
and more significant (P = 0.0011) than that with the serum
IN activity (Fig. 2B and F).
 |
DISCUSSION |
The kinetics of serum IN and HAI activities with RBCV were defined
for the first time during a naturally evolving and experimentally assessed epizootic of SFP and correlated with virus clearance from
respiratory tracts. Such a characterization of the functional effector
mechanism of the bovine humoral immune response is not possible through
enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, immunodiffusion test, or
immunoblotting assay. Similar investigations of young calves with EBCV
infections have not been reported except for in vivo studies after
inoculating attenuated and virulent EBCV into the surgically isolated
Thirty-Vella intestinal loops of 4-day-old, colostrum-deprived calves
(15). Serum IN antibody was present 6 to 7 days
postinoculation, and IgM and IgA but no virus were detected in the
intestinal loop fluid 9 to 10 days postinoculation.
Strong primary IN antibody responses were detected among the cattle
which nasally shed RBCV during the early stage of the epizootic. The
serum IN antibody level was initially low and significantly increased
after day 7, with a simultaneous decline of nasal RBCV shedding in most
cattle within a week. Intranasal vaccination of calves with modified
live virus of infectious bovine rhinotracheitis induced neutralizing
activity in the serum by day 21 (12). This finding, along
with our previous studies on the antigenicity of RBCV structural
proteins by immunoblotting assays (14), highlights the
importance of S and HE glycoproteins in inducting IN antibodies in RBCV
infections, similar to reports on EBCV and human respiratory coronavirus infections (4, 5, 9, 21).
Serum HAI activity was higher than that of serum IN during the first
week of this investigation. Our previous observation on the
antigenicity of RBCV structural proteins in RBCV infections indicates
that both HE and S are viral antigens recognized during the initial
stages of the bovine immune response to RBCV infections (14). The HE glycoprotein induced antibodies 1 week
earlier than S glycoprotein, whereas S glycoprotein induced a more
persistent antibody response. The structure favoring exposed epitopes
and the abundance of the HE glycoprotein might have facilitated the early strong HAI antibody response (11, 13, 19).
Interestingly, a remarkable rise in the level of serum HAI activity was
observed among the sick but not among clinically normal cattle between days 0 and 21. Immunologic injury, mediated largely through antibody to
the S glycoprotein, plays an important role in the pathogenesis of
feline infectious peritonitis (FIP) (3, 10, 17, 18). Immune complex formation and complement deposition incite
pyogranulomatous lesions of FIP, and MAbs to the S glycoprotein of FIP
virus can enhance this infection of macrophages in vitro. Furthermore,
purified S glycoprotein of EBCV was documented to exhibit higher HA
activities with rodent RBC than purified HE glycoprotein (23,
24). Therefore, we proposed that a rapid increase in the level
of HAI antibody primarily against S glycoprotein could result in
deposition of antibody-antigen complex and complement and aggravation
of the RBCV infection as a possible pathologic mechanism of early
disease enhancement.
Infectivity neutralizing and HAI antibodies could only be detected at
minimal levels in the serum of cattle with fatal SFP. High titers of
RBCV, reaching up to 5.0 × 106 PFU/g were detected in
the pneumonic lung tissues of these cattle (25). Inability
to develop neutralizing antibodies against S and HE glycoproteins could
have resulted in severe RBCV infections of lungs, which evidently
favored Pasteurella haemolytica infections, typical for SFP
(25, 34). The interactive infection of the lung with RBCV
and P. haemolytica in SFP requires additional study.
High levels of IN and HAI antibodies against RBCV infections in serum
developed initially and further increased in a subgroup of cattle that
remained completely RBCV isolation negative during this 5-week
investigation. Importantly, a major difference between the cattle with
and without signs of respiratory tract diseases was the serum IN
antibody level during the first week. These clinically normal cattle
had significantly higher IN levels than the cattle developing clinical
signs, suggesting that a high level of IN antibody against RBCV enabled
the cattle to resist RBCV infections more efficiently, thus preventing
clinical signs of SFP.
A high correlation between serum IN and HAI activities was documented.
However, results of the correlation of serum IN and HAI activities with
immunoisotype levels, along with the detailed illustrations in Fig. 1,
suggest that the IgG, especially IgG2, might contain the majority of
the RBCV-specific IN activity in the bovine serum, whereas both IgG and
IgM might play an important role in serum HAI activity. This result
implies that detection of serum RBCV-specific HAI antibodies is more
useful at the early stage of RBCV infection, whereas monitoring of
serum RBCV-specific IN activity may be a better indicator of overall
outcome of disease development. These results further indicate that
measurement of RBCV-specific IgG, particularly IgG2, may provide a good
estimate of protective IN antibody levels.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
This research was supported by grants from the Critical Issues
and the National Research Initiative Programs of the United States
Department of Agriculture (98-34362-6071 and 94-37204-0926); the
Louisiana Education Quality Support Fund (RF/1995-1998) RD-B-18 with
matches from Immtech Biologics, LLC, Bucyrus, Kans., and Bayer
Corporation, Merriam, Kans.; the Texas Advanced Technology Program
(grant no. 999902); the Louisiana Beef Industry Council; and the School
of Veterinary Medicine, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge.
We thank C. W. Purdy and R. W. Loan for providing excellent
serum samples and Michael Kearney for statistical assessment.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of
Veterinary Microbiology and Parasitology, Louisiana State University School of Veterinary Medicine, Baton Rouge, LA 70803. Phone: (225) 578-9683. Fax: (225) 578-9701. E-mail:
JStorz{at}vetmed.lsu.edu.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Chouljenko, V. N.,
K. G. Kousoulas,
X. Q. Lin, and J. Storz.
1998.
Nucleotide and predicted amino acid sequences of all genes encoded by the 3' genomic portion (9.5kb) of respiratory bovine coronaviruses and comparisons among respiratory and enteric coronaviruses.
Virus Genes
17:33-42[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 2.
|
Clark, M. A.
1993.
Bovine coronavirus.
Br. Vet. J.
149:51-70[Medline].
|
| 3.
|
Corapi, W. V.,
C. W. Olsen, and F. W. Scott.
1992.
Monoclonal antibody analysis of neutralization and antibody-dependent enhancement of feline infectious peritonitis virus.
J. Virol.
66:6690-6705.
|
| 4.
|
Deregt, D., and L. A. Babiuk.
1987.
Monoclonal antibodies to bovine coronavirus: characteristics and topographical mapping of neutralizing epitopes on the E2 and E3 glycoproteins.
Virology
161:410-420[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 5.
|
Deregt, D.,
G. A. Gifford,
M. K. Ijaz,
T. C. Watts,
J. E. Gilchrist,
D. M. Haines, and L. A. Babiuk.
1989.
Monoclonal antibodies to bovine coronavirus glycoproteins E2 and E3: demonstration of in vivo virus-neutralizing activity.
J. Gen. Virol.
70:993-998[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 6.
|
De Vries, A. A. F.,
M. C. Horzinek,
P. J. M. Rottier, and R. J. De Groot.
1997.
The genome organization of the Nidovirales: similarities and differences between arteri-, toro-, and coronaviruses.
Semin. Virol.
8:33-47[CrossRef].
|
| 7.
|
Heckert, R. A.,
L. J. Saif,
K. H. Hoblet, and A. G. Agnes.
1990.
A longitudinal study of bovine coronavirus enteric and respiratory infections in dairy calves in two herds in Ohio.
Vet. Microbiol.
22:187-201[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 8.
|
Heckert, R. A.,
L. J. Saif,
J. P. Mengel, and G. W. Myers.
1991.
Isotype-specific antibody responses to bovine coronavirus structural proteins in serum, feces, and mucosal secretions from experimentally challenged colostrum-deprived calves.
Am. J. Vet. Res.
52:692-699[Medline].
|
| 9.
|
Hussain, K. A.,
J. Storz, and K. G. Kousoulas.
1991.
Comparison of bovine coronavirus antigens: monoclonal antibodies to the spike glycoprotein distinguish between vaccine and wild-type strains.
Virology
183:442-445[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 10.
|
Jacobse-Geels, H.,
M. R. Daha, and M. Horzinek.
1982.
Antibody, immune complex, and complement activity fluctuations in kittens with experimentally induced feline infectious peritonitis.
Am. J. Vet. Res.
43:666-670[Medline].
|
| 11.
|
Lai, M. M. C.
1990.
Coronavirus: organization, replication and expression of genome.
Annu. Rev. Microbiol.
44:303-333[Medline].
|
| 12.
|
LeJan, C., and J. Asso.
1980.
The local and systemic immune response of calves following experimental infection with IBR virus, p. 677-692.
In
J. E. Butler (ed.), The ruminant immune system. Plenum Press, New York, N.Y.
|
| 13.
|
Lin, X. Q.,
V. N. Chouljenko,
K. G. Kousoulas, and J. Storz.
2000.
Temperature-sensitive acetylesterase activity of haemagglutinin-esterase specified by respiratory bovine coronaviruses.
J. Med. Microbiol.
49:1119-1127[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 14.
|
Lin, X. Q.,
K. L. O'Reilly,
J. Storz,
C. W. Purdy, and R. W. Loan.
2000.
Antibody responses to respiratory coronavirus infections of cattle during shipping fever pathogenesis.
Arch. Virol.
145:2335-2349[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 15.
|
Mebus, C. A.
1980.
Reovirus and coronavirus infections, p. 127-138.
In
H. E. Amstutz (ed.), Bovine medicine and surgery. American Veterinary Publications, Inc., Santa Barbara, Calif.
|
| 16.
|
Mebus, C. A.,
E. L. Stair,
M. B. Rhodes, and M. J. Twiehaus.
1973.
Neonatal calf diarrhea: propagation, attenuation, and characteristics of a corona-like agent.
Am. J. Vet. Res.
34:145-150[Medline].
|
| 17.
|
Olsen, C. W.,
W. V. Corapi,
R. H. Jacobson,
R. A. Simkins,
L. J. Saif, and F. W. Scott.
1993.
Identification of antigenic sites mediating antibody-dependent enhancement of feline infectious peritonitis virus infectivity.
J. Gen. Virol.
74:745-749[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 18.
|
Olsen, C. W.,
W. V. Corapi,
C. K. Ngichabe,
J. D. Baines, and F. W. Scott.
1992.
Monoclonal antibodies to the spike protein of feline infectious peritonitis virus mediate antibody-dependent enhancement of infection of feline macrophages.
J. Virol.
66:956-965[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 19.
|
Parker, M. D.,
D. Yoo, and L. A. Babiuk.
1990.
Expression and secretion of bovine coronavirus hemagglutinin-esterase glycoprotein by insect cells infected with recombinant baculoviruses.
J. Virol.
64:1625-1629[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 20.
|
Saif, L. J.,
D. R. Redman,
K. V. Brock,
E. M. Kohler, and R. A. Heckert.
1988.
Winter dysentery in adult dairy cattle: detection of coronavirus in the feces.
Vet. Rec.
123:300-301[Medline].
|
| 21.
|
Schmidt, O. W., and G. E. Kenny.
1982.
Polypeptides and functions of antigens from human coronaviruses 229E and OC43.
Infect. Immun.
32:1000-1006.
|
| 22.
|
Schultze, B., and G. Herrler.
1992.
Bovine coronavirus uses N-acetyl-9-O-acetyl-neuraminic acid as a receptor determinant to initiate the infection of cultured cells.
J. Gen. Virol.
74:901-906[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 23.
|
Schultze, B.,
H. J. Gross,
R. Brossmer, and G. Herrler.
1991.
The S protein of bovine coronavirus is a hemagglutinin recognizing 9-O-acetylated sialic acid as a receptor determinant.
J. Virol.
65:6232-6237[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 24.
|
Schultze, B.,
K. Wahn,
H. D. Klenk, and G. Herrler.
1991.
Isolated HE-protein from haemagglutinating encephalomyelitis virus and bovine coronavirus has receptor-destroying and receptor-binding activity.
Virology
180:221-228[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 25.
|
Storz, J.,
X. Q. Lin,
C. W. Purdy,
V. N. Chouljenko,
K. G. Kousoulas,
F. M. Enright,
W. C. Gilmore, and R. W. Loan.
2000.
Coronavirus and Pasteurella infections in bovine shipping fever pneumonia and Evans' criteria for causation.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
38:3291-3298[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 26.
|
Storz, J.,
C. W. Purdy,
X. Q. Lin,
M. Burrell,
R. E. Truax,
R. E. Briggs, and R. W. Loan.
2000.
Isolation of respiratory bovine coronavirus, other cytocidal viruses, and Pasteurella spp from cattle involved in two natural outbreaks of shipping fever.
J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc.
216:1599-1604[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 27.
|
Storz, J.
1999.
Respiratory disease of cattle associated with coronavirus infections, p. 291-293.
In
J. L. Howard, and R. A. Smith (ed.), Current veterinary therapy: food animal practice 4. The W. B. Saunders Co., Philadelphia, Pa.
|
| 28.
|
Storz, J.,
L. Stine,
A. Liem, and G. A. Anderson.
1996.
Coronavirus isolation from nasal swab samples in cattle with signs of respiratory tract disease after shipping.
J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc.
208:1452-1455[Medline].
|
| 29.
|
Storz, J.,
X. M. Zhang, and R. Rott.
1992.
Comparison of hemagglutinating, receptor-destroying, and acetylesterase activities of avirulent and virulent bovine coronavirus strains.
Arch. Virol.
125:193-204[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 30.
|
Storz, J.,
G. Herrler,
D. R. Snodgrass,
K. A. Hussain,
X. M. Zhang,
M. A. Clark, and R. Rott.
1991.
Monoclonal antibodies differentiate between the haemagglutinating and the receptor-destroying activities of bovine coronavirus.
J. Gen. Virol.
72:2817-2820[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 31.
|
Storz, J., and R. Rott.
1981.
Reactivity of antibodies in human serum with antigens of an enteropathogenic bovine coronavirus.
Med. Microbiol. Immun.
169:169-178.
|
| 32.
|
Storz, J.,
R. Rott, and G. Kaluza.
1981.
Enhancement of plaque formation and cell fusion of an enteropathogenic coronavirus by trypsin treatment.
Infect. Immun.
31:1214-1222[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 33.
|
Storz, J., and R. Rott.
1980.
Über die Verbreitung der Coronavirusinfektion bei Rindern in ausgewählten Gebieten Deutschlands: Antikörpernachweis durch Mikroimmundiffusion und Neutralisation.
Dtsch. Tierärztl. Wochenschr.
87:252-254.
|
| 34.
|
Yates, W. D. G.
1982.
A review of infectious bovine rhinotracheitis, shipping fever pneumonia and viral-bacterial synergism in respiratory disease of cattle.
Can. J. Comp. Med.
46:225-263[Medline].
|
| 35.
|
Zhang, X. M.,
K. G. Kousoulas, and J. Storz.
1991.
The hemagglutinin/esterase glycoprotein of bovine coronaviruses: sequence and function comparison between virulent and avirulent strains.
Virology
185:847-852[CrossRef][Medline].
|
Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology, March 2001, p. 357-362, Vol. 8, No. 2
1071-412X/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/CDLI.8.2.357-362.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Lin, X.-Q., O'Reilly, K. L., Storz, J.
(2002). Antibody Responses of Cattle with Respiratory Coronavirus Infections during Pathogenesis of Shipping Fever Pneumonia Are Lower with Antigens of Enteric Strains than with Those of a Respiratory Strain. CVI
9: 1010-1013
[Abstract]
[Full Text]