Previous Article | Next Article 
Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology, July 2001, p. 768-771, Vol. 8, No. 4
1071-412X/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/CDLI.8.4.768-771.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Identification and Strain Differentiation of Vibrio
cholerae by Using Polyclonal Antibodies against Outer
Membrane Proteins
A.
Martínez-Govea,1
J.
Ambrosio,2
L.
Gutiérrez-Cogco,1 and
A.
Flisser1,2,*
Instituto de Diagnóstico y Referencia
Epidemiológicos, Secretaría de Salud, Colonia
Santo Tomás, 11340 DF,1 and
Departamento de Microbiología y Parasitología,
Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de
México, San Ángel 04510 DF,2
México
Received 11 January 2001/Returned for modification 27 March
2001/Accepted 17 April 2001
 |
ABSTRACT |
Cholera is caused only by O1 and O139 Vibrio
cholerae strains. For diagnosis, 3 working days are needed for
bacterial isolation from human feces and for biochemical
characterization. Here we describe the purification of bacterial outer
membrane proteins (OMP) from V. cholerae O1 Ogawa, O1
Inaba, and O139 strains, as well as the production of specific antisera
and their use for fecal Vibrio antigen detection.
Anti-OMP antisera showed very high reactivity and specificity by
enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and dot-ELISA. An
inmunodiagnostic assay for V. cholerae detection was
developed; this assay avoids preenrichment and costly equipment and can
be used for epidemiological surveillance and clinical diagnosis of
cases, considering that prompt and specific identification of bacteria
is mandatory in cholera.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Cholera is an acute
intestinal disease with watery diarrhea, vomiting, high dehydration,
acidosis, and circulation disorders caused by Vibrio
cholerae. In case of erratic treatment, death can occur during the
first day (12, 13). In spite of the appearance of more
than 100 V. cholerae serogroups, only O1 and O139 induce disease (12, 16, 17). Etiological diagnosis of V. cholerae is based on the isolation of the bacteria from human
feces and their biochemical characterization (5a, 20).
Vomiting material, water sources, and food can also be used to isolate
V. cholerae (5a). Cholera is an infection of
pandemic magnitude, and thus prompt and specific identification of
bacteria is mandatory; nevertheless, routine microbiological and
biochemical analyses need 3 working days (5a, 8). In spite
of many publications related to immunological and molecular methods for
cholera diagnosis (1, 2, 6, 7, 10, 11, 14, 19), most
assays require enrichment by previous culture of bacteria, which
increases the time needed or involves the use of costly equipment and
reagents. In this paper we describe the purification of bacterial outer
membrane proteins (OMP) and the production of specific antisera and
their use in a detection assay for fecal antigens that does not require preenrichment.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Selection and evaluation of bacteria.
Four Vibrio
strains were used for antibody production and as controls for the
assays: V. cholerae O1 Inaba (CDC13), V. cholerae O1 Ogawa (CDC12), V. cholerae O139, and Vibrio
alginolyticus. Bacteria were plated and grown in
thiosulfate-citrate-bile salts-sucrose agar (TCBS;
Dibico-Mexico) for 18 h at 37°C. Colonies were tested by
biochemical methods (5a, 9, 13) and by agglutination using
polyclonal antibodies against V. cholerae O1 prepared with Roshka antigens in accordance with Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention protocols (20). Other enteric bacteria
(Aeromonas caviae, Aeromonas hydrophila,
Citrobacter freundii, Enterobacter agglomerans,
Enterobacter cloacae, Escherichia coli,
Klebsiella oxytoca, Klebsiella pneumoniae,
Morganella morganii, Plesiomonas shigelloides,
Proteus mirabilis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa,
Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium,
Serratia marcescens, Vibrio mimicus, and
Vibrio parahaemolyticus) were grown in Trypticase in soybean broth (TSB; Bioxon-Mexico), pooled, and inactivated by boiling for 20 min before using them in immunological assays.
Isolation of OMP.
Vibrios for antibody production were grown
in TSB at 37°C for 6 h in a humid chamber; 1 ml was transferred
to Erlenmeyer flasks in TSB and grown overnight to induce
logarithmic-phase growth. Bacteria were processed as described by
Pruzzo et al. (18) and Tarsi and Pruzzo (23).
Briefly, the culture was washed three times by centrifugation at
10,000 × g (Beckman; JA-21 or JA-20) for 20 min
at 4°C in 125 mM Tris-HCl, pH 6.8. The last pellet was dissolved in
the same buffer, and, instead of using a French press, it was frozen
immediately in liquid N2 and thawed. This procedure was repeated 10 times. The suspension was centrifuged at
10,000 × g, and the supernatant was processed to
obtain OMP by centrifugation at 100,000 × g (Beckman;
TL-100 or SN-402) for 40 min at 4°C. Proteins in the pellet were
extracted in Tris-HCl with 0.5% Sarkosyl for 30 min at 20°C and
centrifuged at 100,000 × g for clarification and
Sarkosyl elimination. The final pellet containing OMP was resuspended
in Tris-HCl; the concentration of the OMP was measured by the Coomassie
micromethod (Bio-Rad protein assay), and they were separated in
aliquots and kept at
20°C.
Polyclonal antibody preparation.
New Zealand rabbits
were injected subcutaneously with V. cholerae O1 Ogawa (52 µg), V. cholerae O1 Inaba (26 µg), V. cholerae O139 (22 µg), or V. alginolyticus (18 µg)
OMP. For the first immunization OMP were mixed 1:1 with complete
Freund's adjuvant (Microlab-Mexico); for the next two, performed with
a 15-day interval, incomplete Freund's adjuvant (Microlab-Mexico) was
used. Anti-Vibrio antibody production was determined by
enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) using heat-inactivated
bacteria as the antigen. After the third injection antibodies were
detected at high dilutions; thus sera were obtained and kept frozen in aliquots.
Standardization of a polyclonal antibody-based ELISA for
bacterial antigen detection.
Bacteria were adjusted to
108 CFU/ml with a McFarland nephelometer, and
serial dilutions up to 10 CFU/ml were prepared. Maxisorb plates (Nunc)
were activated using UV exposure for 10 min as suggested by Boudet et
al. (4); 100 µl of one dilution per well was adsorbed at
4°C overnight in carbonate buffer, and wells were washed and blocked
with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), pH 7.2-1% Tween-1% bovine
serum albumin for 60 min. A similar volume of anti-Vibrio serum at serial dilutions from 1:100 to 1:102,400 was incubated for
1 h at 20°C; this was followed, after washing, by a 1:1,000 dilution of anti-rabbit immunoglobulin G conjugated to horseradish peroxidase (as recommended by the manufacturer's protocol; Sigma), which was incubated in similar conditions. The enzymatic reaction was
developed using H2O2
(0.012%) and orthophenylenediamine (400 µg/ml) in citrate buffer as
the substrate.
Standardization of a bacterial antigen detection dot-ELISA with
polyclonal antibodies.
The procedure used by Bosompem et al.
(3) was followed with minor changes. Initially anti-OMP
antiserum samples were evaluated; for this, serial bacterial dilutions,
prepared in TSB as described above, were adsorbed to small disks (6 mm
in diameter) of methanol-activated polyvinyl difluoride (PVDF)
membranes (Millipore), which were introduced into 24-microwell plates
(Costar) to perform the reactions. Membranes were blocked using
PBS-1% Tween-1% bovine serum albumin and washed three times with
PBS, and 1 ml of an anti-OMP antiserum was added. The membranes were
incubated, and after they were washed and incubated with the second
antibody, color was developed with H2O2 (0.012%) and
3',3-diaminobenzidine (400 µg/ml) in PBS. All incubations were
performed for 30 min at 20°C.
For the detection of bacterial antigens in feces, defined
concentrations of a dead bacterial strain were mixed with fecal samples
from a healthy donor diluted in PBS (1:5) by soft stirring in an
orbital shaker. The mixtures were immediately added to the PVDF disks,
and the discs were processed as described above.
Evaluation of rectal swabs collected during surveillance
activities.
Feces were recovered using rectal swabs during field
activities, enriched in alkaline peptone water, pH 8 (8 h, 37°C), and separated in three aliquots. One was cultured in TCBS (18 to 24 h,
37°C); the other two were kept frozen (
20°C) until use. After observation of cultures and biochemical species confirmation, bacteria
were incubated for a further 18 to 24 h at 37°C and the characteristic metabolism of V. cholerae was confirmed and
the serogroup was identified (5a, 8, 9). Finally 18 samples were subjected to ELISA and dot-ELISA.
 |
RESULTS |
Polyclonal antisera raised against OMP antigens showed very high
absorbance values in ELISA at high serum dilutions (between 1:12,800
and 1:102,400) with homologous antigens compared to antibodies prepared
with Roshka antigens (between 1:400 and 1:3,200), routinely used in our
institute. Sera raised against Vibrio OMP did not react with
other enteric bacteria (listed in Materials and Methods; Fig.
1). Specificity was further demonstrated
in ELISA by reactions of bacteria at different concentrations and the
highest OMP antiserum dilution (Fig. 2).
Ten to 100 million Ogawa and Inaba bacteria were detected by their
homologous antiserum diluted 1:50,000, while O139 at the same
level was detected with a 1:150,000 dilution of its specific
antiserum. No reaction was found with other enteric bacteria (listed in
Materials and Methods), and a very low reaction (except with the Inaba
antiserum) with the heterologous antisera was found (Fig. 2).

View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Reactivities of polyclonal antibodies prepared with OMP
against bacterial antigens from V. cholerae O1 Ogawa
( ), V. cholerae O1 Inaba ( ), V.
cholerae O139 ( ), and V. alginolyticus ( )
and with Roshka antigens from V. cholerae O1 Ogawa
( ) and V. cholerae O1 Inaba ( ), as well as
with the enteric bacteria listed in Materials and Methods (×).
|
|

View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
The specificity of anti-Vibrio antibodies
was defined using several CFU values for V. cholerae O1
Ogawa ( ), V. cholerae O1 Inaba ( ), V.
cholerae O139 ( ), and enteric bacteria listed in Materials
and Methods (×). (a) Anti-V. cholerae O1 Ogawa (diluted
1:50,000); (b) anti-V. cholerae O1 Inaba (diluted
1:50,000); (c) anti-V. cholerae O139 (diluted
1:150,000).
|
|
The reactivity in dot-ELISA of anti-OMP antisera was analyzed using
several dilutions and 106 CFU of V. cholerae or enteric bacteria (listed in Materials and Methods)/ml.
OMP antisera to Ogawa and O139 reacted against their specific adsorbed
bacteria in all tested dilutions (1:500 to 1:16,000), but the
anti-Inaba OMP reacted only in 1:500 and 1:1000 dilutions (Fig.
3). Eighteen randomly selected blind
peptonated enriched samples from those kept frozen after surveillance
activities were analyzed by ELISA and by dot-ELISA; 8 were positive and
10 were negative in both assays. These results agreed with
microbiological and biochemical results, suggesting 100% sensitivity
and specificity for the assays.

View larger version (116K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Evaluation of anti-V. cholerae antibodies
by dot-ELISA. Bacteria were added to human fecal samples, adsorbed to
PVDF membranes, and reacted with anti-V. cholerae O1
Ogawa (1 and 2), anti-V. cholerae Inaba (3 and 4), and
anti-V. cholerae O139 (5 and 6). Bacteria
(108 CFU/ml) used were V. cholerae O1 Ogawa
(1), V. cholerae Inaba (3), V. cholerae
O139 (5), and enteric bacteria (2, 4, and 6; listed in Materials and
Methods). Antisera were diluted 1:500, 1:1,000, 1:2,000, 1:4,000,
1:8,000, and 1:16,000 from left to right.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
The purpose of the study described here was to obtain a sensitive
and specific inmunodiagnostic assay for detection of V. cholerae that would avoid preenrichment and costly equipment so that it can be used for epidemiological surveillance and clinical diagnosis of cholera cases. For this, OMP from V. cholerae
Inaba and Ogawa serotypes (18, 23) were obtained by
employing a technique similar to that used for V. alginolyticus (18). OMP antigens induced a higher
humoral immune response in rabbits than antibodies produced with the
Roshka extracts, similar to previous findings (18). OMP
antibodies were specific, as could be seen by the reactivity in ELISA
with the different antisera produced. Some degree of cross-reaction
between anti-Inaba serum and the Ogawa strain was seen; this could be
related to the transformation of Inaba to Ogawa (5, 22).
Also the anti-Inaba antiserum was less sensitive in the dot blot assay.
Specificity of OMP has been shown previously (21),
indicating that members of the Vibrionaceae family have
different membrane antigens.
Whole bacteria were identified by ELISA and by dot-ELISA with OMP
antisera using mixtures of known numbers of bacteria in human feces or
frozen samples obtained from cases detected during surveillance
activities. Concentrations of 106 and
108 CFU/ml were positive in dot-ELISA and ELISA,
respectively. Probably the same sensitivity could be found with fresh
human feces, but the feces obtained during epidemiological surveillance
activities were, by routine, enriched in peptonated water, which
increases the amount of bacteria. In natural infections bacterial
concentrations of 106 CFU/ml are usually found in
feces; thus the assays developed in this study suggest that direct
detection of bacteria in fecal samples is feasible. This sensitivity
could not be confirmed in field or clinical studies due to the lack of
recent cases. Anti-V. cholerae O139 antibodies as well as
those of other enteric bacteria (listed in Materials and Methods) had
very low cross-reactivity against the O1 V. cholerae
serogroups used, supporting the specificity of the assay. Furthermore
the amount of specific antisera produced in this study is enough for
15,000 dot-ELISAs.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
Roshka antigens and polyclonal sera produced against them were
kindly donated by MPH Celia González and QBP Altagracia
Villanueva (InDRE, SSA).
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Departamento de
Microbiología y Parasitología, Facultad de Medicina,
Ciudad Universitaria, San Ángel 04510 DF, México.
Phone: (525)6232466. Fax: (525)6232459. E-mail:
flisser{at}servidor.unam.mx.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Albert, M. J.,
D. Islahm,
S. Nahar,
F. Qadri,
S. Falklind, and A. Weintraub.
1997.
Rapid detection of Vibrio cholerae O139 Bengal from stool specimens by PCR.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
35:1633-1635[Abstract].
|
| 2.
|
Benenson, A. S.,
M. R. Islam, and W. B. Greenough, III.
1964.
Rapid identification of Vibrio cholerae by darkfield microscopy.
Bull. W. H. O.
30:827-831.
|
| 3.
|
Bosompem, K. M.,
I. Ayi, and W. K. Anyan.
1997.
A monoclonal antibody-based dipstick assay for diagnosis of urinary schistosomiasis.
Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg.
91:554-556[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 4.
|
Boudet, F. J.,
J. Thèze, and M. Zovali.
1991.
UV treated polystyrene microtitre plates for use in an ELISA to measure antibodies against synthetic peptides.
J. Immunol. Methods
142:73-82[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 5.
|
Calia, K. E.,
M. Murtagh,
M. J. Ferraro, and S. B. Calderwood.
1994.
Comparison of Vibrio cholerae O139 with V. cholerae O1 Classical and El Tor biotypes.
Infect. Immun.
62:1504-1506[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 5a.
|
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
1993.
Laboratory methods for the diagnosis of Vibrio cholerae.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Ga.
|
| 6.
|
Chaicumpa, W.,
P. Srimanote,
Y. Sakolvaree,
T. Kalampaheti,
M. Chongsa-Nguan,
P. Tapchaisri,
B. Eampokalap,
P. Moolasart,
G. B. Nair, and P. Echeverria.
1998.
Rapid diagnosis of cholera caused by Vibrio cholerae O139.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
36:3595-3600[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 7.
|
Finkelstein, R. A., and E. H. LaBrec.
1959.
Rapid identification of cholera vibrios with fluorescent antibody.
J. Bacteriol.
78:886-891[Free Full Text].
|
| 8.
|
Giono, C. S.
1994.
Vibrio cholerae, p. 309-350.
In
S. Giono, A. Escobar, and J. L. Valdespino (ed.), Diagnóstico de laboratorio de infecciones gastrointestinales. Instituto de Diagnóstico y Referencia Epidemiológicos, Secretaría de Salud, Mexico City, México.
|
| 9.
|
Giono, C. S.,
L. Gutiérrez, and M. Hinojosa.
1991.
Manual de procedimientos para el aislamiento y caracterización de Vibrio cholerae O1: publicación técnica no. 10.
Instituto de Diagnóstico y Referencia Epidemiológicos, Secretaría de Salud, Mexico City, México.
|
| 10.
|
Hasan, J. A. K.,
A. Huq,
M. Tamplin,
R. J. Sieberlin, and R. R. Colwell.
1994.
A novel kit for rapid detection of Vibrio cholerae O1.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
32:249-252[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 11.
|
Jesudason, M. V.,
C. P. Thangavelu, and M. K. Lalitha.
1984.
Rapid screening of fecal samples for Vibrio cholerae by a coagglutination technique.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
19:712-713[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 12.
|
Kaper, J. B.,
J. G. Morris, and M. M. Levine.
1995.
Cholera.
Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
8:48-86[Abstract].
|
| 13.
|
Kay, B. A.,
C. A. Bopp, and J. G. Wells.
1994.
Isolation and identification of Vibrio cholerae O1 from fecal specimens, p. 3-25.
In
I. K. Wachsmuth, P. A. Blake, and Ø. Olsvik (ed.), Vibrio cholerae and cholera: molecular to global perspectives. ASM Press, Washington, D.C.
|
| 14.
|
Lesmana, M.,
R. C. Rockhill,
D. Sutanti, and A. Sutomo.
1982.
A coagglutination test to detect Vibrio cholerae in feces alkaline peptone water cultures.
Southeast Asian J. Trop. Med. Public Health
13:337-379.
|
| 15.
|
Manning, P. A.,
U. H. Stroeher, and R. Morona.
1994.
Molecular basis for O-antigen biosynthesis in Vibrio cholerae O1: Ogawa-Inaba switching, p. 77-94.
In
I. K. Wachsmuth, P. A. Blake, and Ø. Olsvik (ed.), Vibrio cholerae and cholera: molecular to global perspectives. ASM Press, Washington, D.C.
|
| 16.
|
Moreira, L. A. A.
1994.
Cholera: molecular epidemiology, pathogenesis, immunology, treatment and prevention.
Curr. Opin. Infect. Dis.
7:592-601[CrossRef].
|
| 17.
|
Morris, J. G., Jr., and the Cholera Laboratory Task Force.
1994.
Vibrio cholerae O139 Bengal, p. 95-102.
In
I. K. Wachsmuth, P. A. Blake, and Ø. Olsvik (ed.), Vibrio cholerae and cholera: molecular to global perspectives. ASM Press, Washington, D.C.
|
| 18.
|
Pruzzo, C.,
A. Crippa,
S. Bertones,
L. Pane, and A. Carli.
1996.
Attachment of Vibrio alginolyticus to chitin mediated by chitin-binding proteins.
Microbiology
142:2181-2186[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 19.
|
Rahman, M.,
D. Sack,
S. Mahmood, and A. Hossain.
1987.
Rapid diagnosis of cholera by coagglutination test using 4-h fecal enrichment cultures.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
25:2204-2206[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 20.
|
Sakasaki, R.
1992.
Bacteriology of Vibrio and related organisms, p. 37-55.
In
B. Dhiman, and W. B. Greenough III (ed.), Cholera. Plenum Medical Book Company, New York, N.Y.
|
| 21.
|
Sengupta, K. D.,
T. K. Sengupta, and A. C. Ghose.
1992.
Major outer membrane proteins of Vibrio cholerae and their role in induction of protective immunity through inhibition of intestinal colonization.
Infect. Immun.
60:4848-4855[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 22.
|
Stoehr, U. H.,
L. E. Karageorgos,
R. Morona, and P. A. Manning.
1992.
Serotype conversion in Vibrio cholerae O1.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
89:2566-2570[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 23.
|
Tarsi, R., and C. Pruzzo.
1999.
Role of surface proteins in Vibrio cholerae attachment to chitin.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
65:1348-1351[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology, July 2001, p. 768-771, Vol. 8, No. 4
1071-412X/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/CDLI.8.4.768-771.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.