CVI
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Trollfors, B.
Right arrow Articles by Robbins, J. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Trollfors, B.
Right arrow Articles by Robbins, J. B.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology, September 2001, p. 1015-1017, Vol. 8, No. 5
1071-412X/01/$04.00+0   DOI: 10.1128/CDLI.8.5.1015-1017.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Serum Immunoglobulin G Antibody Responses to Bordetella pertussis Lipooligosaccharide and B. parapertussis Lipopolysaccharide in Children with Pertussis and Parapertussis

Birger Trollfors,1,* Teresa Lagergård,2 John Taranger,1 Elisabet Bergfors,1 Rachel Schneerson,3 and John B. Robbins3

The Göteborg Pertussis Vaccine Study, The Göteborg Primary Health Care System,1 and the Department of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, Göteborg University,2 Göteborg, Sweden, and the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 208923

Received 2 February 2001/Returned for modification 27 March 2001/Accepted 21 May 2001


    ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Text
References

Serum immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies against the lipooligosaccharide (LOS) of Bordetella pertussis and the lipopolysaccharide (LPS) of Bordetella parapertussis were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in paired sera from 40 children with pertussis and 14 with parapertussis. Wide differences in the individual responses were noted. Both anti-LOS and -LPS IgG levels increased significantly in the children with pertussis, as did anti-LPS but not anti-LOS in those with parapertussis.


    TEXT
Top
Abstract
Text
References

Bordetella pertussis and Bordetella parapertussis are closely related species and share many virulence factors, including the pertussis toxin gene. The former organism expresses pertussis toxin, while the latter does not (1, 14). The two organisms have different cell wall liposaccharides. The liposaccharide of B. pertussis has a lipid A region and a core oligosaccharide most accurately described as a lipooligosaccharide (LOS) (5, 12, 17). B. parapertussis has similar lipid A and core regions plus an outer O-specific polysaccharide region composed of poly(right-arrow2-alpha -L-GalAp-3right-arrow)n, where n is about 16 (5, 7). Thus, the liposaccharide of B. parapertussis is designated a lipopolysaccharide (LPS).

Characterization of the serum antibody responses against the liposaccharides of these two Bordetella species is of interest for two reasons. First, serum antibodies against the liposaccharides of gram-negative organisms can be protective (6). Second, serum antibody responses to B. pertussis LOS can be used to diagnose pertussis (8, 9). This is of particular interest in recipients of acellular pertussis vaccines in which LOS is only a trace contaminant.

In the present work, the serum immunoglobulin G (IgG) responses to the LOS of B. pertussis and the LPS of B. parapertussis in children with the respective diseases and the cross-reactivity between the two liposaccharides were studied.

Children with pertussis. In a double-blind placebo-controlled study of a monovalent pertussis toxoid vaccine, nasopharyngeal samples for culture of Bordetella species and paired sera were obtained from study participants and family members with cough persisting for at least 7 days (19). IgG antibodies against B. pertussis LOS and B. parapertussis LPS were assayed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) in paired sera from 40 randomly selected siblings of study participants who fulfilled the following criteria: (i) paroxysmal cough for >= 21 days; (ii) pertussis verified by isolation of the organism (35 children) or by significant antibody increases against both pertussis toxin and filamentous hemagglutinin (5 children); (iii) an acute-phase serum obtained within 14 days after onset of symptoms and a convalescent-phase serum obtained 4 to 6 weeks later; and (iv) not vaccinated against pertussis. The age of the children (18 male, 22 female) ranged between 6 months and 7 years (median, 4 years). The time from onset of symptoms until the first serum was obtained ranged between 5 and 14 days (median, 8 days).

Children with parapertussis. Serum IgG antibodies were assayed in all study participants (n = 12) and all siblings (n = 2) in the vaccine efficacy trial (19) with laboratory-verified parapertussis for whom paired sera were available. The age of the 14 children (nine male, five female) ranged between 6 months and 6 years (median, 1 year). The diagnosis of parapertussis was verified by isolation of the organism from 10 children. For three children, parapertussis DNA was detected in nasopharyngeal secretion by PCR (13). B. parapertussis was isolated from a sibling of one child. In addition, all 14 children had significant increases in antibodies against filamentous hemagglutinin but not against pertussis toxin. The interval between onset of symptoms and the first serum sample ranged between 7 and 16 days (median, 13 days).

Serology. Serum IgG was determined by ELISA. Liposaccharides were prepared from B. pertussis (strain Tohama; Culture Collection of Göteborg University no. 15609) and from B. parapertussis (American Type Culture Collection strain 15989) by hot phenol-water extraction (21). The crude liposaccharides were treated with RNase and DNase followed by proteinase K (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, Mo.) and then ultracentrifuged. The protein and nucleic acid content of the two preparations was <1%.

Microtiter plates were coated at 23°C with LOS or LPS at 2 µg/ml, diluted in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) containing 10 mM MgCl2. The plates were washed twice with PBS and blocked with 0.1% bovine serum albumin (BSA) in PBS (0.1% BSA-PBS) for 1 h at 23°C. The plates were then washed three times with 0.05% Tween 20. The acute- and convalescent-phase sera were diluted 1:50 and tested on the same plate in eight threefold dilutions. The plates were incubated overnight, and after washing, alkaline phosphatase-coupled anti-human IgG (Jackson Immuno Research Lab) diluted in 0.1% BSA-PBS was added. The plates were incubated at 23°C for 5 h. After washing, the plates were developed with nitrophenyl phosphate substrate at 1 mg/ml (Sigma) in 1 M Tris-HCl buffer, pH 9.8, with 3 mM MgCl2 and read at 460 nm (Titertek Multiscan; Flow Laboratories). The optimal concentrations of the reagents were tested by checkerboard titrations with each serum tested in duplicate. Wells containing all reagents but with PBS instead of serum were used as controls. A serum with high anti-LOS and anti-LPS IgG titers was used as a positive control. The antibody content was expressed as the reciprocal serum dilution (titer) giving an absorbance of 0.3 above the background. An optical density (OD) of 0.3 above the background was chosen because the linear part of LOS and LPS antibody curves started at an OD of 0.25 above the background. The lower part of the curve was the most constant and showed the least variability between repeated assays. Sera with a titer of <50 were arbitrarily assigned a titer of 25 when geometric mean titers (GMT) were calculated.

Statistical analysis. Comparisons between acute- and convalescent-phase sera were performed with a paired t test after logarithmic and rank transformation of data. All P values are two-tailed.

Serum IgG in patients with pertussis. Table 1 shows that there was approximately an eightfold rise in the GMT of anti-LOS IgG from B. pertussis between the acute- and convalescent-phase sera in the children with pertussis (P < 0.0001 for logarithmically and rank-transformed data). The range of increases varied widely: 10 had no detectable anti-LOS IgG in their convalescent-phase sera, 5 had titers between 50 and 100, 8 had titers between 100 and 1,000, and the remaining 16 had titers between 1,000 and 12,045. 

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1.   Serum IgG responses to B. pertussis LOS and B. parapertussis LPS in patients with pertussis and parapertussis

With the B. parapertussis LPS antigen, there was also an approximately eightfold rise in the GMT of anti-LPS IgG in the children with pertussis (P < 0.0001 for logarithmically and rank-transformed data). Most children with anti-LOS IgG increases also had increases in anti-LPS IgG, but some exceptions were noted. One child had an increase from 73 to 10,147 against LOS, while anti-LPS IgG was <50 in both sera. Three children had increases from levels of less than 100 to more than 5,000 against LPS, while anti-LOS IgG was below 100 in both acute- and convalescent-phase sera. In these three children, the diagnosis of pertussis was verified by both isolation of the organism and significant increases in pertussis toxin IgG.

Serum IgG in patients with parapertussis. Table 1 shows that IgG antibodies to the LPS of B. parapertussis increased significantly (~10-fold) in the children with parapertussis (P < 0.0001 for rank-transformed and P < 0.0003 for logarithmically transformed data). Only one child with parapertussis had nondetectable anti-LPS IgG in the convalescent-phase serum, and two had titers of 50 to 100.

In contrast to the heterologous anti-LPS IgG response of the patients with pertussis, none of the 14 patients with parapertussis had a rise in anti-LOS IgG.

Comments. This study shows that the IgG response following parapertussis is directed only to the LPS of B. parapertussis, while infection with B. pertussis elicits antibodies reactive with the liposaccharides of both Bordetella species. Our explanation for these different responses is based upon the structures of the two surface liposaccharides. The core region of the LPS of B. parapertussis is "covered" by the O-specific polysaccharide region, while antibodies to the shared core region, elicited by B. pertussis, are reactive both with the LOS of this organism and with the purified B. parapertussis LPS, as shown in vitro (11, 17). An LOS IgG response in patients with pertussis has been documented previously (8, 16). There seems to be no difference in the overall immunogenicity of these two pathogens in patients, as the serum IgG responses to the filamentous hemagglutinin and pertactin were similar in both patient groups (2).

We have no explanation for the finding that three pertussis patients developed B. parapertussis anti-LPS but not B. pertussis anti-LOS IgG. Possibly, they had a mixed infection with both pathogens.

Although the LOS of B. pertussis and the LPS of B. parapertussis have structural and biological properties similar to those of other respiratory and enteric gram-negative pathogens, including pyrogenicity (20), fever is not seen in Bordetella infections. Accordingly, it is unlikely that these surface liposaccharides exert a major pathogenic role in the coughing of pertussis or parapertussis.

Serum antibodies to the liposaccharides of bordetellae are found in many individuals without a recent history of a severe cough (8, 16). These so-called "natural" antibodies were probably stimulated by cross-reacting antigens. The presence of LOS antibodies in patients who later develop pertussis argues against their protective role against B. pertussis. Although they induce an in vitro bacteriolysis of B. pertussis in the presence of diluted complement, the failure of anti-LOS IgG to protect against pertussis may be due to the inaccessibility of this comparatively small surface antigen (4, 5, 7, 10, 17).

Similar to the LPS of other gram-negative bacteria and in contrast to the LOS of B. pertussis, the O-specific polysaccharide region of the LPS shields B. parapertussis against the cidal action of complement alone (3, 14, 15, 18). Accordingly, the LPS region may confer virulence on B. parapertussis.

In summary, serum IgG increases against LOS of B. pertussis and LPS of B. parapertussis are common but not constant findings in patients with pertussis and parapertussis, respectively. Many patients with pertussis had IgG increases against B. parapertussis LPS, while the reverse was not seen. These findings may be of importance for diagnosing pertussis in patients who have the disease despite vaccination with acellular pertussis vaccines and for studying parapertussis epidemiology in populations in which pertussis has become eradicated due to mass vaccination with acellular pertussis vaccines.


    FOOTNOTES

* Corresponding author: Birger Trollfors, Department of Pediatrics, Sahlgrenska University Hospital-East, S-416 85 Göteborg, Sweden. Phone: 46 31 3434000. Fax: 46 31 84 30 10. E-mail: birger.trollfors{at}vgregion.se.


    REFERENCES
Top
Abstract
Text
References

1. Arico, B., and R. Rappuoli. 1987. Bordetella parapertussis and Bordetella bronchiseptica contain transcriptionally silent pertussis toxin genes. J. Bacteriol. 169:2847-2853[Abstract/Free Full Text].
2. Bergfors, E., B. Trollfors, J. Taranger, T. Lagergård, V. Sundh, and G. Zackrisson. 1999. Parapertussis and pertussis: differences and similarities in incidence, clinical course, and antibody responses. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 3:140-146[CrossRef][Medline].
3. Brodeur, B. R., J. Hamei, D. Martin, and R. Rondeau. 1991. Biological activity of a human monoclonal antibody to Bordetella pertussis lipooligosaccharide. Hum. Antib. Hybrid. 2:194-198[Medline].
4. Byrd, D. W., R. M. Roop, H. P. Veit, and G. G. Schurig. 1991. Serum sensitivity and lipopolysaccharide characteristics in Bordetella bronchiseptica, B. pertussis and B. parapertussis. J. Med. Microbiol. 34:159-165[Abstract].
5. Caroff, M., R. Chaby, D. Karibian, J. Perry, C. Deprun, and L. Szabo. 1990. Variations in the carbohydrate regions of Bordetella pertussis lipopolysaccharides: electrophoretic, serological, and structural features. J. Bacteriol. 172:1121-1128[Abstract/Free Full Text].
6. Cohen, D., S. Ashkenazi, M. S. Green, M. Gdalevich, G. Robin, R. Slepon, M. Yavzori, N. Orr, C. Block, I. Ashkenazi, J. Shemer, D. N. Taylor, T. L. Hale, J. C. Sadoff, D. Pavliakova, R. Schneerson, and J. B. Robbins. 1997. Double-blind vaccine-controlled randomized efficacy trial of an investigational Shigella sonnei conjugate vaccine in young adults. Lancet 349:155-159[CrossRef][Medline].
7. DiFabio, J. L., M. Caroff, D. Kariban, J. C. Richards, and M. B. Perry. 1992. Characterization of the common lipopolysaccharide O-chains produced by Bordetella bronchiseptica and Bordetella parapertussis. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 97:275-282.
8. Granström, G., M. Granström, M. Anderson, U. Lindquist, K. Leontein, S. B. Svenson, and B. Wretlind. 1990. Bordetella pertussis lipopolysaccharide as antigen in ELISA for serological diagnosis of whooping cough. Serodiagn. Immunother. Infect. Dis. 4:151-158.
9. Granström, M., and G. Granström. 1993. Serological correlates in whooping cough. Vaccine 11:445-448[CrossRef][Medline].
10. Harvill, E. T., A. Preston, P. A. Cotter, A. G. Allen, D. J. Maskell, and J. F. Miller. 2000. Multiple roles for Bordetella lipopolysaccharide molecules during respiratory tract infection. Infect. Immun. 68:6720-6728[Abstract/Free Full Text].
11. Khelef, N., B. Danve, M.-J. Quentin-Millet, and N. Guiso. 1993. Bordetella pertussis and Bordetella parapertussis: two immunologically distinct species. Infect. Immun. 61:486-490[Abstract/Free Full Text].
12. LeDur, A., M. Caroff, R. Chaby, and L. Szabo. 1978. A novel type of endotoxin structure present in Bordetella pertussis. Eur. J. Biochem. 84:579-589[Medline].
13. Lind-Brandberg, L., C. Welinder-Olsen, T. Lagergård, J. Taranger, B. Trollfors, and G. Zackrisson. 1998. Evaluation of PCR for diagnosis of Bordetella pertussis and Bordetella parapertussis infections. J. Clin. Microbiol. 36:679-683[Abstract/Free Full Text].
14. Marchitto, K. S., S. G. Smith, C. Locht, and J. M. Keith. 1987. Nucleotide sequence homology to pertussis toxin gene in Bordetella bronchiseptica and Bordetella parapertussis. Infect. Immun. 55:497-501[Abstract/Free Full Text].
15. Mountzouros, K. T., A. Kimura, and J. L. Cowell. 1992. A bactericidal monoclonal antibody specific for the lipooligosaccharide of Bordetella pertussis reduces colonization of the respiratory tract of mice after aerosol infection with B. pertussis. Infect. Immun. 60:5316-5318[Abstract/Free Full Text].
16. Novotny, P., M. E. Macauley, T. C. Hart, and F. Skvaril. 1990. Analysis of antibody profiles in children with whooping cough. Symposium on Pertussis: Evaluation and Research on Acellular Pertussis Vaccines. Shizuoka, Japan, 1990. Dev. Biol. Stand. 73:267-273.
17. Peppler, M. S. 1984. Two physically and serologically distinct lipopolysaccharide profiles in strains of Bordetella pertussis and their phenotypic variants. Infect. Immun. 43:224-232[Abstract/Free Full Text].
18. Shahin, R. D., J. Hamel, M. F. Leef, and B. R. Brodeur. 1994. Analysis of protective and nonprotective monoclonal antibodies specific for Bordetella pertussis lipooligosaccharide. Infect. Immun. 62:722-725[Abstract/Free Full Text].
19. Trollfors, B., J. Taranger, T. Lagergård, L. Lind, V. Sundh, G. Zackrisson, W. Blackwelder, C. U. Lowe, and J. B. Robbins. 1995. A placebo-controlled trial of a pertussis toxoid vaccine. N. Engl. J. Med. 333:1045-1050[Abstract/Free Full Text].
20. Wantanabe, M., H. Takimoto, Y. Kumazawam, and K. Amano. 1990. Biological properties of lipopolysaccharides from Bordetella pertussis. J. Gen. Microbiol. 136:489-493[Medline].
21. Westphal, O., and K. Jann. 1965. Bacterial polysaccharide: extraction with phenol-water and further applications of the procedure, p. 83-91. In R. L. Whisler (ed.), Methods in carbohydrate chemistry, vol. 5. Academic Press, New York, N.Y.


Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology, September 2001, p. 1015-1017, Vol. 8, No. 5
1071-412X/01/$04.00+0   DOI: 10.1128/CDLI.8.5.1015-1017.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.



This article has been cited by other articles:


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Trollfors, B.
Right arrow Articles by Robbins, J. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Trollfors, B.
Right arrow Articles by Robbins, J. B.


Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. Infect. Immun.
J. Clin. Microbiol. J. Virol. ALL ASM JOURNALS