Previous Article | Next Article 
Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology, September 2001, p. 904-908, Vol. 8, No. 5
1071-412X/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/CDLI.8.5.904-908.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Simplified Assay for Measuring Toxoplasma
gondii Immunoglobulin G Avidity
Harry E.
Prince1,* and
Marianna
Wilson2
Focus Technologies, Cypress,
California,1 and Reference
Immunodiagnostic Laboratory, Division of Parasitic Diseases, Centers
for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta,
Georgia2
Received 8 March 2001/Returned for modification 17 May
2001/Accepted 7 June 2001
 |
ABSTRACT |
A Toxoplasma gondii immunoglobulin G (IgG) avidity
enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was developed that combines
the accuracy of assays based on end point titers and the relative ease
of assays based on optical density values. Like published procedures,
the new assay's avidity index (AI) was based on differential T.
gondii-specific IgG reactivity in serum-treated wells washed with urea buffer versus that in wells washed with control buffer; unlike previous assays, however, the IgG reactivity was measured quantitatively using a standard curve. The assay was evaluated using 24 IgG-positive and IgM-positive sera collected within 5 months of
the onset of symptoms (recent-infection group) and 25 IgG-positive and
IgM-negative sera (past-infection group). All sera in the
recent-infection group exhibited AI values of <0.18, whereas all sera
in the past-infection group exhibited AI values of >0.27. The AI
values of the recent-infection group showed significant correlation
with the number of days after the onset of symptoms. A subset of 16 sera (8 recent and 8 past) was tested using a commercially available
T. gondii IgG avidity ELISA based on end point
titration; the results of the two assays showed highly significant
correlation (R2 = 0.9125). In addition,
we confirmed and extended the findings of other investigators, showing
that AI values calculated using optical density values, but not AI
values calculated using quantitative IgG values, varied significantly
depending on the serum dilution used. This new assay should facilitate
the accurate measurement of T. gondii IgG avidity in a
reference laboratory setting.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Measurement of Toxoplasma
gondii immunoglobulin G (IgG) avidity (binding strength) is a
powerful tool for distinguishing recent from past T. gondii
infection. Detection of low-avidity IgG is a reliable indicator of
infection within the previous 8 months, whereas detection of
high-avidity IgG essentially excludes the possibility that infection
occurred within the previous 5 months (2, 4, 7). T. gondii IgG avidity measurement is particularly valuable for
approximating the time of infection in pregnant women found to be
positive for T. gondii IgG and IgM at the time of their
first prenatal care visit (4, 7, 8, 12).
IgG avidity measurement is based on the differential elution of
antigen-bound IgG using urea-containing wash buffer; low-avidity IgG
dissociates from antigen in the presence of urea, whereas high-avidity
IgG remains bound to antigen (2). Results for avidity
assays are generally expressed as an avidity index (AI), which reflects
the relative amount of T. gondii-specific IgG detected following washes with urea buffer versus that found following washes
with control buffer. Published methods differ, however, in how these
IgG levels are expressed. Using the end point titration method,
multiple dilutions of patient sera are tested, and titers are defined
in relation to a cutoff optical density (OD) value (2,
4-7). Drawbacks to this method include the requirement for four
or more dilutions of a specimen, the frequent need for repeat testing
due to insufficient serial dilution of a specimen (i.e., the highest
routine dilution gives an OD value higher than the cutoff OD), and
complex calculations. An alternative to end point titration is the OD
method, where IgG levels are simply expressed as the OD values obtained
following washing with either urea buffer or control buffer (1,
3, 8-11). The OD method, although much easier than the
titration method, also has a major drawback: the AI can vary markedly
(4), depending on the total amount of T. gondii-specific IgG in the specimen. Thus, prior determination of
antigen-specific IgG levels is often required before the actual avidity
assay can be performed (8-10).
To overcome these drawbacks, we have developed a T. gondii
IgG avidity assay that incorporates a standard curve, allowing quantitative measurement of T. gondii IgG levels using a
single dilution of patient serum in most cases. The assay yields AI
values comparable to those of the titration method with the relative ease of the OD method.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Patient sera.
The sera (n = 49) used for
evaluating T. gondii IgG avidity were components of the
Toxoplasma 1998 Human Serum Panel prepared by the Reference
Immunodiagnostic Laboratory, Division of Parasitic Diseases, Centers
for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Ga. These sera were
obtained from both men and women, and none of the women were pregnant
at the time of blood donation. The sera were divided into two groups on
the basis of the time since the onset of toxoplasmosis. The
recent-infection group included 24 sera from 11 individuals with
primary toxoplasmosis collected within the 5-month period after the
onset of symptoms. These patients were infected during an outbreak of
toxoplasmosis at a riding stable in 1977 (13); most
samples had T. gondii-specific IgG levels of >2,000 IU/ml,
and all contained T. gondii-specific IgM and IgA. The
past-infection group included 25 sera collected from individuals who
had had toxoplasmosis many months or years earlier (the exact times
were unknown), as demonstrated by the presence of T. gondii-specific IgG (5 to 1,000 IU/ml) but the absence of T. gondii-specific IgM and IgA (13).
Commercially available T. gondii IgG avidity
assay.
A commercially available enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay
(ELISA) kit (Labsystems, Helsinki, Finland) based on the end point titration method was used to measure the avidity of eight
recent-infection group sera and eight past-infection group sera. The
assay was performed according to the instructions supplied in the kit insert.
Experimental T. gondii IgG avidity assay.
Microtiter wells (Polysorb; Nunc, Copenhagen, Denmark) were
coated with T. gondii antigen (Microbix Biosystems, Toronto,
Canada) in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), blocked with PBS containing 0.1% bovine serum albumin (Sigma, St. Louis, Mo.), air dried, and
stored at 4°C. Prior to assay setup, the microwell strips were washed
with 0.25 ml of control wash buffer (PBS containing 0.1% Tween 20 [Sigma] [PBST]). Patient sera were diluted 1:100 and 1:1,000 in
PBST containing 0.1% bovine serum albumin, and each dilution was added
to duplicate microtiter wells (0.1 ml per well). Each assay included a
seven-point standard curve, prepared by making serial threefold
dilutions of the World Health Organization T. gondii
antibody standard (lot TOXS 60 April 79; Statens Seruminstitut, Copenhagen, Denmark); the curve spanned values of 3 to 2,000 IU/ml. After an hour at room temperature, the well contents were discarded. Control wash buffer was then added to all standard wells, and one of
each pair of duplicate wells was treated with a patient serum
dilution; control buffer containing 6 M urea (ICN, Aurora, Ohio) was
added to the other duplicate well. After 5 min at room temperature, the
well contents were discarded and the wash procedure was repeated
(including the 5-min soaking step). All wells were washed once more
(without soaking) with control wash buffer and then received 0.1 ml of
appropriately diluted horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-human
IgG (Fc specific; Jackson Immunoresearch, West Grove, Pa.). After 30 min at room temperature, the well contents were discarded and all wells
were washed three times with control wash buffer. Substrate reagent
(tetramethylbenzidine; Moss Inc., Pasadena, Mo.) was then added to all
wells (0.1 ml per well); after 10 min at room temperature, the reaction
was stopped by the addition of 0.1 ml of 1 N sulfuric acid (Ricca,
Arlington, Tex.). OD values (at 450 nm) were determined using an ELISA
plate reader (Bio-Tek Instruments, Winooski, Vt.). The instrument
software then plotted the standard curve and used this curve to convert the OD values of serum-treated wells to quantitative IgG values, expressed in international units per milliliter. For a given patient serum dilution, the AI was calculated using the following formula: international units of IgG per milliliter for the well washed with urea buffer/international units of IgG per milliliter for the well
washed with control buffer. For comparative purposes, the avidity index
was also calculated using OD values rather than international units of
IgG per milliliter.
Statistical analyses.
Correlations were determined by linear
regression analysis, and means were compared using the t
test. Significance was defined as a P value of <0.01.
 |
RESULTS |
A representative standard curve for the experimental T. gondii IgG avidity assay is shown in Fig.
1. Representative data generated for a
specimen from the recent-infection group and a specimen from the
past-infection group are shown in Table
1. As expected, for the control wash, the
number of international units of IgG per milliliter for the 1:1,000
dilution was approximately 10-fold lower than the comparable value for
the 1:100 dilution, demonstrating good linearity of the standard curve.
Numbers of international units of IgG per milliliter obtained for the
1:1,000 dilution were not corrected for this 10-fold dilution factor,
since such correction had no influence on the calculated AI.

View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Representative T. gondii IgG standard
curve. OD values are plotted on a linear scale versus international
units per milliliter on a logarithmic scale.
|
|
An AI based on international units of IgG per milliliter could be
calculated using the 1:100 dilution data for all 25 past-infection group sera and 17 of 24 recent-infection group sera. For the seven remaining recent-infection group sera, an AI for the 1:100 dilution could not be calculated because the control wash numbers of
international units of IgG per milliliter were greater than the highest
standard. However, the 1:1,000 dilution for these seven sera yielded
quantitative IgG values that could be used to calculate the AI. Thus,
the AI values based on international units of IgG per milliliter
presented in Fig. 2 represent data from
the 1:100 dilution for 42 sera (all 25 past-infection group sera plus
17 recent-infection group sera) and the 1:1,000 dilution for 7 sera
(all within the recent-infection group). For comparative purposes, the
AI values based on ODs for these same serum dilutions are also shown in
Fig. 2.

View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
AI values determined using either OD or international
units of IgG per milliliter for sera from the recent-infection group
(Recent; n = 24) and the past-infection group
(Past; n = 25).
|
|
Figure 2 demonstrates the superior performance of AI determination
based on international units of IgG per milliliter for distinguishing
the recent-infection group from the past-infection group. Although the
range of AI values based on OD was obviously lower for the
recent-infection group than for the past-infection group, pronounced
overlap of ranges was observed. In contrast, no overlap was observed
using AI values based on international units of IgG per milliliter; all
recent-infection group sera exhibited AI values of <0.18, whereas all
past-infection group sera exhibited values of >0.27.
The relationship between AI values based on international units per
milliliter and days after the onset of symptoms for the recent-infection group is shown in Fig.
3. Increasing time since onset of
symptoms was significantly correlated with increasing AI.

View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Relationship between AI based on international units per
milliliter and days after the onset of symptoms for the
recent-infection group. The R2 value,
determined by linear regression analysis, was statistically
significant.
|
|
A subset of sera (eight recent-infection group and eight past-infection
group) was tested using a commercially available T. gondii
IgG avidity ELISA in which the AI was based on end point titration. In
order to compare the results of the commercial assay to those of the
experimental assay, the commercial assay results were expressed as the
true index (i.e., without multiplication by 100 to enable expression as
a percentage). The correlational relationship between AI values (based
on international units per milliliter) from the experimental avidity
assay and AI values from the commercial assay is shown in Fig.
4; the correlation coefficient was highly
significant. Further, the mean AI for the 16 sera as determined in the
experimental assay did not differ significantly from the mean AI
determined in the commercial assay (0.284 ± 0.060 versus
0.301 ± 0.045, respectively; P = 0.370; paired
t test).

View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
Relationship between AI values based on international
units per milliliter and AI values obtained using a commercially
available kit for eight sera from the recent-infection group and eight
sera from the past-infection group. The correlation was highly
significant.
|
|
As mentioned in the introduction, previous investigators reported that
AI values based on the OD for a given specimen varied markedly
depending on the amount of T. gondii-specific IgG in the
specimen (4). The results shown in Fig.
5 confirm this finding and extend it by
showing that such variation does not characterize AI values based on
international units per milliliter. These data represent AI values for
the 17 recent-infection group sera for which complete OD and
international unit per milliliter data were available at both the 1:100
and 1:1,000 serum dilutions. The distribution of AI values based on OD
was clearly higher for the 1:100 dilution than for the 1:1,000
dilution; this difference was highly significant when it was evaluated
using the paired t test (mean values, 0.490 ± 0.089 versus 0.327 ± 0.071, respectively; P < 0.01).
In contrast, the distributions of AI values based on international
units per milliliter were very similar at both dilutions, and the mean
values did not differ significantly (0.092 ± 0.032 at 1:100
versus 0.097 ± 0.037 at 1:1,000; P = 0.429;
paired t test). Data are not presented for the
past-infection group because most of these sera (18 of 25) had
undetectable IgG (defined as <6 IU/ml [4]) for one or
both wash treatments at the 1:1,000 dilution.

View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
Influence of specimen dilution on AI values determined
using OD values versus quantitative IgG values (international units per
milliliter) for 17 specimens from the recent-infection group. The
numbers on the abscissa (100 or 1,000) indicate the serum dilution
factor.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
We have developed an ELISA for measuring T. gondii IgG
avidity that combines the discriminatory power of end point titration assays with the performance ease of OD assays. Rather than titrating each specimen under both urea wash and control wash conditions, a
single specimen dilution is tested under both wash conditions, and the
IgG content is quantified by comparison to a titrated standard (i.e.,
the standard curve). This approach avoids the strict graphing and
interline measurement steps required for each specimen when the end
point titration method is used (2, 7). Further, initial
testing of two serum dilutions by the experimental method yielded an AI
result for all specimens, obviating the need for repeat testing due to
failure to reach an end point titer.
Based on our findings for a panel of well-characterized sera, we
consider an AI (based on international units per milliliter) of <0.20
low avidity and an AI of >0.25 high avidity; AI values between 0.20 and 0.25 are considered intermediate avidity. These ranges show
excellent agreement with the definitions of low and high avidity for AI
values based on end point titration. In seminal publications describing
T. gondii IgG avidity, Hedman's group considered AI values
of <20% (equivalent to 0.20 in our assay) low avidity and AI values
of >25% (equivalent to 0.25) high avidity (2, 6).
Similarly, Jenum et al. considered 20% the transition point for
distinguishing high avidity from low avidity (4).
Problems with variations in AI values based on OD in relation to the
serum dilution tested have apparently plagued most investigators attempting this approach. As discussed by Jenum et al.
(4), several prior reports described assays in which sera
were first pretested for T. gondii IgG levels and then
diluted to a target level (either OD or quantitative units) for
performance of the actual OD-based avidity assay. This pretesting
requirement thus makes the OD-based avidity assay essentially
equivalent to the titration-based assay in terms of technical and
mathematical complexity. The new assay described here represents an
improvement over both OD-based and titration-based avidity assays,
since only two serum dilutions and no pretesting are required.
The recent-infection group sera used in this study were from the 1977 Atlanta stable outbreak (13) and exhibited extremely high
levels of T. gondii-specific IgG. Such high IgG levels
cannot be considered representative of levels found in the typical
patient with primary toxoplasmosis (2, 4). In addition,
the study did not include sera collected during the very early phase of infection (i.e., days 1 to 78 after the onset of symptoms). Additional studies utilizing sera from more typical toxoplasmosis patients, collected over the full time course of early infection, are needed to
demonstrate the utility of this assay in other clinical situations.
The simplified format of this new ELISA for T. gondii IgG
avidity makes it practical for performance in a reference laboratory setting, where reagent costs and ease of setup are major factors in the
selection of new test offerings. Due to its superior clinical utility
for estimating the time of T. gondii infection
(2-12), particularly in expectant mothers, T. gondii IgG avidity measurement should be included in
infectious-disease testing regimens.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Focus
Technologies, 5785 Corporate Ave., Cypress, CA 90630. Phone: (714)
503-2047. Fax: (714) 484-1296. E-mail:
hprince{at}focusanswers.com.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Garweg, J. G.,
P. Jacquier, and M. Boehnke.
2000.
Early aqueous humor analysis in patients with human ocular toxoplasmosis.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
38:996-1001[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 2.
|
Hedman, K.,
M. Lappalainen,
I. Seppaia, and O. Makela.
1989.
Recent primary Toxoplasma infection indicated by a low avidity of specific IgG.
J. Infect. Dis.
159:736-740[Medline].
|
| 3.
|
Holliman, R. E.,
R. Raymond,
N. Renton, and J. D. Johnson.
1994.
The diagnosis of toxoplasmosis using IgG avidity.
Epidemiol. Infect.
112:399-408[Medline].
|
| 4.
|
Jenum, P. A.,
B. Stray-Pedersen, and A.-G. Gundersen.
1997.
Improved diagnosis of primary Toxoplasma gondii infection in early pregnancy by determination of antitoxoplasma immunoglobulin G avidity.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
35:1972-1977[Abstract].
|
| 5.
|
Joynson, D. H.,
R. A. Payne, and B. K. Rawal.
1990.
Potential role of IgG avidity for diagnosing toxoplasmosis.
Epidemiol. Infect.
107:526-535.
|
| 6.
|
Korhonen, M. H.,
J. Brunstein,
H. Haario,
A. Katnikov,
R. Rescaldani, and K. Hedman.
1999.
A new method with general diagnostic utility for the calculation of immunoglobulin G avidity.
Clin. Diagn. Lab. Immunol.
6:725-728[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 7.
|
Lappalainen, M.,
P. Koskela,
M. Koskiniemi,
P. Ammala,
V. Hiilesmaa,
K. Teramo,
K. O. Raivio,
J. S. Remington, and K. Hedman.
1993.
Toxoplasmosis acquired during pregnancy: improved serodiagnosis based on avidity of IgG.
J. Infect. Dis.
167:691-697[Medline].
|
| 8.
|
Lecolier, B., and B. Pucheu.
1993.
Value of the study of IgG avidity for the diagnosis of toxoplasmosis.
Pathol. Biol (Paris)
41:155-158[Medline].
|
| 9.
|
Paul, M.
1999.
Immunoglobulin G avidity in diagnosis of toxoplasmic lymphadenopathy and ocular toxoplasmosis.
Clin. Diagn. Lab. Immunol.
6:514-518[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 10.
|
Pelloux, H.,
E. Brun,
G. Vernet,
S. Marcillat,
M. Jolivet,
D. Guergour,
H. Fricker-Hidalgo,
A. Goullier-Fleuret, and P. Ambroise-Thomas.
1998.
Determination of anti-Toxoplasma gondii immunoglobulin G avidity: adaptation to the Vidas system (bioMerieux).
Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis.
32:69-73[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 11.
|
Rossi, C. L.
1998.
A simple, rapid enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for evaluating immunoglobulin G antibody avidity in toxoplasmosis.
Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis.
30:25-30[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 12.
|
Sensini, A.,
S. Pascoli,
D. Marchetti,
R. Castronari,
M. Marangi,
G. Sbaraglia,
C. Cimmino,
A. Facero,
M. Castelletto, and A. Mottola.
1996.
IgG avidity in the serodiagnosis of acute Toxoplasma gondii infection: a multicenter study.
Clin. Microbiol. Infect.
2:25-29[Medline].
|
| 13.
|
Teutsch, S. M.,
D. D. Juranek,
A. Sulzer,
J. P. Dubey, and R. K. Sikes.
1979.
Epidemic toxoplasmosis associated with infected cats.
N. Engl. J. Med.
300:695-699[Abstract].
|
Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology, September 2001, p. 904-908, Vol. 8, No. 5
1071-412X/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/CDLI.8.5.904-908.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Petersen, E., Borobio, M. V., Guy, E., Liesenfeld, O., Meroni, V., Naessens, A., Spranzi, E., Thulliez, P.
(2005). European Multicenter Study of the LIAISON Automated Diagnostic System for Determination of Toxoplasma gondii-Specific Immunoglobulin G (IgG) and IgM and the IgG Avidity Index. J. Clin. Microbiol.
43: 1570-1574
[Abstract]
[Full Text]