Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology, September 2001, p. 965-971, Vol. 8, No. 5
North Shore University Hospital
Received 3 April 2001/Returned for modification 11 May
2001/Accepted 5 June 2001
Resistance to HIV-1 infection and delayed disease progression have
been associated with a 32-bp deletion ( The beta chemokine receptor CCR5 has
been identified as the major coreceptor that, in conjunction with CD4,
facilitates the viral fusion and infection of human host cells by
macrophage-tropic human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1)
strains (7, 8). Studies have identified a genetic
polymorphism in the CCR5 gene consisting of a 32-bp deletion ( Recent collaborative studies from our laboratories have
described the development and clinical use of an isothermal nucleic acid sequence-based amplification (NASBA) assay for CCR5 The present studies were designed to modify the original
NASBA-based CCR5 genotyping assay (referred to as the
standard assay) (14) for a NucliSens Basic Kit (Organon
Teknika, Durham, N.C.) format, using a sandwich hybridization
target-specific detection oligonucleotide methodology. The CCR5
Study population.
The study population consisted of 83 HIV-1-infected adults and 1 HIV-1-seronegative female with high-risk
exposure to HIV-1 (HRSNF) who attend the North Shore University
Hospital Center for AIDS Research and Treatment and 20 HIV-1-seronegative volunteer donors. Institutional Review Board
approval and informed consent were obtained prior to collection of
blood and/or buccal scrapings.
Sample collection and processing.
All whole-blood samples
were collected in VACUTAINER EDTA anticoagulant tubes (Becton
Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, N.J.). If indicated, whole-blood samples
were centrifuged for 20 min at 1,200 × g in a swinging
bucket rotor (RT 6000B; Sorvall) and processed as described below
within 8 h of specimen collection. Cell-free plasma was removed
and immediately frozen in cryovials (Nalgene, Nunc International,
Roskilde, Denmark) at (i) Whole blood.
Whole blood was collected from 21 individuals, including 15 HIV-1-infected and 6 uninfected individuals.
Next, 50.0- and 100.0-µl aliquots of whole blood from each patient
were independently lysed in 0.9 ml of NucliSens lysis buffer (Organon
Teknika) containing guanidine thiocyanate and Triton X for 30 min at
room temperature and then stored at (ii) Dried blood spots.
Dried blood spots were prepared from
whole blood collected from 21 individuals, including 15 HIV-1-infected
and 6 uninfected individuals. Separate 50.0- and 100.0-µl aliquots of
whole blood were spotted onto no. 903 blood collection cards
(Schleicher & Schuell, Keene, N.H.). The spotted blood was allowed to
dry completely for 3 to 4 h in a biohazard hood, and the dried
cards were stored at room temperature in individual envelopes until
testing. The dried whole-blood circles were then excised and placed in
9.0 ml of NucliSens lysis buffer. Whole blood was eluted from the filter cards by gentle rocking for 2 h at room temperature, after which the filter paper was removed from the lysis tubes and the lysis
tubes were stored at (iii) Separation of PBMC.
PBMC were collected from a total
of 21 subjects including 20 HIV-1-infected patients and 1 HRSNF. PBMC
were isolated from whole blood by Ficoll-metrizoate (Lymphoprep;
Nycomed Pharma, Oslo, Norway) density gradient centrifugation following
standard protocols (4). Approximately 2 × 106 PBMC from each patient were lysed in 9.0 ml
of NucliSens lysis buffer for 30 min at room temperature and stored at
(iv) Buccal scrapings.
Buccal scraping samples were obtained
from 20 healthy volunteers and 1 HRSNF using cytobrush cell
collectors (Medscand Inc., Hollywood, Fla.) by brushing the buccal
surface for 5 s and then transferring the brush to 0.9 ml of
NucliSens lysis buffer. The brushes were hand rotated vigorously
in the lysis buffer tubes and removed. The eluted cellular material was
lysed for 30 min at room temperature and stored at (v) Plasma.
Two hundred microliters of plasma obtained from
62 HIV-1-infected individuals and 1 HRSNF was lysed in 0.9 ml of
NucliSens lysis buffer for 30 min at room temperature and stored at
NucliSens Basic Kit.
The NucliSens Basic Kit was obtained
from Organon Teknika. It is a complete kit for customized RNA
amplification testing, containing all reagents necessary for nucleic
acid release, Boom silica-based extraction of nucleic acids, NASBA, and
electrochemiluminescence (ECL) detection. The kit contains a generic
Ru2+-labeled detection probe (ECL probe). Using
these standardized reagents, custom assays may be built by designing
analyte-specific primers and probes. This home development is actively
supported by a dedicated Basic Kit help desk. Alternatively, Basic Kit
users may download Basic Kit protocols (including primer and probe
sequences) from an application database hosted at an Extranet web site
(http://www.basickit-support.com/).
Nucleic acid isolation.
Nucleic acids were isolated from all
sample types by following the guanidine isothiocyanate-acidified silica
procedure of Boom et al. (2) using the NucliSens Basic Kit
isolation reagents. After isolation, 5 µl of the nucleic acid extract
was used in each NASBA and DNA PCR.
NASBA of CCR5 mRNA.
NASBA of CCR5 RNA (Fig.
1A) was achieved by using either the
NucliSens Basic Kit reagents as described by the manufacturer (Organon
Teknika) or the procedure of Romano et al. (14). Briefly, NASBA was performed in a 20.0-µl reaction mixture containing 5 µl
of the nucleic acid extract (described above) in 40 mM Tris (pH 8.5), 5 mM dithiothreitol, 12 mM MgCl2, 70 mM KCl, 2.0 mM (each) ATP, CTP, and UTP, 1.5 mM GTP, 0.5 mM ITP, 1.0 mM (each) dATP,
dCTP, dGTP, and dTTP, 0.1 µg of bovine serum albumin (BSA)/µl, 0.08 U of RNase H, 32 U of T7 RNA polymerase, 6.4 U of AMV-RT, 15% dimethyl
sulfoxide (DMSO), and 0.2 µM each amplification oligonucleotide specific for CCR5. The P1A (antisense) oligonucleotide sequence was
5'-AATTCTAATACGACTCACTATAGGGAGCAGCGGCAGGACCAGCCCCA-3';
the P2B (sense) nucleotide sequence was
5'-TTTGGGGTGGTGACAAGTGTGATCA-3'. (The italicized portion
of the P1A oligonucleotide designates the overhang encoding the T7 RNA
polymerase promoter that is required for the transcription-based NASBA
process.) Amplification reactions were conducted at 41 ± 0.5°C
for 90 min. Included with each amplification run was a set of controls
consisting of in vitro-transcribed WT and Mut CCR5 RNA
(14).
1071-412X/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/CDLI.8.5.965-971.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Chemokine Receptor CCR5
32 Genetic Analysis Using Multiple
Specimen Types and the NucliSens Basic Kit
New York
University School of Medicine, Manhasset, New York
110301; Advanced BioScience
Laboratories, Inc., Kensington, Maryland 208952;
and North Shore- Long Island Jewish Health System
Laboratories, Lake Success, New York 110423
![]()
ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
32) in the gene encoding the
CCR5 chemokine receptor. In the present study we describe the
modification of a nucleic acid sequence-based amplification (NASBA)-based CCR5 genotyping assay for a NucliSens Basic Kit (Organon
Teknika, Durham, N.C.) format using a new target-specific sandwich
oligonucleotide detection methodology. The new method permitted the use
of generic electrochemiluminescent probes supplied in the NucliSens
Basic Kit, whereas the original NASBA method required expensive
target-specific ruthenium detection probes. The Basic Kit CCR5
32
genotypic analysis was in 100% concordance with both the original
NASBA assay and DNA PCR results. This study also evaluated the use of
multiple specimen types, including peripheral blood mononuclear cells
(PBMC), whole blood, dried blood spots, buccal scrapings, and plasma,
for CCR5 genotype analysis. The sensitivities of the three assays were
comparable when PBMC or whole blood was the specimen source. In
contrast, when dried blood spots, buccal scrapings, or plasma was used
as the sample source, the sensitivity of DNA PCR was 80.95, 42.8, or
0%, respectively, compared to 100% sensitivity obtained with the
original NASBA and Basic Kit NASBA assays. Our study indicates that the
NucliSens Basic Kit NASBA assay is very sensitive and specific for CCR5
32 genotyping using multiple sample types.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
32)
which has been linked to resistance to HIV-1 infection in certain
individuals homozygous for the mutation (11, 15, 16).
Overall, individuals heterozygous for this mutation have been
shown to exhibit slower rates of HIV-1 disease progression than matched
cohorts of persons homozygous for the wild-type (WT) genotype
(6, 9). In addition to CD4+ T-cell
counts, HIV-1 viral load, and viral phenotype, the CCR5
32 genotype
may serve as an important marker for assessing the rate of disease
progression, provide deeper insight into disease pathogenesis, and
contribute to the development of new therapeutic strategies aimed at
suppressing or blocking HIV-1 infection (13).
32
genotyping using peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC)
(14). The single NASBA assay targets the mRNA transcribed
from both the WT and
32 mutant (Mut) CCR5 alleles. Amplification of
the CCR5 mRNA target sequence is performed by using a single
oligonucleotide set which flanks the 32-bp deletion region and three
enzymes (avian myleoblastosis virus reverse transcriptase [AMV-RT],
RNase H, and T7 RNA polymerase). Detection is achieved by use of two
target-specific ruthenium (Ru2+)-labeled nucleic
acid probes, one whose sequence is internal to the 32-bp deletion
region (WT probe) and one that spans the deletion junction site (Mut probe).
32 genotypes determined by use of the Basic Kit assay were validated
by comparison to the standard NASBA assay and a DNA PCR-based assay
described previously (9). In addition, we determined if
additional specimen types, including whole blood, dried whole-blood
spots, plasma, and buccal scrapings, were suitable for CCR5 genotyping
by the NucliSens Basic Kit assay. The ability to use alternative
specimen types, particularly dried whole-blood spots, would provide an
easy and convenient method for the processing and safe shipping of
large numbers of specimens from sites where immediate sample processing and freezing are not possible. Buccal scrapings are a simpler alternative specimen type for CCR5 genotyping, since they can be obtained by a completely noninvasive method.
![]()
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
70°C. The remaining cells were used for PBMC
separation as described below.
70°C until further testing.
70°C until nucleic acid extraction. To
determine the stability of CCR5 mRNA over time in dried blood spots, 50 µl of whole blood from five patients was spotted onto blood
collection cards in quadruplicate and allowed to dry as described
above. After 48 h, one sample from each patient was lysed and CCR5
32 genotyping was performed. The three additional dried blood spots
for each patient were processed and tested after storage on the blood
collection cards at room temperature for 3, 6, and 12 months postcollection.
70°C until testing.
70°C until testing.
70°C until testing.

View larger version (12K):
[in a new window]
FIG. 1.
CCR5 amplification with the NucliSens Basic Kit and the
sandwich hybridization detection method. (A) Amplification of CCR5 WT
and
32 mRNAs. P1A, antisense oligonucleotide primer 1 (5'-AATTCTAATACGACTCACTATAGGGAGCAGCGGCAGGACCAGCCCCA-3'),
containing the T7 RNA polymerase promoter region (in italics); P2B,
sense oligonucleotide primer 2 (5'-TTTGGGGTGGTGACAAGTGTGATCA-3'); WT probe, WT sandwich
oligonucleotide detection probe
(5'-AGTATCAATTCTGGAAGAATTTCCACTCATATGCGACCTTGCATC-3')
(underlined letters represent the generic ECL tail and correspond to
the portion of the WT probe depicted as an open rectangle); Mut probe,
Mut allele sandwich oligonucleotide detection probe
(5'-TCCATACA:TTAAAGATCTCATATGCGACCTTGCATC-3')
(underlined letters represent the generic ECL tail and correspond to
the portion of the Mut probe depicted as an open rectangle; colon,
junction site created by the 32-base deletion). (B) Sandwich
hybridization detection of CCR5 WT and
32 mRNAs. A,
streptavidin-coated magnetic bead; B, 5' end biotin-labeled capture
probe specific for a conserved sequence present in both WT and Mut
allele amplification products; C, target-specific probe (WT allele or
Mut allele) with generic ECL oligonucleotide capture sequence; D,
Ru2+-labeled ECL detection oligonucleotide; E, diluted CCR5
RNA amplicons. Separate CCR5 allele-specific (WT or Mut) tube liquid
sandwich hybridization reactions, including components A through E,
were conducted at 60°C for 5 min and then for 30 min at 41°C.
Voltage was applied, and resulting ECL signals were analyzed by the
NASBA QR System.
Analysis of CCR5 NASBA products. (i) Standard NASBA assay hybridization method. Analysis of CCR5 mRNA following amplification was performed by using a modified version of the differential probe hybridization procedure of Romano et al. (14). The Ru2+-labeled oligonucleotide probe specific for the WT amplification product (5'-AGTATCAATTCTGGAAGAATTTCCA-3') anneals to the position corresponding to bases 557 to 581 (with base 1 corresponding to the A of the ATG initiator codon) and is located within the 32-base deleted portion of the Mut allele. The Ru2+-labeled oligonucleotide probe specific for the Mut allele (5'-TCCATACA:TTAAAGAT-3') corresponds to base positions 546 to 553 and 586 to 593. Importantly, this probe is a continuous oligonucleotide corresponding to these two distinct regions, with the colon designating the junction site that is present only in the Mut allele. A third probe, labeled with biotin at the 5' end and attached to streptavidin-coated beads (type 280; Dynal, Lake Success, N.Y.), was used for amplicon capture. This capture probe (5'-AAAGAAGGTCTTCATTACACCTGCAGC-3') was complementary to an identical sequence present in both alleles (positions 511 to 537). Actual hybridization was achieved by mixing 5 µl of the NASBA reaction product (prediluted by a factor of 40) with 20 µl of a solution containing 0.75 M NaCl, 75 mM sodium citrate, 0.8 mg of BSA/ml, 2 × 1012 copies of one of the allele-specific ruthenium-labeled detector probes, and 2 × 1012 copies of the bead-immobilized capture probe. Each NASBA product was analyzed in separate hybridization reactions with one of the allele-specific probes by incubation at 60°C for 5 min followed by 30 min at 41 ± 0.5°C. Positive hybridization was measured by quantification of the ECL signal using the NASBA QR System ECL reader (Organon Teknika).
(ii) NucliSens Basic Kit sandwich hybridization method.
With
the sandwich hybridization method (Fig. 1B), an alternative detection
format, the WT and Mut target-specific detection oligonucleotides are
not directly Ru2+ labeled. Rather, each
oligonucleotide detection probe has a 3' overhang sequence that is
complementary to the Ru2+-labeled generic probe
supplied in the NucliSens Basic Kit. Therefore, the CCR5 WT
target-specific detection probe sequence
is 5'-AGTATCAATTCTGGAAGAATTTCCACTCATATGCGACCTTGCATC- 3'.
The CCR5
32 target-specific detection probe sequence is
5'-TCCATACA:TTAAAGATCTCATATGCGACCTTGCATC-3'. (The underlined portions of the probes represent the sequences that are
complementary to the generic ECL probe, and the colon in the Mut allele
probe represents the junction site created by the 32-base deletion.)
The target-specific detection probes therefore serve as a bridge
between the amplified CCR5 mRNA sequence and the
Ru2+-labeled generic probe, resulting in a
sandwich hybridization format. The modified WT and Mut probes each were
prepared as follows. A 0.5-ml volume of BSA at 10 g/liter, with
2-chloroacetamide as a preservative, was added to 1.25 ml of 20× SSC
(1× SSC is 0.15 M NaCl plus 0.015 M sodium citrate) and 0.05 ml of
probe (WT or Mut) containing 2 × 1013
molecules/µl. The final volume of each probe mixture was adjusted to
5.0 ml by addition of 3.2 ml of RNase- and DNase-free water. Sandwich
hybridization with NASBA reaction products was performed by adding 10 µl of WT or Mut probe mixture to a hybridization tube containing 10 µl of generic ECL probe at a concentration of 2 × 1011 copies/µl, 10 µl of CCR5-specific
capture beads (prepared as described in the preceding section), and 5 µl of diluted (1:10) amplicons. The solution (total volume, 35 µl)
was hybridized at 60°C for 5 min, followed by 30 min at 41 ± 1°C in a shaking water bath. Resulting ECL signal intensities were
again measured using the NASBA QR System. Samples demonstrating a
homozygous WT CCR5 genotype (WT/WT) had positive ECL signals for the WT
probe and background level ECL signals for the Mut probe. Samples
demonstrating a heterozygous CCR5 genotype (WT/
32) had positive ECL
signals for both the WT and Mut probes. Samples demonstrating a
homozygous CCR5 Mut genotype (
32/
32) had positive ECL signals for
the Mut probe and only background level ECL signals for the WT probe.
PCR amplification of CCR5 DNA. DNA PCR amplification for CCR5 genotyping was performed by the method of Eugen-Olsen et al. (9). PCR reagents were obtained from the Applied Biosystems Division, Perkin-Elmer, Foster City, Calif. PCR mixtures contained 5 µl of 10× PCR buffer, 0.2 mM each deoxynucleoside triphosphate, 20 pm each of the sense primer (5'-CAATGTGTCAACTCTTGACAGG-3') and the antisense primer (5'-ACCTGCATAGCTTGGTCCAACC-3'), 33.5 µl of distilled H2O, 0.5 µl of Ampli Taq enzyme (Applied Biosystems), and 5 µl of nucleic acid extract (as described above), for a total volume of 50 µl. The PCR mixtures were denatured for 1 min at 94°C on a thermal cycler (PCR 9600 System; Perkin-Elmer Corporation) and subjected to 35 cycles of PCR amplification. Each cycle consisted of denaturation at 94°C for 30 s, followed by annealing at 56°C for 30 s and then extension at 72°C for 30 s. Following the 35 cycles of PCR, there was an extension for 10 min at 72°C. When indicated, second-round PCR was performed in the same manner, using 1.0 µl of the initial PCR product.
Electrophoresis and detection of PCR-amplified products.
PCR-amplified CCR5 DNAs were electrophoretically separated on a 2%
agarose gel containing ethidium bromide. DNA amplicons were visualized
by UV scanning using a UVP gel documentation system (Integral
Technologies, Inc., Indianapolis, Ind.). The sizes of the PCR-amplified
WT and Mut products were determined by including 0.5 µg of a 100-bp
DNA ladder (Life Technologies, Rockville, Md.) in the agarose gel
evaluation system. Samples with a homozygous WT genotype (WT/WT)
demonstrated a single DNA band of 547 bp. Samples with a heterozygous
WT/
32 genotype demonstrated two DNA bands: one of 547 bp and one of
515 bp. Samples with a homozygous Mut genotype (Mut/Mut) demonstrated a
single DNA band of 515 bp.
Statistical determination of positive ECL cutoff values for the Basic Kit assay. We employed two methods to determine the ECL cutoff value for the newly developed Basic Kit genotyping assay for the CCR5 locus. In the first approach the mean WT and Mut probe ECL values were obtained from analysis of 14 negative-control samples (i.e., no template). The mean ECL value for each probe was determined, and the standard deviations for these 14 WT and Mut ECL signals were also calculated. The cutoff ECL signal for each detection probe was then defined as the mean background ECL signal plus 5 standard deviations.
The alternative method for calculating cutoff was to determine the mean background ECL signal from hybridization of the WT probe to Mut RNA amplification products, as well as the converse situation (mean background ECL signal from hybridization of the Mut probe to WT RNA amplification products). Specific RNA templates were obtained by in vitro transcription of independent plasmid clones encoding each CCR5 allele. ECL means and standard deviations from 14 separate trials were calculated for each probe. Background ECL signal for each probe was defined as this mean value plus 5 standard deviations.| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Establishment of ECL positive cutoff values. In order to evaluate raw ECL signals generated by the Basic Kit CCR5 NASBA assay on clinical samples, cutoff values for WT and Mut probe signals must be validated. The need to calculate independent cutoff values for WT and Mut signals stems from the fact that the two probes detect different target sequences on different amplification reaction products (see Materials and Methods). Therefore, background signals with these two distinct hybridization-based detection systems will not necessarily be equal. Consequently, we evaluated two methods for determining cutoff values (see Materials and Methods) so as to determine the most appropriate means of evaluating raw data obtained from the application of this assay to clinical samples.
Results from the analysis of negative-control samples with each probe were used to determine the mean negative-control ECL values, as well as the standard deviation, for 14 samples. The mean negative-control WT probe ECL signal was 340 U, with a standard deviation of 279. By this method, the WT ECL cutoff was defined as 1,735 U. Similarly, the mean negative-control Mut probe ECL signal was 232 U, with a standard deviation of 115. Thus, the defined cutoff for the Mut probe was 807 U. In the alternative approach, the mean ECL signal from the analysis of each probe on its alternative control template material was determined, along with the associated standard deviation. The mean ECL signal obtained with the WT probe hybridized to Mut RNA amplification products was 100 U (standard deviation, 165). Therefore, the background cutoff, calculated as the mean plus 5 standard deviations in this system, was 925 U. The mean ECL signal obtained from the Mut probe hybridized to WT RNA amplification products was 1,087 U (standard deviation, 866). Thus, the Mut probe ECL cutoff calculated by this approach was 5,417 U. A total of 147 different clinical samples were analyzed in this study (results of this analysis are summarized in the following sections). Results obtained with the WT probe using the two different cutoff values derived above were 100% concordant; results obtained with the Mut probe by the two methods were also 100% concordant. However, it should be noted that one of the samples had a Mut probe ECL value of 5,418 U, putting it above the cutoff value for this probe by a single ECL unit. In a clinical situation, such a sample would require retesting in order to confirm the result. For subsequent analysis of all clinical samples, we conservatively used the higher cutoff value for each probe.Validation of NucliSens Basic Kit CCR5
32 genotyping assay
using PBMC.
Nucleic acids isolated from 2 × 106 PBMC derived from 21 patients were subjected
to standard NASBA, NucliSens Basic Kit, and DNA PCR amplification as
described in Materials and Methods. The results were scored positive or
negative for the WT and Mut CCR5 probes based on the ECL signals and
established cutoff values for both the standard NASBA assay
(14) and the NucliSens Basic Kit assay as described above.
Both CCR5 WT and Mut in vitro-transcribed RNA controls were included
with each assay run. In addition to validating the NucliSens Basic Kit
assay against the standard NASBA assay, DNA PCR was performed from
another aliquot of the same nucleic acid extracts for all 21 patients.
As shown in Table 1, all three methods
were able to determine the CCR5 genotype and all results were 100%
concordant. Representative CCR5
32 genotyping results obtained by
all three methods from five patients are shown in Fig.
2. Panel 1A shows results obtained by the
standard NASBA assay, panel 1B depicts results with the NucliSens Basic Kit assay, and panel 1C depicts results from DNA PCR amplification. Assay results indicate that patient CC89 (lanes 2) is homozygous for
the
32 deletion mutation (
32/
32), patients CC43 and CC95 (lanes 3 and 5, respectively) are heterozygous for the
32 mutation (WT/
32), and patients CC94 and CC114 (lanes 4 and 6, respectively) are homozygous for the WT CCR5 alleles (WT/WT).
|
|
CCR5
32 genotyping using alternative specimen types. (i)
Whole-blood and dried blood samples.
The standard NASBA assay,
NucliSens Basic Kit assay, and DNA PCR were used independently to
perform CCR5
32 genotyping on 50 and 100 µl of whole
blood and dried blood spots derived from 15 HIV-1-infected patients and
6 uninfected healthy volunteers. For all samples tested, sufficient ECL
signals were generated to accurately determine allele status by both
the standard NASBA and NucliSens Basic Kit assays. PCR amplification
products obtained from whole blood were visible on ethidium
bromide-stained 2% agarose gels for all samples, although the bands
were faintly visible in three cases (data not shown). Of the 21 dried
blood spots, PCR amplification products were visible on ethidium
bromide-stained gels in 9 cases, faintly visible in 3 case, and not
visible in the remaining 9 cases. A second round of amplification using
1 µl of product from the first-round PCR gave visible bands in five of the nine samples that were negative after first-round PCR. Four of
the samples could still not be typed after the second round of PCR
(Table 1). Genotyping results from all three methods were 100%
concordant for all comparable samples. Furthermore, the results from
PBMC samples were also 100% concordant. Examples of CCR5 genotyping by
standard NASBA (Fig. 2, A panels), the NucliSens Basic Kit (B panels),
and DNA PCR (C panels) obtained from whole-blood samples (panels 2A,
2B, and 2C) and dried blood spots (panels 3A, 3B, and 3C) from five
patients are shown in Fig. 2.
|
(ii) CCR5 genotyping from buccal smear samples. Amplification and detection of CCR5 mRNA from buccal scrapings were successful by both standard NASBA and NucliSens Basic Kit methods for all 21 healthy volunteers (Table 1). PCR amplification products were weakly positive on ethidium bromide-stained gels for 8 of 21 subjects analyzed. Second-round PCR of samples from the remaining 13 subjects gave a faintly visible band in one case (BS 1) and no visible bands for the other 12 subjects (data not shown).
(iii) CCR5 genotyping from plasma samples. Plasma samples from 63 patients were tested using the NucliSens Basic Kit assay. A subset of 20 patients were tested by the DNA PCR method for confirmatory purposes. Genotype results were successfully obtained for all 63 patients using the NucliSens Basic Kit assay (Table 1). In contrast, no DNA PCR products were detected, even after second-round PCR, for any of the 20 samples tested by this method. The genotyping results obtained from 10 plasma samples were validated by comparing the results to those obtained using PBMC from the same patient and were found to be 100% concordant.
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We have previously described a NASBA assay that provides a simple,
rapid. and sensitive method for accurate genotyping of the CCR5 locus
for the
32 deletion (14). The development of techniques
for CCR5
32 coreceptor genotyping can aid in understanding the
effects of CCR5 chemokine receptor mutations in HIV-1 disease progression and transmission and will allow for patient stratification in therapeutic clinical trials. In the present study, we modified the
original method to permit CCR5
32 genotypic analysis using a
NucliSens Basic Kit format. The NucliSens Basic Kit assay utilizes amplification oligonucleotides and a capture probe that are identical to those used in the original assay. The assay differs in that the
target-specific detection probes (WT and Mut) are not directly Ru2+ labeled as in the original assay. Instead,
the detection probes contain the same CCR5 allele-specific sequences
(WT or Mut) and, in addition, a sequence complementary to one present
on the generic Ru2+-labeled probe supplied with
the NucliSens Basic Kit. With this new method the target-specific CCR5
WT and Mut detection oligonucleotides serve as a bridge between the
CCR5 mRNA amplicons and Ru2+-labeled generic
probes. This method eliminates the need to purchase expensive
target-specific Ru2+-labeled probes. Furthermore,
the kit format permits end users to perform the assay without having to
prepare reagents independently or engage in complex labeling chemistry
procedures. This particular application of the NucliSens Basic
Kit also demonstrates a user's ability to customize the kit for a
specific analyte of interest.
Our studies evaluated both the specificity and sensitivity of the NucliSens Basic Kit assay for genotypic analysis performed on multiple specimen types, including PBMC, whole blood, dried blood spots, buccal scrapings, and plasma. Our studies demonstrated that the CCR5 genotyping results obtained by the NucliSens Basic Kit assay correlated 100% with those obtained by the original NASBA assay and by DNA PCR, indicating a specificity of 100% for all specimen types. A distinct advantage of the ECL detection system used with the NASBA assays is the generation of a quantitative ECL signal, allowing for definitive scoring of a sample result. This was in contrast to DNA PCR results, with which interpretation was sometimes not as clearly defined and depended on the efficiency of the PCR amplification, the amount of product generated, sample type, and subjective evaluation of a gel electrophoresis result. The sensitivities of all three assays were comparable when nucleic acids were extracted from 106 PBMC or 100-µl whole-blood samples. However, both the original NASBA assay and the NucliSens Basic Kit assay demonstrated sensitivity superior to that of the DNA PCR assay when dried blood spots, plasma, or buccal scrapings were used as the source of target nucleic acids. DNA PCR was not able to provide clear accurate genotyping results for 13 out of 21 buccal scrapings after a single round of PCR and for 12 out of 21 specimens after second-round PCR. None of the 20 nucleic acid extracts derived from plasma yielded detectable PCR results even after second-round PCR amplification. The increased sensitivity of NASBA over PCR relates to both the amount of nucleic acid target present in each sample type and the sensitivity of the detection method. The amplification target for the NucliSens Basic Kit assay is CCR5 mRNA, and although it may vary according to sample type, overall the mRNA is present in copy numbers significantly higher than the 1 copy per allele per cell target for DNA PCR. The use of radiolabeled probes should enhance the detection rate of the DNA PCR. However, the use of sensitive nonradioactive methods is simpler, safer, and less expensive for routine clinical testing. The abundance of RNA target material is most likely responsible for the capacity of the NASBA assay to use plasma as a test sample. Typically, plasma preparations are cell free and should not contain mRNA. However, it is possible that the plasma collection process leads to the lysis of cells, liberating intracellular CCR5 mRNA, which is present at high expression levels. Undoubtedly, some of the CCR5 mRNA is degraded in the plasma, but relatively rapid processing of the plasma with Boom nucleic acid isolation lysis buffer serves to preserve a sufficient quantity of mRNA for detection in the plasma.
The use of alternative specimen types in lieu of PBMC has specific advantages including ease of specimen collection, less specimen preparation, and enhanced specimen stability. Whole blood, dried blood spots, buccal scrapings, and plasma specimens require minimal preanalytical preparation, limited technical time, and reduced amounts of reagents compared to separation of PBMC. Dried blood spots can be collected by finger puncture, eliminating the need for venipuncture. We have demonstrated that, once dry, RNA in the blood spots is stable for a minimum of 1 year when stored at room temperature. Our results are consistent with those of other studies which have demonstrated that dried blood collected on filter paper can be successfully used for the diagnosis of HIV-1 DNA by PCR in adults (3) and children (1, 12), for quantitating plasma HIV-1 RNA (10), and for serologic subtyping of HIV-1 as well (5). Dried blood spots would be an excellent specimen source for large epidemiology or clinical outcome studies, since many samples can be easily collected and transported at room temperature to centralized laboratory facilities. This is in contrast to methods utilizing PBMC, which require larger amounts of blood and more labor-intensive cell separation procedures and may be cell count dependent. Moreover, temperature is an important variable in the shipment of nondried sample types, which need to be transported frozen on dry ice. In addition, the integrity of the PBMC and the efficiency of cell separation depend on the time elapsing between blood collection and cell separation. During the course of our studies we often found that whole-blood samples stored longer than 24 h prior to PBMC isolation demonstrated significant reductions in the viability of the PBMC population and the total number of cells available for analysis, leading to negative or inconclusive results for DNA PCR testing (data not shown). However, the same samples, when tested by the NASBA or NucliSens Basic Kit assay, were not affected by the length of storage time, and genotyping was successfully performed from a significantly lower number of PBMC (105 versus 106 [data not shown]). Finally, the ability to genotype from buccal scrapings has the unique advantage of being entirely noninvasive.
In summary, the NucliSens Basic Kit assay is a very sensitive and
specific method for determining CCR5
32 genotype. Our data indicates
that plasma, whole blood, dried blood spots, and buccal scrapings are
acceptable alternative specimens that can be used without compromising
the sensitivity or specificity of the assay.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
This study was funded in part by the Jane and Dayton Brown and Dayton Brown, Jr., Molecular Diagnostics Laboratory and by Advanced Bioscience Laboratories, Kensington, Md.
We sincerely thank the volunteer patients and nurses from the North Shore University Hospital Center for AIDS Research and Treatment. We also thank Peter Haima and Pierre van Aarle (Organon Teknika International, Boxtel, The Netherlands) for support in developing the Basic Kit sandwich hybridization method.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: North Shore-Long Island Jewish Health System Laboratories, 10 Nevada Dr., Lake Success, NY 11042. Phone: (516) 719-1079. Fax: (516) 719-1254. E-mail: cginocch{at}nshs.edu.
Dedicated to the memory of Suryakumari Tetali, who died tragically
before the submission of this paper. This work is a tribute to her
scientific excellence and dedication to HIV research.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Biggar, R. J., W. Miley, P. Miotti, T. E. Taha, A. Butcher, J. Spadoro, and D. Waters. 1996. Blood collection on filter paper: a practical approach to sample collection for studies of perinatal HIV transmission. J. Acquir. Immune Defic. Syndr. 14:368-373. |
| 2. |
Boom, R.,
C. J. Sol,
M. M. Salisman,
C. L. Jansen,
P. M. E. Wertheim-van Dillen, and J. van der Noorda.
1990.
Rapid and simple method for purification of nucleic acids.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
28:495-503 |
| 3. |
Cassol, S.,
T. Salas,
M. J. Gill,
M. Montpetit,
J. Rudnik,
C. T. Sy, and M. V. O'Shaughnessy.
1992.
Stability of dried blood spot specimens for detection of human immunodeficiency virus DNA by polymerase chain reaction.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
30:3039-3042 |
| 4. |
Castro, B. A.,
C. D. Weiss,
L. D. Wiviott, and J. A. Levy.
1988.
Optimal conditions for recovery of the human immunodeficiency virus from peripheral blood mononuclear cells.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
26:2371-2376 |
| 5. |
Chanbancherd, P.,
A. E. Brown,
R. Trichavaroj,
P. Tienamporn,
P. Puthakird,
N. Limpairojn,
T. C. VanCott, and M. S. DeSouza.
1999.
Application of dried blood spot specimens for serologic subtyping of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 in Thailand.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
37:804-806 |
| 6. |
Dean, M.,
M. Carrington,
C. Winkler,
G. A. Huttley,
M. W. Smith,
R. Allikmets,
J. J. Goedert,
S. P. Buchbinder,
E. Vittinghoff,
E. Gomperts,
S. Donfield,
D. Vlahov,
R. Kaslow,
A. Saah,
C. Rinaldo,
R. Detels, and S. J. O'Brien.
1996.
Genetic restriction of HIV-1 infection and progression to AIDS by a deletion allele of the CKR5 structural gene. Hemophilia Growth and Development Study, Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study, Multicenter Hemophilia Cohort Study, San Francisco City Cohort, ALIVE Study.
Science
273:1856-1862 |
| 7. | Deng, H., R. Liu, W. Ellmeier, S. Choe, D. Unutmaz, M. Burkhart, P. Di Marzio, S. Marmon, R. E. Sutton, C. M. Hill, C. B. Davis, S. C. Peiper, T. J. Schall, D. R. Littman, and N. R. Landau. 1996. Identification of a major co-receptor for primary isolates of HIV-1. Nature 381:661-666[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 8. | Dragic, T., V. Litwin, G. P. Allaway, S. R. Martin, Y. Huang, K. A. Nagashima, C. Cayanan, P. J. Maddon, R. A. Koup, J. P. Moore, and W. A. Paxton. 1996. HIV-1 entry into CD4+ cells is mediated by the chemokine receptor CC-CKR5. Nature 381:667-673[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 9. | Eugen-Olsen, J., A. K. N. Iversen, P. Garred, U. Koppelhus, C. Pedersen, T. L. Benfield, A. M. Sorensen, T. Katzenstein, E. Dickmeiss, J. Gerstoft, P. Skinhoj, A. Svejgaard, J. O. Nielsen, and B. Hofmann. 1997. Heterozygosity for a deletion in the CKR-5 gene leads to prolonged AIDS-free survival and slower CD4 T-cell decline in a cohort of HIV-seropositive individuals. AIDS 11:305-310[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 10. |
Fiscus, S. A.,
D. Brambilla,
L. Grosso,
J. Schock, and M. Cronin.
1998.
Quantitation of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 RNA in plasma by using blood dried on filter paper.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
36:258-260 |
| 11. | Liu, R., W. A. Paxton, S. Choe, D. Ceradini, S. R. Martin, R. Horik, M. E. MacDonald, H. Stuhlmann, R. A. Koup, and N. R. Landau. 1996. Homozygous defect in HIV-1 coreceptor accounts for resistance of some multiply-exposed individuals to HIV-1 infection. Cell 86:367-377[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 12. |
Nyambi, P. N.,
K. Fransen,
H. D. Beenhouwer,
E. N. Chomba,
M. Temmerman,
J. O. Ndinya-Achola,
P. Piot, and G. van der Groen.
1994.
Detection of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) in heel prick blood on filter paper from children born to HIV-1-seropositive mothers.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
32:2858-2860 |
| 13. | O'Brien, S. J., and J. P. Moore. 2000. The effect of genetic variation in chemokines and their receptors on HIV transmission and progression to AIDS. Immunol. Rev. 177:99-111[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 14. |
Romano, J. W.,
S. Tetali,
E. M. Lee,
R. N. Shurtliff,
X. P. Wang,
S. Pahwa,
M. H. Kaplan, and C. C. Ginocchio.
1999.
Genotyping of the CCR5 chemokine receptor by isothermal NASBA amplification and differential probe hybridization.
Clin. Diagn. Lab. Immunol.
6:959-965 |
| 15. | Samson, M., F. Libert, B. J. Doranz, J. Rucker, C. Liesnard, C. M. Farber, S. Saragosti, C. Lapoumeroulie, J. Cognaux, C. Forceille, G. Muyldermans, C. Verhofstede, G. Burtonboy, M. Georges, T. Imai, S. Rana, Y. Yi, R. J. Smyth, R. G. Collman, R. W. Doms, G. Vassart, and M. Parmentier. 1996. Resistance to HIV-1 infection in Caucasian individuals bearing Mut alleles of the CCR-5 chemokine receptor gene. Nature 382:722-725[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 16. | Zimmerman, P. A., A. Buckler-White, G. Alkhatib, T. Spalding, J. Kubofcik, C. Combadiere, D. Weissman, O. Cohen, A. Rubbert, G. Lam, M. Vaccarezza, P. E. Kennedy, V. Kumaraswami, J. V. Giorgi, R. Detels, J. Hunter, M. Chopek, E. A. Berger, A. S. Fauci, T. B. Nutman, and P. M. Murphy. 1997. Inherited resistance to HIV-1 conferred by an inactivating mutation in CC chemokine receptor 5: studies in populations with contrasting clinical phenotypes, defined racial background, and quantified risk. Mol. Med. 3:23-36[Medline]. |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»