Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology, March 2002, p. 383-387, Vol. 9, No. 2
1071-412X/02/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/CDLI.9.2.383-387.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Department of Molecular Biosciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia 5005, Australia,1 Department of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, Göteborg University, Göteborg, Sweden,2 National Institute of Hygiene and Epidemiology, Hanoi, Vietnam,3 International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Dhaka, Bangladesh4
Received 19 October 2001/ Accepted 26 November 2001
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
The emergence and rapid spread of a second V. cholerae serogroup (O139) with epidemic potential (3, 12) provided the impetus for attempts to develop O139-specific vaccines by using approaches previously applied to O1 vaccine development. Early reports provided conflicting indications as to the likely value of measuring bactericidal responses in O139 vaccine recipients, however (4, 6, 9, 15). In a recent study (2), we used a tube-based bactericidal assay to study the comparative susceptibilities of V. cholerae O1 and O139 to lysis by antibody and complement. Whereas O1 strains were generally extremely sensitive to lysis, O139 bacteria displayed resistant or susceptible phenotypes, depending on assay conditions. Several features of the microplate assay systems used in laboratories that need to screen large numbers of serum samples appear to militate against the efficient detection of antibodies with lytic potential against V. cholerae O139 (2).
We describe here a modified microplate assay that is sensitive, highly reproducible, specific, and convenient to use. It has been successfully applied to detect the induction of bactericidal antibodies to V. cholerae O139 following vaccination or disease. In both instances there was a significant inverse correlation between preexisting antibody titers and the magnitude of the immune responses observed.
|
|
|---|
Various modifications were made to this assay procedure during the course of these studies. A spontaneous streptomycin-resistant variant of 4260B was selected for use as an indicator strain by growth on solid medium in the presence of antibiotic (200 µg/ml). Use of this variant allowed inclusion of antibiotic in both the killing and the growth phases of the assay to prevent growth of any chance contaminants (e.g., from serum samples). Initially, this strain was also grown in liquid (Luria-Bertani [LB]) medium, but subsequently the indicator bacteria were harvested from agar plates. LB plates (with streptomycin) were spread with ca. 104 bacteria taken from an early-log-phase culture in LB medium. After incubation for 17 to 18 h at 37°C, the bacteria were harvested into Mg2+-saline (2 mM MgCl2 in 0.85% [wt/vol] NaCl; pH 7.0), the OD of a suitable dilution was determined, and the suspension was diluted to a final concentration of ca. 2 x 105 per ml in the same diluent containing 20% guinea pig serum (and 200 µg of streptomycin per ml).
The assay diluent was changed to Mg2+-saline, and test sera were titrated in twofold dilution series (in volumes of 50 µl) by using a multichannel pipettor. Paired sera were always tested together in adjoining rows of the same tray. In each tray control rows were allocated for titration of a standard rabbit anti-O139 serum, while additional wells received either no bacteria (-ve control for bacterial growth) or no serum sample (+ve control for growth). After serial dilution of the serum samples, each well received an equal volume (50 µl) of vibrio suspension, resulting in a final bacterial concentration of 105 per ml and a final complement concentration of 10%. Trays were incubated at 37°C for 60 min, at which time 70 µl of (prewarmed) 5x LB medium (containing streptomycin) was added to each well. Incubation was continued at 37°C until the OD600 of the +ve control wellsspectrophotometrically determined in a microplate reader (Labsystems Multiskan MS)reached 0.35 to 0.38 (ca. 5.5 h).
The mean ODs of -ve and +ve control wells (a and b, respectively) were used to calculate an OD that represented a 70% inhibition of bacterial growth (OD = a + 0.3[b - a]). This value was then used to assign a lytic endpoint to each test sample, this being the highest dilution causing
70% killing. The assay was not accepted unless the titer of the standard antiserum fell within an acceptable range.
A fourfold increase in bactericidal titer was used as the criterion of a significant response. For purposes of calculating fold rises in titer or the geometric mean (GM) titer, samples with killing endpoints of <10 or <20 were assigned titers of 5 or 10, respectively. For some analyses Spearman's correlation coefficient (one tailed) was calculated by using Graphpad Prism software; a probability of 0.01 was regarded as significant.
Some assays were performed with the O1 serogroup strain T19479 to measure bactericidal antibodies in serum samples collected from cholera patients whose disease was caused by V. cholerae O1. These were conducted according to the modified microplate protocol described above, except that streptomycin was omitted.
Serum samples. Anti-O139 bactericidal responses were analysed in Vietnamese recipients of an oral, inactivated, bivalent O1/O139 cholera vaccine (16). Recipients (aged 19 to 24 years) were given two doses of vaccine, each comprising 1.25 x 1011 O1 and 0.5 x 1011 O139 bacteria, on days 0 and 14; serum samples were obtained on day 0 and day 28 and stored at -20°C until assay. We also determined the bactericidal titers of sera from Bangladeshi cholera patients (aged 5 to 58 years; median, 30 years) whose disease was confirmed bacteriologically to be caused by O139 strains. Sera were prepared from blood collected on the day of presentation (representing day 2 after onset of illness and referred to as acute phase) and during convalescence (days 21 to 22, n = 11; day 30, n = 4).
A final set of serum samples was prepared from Bangladeshi patients whose disease was caused by O1 serogroup V. cholerae. Again, acute-phase samples were obtained on day 2, with convalescent samples on day 22 or 30. In some cases an intermediate day 11 sample was also available; where two postinfection samples were tested, the sample with the higher titer was used to calculate the (peak) rise in bactericidal titer. All sera were heat inactivated (56°C, 30 min) before assay.
|
|
|---|
At this stage the combined impact of changing the assay diluent and the indicator concentration was assessed by performing parallel titrations of 24 pairs of serum samples collected from recipients of an inactivated whole-cell O139 vaccine. For both pre- and postvaccination sera, titers assigned by using the modified procedure were a median eightfold higher than those obtained by the original method. For nine sample pairs, the increase in titer was the same for both pre- and postvaccination sera, resulting in no change in the ratio of the two endpoints. In seven other cases, however, the modified assay allowed the detection of seroconversion in vaccinees regarded as nonresponders using the original method, reflecting proportionally greater titer increases in postvaccination sera (Table 1). When the same serum pairs were titrated in the tube assay previously shown (2) to detect bactericidal responses following O139 disease, seven responders were detected (data not shown). Among this subset were five of the responders identified by the modified microplate assay but none of the three identified by the original protocol.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Summarized data from a comparison of microplate assay protocolsa
|
Assay reproducibility and specificity. The reproducibility of the modified assay procedure was assessed by repeat titration of selected serum samples. Initially, eight samples were assayed on five separate occasions; the titers for six of these remained constant, while a twofold variation was observed with the remaining two samples (Fig. 1A). Subsequently, three serum pairs showing four- to eightfold increases in bactericidal titer were assayed three to four times. The estimated titer increases were constant for each serum pair, indicating that the assay is highly reproducible (Fig. 1B).
![]() View larger version (15K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Reproducibility of modified microplate assay protocol. (A) Eight sera were assayed on five separate occasions; the titers of six showed no variability (e.g., samples A and C), while the other two (samples B and D) showed a twofold range in titer. (B) Three serum pairs (X to Z) were each titrated three to four times, with the results shown. The titer preexposure is shown in black at the bottom of each histogram; the postexposure titer is represented by the open histogram. The ratio of postexposure to preexposure titers remained constant.
|
Bactericidal responses induced by O139 disease.
Having detected seroconversion (
4-fold titer increase) in one-third of the O139 vaccine recipients by using the modified assay protocol (Table 1), it was of interest to determine the frequency and strength of bactericidal responses induced by the disease itself. Paired acute- and convalescent-phase serum samples from 15 O139 patients were titrated in the modified assay, and these results are shown in Table 2. Eleven patients showed
8-fold increases in lytic titer, while three others showed 2-fold increases. The median and GM responses of the group as a whole were 8- and 11-fold, respectively.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Bactericidal responses induced by V. cholerae O139 diseasea
|
![]() View larger version (11K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Magnitude of anti-O139 serum bactericidal responses induced by vaccination or disease in relation to preexisting antibody titers. (A) Responses (fold rise in titer) of Vietnamese recipients of inactivated O139 vaccine, plotted in relation to prevaccination antibody titers. (B) Responses (titer of the convalescent serum divided by the titer of the acute-phase serum) of Bangladeshi cholera patients, plotted in relation to acute-phase antibody titers.
|
|
|
|---|
In addition to this improvement in assay sensitivity, other protocol changes made the test more reproducible and convenient to perform. Spectrophotometric determination of the ODs made estimation of the lytic endpoints more objective and also provided a means for defining the duration of the growth phase of the assay. Harvesting bacteria from agar and using concentrated medium for the growth phase of the assay were both changes that reduced the time required to perform the test.
The modified protocol was demonstrated to be highly reproducible. Replicate assays of eight sera showed minimal interassay variation (Fig. 1A). When three serum pairs showing low but significant titer increases were subjected to repeated assay, the fold increase in lytic titer did not vary for any sample pair (Fig. 1B).
A recent report (8) described an O139 vibriocidal assay which determined 60% lytic endpoints against either wild-type or unencapsulated indicator bacteria (final bacterial concentration of 2.5 x 106 per ml; final complement concentrations of 10 and 2%, respectively). This was used to assess bactericidal responses after administration of wild-type or attenuated V. cholerae O139. Responses in both cohorts were very low and did not correlate with immune status upon rechallenge. Moreover, >50% of the control serum samples collected from volunteers exposed to bacteria other than V. cholerae O139 showed transient low-level activity in this assay (8). This finding prompted us to evaluate the specificity of our O139 bactericidal assay by testing serum samples collected from patients with O1 cholera. Such samples represent ideal specificity controls, given the extremely close relationship between the two pathogens. Only one of 14 serum sets showing seroconversion to O1 V. cholerae also registered as a responder against the O139 indicator strain, and even in this one instance subsequent field exposure to O139 could have occurred.
When the new assay procedure was applied to serum samples collected from O139 patients, the proportion (11 of 15 [73%]) and magnitude (GM = 23, median = 16) of significant responses were very similar to those obtained previously (2) by the tube assay (9 of 11 [82%]; GM = 29, median = 21). Clearly, seroconversion after O139 infection is readily detectable by either assay procedure, suggesting that our earlier goal (2) of combining the sensitivity of the tube assay with the screening power of a microplate procedure has been achieved.
Studies with V. cholerae O1 revealed significant inverse correlations between higher prevaccination or preinfection serum bactericidal titers and lower responses to subsequent (oral) vaccination or infection (1, 5, 7). Accordingly, the responses measured in the present study were plotted in relation to preexposure anti-O139 titers, and significant inverse correlations were noted in both cohorts (Fig. 2). Despite an initial concern that acute-phase sera collected from Bangladeshi patients on the day of presentation might already reflect the boosting of an immune system primed by environmental exposure, the titers seen with these sera were lower than those recorded for the sera prepared from Vietnamese recipients prior to vaccination. This suggests that the latter individuals had been environmentally primed, either by V. cholerae O139 or by other bacteria with cross-reacting O antigens. The higher preexposure antibody titers of the vaccination cohort compared to those of the cholera patients would appear to be a major factor limiting the seroconversion rate of 33% (8 of 24) observed with the inactivated O1/O139 vaccine. If only individuals with initial bactericidal titers of
40 are considered, the proportion of responders following vaccination (8 of 10 [80%]) is similar to that seen following infection (10 of 12 [83%]). This would argue that, during the initial period of vaccine evaluation, potential recipients should be prescreened to eliminate those with high levels of bactericidal antibodies; those who remain might give a clearer indication of vaccine immunogenicity.
|
|
|---|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»