Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology, July 2002, p. 858-863, Vol. 9, No. 4
1071-412X/02/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/CDLI.9.4.858-863.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
and Beth D. Jamieson2
Department of Epidemiology,1 Department of Medicine and Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, and,2 Department of Biostatistics,University of California, Los Angeles, California3
Received 14 November 2001/ Returned for modification 29 January 2002/ Accepted 10 April 2002
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
- and a ß-polypeptide chain (11). The TCRß chain consists of variable (V), joining, diversity, and constant (C) regions encoded by gene segments spanning 685 kilobases of chromosome 7 (10). Diversity and antigen specificity of T-cell antigen recognition is primarily attributed to the hypervariable or third complementarity-determining region (CDR3) of the TCR (2). The extensive diversity of the CDR3 results from the occurrence of random nucleotide additions or deletions during TCR gene rearrangements (8). This variation is observable as multiple lengths of PCR amplicons, each set separated by 3 base pairs, arising from single TCRVß and Cß primers. X-ray crystallography has revealed that the CDR3 of the TCR physically contacts HLA-presented peptides (4). Thus, the CDR3 plays an important role in determining the antigen specificity of the T cell. Antigen-specific responses give rise to oligoclonal populations within the peripheral T-cell compartment (1). These responses are observable as clonal expansions of T-cell subsets with distinct TCRVß CDR3 lengths. Thus, differences in the frequency of T-cell clones' pre- and postantigenic stimulation can be measured by analyzing CDR3 distributions, giving the investigator a measure of the diversity of the T-cell response.
Measuring the TCR repertoire has been achieved by two methods, flow cytometry and spectratyping by PCR. Each method possesses its own advantages and disadvantages. Absolute quantitation of the frequency of individual members of the T-cell repertoire is easily achieved with the use of flow cytometry. Flow cytometry also allows quantitation of the abundance of specific TCRs expressed on the cell surface. The greatest limitation of flow cytometry for the use of T-cell repertoire comparisons is the lack of sensitivity of the monoclonal antibodies that identify TCR families. For example, biologically significant clonal expansions may comprise a relatively small percentage of a TCR family and may not measurably increase the percentage of the entire family. Other limitations include the incomplete repertoire coverage (
60% [unpublished data]) of commercially available monoclonal antibodies, as well as a requirement for a relatively large number of cells (approximately 4 million peripheral blood mononuclear cells [PBMC]). Our observations indicate that gross differences in the extent of clonality between individuals are not revealed by flow cytometric analysis of the T-cell repertoire (unpublished data). Alternatively, spectratyping by PCR provides the ability for greater resolution given a fewer number of cells. However, absolute quantitation following reverse transcription (RT)- PCR is not currently achievable. At best, RT-PCR-based methods are semiquantitative despite the intricate statistical methods that must be applied to the data analysis.
The identification, quantitation, and comparison of CDR3 profiles provides valuable information relating to the T-cell immune response. For example, cross-sectional analyses can be used to compare the T-cell repertoires of groups with differing risks of disease or longitudinal analyses can be applied to studies of vaccine effectiveness. Regardless of the study design, each investigation must identify and enumerate clonal expansions in a manner that can be applied to cross-sectional or longitudinal comparisons. Ideally, absolute values of the quantity of each CDR3 length would be used for comparison. However, even with the use of internal quantitation controls, uncontrollable RT-PCR variation negates the use of absolute CDR3 length magnitudes. While accounting for this variation greatly complicates the methods, analysis of CDR3 profiles remains approachable.
Here, we present a novel statistical analysis method, the MaGiK (Matud, Giorgi, Killian) method, and describe its use in the analysis of the CD4 TCR repertoire of healthy individuals. As both the diversity and the magnitude of the T-cell response to many diseases factor into prognoses, this method offers both clinical and diagnostic value.
|
|
|---|
CDR3 length analyses using RT-PCR. PBMC were isolated by gradient separation and then cryopreserved. Positive selection for CD4+ T lymphocytes was performed by incubating thawed PBMC with anti-CD4 immunomagnetic beads (Dynal, Great Neck, N.Y.) for 30 min at 4°C on a rotating shaker, as recommended by the manufacturer. The average purity of separated CD4+ cells was >99%. CDR3 length assays were performed as previously described (6). Briefly, RNA was extracted from cell suspensions in TriReagent (Sigma, St. Louis, Mo.) and reverse transcribed using Moloney murine leukemia virus reverse transcriptase and a TCRß chain C region primer (CTCAGCTCCAGTG). Specific combinations of one, two, or three TCRVß-specific forward primers (0.1 µM each) were then used for each multiplex PCR on the resulting cDNA. Each reaction also contained a fluorescently labeled (with 6-Fam, Tet, or Hex) reverse primer (0.1 µM) specific for the TCRß C region. PCR primers and reaction tubes are described in Table 1. The nucleotide lengths of the fluorescently labeled CDR3 amplicons were measured by a model 310 Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, Calif.). The model 310 Genetic Analyzer is a capillary-based sequencer and genetic fragment analyzer that can simultaneously detect the fluorescence intensity of four separate colors (three PCR product colors and one size-standard color). Genetic fragment quantity, e.g., discrete CDR3 lengths, is determined from the fluorescence intensity of the fragment and the nucleotide length of the fragment. Fluorescence data was collected and processed using Genescan and Genotyper software packages (Applied Biosystems). PCRs and CDR3 measurements were performed in duplicate.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Description of primer combinations used for the TCRß multiplex PCRsa
|
![]() View larger version (19K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. The MaGiK method of TCR repertoire comparison. CDR3 lengths for a TCRVß family between hypothetical samples 1 and 2 (S1 and S2, respectively) are compared. S1 represents a TCRß family with a clonal expansion. S2 represents an idealized TCRß family with CDR3 length magnitudes averaged from several controls with no expansions. (A) The area (ai) under each peak (i) was calculated. (B) Each peak's proportional representation (pi = ai/ ai) was computed. For each peak, a sample proportion ratio [PRi = S1(pi)/S2(pi)] was computed. The median of the ratios (Rm) from all peaks in a family was then calculated. S1 proportions were then multiplied by the median PR [aS1(pi) = S1(pi) x medianPR] to standardize their distributions. (C) Expansions were identified among the S1 peaks whose adjusted proportions aS1(pi) were greater than 3 standard deviations above the corresponding S2 peak's proportion.
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Data used to generate Fig. 1
|
|
|
|---|
![]() View larger version (37K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Spectratypes for 24 TCRVß families, showing the mean values derived from the CD4+ T cells of 35 healthy subjects. Relative proportions (y axis) are plotted for each discrete CDR3 length (x axis). Standard deviations for each CDR3 length are indicated by bars.
|
Figure 1A presents hypothetical data for two samples for which the areas under each peak were identical except for the peak centered at 212 base pairs, or peak 5. Visually, an expansion is evident at peak 5. Notice that even though only one peak was expanded in this example, the individual CDR3 length proportions of the total TCRVß family for the two samples were all different. In this example, it is readily apparent that directly computing differences between the proportions of the two samples would lead to the incorrect conclusion that all of the peaks were different in magnitude. Therefore, to correctly compare the samples, we calculated each peak's proportional representation in a given family, as shown in Fig. 1B.
An outline of the MaGiK T-cell repertoire analysis method is provided in Table 3. MaGiK analysis begins with the assumption that major expansions are present in fewer than 50% of the peaks within a given family. This assumption is required when absolute magnitude values cannot be ascertained, since expansions must then be determined based on the relative distribution of CDR3 lengths. The large number of differing antigens required for greater than 50% of the peaks to be expanded lends credibility to this assumption. Another assumption is that deletions do not significantly affect CDR3 length distributions. Deletions of entire CDR3 lengths are improbable events, since each CDR3 length consists of numerous T-cell variants. Genetic heterogeneity of
- and ß-chain gene segments gives rise to T-cell variants, as does other genetic and phenotypic heterogeneity among cells sharing a common CDR3 length and TCRß variable segment.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 3. Outline of the MaGiK method of TCR repertoire analysis
|
The MaGiK method of analysis offers a systematic means of assessing the degree of clonality, and thus antigen-specific responses, within the T-cell repertoire. By definition, an expanded population of T cells is one that is increased in frequency above the expected value. We have elected to use the CD4+-T-cell repertoire, averaged from the data from 35 healthy donors, as a reference that has been observed to contain very few expansions. Adjusted sample CDR3 lengths that exceed the control value are by definition expanded.
Direct sequencing of CDR3 PCR fragments has been used to demonstrate the presence of clonal expansions. For instance, if a given CDR3 fragment comprises 50% or more of the total PCR product for a given TCRVß family, direct sequencing of the total PCR product for that TCRVß family reveals a cleanly readable sequence 95% of the time (6). However, the ability to obtain a cleanly readable sequence might, in some cases, be sufficient to indicate the presence of clonal expansions though it is not a necessary requirement. Direct sequencing only reveals very large clonal expansions or clonal dominance. As depicted in Fig. 3, clonal expansions of T cells may or may not be of sufficient magnitude to result in clonal dominance.
![]() View larger version (24K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Identifying diminutive clonal expansions. We identified a clonal expansion of HIV-specific CD8+ T cells (TCRVß21+) by using HLA class I (A0201) tetramers complexed with a Gag peptide (SLYNTVATL). The CDR3 length distributions of three fluorescence-activated cell-sorted T-cell subsets are shown. (A) CDR3 length distribution for the tetramer positive subset; (B and C) tetramer-negative and total CD8+-T-cell subsets, respectively. The gray vertical bar aligns the expanded CDR3 length across the panels.
|
Analysis of the diversity in the CDR3 of TCR families is a valuable method for investigating the cellular immune response. Comparing TCR diversity between persons with opposed infection risks and prognoses may provide valuable immunologic insight. However, it is imperative that such comparisons are not flawed by invalid analysis methods.
We have presented MaGiK analysis as an analytical method for comparing TCR repertoires. The method functions through the computation of basic statistics used to compare CDR3 distributions of T-cell repertoires. Analysis of the T-cell repertoire is clinically useful for identifying infections and determining prognoses. In addition, this method has important application in vaccine development and efficacy assessment, as it may be applied to quantitation of the magnitude and diversity of the antigen-specific T-cell response.
The research presented here included data collected on participants in the Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study (MACS), which includes the following sites and investigators: from the Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health, Baltimore, Md., J. B. Margolick (principal investigator), H. Armenian, B. Crain, A. Dobs, H. Farzadegan, N. Kass, S. Lai, Justin McArthur, S. Strathdee, and E. Taylor; from the Howard Brown Health Center and Northwestern University Medical School, Chicago, Ill., J. P. Phair (principal investigator), J. S. Chmiel, B. Cohen, M. O'Gorman, D. Variakojis, and S. M. Wolinsky; from the University of California UCLA Schools of Public Health and Medicine, Los Angeles, R. Detels and B. Jamieson (principal investigators), B. R. Visscher (coprincipal investigator), A. Butch, J. Fahey, O. Martínez-Maza, E. N. Miller, J. Oishi, P. Satz, E. Singer, H. Vinters, O. Yang, and S. Young; from the University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health, Pittsburgh, Pa., C. R. Rinaldo (principal investigator), L. Kingsley (coprincipal investigator), J. T. Becker, P. Gupta, J. Mellors, S. Riddler, and A. Silvestre; from the Data Coordinating Center at the Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health, Baltimore, Md., A. Muñoz (principal investigator), L. P. Jacobson (coprincipal investigator), L. Ahdieh, S. Cole, S. Gange, C. Kleeberger, S. Piantadosi, E. Smit, S. Su, and P. Tarwater; and from NIH, Bethesda, Md., the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, C. Williams and P. Miotti, and the National Cancer Institute, S. Melnick.
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»