Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology, September 2002, p. 1067-1071, Vol. 9, No. 5
1071-412X/02/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/CDLI.9.5.1067-1071.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Laboratory of Microbiology, Institute of Nutrition and Food Technology, University of Chile, Santiago, Chile
Received 15 March 2002/ Returned for modification 1 May 2002/ Accepted 20 June 2002
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
Since they were first described, coccoid H. pylori forms were considered an irreversible phase that leads to cell death (18). Present knowledge suggests that coccoid cells are not dead but actually dormant (6, 13). Coccoid forms may therefore play a role in the survival, and eventually in the transmission, of this microorganism.
A number of reports suggest that coccoid forms maintain cell structures, metabolism, DNA indemnity (2, 24, 26, 32, 33, 34), and gene expression (25). There are also reports indicating that H. pylori cells are able to survive for prolonged periods in the environment, especially in water (31) and under conditions of starvation (27). This would not be surprising if we took into account that coccoid forms are biologically important for other pathogenic bacteria, such as Vibrio vulnificus (29) or Campylobacter jejuni (15). This study of coccoid forms may help us to better understand the natural history of H. pylori infection.
H. pylori infection induces a strong local inflammatory response which often is insufficient to eradicate the pathogen, and this failure may be responsible for the chronicity that these gastric diseases often demonstrate. It is not fully understood how the immune system is involved in clinical outcomes. One point upon which investigators agree is that the presence of specific antibodies can be used as an epidemiological indicator of infection (9, 12). Some studies suggest that noninvasive serologic tests may be of value to confirm treatment success (10, 17, 30). Although many studies have focused on the impact of bacillary H. pylori cells on immune status (1, 8, 16, 20), there is no information on the potential role of coccoid forms. The aim of this work was to study the immunoglobulin G (IgG) immune response of colonized individuals against coccoid H. pylori forms and compare it with that elicited by its spiral counterpart.
|
|
|---|
Antigen preparation. All strains were grown under microaerophilic conditions at 37°C on chocolate agar and a Skirrow antibiotic pool. Spiral cells were collected after 3 days in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). The coccoid cells were harvested after 30 days at room temperature under aerobic conditions. Coccoid morphology was confirmed by Gram stain (100 fields) and by the strains' inability to grow in appropriate conditions. The coccoid and bacillary antigens were prepared by the acid glycine extraction method (22), standardized in their protein content (Bio-Rad Labs, Hercules, Calif.), and maintained frozen (-20°C) until analysis.
SDS-PAGE antigen characterization. H. pylori proteins were separated by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE), with 4 and 7% stacking and running gels, respectively. The bands were visualized with silver stain, and the gels were analyzed by Quantity One software (Bio-Rad).
2-D electrophoretic antigen characterization. The H. pylori preparations were first separated by isoelectric focusing according to a procedure described by Celis et al. (5). Antigens (200 µg/capillary) were incubated at room temperature with 40 µl of lysis solution (9.8 M urea, 2% NP-40, 2% ampholyte 3/10, 100 mM dithiothreitol) for 15 min. Preparations were loaded into the capillaries and covered with 20 µl of overlay solution (8 M urea, 1% ampholyte 7/9, 5% NP-40, 100 mM dithiothreitol). Gels were run at 200 V for 2 h, 500 V for 2 h, and 800 V for 16 h in two-dimensional (2-D) electrophoresis equipment (Protean II; Bio-Rad). After an electrophoretic run under similar conditions, the protein spots were visualized by silver staining and analyzed by 2-D Bio-Rad software.
Western blot antigen analysis. The H. pylori coccoid and bacillary antigens were evaluated by Western blot analysis (3). In brief, strips were blocked with skimmed milk, confronted with 1:150 serum dilutions, and maintained overnight at room temperature. Membranes were then incubated with an anti-human IgG alkaline phosphatase conjugate (Sigma). Reaction was revealed with 5-bromo-4-chloroindolylphosphate, nitroblue tetrazolium (GIBCO), and MgCl2 (Merck). The molecular masses of the proteins were calculated by interpolating the proteins in a curve constructed with reference markers (Bio-Rad).
Serum panel. The sera obtained previously (11) were from 295 colonized individuals: 100 duodenal ulcer (DU) patients, 98 nonulcer dyspepsia (NUD) patients, 11 gastric cancer patients, and 86 asymptomatic individuals. Colonization of asymptomatic subjects was confirmed by the presence of IgG antibodies to H. pylori.
ELISA for IgG antibodies to spiral and coccoid preparations. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was previously standardized in our laboratory (10); the conditions were optimized by check board analysis. In brief, flat-bottom plates (Maxisorp; Nunc, Roskilde, Denmark) were covered with either bacillary or coccoid H. pylori surface antigen preparation (0.125 µg/well). After blocking with PBS containing 10% skim milk, serum diluted 1:600 was added, the plates were incubated for 2 h at 37°C, and their reactivity was revealed with anti-human IgG alkaline phosphatase conjugate diluted 1:1,000 (Sigma). Wells were washed, and the substrate was added (p-nitrophenyl phosphate; Sigma) and maintained for 30 min at 37°C. The reaction was stopped with 3 M NaOH. Results were expressed as optical density (OD) at 405 nm. All serum samples were evaluated in duplicate.
Adsorption assay. Four sera with high ELISA levels were tested to evaluate the presence of common antigens between both preparations. Serum samples were assayed before and after adsorption with bacillary and coccoid antigens separately. Briefly, a total of 25 µg of antigen was incubated with 400 µl of diluted sera (in PBS diluted 1/20) under gentle agitation for 1 h at 37°C and overnight at 4°C. Adsorbed sera were centrifuged at 6,000 x g, and the supernatant was saved and kept frozen at -20°C until ELISA was performed.
Statistics. Comparisons between values obtained by ELISA based on coccoid and bacillary forms were performed through the Student's t test (STATISTICA software).
|
|
|---|
![]() View larger version (98K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. SDS-PAGE of bacillary (lanes 1 through 6) and coccoid (lanes 7 through 12) antigens of six Helicobacter pylori strains included for antigen characterization. MW, molecular weight standard.
|
![]() View larger version (61K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Comparative 2-D gel electrophoresis of bacillary (a) and coccoid (b) protein preparations from a single strain. Arrows show two spots found only in the coccoid form. The ovals show the spots that became more intense in the coccoid preparation. MW, molecular weight standard.
|
ELISA antigen selection. Twelve out of 21 strains were selected due to the higher number of bands detected on the blot (Fig. 3), and a higher protein content was revealed by 1- and 2-D electrophoresis. Strains with exclusive spots or higher intensity in the coccoid forms were also included (Fig. 2).
![]() View larger version (103K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Immunoblot of bacillary (even lanes) and coccoid (pair lanes) preparations from the 12 selected H. pylori strains for ELISA. Each antigenic preparation was tested against homologous serum. Lanes: MW, molecular weight standard; 1 and 2, strain 1; 3 and 4, strain 2; 5 and 6, strain 3; 7 and 8, strain 4; 9 and 10, strain 5; 11 and 12, strain 6; 13 and 14, strain 7; 15 and 16, strain 8; 17 and 18, strain 9; 19 and 20, strain 10, 21 and 22, strain 11; 23 and 24, strain 12.
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. IgG responses in OD units to bacillary and coccoid antigens in different groups of patients
|
Western blot analysis with the antigen preparation used in ELISA. A representative subset of serum samples tested (22 DU patients, 14 NUD patients, 11 cancer patients, and 21 asymptomatic individuals) was blotted against the coccoid and spiral capturer antigens used by ELISA. The results showed that sera from infected individuals recognized H. pylori epitopes with a wide individual variability. Accordingly, we could not find a common recognizable profile from patients with similar gastric conditions. However, some bands appeared with a higher frequency in most sera (molecular weights of ca. 104, 87, 66, 63, 61, 35, and 28) (Table 2). Some bands were recognized only among the antigens presented by the bacillary form (molecular weights of 49, 32, 30, and 19) in serum samples from ulcer patients. Other bands were recognized only in the coccoid antigen by serum samples from asymptomatic individuals (molecular weights of 171, 156, 135, 116, 104, and 32), and yet other bands were recognized by sera from the ulcer patients (molecular weights of 144, 135, and 98). Serum samples from many asymptomatic subjects had antibodies to a 77-molecular-weight antigen; this epitope was not recognized by serum samples from symptomatic patients (Table 2).
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Frequency of band recognition of bacillary and coccoid antigen pools by sera from patients with different gastroduodenal conditions
|
![]() View larger version (99K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Antigenic protein bands of bacillary (lanes 1, 3, 5, and 7) and coccoid (lanes 2, 4, 6, and 8) pools used in ELISA recognized by pooling of sera from patients with different gastroduodenal conditions. Lanes: 1 and 2, sera from gastroduodenal ulcer patients; 3 and 4, sera from NUD patients; 5 and 6, sera from cancer patients; 7 and 8, sera from asymptomatic individuals.
|
|
|
|---|
To explore this issue, we attempted to determine whether the coccoid forms have any impact on the immune response to H. pylori in colonized individuals. We established a specific ELISA aimed at evaluating and comparing the immune response to coccoid and spiral forms against a panel of sera from symptomatic and asymptomatic infected individuals. The results revealed that all infected individuals either with or without symptoms were highly reactive to both forms. However, the coccoid antigen preparations usually gave significantly higher OD readings than their bacillary counterparts. The biologic significance of these differences is probably not relevant. It is tempting to speculate that the higher values found with coccoid antigen in ELISA may be due to the overexpression of one or more major epitopes in the coccoid morphology. However, the results obtained in the blotting assays make this explanation less probable. This is because we did not find any major differences in band recognition when sera were assayed against coccoid or bacillary antigens. The data from 68 serum samples analyzed indicated that the IgG response to the coccoid antigen was as strong as that to the spiral one (Table 2). Most of the bands recognized by blotting were similar to those described by Nilsson et al. (28). We found no specific bands or profiles that could be associated with a particular morphological state or specific gastric condition. Kimmel et al. (16) obtained similar results: when comparing antigenic patterns recognized in sera from different patients, they found no association of specific H. pylori antigens with antibodies in patients with specific gastroduodenal pathologies.
The results presented here indicate that the coccoid forms of H. pylori are able to induce a humoral immune response. They also show that their immune response is similar to that induced by the bacillary forms. The analysis of the antigenic preparations applied in this study by 1-D and 2-D electrophoresis and immunoblotting showed that the total protein content of the coccoid forms is very similar to that of the spiral ones. Furthermore, it established that the cell proteins remain intact, as demonstrated by their immunogenic potential. The results of ELISA with adsorbed sera support this idea. These assays using cross-adsorbed sera confirm the presence of common antigens in coccoid and bacillary preparations.
An important subject that remains to be elucidated is whether coccoid forms also elicit a cellular immune response or, in particular, whether there are differences in Th1 or Th2 involvement when coccoid antigens are presented. Future studies in our laboratory will focus on some of these issues.
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»