Skip to main page content

• HOME
• Current Issue
• Archive
• Alerts
• About ASM
• Contact us
• Tech Support
• Journals.ASM.org

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Sriram, S. Articles by Yamamoto, Y. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Sriram, S. Articles by Yamamoto, Y.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology, November 2002, p. 1332-1337, Vol. 9, No. 6
1071-412X/02/$04.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/CDLI.9.6.1332-1337.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Comparative Study of the Presence of Chlamydia pneumoniae in Cerebrospinal Fluid of Patients with Clinically Definite and Monosymptomatic Multiple Sclerosis

Subramaniam Sriram,^1* Song-yi Yao,¹ Charles Stratton,² Peter Calabresi,³ William Mitchell,² Hideaki Ikejima,⁴ and Yoshimasa Yamamoto⁴

Department of Neurology,¹ Department of Pathology, Vanderbilt School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee,² Department of Neurology, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland,³ Department of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, University of South Florida, College of Medicine, Tampa, Florida⁴

Received 24 June 2002/ Accepted 14 August 2002

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
There is considerable controversy concerning the evidence for the presence of Chlamydia pneumoniae in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of both multiple sclerosis (MS) patients and patients with other neurological diseases (OND). In order to clarify this issue, the laboratories at Vanderbilt University Medical Center (VUMC) and the University of South Florida (USF) examined the reproducibility of their respective PCR assays for the detection of C. pneumoniae DNA in the CSF of a common group of MS patients and OND controls. The two laboratories used different DNA extraction and PCR techniques in order to determine the prevalence of the C. pneumoniae genome in both monosymptomatic and clinically definite MS patients as well as in OND controls. In clinically definite MS patients, the VUMC and USF detection rates were 72 and 61%, respectively, and in patients with monosymptomatic MS, the VUMC and USF detection rates were 41 and 54%, respectively. The PCR signal was positive for 7% of the OND controls at VUMC and for 16% at USF. These studies confirm our previous reports concerning the high prevalence of C. pneumoniae in the CSF of MS patients. The presence of C. pneumoniae in patients with monosymptomatic MS would also suggest that infection with the organism occurs early in the course of the disease.

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
Although the etiology of multiple sclerosis (MS) is not known, clinical and pathological observations suggest that interplay occurs between an infectious agent(s) and an autoimmune response to myelin antigens in the development of the disease (10). Epidemiologic studies have implicated environmental factors and most likely infectious agents as necessary elements in the development of MS (7).

The diagnosis of MS is made by establishing the presence of inflammatory demyelinating lesions in the white matter of the central nervous system (CNS) that are disseminated in time and space (9, 12). MS affects young adults and most often presents as a relapsing remitting disease. The initial presentation of a clinical attack usually involves the optic nerve brain stem or spinal cord. Patients presenting with an initial clinical attack in these anatomical regions are at high risk for the development of MS; however, the progression to clinically definite MS is not absolute (2).

We have previously reported the high prevalence of C. pneumoniae CNS infection in MS patients but not in patients with other neurological disease (OND controls) (16). Some investigators have confirmed the presence of C. pneumoniae DNA in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of MS patients, although usually in a smaller percentage of patients than we reported (4, 5, 8; C. Contini and E. Fainardi, Abstr. 41st Intersci. Conf. Antimicrob. Agents and Chemother., abstr. L-2171, 2001). Others have been unable to detect any chlamydial DNA in MS patients or controls (1, 13; M. A. Marcos, A. Sanz, J. Vidal, F. Graus, and M. T. Jimenez, presented at the International Chlamydia Meeting, Helsinki, Finland, 2000). The inconsistencies among these results from different laboratories strongly suggest that methodological problems are present in the PCR detection of C. pneumoniae from CSF and that these problems might, in part, account for the differences in published results. This is not surprising, as there are no well-accepted methods and techniques for demonstrating the presence of C. pneumoniae in CSF (3). In order to reconcile these differences, the laboratories at both the Vanderbilt University Medical Center (VUMC), Nashville, Tenn., and the University of South Florida (USF) compared a common set of CSF samples. In the past, these two laboratories have shown the presence of C. pneumoniae in the CSF of a majority of MS patients (5, 16, 18). We therefore predicted that techniques developed independently in the two laboratories might be useful in comparing PCR techniques for detection of the organism in the CSF. We believed that a comparative analysis for the detection of C. pneumoniae that used a common set of CSF samples would validate the earlier observations from these two laboratories.

The presence of C. pneumoniae in the CSF does not necessarily ascribe a causal relationship between C. pneumoniae infection and the development of MS. However, the presence of chlamydial CNS infection early in the course of MS would be more suggestive of a causal link between C. pneumoniae infection of the CNS and the development of MS. Thus, we also examined the prevalence of C. pneumoniae in the CSF of patients with clinically isolated syndromes that are harbingers of MS.

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
Patients and patient selection. Patients with clinically isolated demyelinating syndromes, clinically definite MS patients, and OND controls were prospectively recruited from VUMC and the Brown University MS Clinic at Rhode Island Hospital, Providence. None of the patients in this study have been used in studies reported previously. CSF was immediately aliquoted into 0.5-ml vials and kept frozen at -70°C. Blinded samples of CSF were sent to the laboratory of Y. Yamamoto, USF, for analysis. Sufficient CSF samples from six monosymptomatic patients seen at the Rhode Island MS clinic and two OND controls were not available for analysis at both centers and were, therefore, examined only at VUMC. The time interval between fluid collection and performance of the studies ranged from 3 months at VUMC to 24 months at USF. All samples, both those sent from the MS centerin Rhode Island and those shipped to USF, were packaged on dry ice and sent via overnight delivery.

PCR amplification of the major outer membrane protein (MOMP) gene of C. pneumoniae at VUMC. The DNA extraction protocol used was modified from previously published protocols (16). Briefly, 300 µl of CSF sample was centrifuged at 30,000 rpm (40,000 x g) in a TL-100 ultracentrifuge (Beckman) for 30 min. Two hundred fifty microliters of supernatant was discarded, and the remaining 50 µl was resuspended and mixed with 450 µl of lysate buffer containing 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 0.5% sodium dodecyl sulfate, 1% NP-40, 0.2 M NaCl, 10 mM EDTA, and 10 mM dithiothreitol. The mixture was vortexed and incubated for 30 min at room temperature. Twenty-five microliters of proteinase K (10-mg/ml stock solution; Worthington Biochemical Corporation, Lakewood, N.J.) was added, and the sample was then vortexed for 30 s and incubated overnight at 37°C. The DNA was extracted by the phenol chloroform method and dissolved in 30 µl of Tris-EDTA buffer. The DNA extraction protocol was also performed on fluid containing the extraction buffer alone, normal CSF, and normal CSF spiked with 5 inclusion-forming units (IFU) of C. pneumoniae elementary bodies (EB). These were used as internal positive and negative controls.

The presence of C. pneumoniae was examined by PCR with two different sets of internal and external primers that are specific for the C. pneumoniae MOMP gene (also known as the ompA and omp1 gene) (Table 1). For PCR amplification, 5 µl of DNA in Tris-EDTA buffer was mixed with 50 mM KCl, 1.5 mM MgCl₂, 25 pmol of each primer, 200 µM each deoxynucleoside triphosphate, and 1 U of AmpliTaq polymerase (Roche, Indianapolis, Ind.) in a volume of 25 µl. DNA amplification of the C. pneumoniae MOMP gene was performed by using a touchdown PCR or nested-PCR technique. The first amplification of the outside product was done by using the touchdown technique, in which the annealing temperature was reduced by 0.5°C for every cycle from 60 down to 50°C. The amplification was performed for an additional 20 cycles at 50°C. The denaturation and extension temperatures were 94 and 74°C, respectively. At each point, the temperature was held for 1 min and a final extension was done at 74°C for 5 min. Two microliters of the first product was then subjected to a second amplification with internal primers. The PCR mixture was the same as before except that the MgCl₂ concentration was increased to 2 mM along with the specified internal primers (Table 1). The nested-PCR amplification was run for 35 cycles of 1 min at 94°C, 1 min at 58°C, and 1 min at 74°C. The PCR product was run on a 1.5% agarose gel and stained with ethidium bromide. All CSF samples were tested in duplicate assays. In all experiments, reaction buffer alone plus DNA from normal CSF or water spiked with 0.4 IFU of C. pneumoniae EB were used as positive and negative internal controls, respectively.

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]

TABLE 1. Sequence and position of primers on the MOMP (ompA) gene of C. pneumoniae

PCR amplification of the MOMP gene of C. pneumoniae at USF. Bacterial DNA was extracted from 200-µl specimens of CSF by using a QIAmp DNA mini kit (Qiagen, Valencia, Calif.) as described previously. In brief, each specimen was centrifuged for 30 min at 20,000 x g. The pellet was resuspended in 180 µl of buffer ATL (Qiagen) with 20 µl of proteinase K and then incubated at 56°C with occasional vortexing until the pellet was completely lysed, which usually took 30 min. After lysis of the sample, 200 µl of buffer AL (Qiagen) was added to the sample and the mixture was incubated for 10 min at 70°C. The mixture was then combined with 200 µl of absolute ethanol and mixed by pulse-vortexing for 15 s. The mixture was applied to a spin column, which holds a silica gel membrane, and spun for 1 min at 6,000 x g. The spin column was washed with 500 µl of buffer AW2 by centrifugation at 20,000 x g for 3 min. The DNA bound on a membrane was eluted by centrifugation with 50 µl of buffer AE (Qiagen) after a 5-min incubation at room temperature. The resulting DNA extracts were stored at -20°C until PCR assessment.

The extracted DNA samples were subjected to PCR with primers specific for C. pneumoniae MOMP (Table 1). In brief, 2 µl of DNA extracts was processed in a 25-µl reaction volume containing PCR buffer (10 mM Tris [pH 8.3], 50 mM KCl), 200 µM deoxynucleoside triphosphate, 2.5 mM MgCl₂, 0.5 µM each primer, and 1.25 U of Taq polymerase (AmpliTaq Gold; Applied Biosystems, Foster City, Calif.). The PCR cycle consisted of an initial denaturation for 5 min at 94°C, which was followed by 60 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 45 s, annealing beginning at 62°C and ending at 52°C for 45 s and extension at 72°C for 1 min. The annealing temperature was reduced by 1°C every four cycles until it reached 52°C, with six more cycles at the last annealing temperature. The final extension was for 10 min at 72°C. The PCR products were visualized by 2% agarose gel electrophoresis staining with ethidium bromide. The specificity of the PCR product was confirmed by performing Southern blot hybridization with a MOMP-labeled probe (5). For quality control for each PCR, a mock DNA extraction sample from water, PCR buffer without a sample, and C. pneumoniae DNA were used as negative and positive controls. The PCR was sensitive in detecting EB at a level of 1 IFU per PCR.

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
Patient demographics. All 18 patients in the clinically definite group met the criteria for MS described by Poser et al. (12), which are shown in Table 2. None of these patients have been used in previous studies. Of the 18 patients in the clinically definite group, 8 patients were diagnosed with secondary progressive disease and the remaining 10 were diagnosed with relapsing remitting disease. In the OND group, five patients had either an elevated level of CSF protein or a cell count suggesting increased permeability of either the blood-brain or blood-CSF barrier (Table 3). Patient 11 was diagnosed with CNS sarcoidosis and demonstrated oligoclonal bands. Of the 17 patients with monosymptomatic MS, 6 presented with spinal cord syndromes, 6 presented with brain stem syndromes, and 5 presented with optic neuritis (Table 4).

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]

TABLE 2. PCR for C. pneumoniae in the CSF of patients with clinically definite MS

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]

TABLE 3. Prevalence of C. pneumoniae in the CSF of OND controls

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]

TABLE 4. Prevalence of C. pneumoniae in monosymptomatic MS patients

PCR results. The VUMC laboratory used two different sets of external and internal PCR primers of the MOMP gene (Table 1) and employed a nested-PCR or touchdown PCR assay for the detection of C. pneumoniae. One of the sets was the Tong and Sillis primer set for the MOMP gene, which has been used previously for detecting C. pneumoniae in clinical samples, including CSF samples from MS patients (8). In addition, a new set of primers was designed for the amplification of the MOMP gene (VU-MOMP); this primer set was, in preliminary studies, sufficiently sensitive to detect C. pneumoniae EB at a concentration of 0.04/IFU. The internal primer set of Tong and Sillis produced a 207-bp product, while the internal primer of the VU-MOMP primers produced a 238-bp product (Table 1).

The overall DNA extraction, which is designed to extract bacterial DNA, and the PCR protocols utilized at USF showed remarkable detection sensitivity, with approximately 125 organisms detected per ml of CSF (1 IFU/PCR performed with 2 µl of a 50-µl volume of DNA extracted from 200 µl of CSF). The results of these protocols did not show any smear, a condition which often makes the PCR products difficult to read.

We were able to detect the C. pneumoniae signal in samples from 13 of 18 (72%) of the clinically definite MS patients with the VU-MOMP primers and in samples from 12 of 18 (67%) of the same patients with the Tong and Sillis primers (Table 2). In samples from 11 patients, the PCR signal was present with both the VU-MOMP and the Tong and Sillis primers. In the sample from patient 2, a signal was seen only with the VU-MOMP primers, while in the sample from patient 11, the signal was seen only with the Tong and Sillis primers. When the positive assay results with both primers were combined, the overall detection rate was 78% (14 of 18) in CSF samples analyzed at VUMC. Although the Tong and Sillis primers were as sensitive as the VU-MOMP primers for the detection of C. pneumoniae, there was often a smear on the agarose gel above the PCR product of the Tong and Sillis primers. The smear was less prominent with the VU-MOMP primers.

For the CSF samples studied at USF with a touchdown enzyme time release PCR specific for the MOMP gene, those for 11 of 18 (61%) patients in the clinically definite MS group were positive (Table 2). The sample from patient 6 was positive at USF and negative at VUMC. Samples from patients 11, 13, 14, and 15 were positive at VUMC (with the Tong and Sillis primers for the patient 11 sample and the VU-MOMP primers for patient samples 13, 14, and 16) and were negative at USF. Samples from 8 of 18 (44%) patients were positive with all three sets of primers, and 10 patient samples (56%) were positive with the VU-MOMP and USF MOMP primer sets. When the results of all three primers were combined, the overall detection rate was 83% (15 of 18 patients). Only 3 of 18 MS patients (17%) were negative with all three sets of primers. These studies show significant correlations between the different laboratories in the detection of C. pneumoniae in the CSF of MS patients.

For the OND controls, VUMC and USF compared 12 samples (Table 3). The sample from patient 1 was positive at both centers while that from an additional patient, patient 10, was positive at USF. None of the samples from the OND controls was positive with the Tong and Sillis primers. The detection rate in OND controls was significantly less than that in MS patients with all three MOMP primers (P < 0.01).

We next studied the presence of C. pneumoniae in patients with monosymptomatic MS. With the VU-MOMP primers, 7 of 17 (41%) samples were positive, while with the Tong and Sillis primers, 3 of 11 (27%) were positive. The detection rate with the USF primers was 55% overall (6 of 11 patients), with four patients sharing a positive signal with both VU-MOMP and USF primers. Three samples (from patients 2, 6, and 11) were positive with all three sets of primers. The overall detection rate in patients with monosymptomatic MS was 57% (10 of 17) when all three primers were used, which was higher than that seen in the OND controls (P < 0.01) and lower than that in the clinically definite group (P < 0.05).

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
The results of this study suggest a strong degree of correlation between the abilities of two different laboratories to detect the presence of C. pneumoniae in the CSF from MS patients but not from OND controls. These results also show that these two laboratories were able to detect C. pneumoniae at levels that were significantly higher in MS patients than in OND controls. The two laboratories used different techniques for DNA extraction and for PCR testing. The VUMC laboratory modified the lysis buffer and used phenol-chloroform for DNA extraction. A nested-PCR assay with two different sets of primers, both of which are specific for the MOMP gene of C. pneumoniae, were used. While the Tong and Sillis primers have been used before for the detection of C. pneumoniae in clinical specimens, the running conditions for the present study were modified to detect C. pneumoniae in CSF at concentrations of 0.05 IFU/µl (17). Similar strategies were also employed prior to the use of the VU-MOMP primers.

The USF laboratory performed DNA extraction with the Qiagen DNA mini kit with bacterial DNA extraction protocols. The primer set that the USF laboratory used was developed and previously reported to be sensitive for the detection of chlamydial DNA at 1 IFU per PCR mixture. Since the IFU number shows only the number of infective EB, which may be affected by the protocols of EB isolation and culture conditions, the absolute PCR sensitivities for protocols based on IFU numbers prepared in different institutes are difficult to compare. The results of this comparative study make it unlikely that the PCR product detected in CSF from MS patients was an artifact of DNA amplification.

Since our initial report on the association between the presence of C. pneumoniae in the CSF of MS patients and the development of MS, there have been a number of studies that have attempted to reproduce these observations. Most of these studies have met with limited success. Layh-Schmitt et al. (8) was able to show the presence of the organism in 22% of MS patients, and this number increased when phenol-chloroform extraction techniques were used (17). More recently, Contini and Fainardi (41st ICAAC) have reported the presence of C. pneumoniae in the CSF of 58% of MS patients, and another report (15) noted the presence in 10% of MS patients. It should be noted that in all these studies, the presence of the C. pneumoniae genome was statistically higher in MS patients than in control patients. In a report by Gieffers et al., the presence of C. pneumoniae in the CSF was demonstrated in a high number of OND patients by PCR (4). This OND group included a number of individuals with inflammatory disease, including optic neuritis. Therefore, these patients might represent patients with early symptoms of MS. Investigators from the University Hospital of Umeå could not document the presence of C. pneumoniae by PCR in any CSF samples previously collected from 48 MS patients as well as in 51 OND patients (1). Other groups also have failed to identify C. pneumoniae by PCR in CSF samples and the tissues of patients with MS (13, 18; Marcos et al., presented at the International Chlamydia Meeting, Helsinki, Finland, 2000).

In a recent collaborative study involving four different laboratories, the presence of C. pneumoniae was examined in 52 blinded CSF samples (6). VUMC was able to detect C. pneumoniae in 73% (22 of 30) of MS patients compared to 22% (5 of 22) of controls. Three other laboratories (C. Gaydos, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Md.; J. Boman, Umeå, Sweden; and L. Tondilla, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Ga.) failed to show the presence of C. pneumoniae in any of the CSF samples. This study also suggests that the presence of the organism is not due to any regional differences in the patient population, since all samples were obtained from Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, N.C. The procedures used by these four laboratories were different, and since the samples were blinded with regard to the underlying diagnosis, technical differences could very likely account for the differences in the outcomes of the PCR studies. The ability of the laboratory at USF to validate results obtained from VUMC suggests that technical problems in the PCR procedure (which may include sample collection and storage as well as extraction of DNA and PCR testing) might account for the discrepancies among results from different laboratories.

The preliminary study conducted at USF and published earlier had shown that optimization of the PCR conditions is necessary for obtaining a signal for C. pneumoniae in the presence of low copy numbers of the organism (5). These issues were extensively reviewed by us, and the importance of DNA extraction techniques, primer selection, and optimization or running conditions have been previously discussed (Zuzak et al., presented at the International Chlamydia Meeting, Helsinki, Finland, 2000). It is clear, for example, that primers for MOMP are more sensitive than the 16S RNA gene for the detection of C. pneumoniae. This may explain the inability of the C. Gaydos laboratory to detect C. pneumoniae in the CSF of MS patients (6).

In our previous studies, we had amplified the entire 1.1-kb MOMP gene. In the present study, we used the Tong and Sillis primers, since they have been used extensively to document the presence of C. pneumoniae, in addition to new primers that produced less background signal. The laboratory of J. Boman has also used the Tong and Sillis MOMP primers but has relied on the Qiagen blood mini kit for DNA extraction (6). We were unable to detect a signal for C. pneumoniae in the CSF of MS patients with the Tong and Sillis primers following DNA extraction with the Qiagen blood mini kit. We therefore believe that DNA extraction may prove more efficient when performed with phenol-chloroform or with the QIAmp bacterial DNA extraction kit.

Although we have not quantitated the number of copies of the C. pneumoniae gene that is present in the CSF of MS patients, it is very likely that this copy number is low. Others have shown that performance of PCR in triplicate or more, as well as performance of probit analysis, may be necessary to exclude the problems of dilution and statistical variability in the presence of low copy numbers (14).

Importantly, our study also suggests that CNS infection with C. pneumoniae occurs early in the course of the disease, since the organism was identified in 50% of MS patients who presented heralding signs of MS but who had not yet shown dissemination of the disease. In situations wherein patients present with clinically isolated syndromes that are highly characteristic of MS (e.g., optic neuritis, internuclear ophthalmoplegia, or partial transverse myelopathy), the definitiveness of the diagnosis is uncertain, since the essential criteria of the dissemination of lesions over time has not yet been satisfied. Long-term studies of patients with isolated clinical syndromes suggest that the initial abnormalities on magnetic resonance images (MRI) and the presence of oligoclonal bands are likely to predict conversion to clinically definite MS (2, 11). These prospective studies suggest that at 15 years, 88% of patients presenting with clinically isolated syndromes suggestive of MS progress to clinically definite MS (2). Although the number of patients in our study was small, three patients (patients 1, 2, and 4) who were positive by PCR for the presence of the C. pneumoniae gene and one patient (patient 3) who was negative by PCR for C. pneumoniae have subsequently progressed into clinically definite MS.

In conclusion, our study further substantiates our initial observation regarding the increased presence of C. pneumoniae genes in the CSF of MS patients relative to that of controls. Also, the presence of C. pneumoniae in patients with signs of MS indicates that infection by this microorganism in MS occurs early in the course of the disease. The significance of this observation in relation to the role of C. pneumoniae in the pathogenesis of MS remains uncertain. We believe that a clinical trial that monitors the course of MS during and after eradication of the organism is most likely to explain conclusively the causal nature of this association.

 
This study was supported, in part, by grants from the National MS Society and the NIH.

 
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Multiple Sclerosis Research Laboratory, 1222H Vanderbilt Stallworth Rehabilitation Hospital, 2201 Capers Ave., Nashville, TN 37212. Phone: (615) 963-4042. Fax: (615) 321-5247. E-mail: Srirams{at}ctrvax.vanderbilt.edu.

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 

1
1. Boman, J., P. M. Roblin, P. Sundstrom, M. Sundstrom, and M. Hammerschlag. 2000. Failure to detect Chlamydia pneumoniae in the central nervous system of patients with multiple sclerosis. Neurology 54:265-268.[Free Full Text]
2
2. Brex, P. A., O. Ciccarelli, J. I. O'Riordan, M. Sailer, A. J. Thompson, and D. H. Miller. 2002. A longitudinal study of abnormalities on MRI and disability from multiple sclerosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 346:158-164.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
3
3. Dowell, S. F., R. W. Peeling, J. Boman, G. M. Carlone, B. S. Fields, J. Guarner, M. R. Hammerschlag, L. A. Jackson, C. C. Kuo, M. Maass, T. O. Messmer, D. F. Talkington, M. L. Tondella, and S. R. Zaki. 2001. Standardizing Chlamydia pneumoniae assays: recommendations from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (USA) and the Laboratory Centre for Disease Control (Canada). Clin. Infect. Dis. 33:492-503.[CrossRef][Medline]
4
4. Gieffers, J., D. Pohl, J. Treib, R. Dittman, C. Stephan, K. Klotz, F. Hanefeld, W. Solbach, A. Haass, and M. Maass. 2001. Presence of Chlamydia pneumoniae DNA in the cerebral spinal fluid is a common phenomenon in a variety of neurological diseases and not restricted to multiple sclerosis. Ann. Neurol. 49:585-589.[CrossRef][Medline]
5
5. Ikejima, H., S. Haranaga, H. Takemura, T. Kamo, Y. Takahashi, H. Friedman, and Y. Yamamoto. 2001. PCR-based method for isolation and detection of Chlamydia pneumoniae DNA in cerebrospinal fluids. Clin. Diagn. Lab. Immunol. 8:499-502.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
6
6. Kaufman, M., C. Gaydos, S. Sriram, J. Boman, M. L. Tondella, and H. J. Norton. 2002. Is Chlamydia pneumoniae found in spinal fluid samples of multiple sclerosis patients? Mult. Scler. 8:289-294.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
7
7. Kurtzke, J. F. 2000. Multiple sclerosis in time and space—geographic clues to cause. J. Neurovirol. 6:S134-S140.
8
8. Layh-Schmitt, G., C. Bendi, U. Hildt, T. Dong-Si, E. Juttler, P. Schnitzler, C. Grond-Ginsbach, and A. J. Grau. 2000. Evidence for infection with Chlamydia pneumoniae in a subgroup of patients with multiple sclerosis. Ann. Neurol. 47:652-655.[CrossRef][Medline]
9
9. McFarlin, D. E., and H. F. Mcfarland. 1982. Multiple sclerosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 307:1183-1188.[Medline]
10
10. Noseworthy, J. H., C. Lucchinetti, M. Rodriguez, and B. G. Weinshenker. 2000. Multiple sclerosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 343:938-946.[Free Full Text]
11
11. O'Riordan, J. I., A. J. Thompson, D. P. Kingsley, D. G. MacManus, B. E. Kendall, P. Rudge, W. I. McDonald, and D. H. Miller. 1998. The prognostic value of brain MRI in clinically isolated syndromes of the central nervous system. A 10-year follow-up. Brain 121:495-503.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
12
12. Poser, C. M., D. W. Paty, L. Scheinberg, W. I. McDonald, F. A. Davis, G. C. Ebers, K P. Johnson, W. A. Sibley, D. H. Silberberg, and W. W. Tourtellotte. 1983. New diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: guidelines for research. Ann. Neurol. 13:227-231.[CrossRef][Medline]
13
13. Pucci, E., C. Tauas, and E. Cartechini. 2000. Lack of Chlamydia infection of the central nervous system in multiple sclerosis. Ann. Neurol. 48:399-400.
14
14. Smieja, M., J. B. Mahony, C. H. Goldsmith, S. Chong, A. Petrich, and M. Chernesky. 2001. Replicate PCR testing and probit analysis for detection of Chlamydia pneumoniae in clinical specimens. J. Clin. Microbiol. 39:1796-1801.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
15
15. Sotgiu, S., A. Piana, M. Pugliatti, A. Sotgiu, G. A. Deiana, E. Sgaramella, E. Muresu, and G. Rosati. 2001. Chlamydia pneumoniae in the cerebrospinal fluid of patients with multiple sclerosis and neurological controls. Mult. Scler. 7:371-374.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
16
16. Sriram, S., C. W. Stratton, S. Yao, A. Tharp, L. Ding, J. D. Bannan, and W. M. Mitchell 1999. Chlamydia pneumoniae infection of the central nervous system in multiple sclerosis. Ann. Neurol. 46:6-14.[CrossRef][Medline]
17
17. Tong, C. Y., and M. Sillis. 1993. Detection of Chlamydia pneumoniae and Chlamydia psittaci in sputum samples by PCR. J. Clin. Pathol. 46:313-317.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
18
18. Yamamoto, Y. 2002. PCR diagnosis of infection: detection of bacteria in cerebrospinal fluid. Clin. Diagn. Lab. Immunol. 9:508-514.[Free Full Text]

---

Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology, November 2002, p. 1332-1337, Vol. 9, No. 6
1071-412X/02/$04.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/CDLI.9.6.1332-1337.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Tondella, M. L. C., Galagoda, G., Gaydos, C. A., Boman, J., Sriram, S., Yao, S., Stratton, C. S., Mitchell, W., Yamamoto, Y. (2003). Is Chlamydia pneumoniae Present in Cerebrospinal Fluid of Multiple Sclerosis Patients?. CVI 10: 977-978 [Full Text]  

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Sriram, S. Articles by Yamamoto, Y. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Sriram, S. Articles by Yamamoto, Y.