This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Xu, W. Articles by Raoult, D. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Xu, W. Articles by Raoult, D.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology, Nov 1997, 753-763, Vol 4, No. 6
Copyright © 1997 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Distribution of immunogenic epitopes on the two major immunodominant proteins (rOmpA and rOmpB) of Rickettsia conorii among the other rickettsiae of the spotted fever group

W Xu and D Raoult
Unite des Rickettsies, CNRS UPRES-A 6020, Faculte de Medecine, Universite de la Mediterranee, Marseille, France.

Forty-four monoclonal antibodies were raised against strain Seven, the type strain of Rickettsia conorii. Of these 44 monoclonal antibodies, 13, 27, and 4 were demonstrated to be directed against the 116-kDa protein (rOmpA), the 124-kDa protein (rOmpB), and lipopolysaccharide- like antigen, respectively. The antiprotein monoclonal antibodies were found to be directed against 29 distinct epitopes, which were located on the two major immunodominant proteins discussed above. Further analysis showed that strain-specific epitopes were located on the rOmpA protein and species- and subgroup-specific epitopes were located on the rOmpB protein. R. conorii Manuel, Indian tick typhus rickettsia, and Kenya tick typhus rickettsia also possessed all 29 epitopes, whereas the other rickettsiae of the spotted fever group (SFG) expressed between 3 and 25 epitopes, with the exception of Rickettsia helvetica, R. akari, and R. australis which did not possess any epitopes. Additional analyses by Western immunoblotting confirmed that the epitopes shared among the SFG rickettsiae were located on the same two high-molecular-mass proteins as on R. conorii. However, although epitopes on the R. conorii rOmpB protein were expressed on the rOmpB proteins of most other SFG rickettsiae, some were found on the rOmpA proteins of R. aeschlimannii, R. rickettsii, and R. rhipicephali. Both proteins possessing the common epitopes were found to have different sizes in the SFG rickettsial species. The different distributions of common epitopes in the SFG rickettsiae were also used to build a taxonomic dendrogram, which demonstrated that all the R. conorii strains formed a relatively independent cluster within the SFG rickettsiae and was generally consistent with previously proposed taxonomies.

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Fang, R., Raoult, D. (2003). Antigenic Classification of Rickettsia felis by Using Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies. CVI 10: 221-228 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Fang, R., Houhamdi, L., Raoult, D. (2002). Detection of Rickettsia prowazekii in Body Lice and Their Feces by Using Monoclonal Antibodies. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40: 3358-3363 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Zhang, J. Z., Fan, M. Y., Wu, Y. M., Fournier, P. E., Roux, V., Raoult, D. (2000). Genetic Classification of "Rickettsia heilongjiangii" and "Rickettsia hulinii," Two Chinese Spotted Fever Group Rickettsiae. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38: 3498-3501 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Xu, W., Raoult, D. (1998). Taxonomic Relationships among Spotted Fever Group Rickettsiae as Revealed by Antigenic Analysis with Monoclonal Antibodies. J. Clin. Microbiol. 36: 887-896 [Abstract] [Full Text]