Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology, July 2000, p. 698-699, Vol. 7, No. 4
HIV Immunology and Diagnostics
Branch1 and International Activity
Branch,2 Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia 30333
Received 6 January 2000/Returned for modification 22 March
2000/Accepted 3 April 2000
We evaluated six rapid tests for their sensitivity and specificity
in diagnosing human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection
using 241 specimens (172 HIV-1 positive, 69 HIV-1 negative) representing different HIV-1 subtypes (A [n = 40], B
[n = 47], C [n = 28], E
[n = 42], and F [n = 7]).
HIVCHEK, Multispot, RTD and SeroStrip were 100% sensitive and
specific. Capillus failed to identify two of eight subtype C specimens
(overall sensitivity of 98.85%), while the SUDS test (the only test
approved by the Food and Drug Administration) gave false-positive
results for 5 of 69 seronegative specimens (specificity of 93.24%).
Our results suggest that although rapid tests perform well in general,
it may be prudent to evaluate a rapid test for sensitivity and
specificity in a local population prior to its widespread use.
1071-412X/00/$04.00+0
Diagnosis of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Infection with Different Subtypes Using Rapid Tests
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention, HIV Immunology and Diagnostics Branch, Mailstop D12, 1600 Clifton Rd., Atlanta, GA 30333. Phone: (404) 639-3647. Fax: (404) 639-2660. E-mail: bsp1{at}cdc.gov.
This article has been cited by other articles:
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»