This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kouzmitcheva, G. A.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, G. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kouzmitcheva, G. A.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, G. P.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology, January 2001, p. 150-160, Vol. 8, No. 1
1071-412X/01/$04.00+0   DOI: 10.1128/CDLI.8.1.150-160.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Identifying Diagnostic Peptides for Lyme Disease through Epitope Discovery

Galina A. Kouzmitcheva,dagger Valery A. Petrenko,Dagger and George P. Smith*

Division of Biological Sciences, Tucker Hall, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri 65211

Received 15 March 2000/Returned for modification 7 July 2000/Accepted 11 September 2000

Serum antibodies from patients with Lyme disease (LD) were used to affinity select peptide epitopes from 12 large random peptide libraries in phage display format. The selected peptides were surveyed for reactivity with a panel of positive sera (from LD patients) and negative sera (from subjects without LD), thus identifying 17 peptides with a diagnostically useful binding pattern: reactivity with at least three positive sera and no reactivity with any of the negative sera. The peptides define eight sequence motifs, none of which can be matched convincingly with segments of proteins from Borrelia burgdorferi, the LD pathogen; evidently, then, they are "mimotopes," mimicking natural pathogen epitopes without matching contiguous amino acids of pathogen proteins. Peptides like these could be the basis of a new diagnostic enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for LD, with sufficient specificity and sensitivity to replace expensive immunoblotting tests that are currently required for definitive serological diagnosis. Moreover, the method used to discover these peptides did not require any knowledge of the pathogen and involved generic procedures that are applicable to almost any infectious disease, including emerging diseases for which no pathogen has yet been identified.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Tucker Hall, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211-7400. Phone: (573) 882-3344. Fax: (573) 882-0123. E-mail: smithgp{at}missouri.edu.

dagger Present address: Institute of Molecular Biology, University of Oregon, OR 97403-1229.

Dagger Present address: Department of Pathobiology, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849-5519.


Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology, January 2001, p. 150-160, Vol. 8, No. 1
1071-412X/01/$04.00+0   DOI: 10.1128/CDLI.8.1.150-160.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.



This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Hamby, C. V., Llibre, M., Utpat, S., Wormser, G. P. (2005). Use of Peptide Library Screening To Detect a Previously Unknown Linear Diagnostic Epitope: Proof of Principle by Use of Lyme Disease Sera. CVI 12: 801-807 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Matthews, L. J., Davis, R., Smith, G. P. (2002). Immunogenically Fit Subunit Vaccine Components Via Epitope Discovery from Natural Peptide Libraries. J. Immunol. 169: 837-846 [Abstract] [Full Text]